An Analysis of the Studies Examining Classroom Management in Education Faculty Journals in Turkey: A Meta-Synthesis Study

Öz

In this study, it was aimed a systematic re-examination of qualitative studies related to the classroom management. For this purpose, it was examined ten journals published by education faculties. In conclusion, 14 qualitative studies, which exactly met the criteria were examined. These studies were analyzed by using thematic synthesis method. As a result of thematic synthesis, four main themes emerged. These themes were the context of classroom management, factors affecting classroom management, disruptive behaviors, and coping with disruptive behaviors. The sub-themes related to classroom management main theme were strategies, approaches, dimensions, and competencies. The factors affecting classroom management were students, teachers, parents, school management, physical insufficiency, and socio-economic structure. The sub-themes related to the disruptive behaviors main theme were breaking the rules, disrupting the flow of the lesson, rudeness and disrespectfulness, emotional instability, verbal violence, indifference, and physical violence. In addition, the sub-themes related to the coping with disruptive behaviors main theme are tolerance, guidance, communication, cooperation, verbal warning, enforcement of sanctions, giving responsibility, and reaction. According to the meta-synthesis results, it may be said that synthesized qualitative studies mostly emphasize on the scope of classroom management, the factors affecting classroom management, and management of disruptive behaviors in classroom.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Education
• teacher
• classroom management
• meta-synthesis study

Sınıf Yönetimine İlişkin Nitel Araştırmaların Analizi: Bir Meta-Sentez Çalışması

Öz

Bu çalışmada, sınıf yönetimi ile ilgili nitel çalışmaların sistematik olarak yeniden incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaçla eğitim fakülteleri tarafından yayınlanan on dergi incelenmiştir. Sonuç olarak, kriterleri tam olarak karşılayan 14 nitel çalışma incelenmiştir. Bu çalışmalar, tematik sentez yöntemi kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Tematik sentez sonucunda dört ana tema ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu temalar, sınıf yöne-timinin kapsamı, sınıf yönetimini etkileyen faktörler, istenmeyen davranışlar ve istenmeyen davranışlarla baş etme stratejileri şeklindedir. Sınıf yönetimine ilişkin alt temalar stratejiler, yaklaşımlar, boyutlar ve yeterlilikler şeklindedir. Sınıf yönetimini etkileyen faktörler öğrenci, öğretmen, veli, okul yönetimi, fiziki yetersizlik ve sosyo-ekonomik yapı olarak ortaya çıkmıştır. Yıkıcı davranışlar ana temasına ilişkin alt temalar kuralları çiğneme, dersin akışını bozma, kabalık ve saygısızlık, duygusal dengesizlik, sözel şiddet, ilgisizlik ve fiziksel şiddettir. Ayrıca yıkıcı davranışlarla baş etme ana temasına ilişkin alt temalar hoşgörü, rehberlik, iletişim, işbirliği, sözlü uyarı, yaptırımların uygulanması, sorumluluk verme ve tepki gösterme şeklindedir. Meta-sentez sonuçlarına göre sentezlenen nitel çalışmaların daha çok sınıf yönetiminin kapsamına, sınıf yönetimini etkileyen faktörlere ve sınıfta istenmeyen davranışların yönetimine odaklandığı söylenebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Eğitim
• öğretmen
• sınıf yönetimi
• meta-sentez çalışması

Kaynakça

1. Anderson, L. M., Evertson, C. M., & Emmer, E. T. (1980). Dimensions in classroom management derived from recent research. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 12(4), 343-356. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027800120407
2. *Arslan, M. M. (2017). Öğretmen adaylarının sınıf yönetimi boyutlarına ilişkin algılarının karikatürize ifadeleri. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(3), 215-231. https://doi.org/10.29299/kefad.2017.18.3.012
3. *Ayaydın, A. (2010). Görsel sanatlar eğitiminde sınıf yönetimi: Bir nitel araştırma örneği. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 23(1), 61-80. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/uefad/issue/16691/173474
4. Baker, P. H. (2005). Managing student behavior: How ready are teachers to meet the challenge? American Secondary Education, 33(3), 51-64. http://www.jstor.com/stable/41064554
5. Blazer, D., & Kraft, M. A. (2017). Teacher and teaching effects on students’ attitudes and behaviors. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39 (1), 146-170. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716670260
6. Boholano, H. B. (2017). Social networking: 21st century teaching and learning skills. Research in Pedagogy, 7 (1), 21-29. https://doi.org/10.17810/2015.45
7. Bondas, T., & Hall, E. O. (2007). Challenges in approaching meta-synthesis research. Qualitative Health Research, 17(1), 113-121. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732306295879
8. Brown, M. J. (2019). Teacher perceptions of factors influencing classroom management practices: A comparative case study of two public high schools in the Western Cape. (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of the Western Cape, Cape Town.

