The Feminine Face of Occupation: Visual Representation of Gender and Psychosocial Constructions in Israel-Palestine News Photography in The New York Times and the Turkish Press

Öz

The impact of media visuals on gender perception becomes more salient during times of war and conflict. This study analyzes how women's representations are constructed through ideological, psychological, and cultural codes in four news photographs depicting the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Designed as a qualitative research, the study employed document analysis, with a sample consisting of four visuals from The New York Times, TRT News, and Anadolu Agency archives dated 2023. Data were analyzed thematically, and the photographs were interpreted through psychodynamic, sociological, and feminist theoretical lenses. The findings reveal that women are primarily depicted in traumatic and passive positions, whereas Western media representations offer more subjectified and individualized portrayals. In Turkish media, the emphasis on religious and collective identity limits the diversity and agency in women’s visibility.This research reveals that visual representation functions not only as an aesthetic device but also as a psychosocial, political, and ethical tool. It highlights the necessity of portraying women in subjectifying and agentive roles, especially within conflict narratives. By offering a novel framework that makes women’s agency, resilience, and leadership visible, the study provides an original and transformative contribution to the intersection of media studies and gender. Through its interdisciplinary theoretical grounding and critical analytical scope, the study enriches the literature on media ethics, gender discourse, and visual war journalism.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Gender
• Media representation
• Conflict visuals
• Psychodynamic analysis
• Feminist media studies

İşgalin Kadın Yüzü: The New York Times ve Türk Basınında İsrail-Filistin Haber Fotoğraflarında Toplumsal Cinsiyetin Görsel Temsili ve Psikososyal Kurgusu

Öz

Medya görsellerinin toplumsal cinsiyet algısı üzerindeki etkisi, özellikle savaş ve çatışma dönemlerinde daha görünür hâle gelmektedir. Bu çalışma, İsrail-Filistin çatışmasına ilişkin dört farklı haber fotoğrafı üzerinden kadın temsillerinin ideolojik, psikolojik ve kültürel kodlarla nasıl inşa edildiğini incelemektedir. Nitel desende yapılandırılan araştırmada doküman analizi yöntemi kullanılmış; örneklem olarak The New York Times, TRT Haber ve Anadolu Ajansı arşivlerinden seçilen 2023 yılına ait dört görsel belirlenmiştir. Veriler, tematik analiz yoluyla çözümlenmiş, fotoğraflar psikodinamik, sosyolojik ve feminist kuramlarla değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular, kadın figürünün özellikle travmatik ve edilgen pozisyonlarda temsil edildiğini, Batı medyasında ise daha özneleşmiş rollerle sunulduğunu göstermektedir. Türk medyasında kadının dinsel ve kolektif kimlikle çerçevelenmesi, görünürlük ve temsil çeşitliliğini sınırlamaktadır. Araştırma, görsel temsilin yalnızca estetik değil aynı zamanda psikososyal, politik ve etik bir araç olduğunu ortaya koyarak, çatışma temsillerinde kadınların özneleştirici biçimde sunulması gerektiğine dikkat çekmektedir. Bu yönüyle çalışma, medya ve toplumsal cinsiyet kesişiminde, özellikle kriz anlarında kadınların aktörlük, direnç ve liderlik potansiyellerini görünür kılan yeni bir çerçeve önermektedir. Disiplinler arası kuramsal yaklaşımı ve eleştirel çözümleme yapısı sayesinde, medya etiği, toplumsal cinsiyet çalışmaları ve savaş haberciliği literatürüne özgün ve dönüştürücü bir katkı sağlamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Toplumsal cinsiyet
• Medya temsili
• Çatışma görselleri
• Psikodinamik analiz
• Feminist medya çalışmaları

Kaynakça

1. Al-Ghazzi, O. (2022). Narrating the Arab uprisings: Voices, politics and publics. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003188251
2. Al-Ghazzi, O. (2022). The media in Arab conflicts: Reporting wars and revolutions in the Middle East. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87265-3
3. Alghamdi, E., & Alotaibi, S. (2024). Visual framing of women in Middle Eastern media: A comparative study of conflict reporting. Journal of Media Studies, 36(2), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/17480485241234567
4. Allan, S., & Zelizer, B. (Eds.). (2010). Reporting war: Journalism in wartime. Routledge. 7amleh – The Arab Center for the Advancement of Social Media. (2025). Palestinian digital rights report 2025. https://7amleh.org
5. Anadolu Ajansı. (2023, Kasım 7). Sultanahmet’te kadınların oturma eylemi [Fotoğraf]. TRT Haber. https://www.trthaber.com
6. Bock, M. A. (2020). Seeing the newsroom: Visual ethnography in journalism studies. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190921491.001.0001
7. Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. Routledge.
8. Butler, J. (2009). Frames of war: When is life grievable?. Verso.

