Analyzing the most eligible site selection for biomass energy facilities through weighted overlay analysis: case of Balikesir (Turkey) province

Yıl 2023, , 19 - 35, 01.04.2023

Faruk Bingöl , Figen Altıner , Abdullah Kelkit

https://doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.1136651

Öz

Objective: This study aims to analyze the eligible site selection for biomass energy facilities in Balıkesir province, which is ranked as one of the important provinces of Turkey from the perspective of agriculture and livestock activities.
Material and Methods: Within the framework of the study, the most eligible areas for biomass energy facilities in the province were determined by Weighted Overlay Analysis with the use of Geographic Information Systems.
Results: In results of the study, it was revealed that the most eligible areas for biomass energy facilities in the province were the districts of Karesi, Susurluk and Savaştepe, respectively, while the districts of Ayvalık, Edremit and Erdek districts located in the coastal part of the province were not suitable.
Conclusion: This study is expected to shed light on all the planning studies undertaken within the scope of the sustainable management of the city and the protection of ecology.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Renewable energy sources, geographic information systems, weighted overlay analysis, Biomass energy, landscape planning, sustainable planning

Weighted owerlay analizi ile biyokütle enerjisi tesisleri için en uygun yer seçimi analizinin yapılması: Balıkesir (Türkiye) ili örneği

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, Türkiye’nin tarım ve hayvancılık faaliyetleri açısından önemli illeri arasında yer alan Balıkesir ilinde biyokütle enerjisi tesisleri için uygun yer seçimi analizinin yapılması amaçlanmıştır.
Materyal ve Yöntem: Çalışma kapsamında, Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri’nden faydalanarak Weighted Overlay Analizi (WOA) ile ildeki biyokütle enerji tesisleri için en uygun alanlar belirlenmiştir.
Araştırma Bulguları: Çalışma sonucunda ilde biyokütle enerji tesisleri için en uygun alanlar sırasıyla Karesi, Susurluk ve Savaştepe ilçeleri iken, ilin kıyı kesiminde yer alan Ayvalık, Edremit ve Erdek ilçelerinin ise uygun olmadığı ortaya çıkmıştır.
Sonuç: Yapılan bu çalışmanın kentin sürdürülebilir alan yönetiminde ve ekolojinin korunması kapsamında yürütülen tüm planlama çalışmalarına ışık tutması öngörülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Biyokütle enerjisi, coğrafi bilgi sistemleri, peyzaj planlama, yenilenebilir enerji kaynakları, sürdürülebilir planlama, weighted overlay analizi