9. Burden, P. R. (1999). Classroom management and discipline. London: John Wiley.
10. Cangelosi, J. S. (2004). Classroom management strategies. (5th ed.). London: John Wiley.
11. Carless, D. (1999). Factors affecting classroom implementation: Task-based curriculum renewal in Hong Kong. International Journal of Educational Reform, 8(4), 374-382. https://doi.org/10.1177/105678799900800405
12. Collier-Meek, M. A., Sanetti, L. M. H., & Boyle, A. M. (2019). Barriers to implementing classroom management and behavior support plans: An exploratory investigation. Psychology in the Schools, 56(1), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22127
13. Collinson, V., Kozina, E., Lin, Y. H. K., Ling, L., Matheson, I., Newcombe, L., & Zogla, I. (2009). Professional development for teachers: a world of change. European Journal of Teacher Education, 32(1), 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619760802553022
14. Çelik, O. (2019). Examining the relationship between primary and secondary school teachers’ self-efficacy and classroom management skills. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Marmara University & Istanbul Sabahattin Zaim University, Social Sciences Institute, Istanbul.
15. Çetin, F. (2016). The relationship between teachers’ classroom management competencies, attitudes towards the teaching profession and job satisfaction. Turkish Studies, 18(3), 791-808. https://doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.9285
16. *Çetin, B. (2013). Sınıfta istenmeyen öğrenci davranışlarıyla ilgili sınıf öğretmenlerinin karşılaştıkları sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(1), 255-269. https://www.acarindex.com/dosyalar/makale/acarindex-1423907520.pdf
17. *Denizel-Güven, E., & Cevher, N. (2005). Okul öncesi öğretmenlerinin sınıf yönetimi becerilerinin çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(18), 1-22. https://app.trdizin.gov.tr/publication/paper/detail/TlRZek5qZzQ=
18. Deveci, Ö., & Aykaç, N. (2018). Evaluation of studies examining the problems experienced in basic: A meta-synthesis study. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 7(1), 277-301. https://doi.org/10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.7c1s.13m
19. Doyle, W. (1986). Classroom organization and management. In M. C. Wittrock, (Ed.). Handbook of research on teaching. (3rd ed.). (pp. 392-431). London: Macmillan.
20. Egeberg, H., & McConney, A. (2018). What do students believe about effective classroom management? A mixed-methods investigation in Western Australian high schools. The Australian Educational Researcher, 45, 195-216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-017-0250-y
21. Erkan, Z. N. (2009). The relationship between class management approaches and job satisfaction of primary school teachers. (Istanbul Anatolian side example). (Unpublished master’s thesis). Maltepe University, Social Sciences Institute, Istanbul.
