Farklı Öğrenme Ortamlarında Kullanılan Bilgisayar ve Mobil Uygulama Destekli Etkinliklerin Etkililiğinin Araştırılması

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı, farklı ortamlarda gerçekleştirilen bilgisayar ve mobil uygulama destekli etkinliklerin öğrencilerin akademik başarı ve fen bilimlerine yönelik tutumlarına etkisini incelemektir. Ön test son test, kontrol gruplu, yarı deneysel desenin kullanıldığı bu çalışma, 2020–2021 eğitim öğretim yılında bir devlet okulunun 7. Sınıfında öğrenim gören 45 öğrenci ile “Bitki ve Hayvanlarda Üreme Büyüme ve Gelişme” ünitesinde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmada kontrol grubuna harmanlanmış öğrenme, deney grubu – 1’e harmanlanmış öğrenmenin zenginleştirilmiş yüz yüze öğrenme boyutu, deney grubu – 2’ye ise harmanlanmış öğrenmenin zenginleştirilmiş e-öğrenme boyutu uygulanmıştır. Her üç grupta da etkinlikler 5E öğrenme modeline uygun tasarlanmıştır. Veri toplama aracı olarak “Akademik Başarı Testi” ve “Fen Bilimleri Tutum Ölçeği” kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen nicel veriler SPSS 22 paket programı ile analiz edilmiştir. Araştırmanın sonuçlarına göre akademik başarı yönünden deney grubu – 2 ile kontrol grubu arasında deney grubu – 2 lehine, fen bilimlerine yönelik tutum açısından deney grubu – 1 ile kontrol grubu arasında, deney grubu – 1 lehine istatistiksel olarak anlamlı düzeyde farklılık tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Fen öğretimi
• bilgisayar ve mobil uygulama destekli öğretim
• okul dışı öğrenme ortamları
• harmanlanmış öğrenme

Investigating the Effectiveness of Activities Supported by Digital Learning Tools in Different Learning Environments

Öz

This study was conducted to determine the effects of learning activities carried out in different environments through digital learning tools - (computer and mobile app) supported activities on students' academic achievement and attitudes towards science. This study, which used a pretest-posttest, control group, and quasi-experimental design as its research model, was conducted with 45 students who were enrolled in the seventh grade of a public school during the academic year of 2020-2021 on the topic of "Reproduction, Growth, and Development in Plants and Animals." In the research, blended learning was applied to the control group, enriched face-to-face learning dimension of blended learning to the experimental-1 group, and enriched e-learning dimension of blended learning to the experimental-2 group. In all groups, the activities were designed in accordance with the 5E learning model. Quantitative data obtained using the “Academic Achievement Test” and the “Science Attitude Scale” were analyzed with the SPSS package program. As a consequence, a statistically significant difference was found between the experimental-2 group and the control group in terms of academic achievement, and between the experimental-1 group and the control group in terms of attitude.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Science education
• out-of-school learning
• blended learning methods
• web-based supported teaching

Kaynakça

1. Akçay, H., Tüysüz, C., & Feyzioğlu, B. (2008). Effect of computer aided and computer assisted chemistry instruction on students’attitudes and success. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 4(2), 169-181. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/temelegitim/issue/44423/542243
2. Akgündüz, D., & Akınoğlu, O. (2017). The impact of blended learning and social media-supported learning on the academic success and motivation of the students in science education. Education and Science, 42(191), 69-90. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2017.6444
3. Akınoğlu, O. (2001). The effect of critical thinking skills based science education to learning outcomes [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Hacettepe University.
4. Akınoğlu, O. (2002). Eğitim ve sosyalleşme açısından internet kullanımı [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Sakarya University.
5. Alsalhi, N. R., Eltahir, Mohd. E., Al-Qatawneh, S., Ouakli, N., Antoun, H. B., Abdelkader, A. F. I., & Al Jumaili, L. (2021). Blended learning in higher education: A Study of its impact on students’ performance. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(14), 249-268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i14.23775
6. Bağcı, H., & Yalın, H. İ. (2018). The effects of 5e learning cycle model in adaptive blended learning environment to students’ academic success. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 11(3), 562-585. https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.382522
7. Bloom, B. S. (2012). İnsan nitelikleri ve okulda öğrenme (D. A. Özçelik, Çev.; 2.baskı). Pegem Akademi. Bulun, M., Gülnar, B., & Güran, M. S. (2004). Eğitimde mobil teknolojiler. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 3(2), 165-169. http://tojet.net/articles/v3i2/3223.pdf
8. *Çırak Kurt, S., Yıldırım, İ., & Cücük, E. (2017). The effects of blended learning on student achievement: a meta-analysis study. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 33(3), 776–802. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2017034685