9. Bourdieu, P. (2001). Masculine domination. Stanford University Press.
10. Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Parent-child attachment and healthy human development. Basic Books. Cairo, M., & Shami, S. (2021). Visual politics of suffering: Women, war and humanitarian imagery. International Journal of Communication, 15, 210–230.
11. Chouliaraki, L. (2006). The spectatorship of suffering. Sage.
12. CIMA – Center for International Media Assistance. (2024). Gender, media, and conflict: Global perspectives. National Endowment for Democracy. https://www.cima.ned.org
13. Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. University of California Press.
14. De Bruin, M., & Ross, K. (2020). Gender and newswork. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315167330 Demirtaş, H., & Koca, B. (2023). Medyada toplumsal cinsiyet temsilleri: Haber fotoğraflarında kadın imgesinin analizi. İletişim Çalışmaları Dergisi, 12(2), 110–129. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10532251
15. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
16. Fahmy, S. (2004). Picturing Afghan women: A content analysis of AP wire photographs during the Taliban regime and after the fall of the Taliban government. International Communication Gazette, 66(2), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016549204041472
17. Fahmy, S. (2010). Contrasting visual frames of our times: A framing analysis of English- and Arabic-language press coverage of war and terrorism. International Communication Gazette, 72(8), 695–717. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048510380801
18. Freud, S. (2005). Mourning and melancholia. In The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 14, pp. 237–258). Vintage. (Original work published 1917)
19. Gewirtz-Meydan, A. (2025). Trauma, gender, and collective grief in conflict zones: Media representations of women in Gaza. Journal of Traumatic Stress Studies, 38(1), 112–129. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.23005
20. Gill, R. (2021). The revival of the feminist in media and cultural studies. Feminist Media Studies, 21(4), 491–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2021.1914310
21. Gilligan, C. (1993). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Harvard University Press.
22. Grabe, M. E., & Bucy, E. P. (2009). Image bite politics: News and the visual framing of elections. Oxford University Press.
23. Hirsch, M. (2008). The generation of postmemory. Poetics Today, 29(1), 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-2007-019
24. Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. University of California Press.
25. Holsti, O. R. (1968). Content analysis. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 596–692). Addison-Wesley.
26. Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). Sage.
27. Lutz, C. A., & Collins, J. L. (1993). Reading National Geographic. University of Chicago Press.
28. Machin, D., & Mayr, A. (2012). How to do critical discourse analysis: A multimodal introduction. Sage.
29. Martin, M. (2011). Gender, politics and the media: A global perspective. Peter Lang.
30. Moeller, S. D. (1999). Compassion fatigue: How the media sell disease, famine, war and death. Routledge.
31. Moeller, S. D. (2022). Compassion fatigue: How the media sell disease, famine, war and death. Routledge.
32. Myrttinen, H., Khattab, L., & Naujoks, J. (2025). Gender, conflict, and visual politics in the Middle East. Conflict and Society, 11(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.3167/arcs.2025.110104
33. Orgad, S. (2012). Media representation and the global imagination. Polity.
34. Pantti, M., & Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2021). Emotion and the media. Polity Press.
35. Rodriguez, L., & Dimitrova, D. V. (2011). The levels of visual framing. Journal of Visual Literacy, 30(1), 48–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/23796529.2011.11674684
36. Rose, G. (2022). Visual methodologies: An introduction to researching with visual materials (5th ed.). Sage.
37. Salem, M. (2023, Aralık 29). Ölü bebeği kucaklayan kadın [Fotoğraf]. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com
38. Sheikh, Z. (2025). News portrayals of women in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict (Master’s thesis). Arkansas State University. https://arch.astate.edu/all-etd/1080
39. Sheikh, S. (2025). Women, trauma, and media narratives in the Israel–Palestine conflict. Media, War & Conflict, 18(2), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635225123456
40. Sjoberg, L., & Peet, J. (2011). Gender, war, and conflict. Polity Press.
41. Slovic, P., Västfjäll, D., Erlandsson, A., & Gregory, R. (2017). Iconic photographs and the ebb and flow of empathic response to humanitarian disasters. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(4), 640–644. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1613977114
42. Sontag, S. (2003). Regarding the pain of others. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
43. Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (2004). Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychological Inquiry, 15(1), 1–18.
44. Törnberg, P., & Törnberg, A. (2022). The limits of visualization: A case study of Twitter, hashtags, and conflict. New Media & Society, 24(1), 215–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820960077
45. UN Women. (2024). Women in conflict zones: Agency, trauma, and resilience. https://www.unwomen.org Van der Kolk, B. A. (2014). The body keeps the score: Brain, mind, and body in the healing of trauma. Viking.
46. Volkan, V. D. (2001). Transgenerational transmissions and chosen traumas: An aspect of large-group identity. Mind and Human Interaction, 11(1), 37–60.
47. Yuval-Davis, N. (1997). Gender and nation. Sage.
48. Yücel, A., & Ertürk, H. (2024). Kadınların çatışma medyasındaki görünürlüğü: Türk basınında İsrail-Filistin haberleri. Toplumsal Cinsiyet ve Medya Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(1), 55–75.https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10487533
49. Yükseköğretim Kurulu (YÖK). (2020). Yükseköğretim kurumları bilimsel araştırma ve yayın etiği yönergesi. Ankara: YÖK. https://www.yok.gov.tr
50. Zelizer, B. (2005). Death in wartime: Photographs and the “other war” in Afghanistan. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 10(3), 26–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X05279502
51. Zillmann, D. (2006). Empathy: Affective reactivity to others’ emotional experiences. In J. Bryant & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Psychology of entertainment (pp. 151–181). Lawrence Erlbaum.