22. Evertson, C. M., Emmer, E. T., & Worsham, M. E. (2006). Classroom management for elementary teachers. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
23. Fidler, P. (2002). The relationship between teacher instructional techniques and characteristics and student achievement in reduced size classes. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED473460
24. Finfgeld, D. (2008). Meta‐synthesis of caring in nursing. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 17(2), 196-204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01824.x
25. Gillette, C., Rudolph, M., Kimble, C., Rockich-Winston, N., Smith, L., Broedel-Zaugg, K. (2018). A meta-analysis of outcomes comparing flipped classroom and lecture. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 82(5), 433-440. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe6898
26. Gülbahar, B., & Sıvacı, S. Y. (2018). Öğretmen adaylarının iletişim becerileri ile sınıf yönetimi yeterlik algıları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. YYÜ Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(1), 268-301. http://dx.doi.org/10.23891/efdyyu.2018.69
27. *Güven, S., & Karslı, M. D. (2014). Sınıf yönetiminin etkililiğini etkileyen faktörlere ilişkin okul müdürlerinin görüşleri. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(23), 1-24. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/786758
28. Howard, P. G. (2018). Twenty-first century learning as a radical re-thinking of education in the service of life. Education Sciences, 8(4), 1-13. doi:10.3390/educsci8040189
29. Huhtala A., & Vesalainen, M. (2017). Challenges in developing in-service teacher training: Lessons learnt from two projects for teachers of Swedish in Finland. Apples-Journal of Applied Language Studies, 11(3), 55-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.17011/apples/urn.201712104584
30. Hysa, E. (2014). Defining a 21st century education: Case study of development and growth course, Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(2), 41-46. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n2p41
31. Ilgar, L. (2007). A research classroom management skills of primary school teachers. (Unpublished PhD Dissertation). Istanbul University, Social Sciences Institute, İstanbul.
32. *Ilgar, L. (2014). Özel okul ve devlet okulunda görev yapmış sınıf öğretmenlerinin sınıf yönetimindeki farklılıklara ilişkin görüşleri: Nitel bir çalışma. Hasan Ali Yücel Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(22), 259-285. https://hayefjournal.org/Content/files/sayilar/75/259.pdf
33. Jennings, P. A. & Greenberg, M. T. (2009). The prosocial classroom: Teacher social and emotional competence in relation to student and classroom outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 491-525. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325693
34. Kaya, M. & Selvitopu, A. (2019). A meta-analysis of the effects of some factors on teachers’ classroom management skills. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 6(2), 409-425. https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.621313
35. Kınay, İ., Elçiçek, Z., & Oral, B. (2015). Investigation of the relationship between prospective teachers’ class management competencies and their attitudes towards teaching profession. International Journal of Eurasia Social Sciences, 6(19), 206-217.http://www.ijoess.com/Makaleler/362458344_206217%20%c4%b0smail%20kinay.pdf
36. *Koçak, A., & Bostancı, A. B. (2019). Sınıf yönetiminde sosyal adalet. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 52(3), 915-942. https://doi.org/10.30964/auebfd.597200
37. Konan, N., Çelik, O. T., & Çetin, R. B. (2018). The problem of delegating school heads in Turkey: A meta-synthesis study. PAU Journal of Education, 44, 92-113. https://doi.org/10.9779/PUJE865
38. Korpershoek, H., Harms, T., De Boer, H., Van Kuijk, H., & Doolaard, S. (2016). A meta-analysis of the effects of classroom management strategies and classroom management programs on students’ academic, behavioral, emotional, and motivational outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 86(3), 643-680. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626799
39. Korthagen, F. A. J. (2004). In search of the essence of a good teacher: Towards a more holistic approach in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(1), 77-97. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2003.10.002
40. Kozikoğlu, İ. (2019). Analysis of the studies concerning flipped learning model: A comparative meta-synthesis study. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 851-868. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1201225
41. Kunter, M., Baumert, J., & Köller, O. (2007). Effective classroom management and the development of subject-related interest. Learning and Instruction, 17(5), 494-509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.002
42. *Külekçi-Akyavuz, E. (2019). İlkokul öğrencilerinin sergiledikleri istenmeyen davranışlar. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(35), 30-40. https://atif.sobiad.com/index.jsp?modul=makaledetay&Alan=sosyal&Id=AWAVWtayZgeuuwfVYLx
43. Lachal, J., Revah-Levi, A., Orri, M., & Moro, M. R. (2017). Metasynthesis: An original method to synthesize qualitative literature in psychiatry. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 8 (269), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00269
44. Lai, E. & Cheung, D. (2015). Enacting teacher leadership: The role of teachers in bringing about change. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(5) 673-692. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214535742
45. Levin, J., & Nolan, F. N. (2000). Principles of classroom management. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
46. Lewis, R. (2008). The developmental management approach to classroom behavior: Responding to individual needs. Melbourne: ACER Press.