9. Driscoll, M. (2002). Blended learning: Let’s get beyond the hype. E-learning, 1(4), 1–4.
10. Elçi̇çek, M., & Bahçeci̇, F. (2017). The investigation of the effects of mobile learning management system on academic success and attitudes of learners. Kastamonu Education Journal, 25(5), 1695-1714. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/kefdergi/issue/31226/342721
11. Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2010). The 95 percent solution. American Scientist, 98(6), 486-493.
12. Falk, J. H., & Needham, M. D. (2016). Utilizing indicator-based methods: “Measuring the impact of a science center on its community”. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(1), 65-69. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21269
13. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed). McGraw-Hill Humanities/Social Sciences/Languages.
14. Graham, C. R. (2006) Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3-21). Pfeiffer Publishing.
15. Gu, X., & Xu, H. (2019). Missing piece in understanding student learning: Out-of-school computer use. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(2), 320-342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633118755494
16. Gürdoğan, M., & Bağ, H. (2019). The effect of blended learning environments on academic achievement, motivation and students’ opinion. Akdeniz University Journal of Education, 2(1), 36–61. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/akuned/issue/48807/570309
17. Jagušt, T., Botički, I., & So, H.-J. (2018). A review of research on bridging the gap between formal and informal learning with technology in primary school contexts. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(4), 417-428. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12252
18. Jones, N., Blackey, H., Fitzgibbon, K., & Chew, E. (2010). Get out of MySpace! Computers & Education, 54(3), 776-782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.008
19. *Kahraman, B., & Kaya, O. N. (2021). Thematic Content Analysis of Blended Learning Studies in Science Education. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 36(3), 509-526. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2020058309
20. Khan, B. H. (1997). Web-based Instruction. Educational Technology.
21. Krombaβ, A., & Harms, U. (2008). Acquiring knowledge about biodiversity in a museum are worksheets effective? Journal of Biological Education, 42(4), 157-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2008.9656134
22. Kubat, U. (2018). Opinions of pre-service science teachers about outdoor education. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty, 48, 111-135. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/555240
23. Laçin Şimşek, C., Şen, A. I., Bozdogan, A. E., Yigit, E. A., Kıyıcı, F. B., Uzun, F. V., Nuhoglu, H., Ertaş, H., & Keleş, Ö. (2011). Fen ögretiminde okul dışı ögrenme ortamları. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
24. Litchfield, A., Dyson, L.E., Lawrence, E. & Zmijewska, A. (2007, December 2-5). Directions for m-learning research to enhance active learning [Paper presentation].Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Annual Conference, Nanyang, NTU, Singapore
25. MoNE. (2018a, October 23). 2023 education vision. http://www.meb.gov.tr/2023-egitim-vizyonu/haber/17293/tr
26. MoNE. (2018b, January 19). Science curriculum 2018. http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/ProgramDetay.aspx?PID=325 Melber L. H. & Abraham L. M. (1999). Beyond the classroom: Linking with informal education. Science Activities: Classroom Projects and Curriculum Ideas, 36(1), 3–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/00368129909601027
27. Meri-Yılan, S. (2021). Turkish prep class students’ views on autonomous learning after the implementation of a blended learning. Ekev Academic Review, 25(87), 563-580. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/sosekev/issue/71551/1151445
28. Osguthorpe, R. T., & Graham, C. R. (2003). Blended learning environments: Definitions and directions. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4(3), 227-233.
29. Özçelik, D. A. (2013). Test hazırlama klavuzu (5.Baskı). Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
30. *Palavan, Ö. & Sungur, B. (2017). A meta-analysis study on the effect of computer-aided teaching on the academic success of primary school students. Çukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 46(2), 603-638. https://doi.org/10.14812/cuefd.298355
31. Pekel, H., & Matyar, F. (2016). The effect of computer assisted instruction based on constructivist approach on academic achievement in teaching cell biology subjects. International Journal of Active Learning, 1(2), 21-37. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/225708
32. Poçan, S., Altay, B., & Yaşaroğlu, C. (2021). Parents' opinions on the use of mobile technology in teaching mathematics. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 22(1), 500-532. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.815348
33. Robson, C. (2015). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri: Gerçek Dünya araştırması. Anı Yayıncılık. *Saraç, H. (2017). Researches related to outdoor learning environments in turkey: content analysis study. Journal of Education, Theory and Practical Research, 3(2), 60-81. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/339611
34. Sarıtepeci̇, M., & Yıldız, H. (2014). The Effect of blended learning environments on students' engagement to course and motivation toward the course. Journal of Kirsehir Education Faculty, 15(1), 207-223. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1490415
35. Sontay, G., Tutar, M., & Karamustafaoğlu, O. (2016). Student views about “science teaching with outdoor learning environments”: planetarium tour. Journal of Research in Informal Environments, 1(1), 1-24. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/230612
36. Teyfur, E. (2010). The effect of computer aided learning environments organized according to constructivist perception on student success and their attitude towards 9th grade geography class. Ahi Evran University Journal of Kırsehir Education Faculty, 11(3), 85-106. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/kefad/issue/59502/855335
37. Üçışık, S., & Tuna, F. (2004). Improvıng the geography teachıng skıll by computer aıded instructıon in secondary schools. Marmara Geographical Review, 9, 98-118. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/marucog/issue/456/3660
38. *Ürey, M. (2018). Trends of garden based learning approach: example of school garden applications. YYU Journal of Education Faculty, 15(1), 1054-1080. https://doi.org/10.23891/efdyyu.2018.96
39. Von Albedyll, A., Fritsch, A., & Dreesmann, D. (2017). “I learned it through the grapevine…”: Exploring atypical ecosystems in schools as a new out-of-school learning site. The American Biology Teacher, 79(5), 351-364. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2017.79.5.351
40. Watson, E., Marin, L. F., White, L. N., Macciota, R., & Lefsrud, L. M. (2020). Blended learning in an upper year engineering course: The relationship between students’ program year, interactions with online material, and academic performance. Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2020.3.8270
41. Wünschmann, S., Wüst-Ackermann, P., Randler, C., Vollmer, C., & Itzek-Greulich, H. (2017). Learning achievement and motivation in an out-of-school setting—Visiting amphibians and reptiles in a zoo is more effective than a lesson at school. Research in Science Education, 47(3), 497-518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9513-2
42. Yavuz, M. (2012). The effect of using zoos in science education on students’ academic achievement and anxiety towards science and teachers’-students’ conceptions [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Sakarya University.
43. Zeren Özer, D., & Güngör, S. N. (2019). The effect of the science centers on student motivation and academic success in sciences. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty, 51, 288–314. https://doi.org/10.21764/ maeuefd.346818