47. Lewis, R. & Burman, E. (2008). Providing for student voice in classroom management: teachers’ views. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 12(2), 151-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110600790605
48. Lozano, R., & Kızılaslan, I. (2013). Approaches to classroom discipline in Turkey and their implications for teacher education. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 4(1), 180-187. http://www.ijonte.org/FileUpload/ks63207/File/17. lozano.pdf
49. Malloy, J. M., Bohanon, H., & Francoeur, K. (2018). Positive behavior interventions and support in high schools: A case study from Hampshire. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 28(2), 219-247. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2017.1385398
50. Martin, F., Dennen, V. P., & Bonk, C. J. (2020). A synthesis of systematic review research on emerging learning environments and technologies. Education Tech Research Dev. 68, 1613-1633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09812-2
51. Marzano, R. J., & Marzano, J. S. (2003). The key to classroom management. Educational Leadership, 61(1), 6-13. http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/sept03/vol 61/num01/The-Key-to-Classroom-Management.aspx
52. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.
53. Midthassel, U. V. (2006). Creating a shared understanding of classroom management. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 34(3), 365-383. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143206065270
54. Muijs, D. & Harris, A. (2003) Teacher leadership: Improvement through empowerment: An overview on literature. Educational Management & Administration, 31(4), 437-448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263211X030314007
55. Muijs, D. & Harris, A. (2007). Teacher leadership in (in) action. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 35(1), 111-134. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143207071387
56. Närhi, V., Kiiski, T., & Savolainen, H. (2017). Reducing disruptive behaviours and improving classroom behavioural climate with class-wide positive behaviour support in middle schools. British Educational Research Journal, 43(6), 1186-1205. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/berj.3305
57. Nelsen, J. & Lynn, L. (2012). Positive discipline. (3rd ed.). NY: Three Rivers Press.
58. Noah, P. D. (2017). A systematic approach to the qualitative meta-synthesis. Issues in Information Systems, 18(2), 196-205. https://iacis.org/iis/2017/2_iis_2017_196-205.pdf
59. Noblit, G. W., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. Sage.
60. Oliver, R. M., Wehby, J. H., & Reschly, D. J. (2011) Teacher classroom management practices: Effects on disruptive or aggressive student behavior. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 7(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2011.4
61. Opdenakker, M. & Van Damme, J. (2006) Teacher characteristics and teaching styles as effectiveness enhancing factors of classroom practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(1), 1-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.07.008
62. Oyinloye, O. M., & Imenda, S. N. (2019). The impact of assessment for learning on learner performance in life science. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(11), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/108689
63. *Öngören-Özdemir, S., & Tepeli, K. (2016). Okul öncesi öğretmenlerinin saldırgan davranışlarla baş etme stratejilerinin incelenmesi. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(2), 51-70. http://kefad.ahievran.edu.tr/InstitutionArchiveFiles/f44778c7
64. *Özgan, H., & Yılmaz, S. (2009). Müfettişlerin, öğretmenlerin sınıf yönetimindeki eksiklikleri hakkındaki görüşleri. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(2), 57-65. https://app.trdizin.gov.tr/publication/paper/detail/T1RRM01UazU=
65. *Öztürk, Y., & Gangal, M. (2016). Okul öncesi eğitim öğretmenlerinin disiplin, sınıf yönetimi ve istenmeyen davranışlar hakkındaki inançları. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 31(3), 593-608 https://app.trdizin.gov.tr/publication/paper/detail/TWpBMk9UVT FOUT09
66. Pane, D. M. (2010). Viewing classroom discipline as negotiable social interaction: A communities of practice perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(1), 87-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.05.002
67. Patel, N. V. (2003). A holistic approach to learning and teaching interaction: Factors in the development of critical learners. International Journal of Educational Management, 17(6), 272-284. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540310487604
68. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
69. Polat, S., & Ay, O. (2016). Meta-synthesis: A conceptual analysis. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 4(1), 52-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.4c2s3m
70. Postholm, M. B. (2013). Classroom management: what does research tell us? European Educational Research Journal, 12(3), 389-402. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2013.12.3.389
71. Pounder, J. S. (2006). Transformational classroom leadership: The fourth wave of teacher leadership? Educational Management, Administration & Leadership, 34(4), 533-545. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1741143206068216
72. Riley, P. (2009). An adult attachment perspective on the student-teacher relationship & classroom management difficulties. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(5), 626-635. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.11.018
73. Sahranç, Ü. (2013). Öğrenme psikolojisi ile ilgili temel kavramlar. In İ. Yıldırım (Ed.), Eğitim psikolojisi. (3rd ed.). (pp. 301-332). Anı.
74. Sakız, G. (2015). Perceived teacher factors in relation to students’ achievement related outcomes in science classrooms in elementary school. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(2), 115-129. http://scimath.net/articles/32/322.pdf
75. Seeman, H. (2000). Preventing discipline problems: A classroom management handbook. Scarecrow Press.
76. *Sezer, Ş. (2018). Öğretmenlerin sınıf yönetimi tutumlarının öğrencilerin gelişimi üzerindeki etkileri: Fenomenolojik bir çözümleme. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 33(2), 534-549. http://dx.doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2017031319
77. Sibanda, M., & Mpofu, L. (2017). Positive discipline practices in schools: A case of Mzilikazi District secondary schools in Zimbabwe. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 7(3), 117-125. https://doi.org/10.1515/jesr-2017-00094
78. *Siyez, D. M. (2009). Liselerde görev yapan öğretmenlerin istenmeyen öğrenci davranışlarına yönelik algıları ve tepkileri. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(25), 67-80. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/114679
79. Smith, J. A. (2008). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. Qualitative Psychology: A practical guide to research methods. Trowbridge: Sage.
80. Soysal (Radmard) S., (2021). A descriptional content analysis of national studies on the classroom management case. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 11(1), 214-244. https://doi.org/10.5961/jhes.2021.443
81. Spoden, C., & Fricke, K. (2018). Measurement of teachers’ reactive, preventive and proactive classroom management skills by student ratings: Results from a two-level confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 60(2), 223-240. https://www.psychologieaktuell.com/fileadmin/download/ptam/22018_ 20180627/05_PTAM-2-2018 Spoden_v2.pdf
82. Sultan, S., & Shafi, M. (2014). Impact of perceived teachers’ competence on students’ performance: Evidence for mediating/moderating role of class environment. i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, 8(1), 10-18. https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.8.1.2764.
83. Sun, R. C. F., & Shek, D. T. L. (2012). Student classroom misbehavior: An exploratory study based on teachers’ perceptions. The Scientific World Journal, (Special Issue), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/208907
84. *Teyfur, M. (2011). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin uyguladığı yapılandırmacı öğrenme yaklaşımının sınıf yönetimi uygulamalarına etkisinin değerlendirilmesi. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(2), 139-164. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/inuefd/issue/8699/108642
85. Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
86. Thompson, J. (1998). Discipline survival kit for the secondary teacher. London: John Wiley.
87. Tong, A., Flemming, K., McInnes, E., Oliver, S., & Craig, J. (2012). Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Med Res Methodology, 12(181), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-181
88. Uğurlu, C. T., Usta, G., & Köybaşı, F. (2019). An investigation of teachers’ classroom management skills in terms of gender variability: A meta-analysis study. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 11(1), 71-90. https://doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2019.01.006
89. UNESCO, (2015). Positive discipline in the inclusive, learning-friendly classroom: A guide for teachers and teacher educators. Paris: UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000149284
90. Walsh, D., & Downe, S. (2005). Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research: A literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 50(2), 204-211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03380.x
91. Wang, M. C., Haertel, G. D., & Walberg, H. J. (1993). Toward a knowledge base for school learning. Review of Educational Research, 63(3), 249-294. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543063003249
92. Weed, M. (2005). Meta interpretation: A method for the interpretive synthesis of qualitative research. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(1), 1-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/fqs-6.1.508
93. Yılmaz, K. (2011). İlköğretim okulu öğretmenlerinin sınıf yönetimi tarzları ile demokratik değerlere ilişkin görüşleri arasındaki ilişki. Değerler Eğitimi Dergisi, 19(21), 147-170. https://ded.dem.org.tr/gorsel/pdf/ded-21-makale-6.pdf
94. Yılmaz, Z. N. & Aydın, Ö. (2015). İlköğretim öğretmenlerinin sınıf yönetimi becerilerine ilişkin algılarının çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(1), 148-164. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/mersinefd/issue/17396/181855