Kaynakça

• Akther, A., T. Ahamed, R. Noguchi, T. Genkawa & T. Takigawa, 2019. Site suitability analysis of biogas digester plant for municipal waste using GIS and multi-criteria analysis. Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, 3(1): 61-93. https://doi:10.1007/s41685-018-0084-2.
• Akyıldız, N.A., 2020. Evaluation of sustainable traditional buildings in the context of energy efficiency and conservation. International Journal of Research- Granthaalayah, 8 (4): 200-215. https://doi.org/1029121 /granthaalayah.v8.i4.2020.26.
• Anonymous, 2007. International Energy Agency. (Web page: https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/) (Date accessed: April, 2022).
• Anonymous, 2014. Climate Change 2014 Synthesis Report. (Web page: ıpcchttps://www.ipcc.ch/data/) (Date accessed: July, 2021).
• Anonymous, 2016a. OECD green growth studies. (Web page: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/environment/oecd-green-growtstudies_22229523) (Date accessed: April, 2022).
• Anonymous, 2016b. How eeighted overlay works. (Web page: https://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/10.4/tools/spatial-analyst-toolbox/how-weighted-overlay-works.htm) (Date accessed: May, 2021).
• Anonymous, 2016c. Healthy energy position paper. (Web page: https://www.env-health.org/IMG/pdf/231118_final_heal_healthy_energy_position_paper) (Date accessed: May, 2022).
• Anonymous, 2019a. World Bioenergy association. global bioenergy statistics. (Web page: http://www.worldbioenergy.org/uploads/191129%20WBA%20GBS%2020) (Date accessed: July, 2021).
• Anonymous, 2019b. Activity report, 2019. (Web page:https://balikesir.tarimorman.gov.tr/Sayfalar/EN/AnaSayfa.aspx) (Date accessed: March, 2022).
• Anonymous, 2021a. Information center-energy-biomass. (Web page: https://www.enerji.gov.tr/) (Date accessed: May, 2022).
• Anonymous, 2021b. Turkey Statistical Institute. (Web page: https://www.tuik.gov.tr/) (Date accessed: May, 2021).
• Anonymous, 2021c. Activity report, 2021. (Web page:https://balikesir.tarimorman.gov.tr/Sayfalar/EN/AnaSayfa.aspx) (Date accessed: July, 2022).
• Buntaine, M.T. & W.A. Pizer, 2015. Encouraging clean energy investment in developing countries: What role for aid?”. Climate Policy, 15 (5): 543-564. https://doi:10.1080/14693062.2014.953903.
• Burke, M. J. & J. C. Stephens, 2018. Political power and renewable energy futures: A critical review. Energy Research & Social Science, 35: 78-93. https://doi:10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.018.
• Deviren, H., C. İlkiliç & S. Aydın, 2017. Usable materials in the production biogas and using fields of biogas. Batman University Journal of Life Sciences, 7 (2/2): 79-89.
• Doğan, H. & A.S. Uludağ, 2018. Evaluation of renewable energy alternatives and selection of suitable facility location: a study in Turkey. The International Journal of Economic and Social Research, 14 (2): 157-180.
• Emeksiz, C. & M.M. Fındık, 2021. Evaluation of renewable energy resources for sustainable development in Turkey. European Journal of Science and Technology, 26:155-164. https://doi: 10.31590/ejosat.948729.
• Hager, C.J., 1992. Democratizing technology: citizen & state in west German energy politics, 1974-1990. Polity, 25 (1): 45-70.doi: 10.2307/3235019.
• Illeez, B., 2020. Biomass energy in Turkey. Turkey's Energy Outlook, 317-346.
• Irfan, M., Z.Y. Zhao, M.K. Panjwani, F.H. Mangi, H. Li, A. Jan, M. Ahmad & A. Rehman, 2020. Assessing the energy dynamics of Pakistan: prospects of biomass energy. Energy Reports, 6: 80-93. https://doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2019.11.161.
• Juntarawijit, C., 2013. Biomass power plants and health problems among nearby residents: a case study in Thailand. Int J Occup Med Environ Health, 26 (5): 813-21. https://doi.org/10.2478/s13382-013-0142-y.
• Kapluhan, E., 2014. A research in the field of energy geography: usage of biomass energy in the world and Turkey. Marmara Geographical Journal, 29: 97-125.
• Karabacak, K.K,. 2021. Agricultural land use suitability analysis: the case of Nicosia district (TRNC). SDU Faculty of Arts and Sciences Journal of Social Sciences, 52: 312-331.
• Karcı, D. A. & T. Birişçi, 2020. Awareness of sustainable campus concept in the case of Ege University campus. Ege Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Derg., 57(3): 367-379. https://doi: 10.20289/zfdergi.638112.
• Kaya, K., 2014. Mechanical Design Principles of Wind Turbine Blade. Institute of Science and Technology, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Master Theses, Samsun, Turkey, 191 pp.
• Kaygusuz, Ö., 2020. Pyrolysis of Forest Residues by Using Fast Pyrolysis Method. Institute of Science and Technology, Giresun University, Master Theses, Giresun, Turkey,104 pp.
• Khademalhoseiny, M. S., M. A Nadoushan & H. Radnezhad, 2017. Site selection for landfill gas extraction plant by fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy analytic network process in the city of Najafabad, Iran. Energy & Environment, 28 (7): 763-774. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X177286.
• Kocabey, S., 2019. Determination of biogas potential from animal waste for Balıkesir province. European Journal of Science and Technology, 17: 234-243. https://doi: 10.31590/ejosat.619058.
• Kumar, A., N. Kumar, P. Baredar & A. Shukla, 2015. A review on biomass energy resources, potential, conversion and policy in India. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 45: 530-539. https://doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.007.
• Ma, J., N. R. Scott, S. D. DeGloria & A. J. Lembo, 2005. Siting analysis of farm-based centralized anaerobic digester systems for distributed generation using GIS. Biomass and Bioenergy, 28 (6): 591-600.
• Masnadi, M.S., J.R. Grace, X.T. Bi, C.J. Lim & N. Ellis, 2015. From fossil fuels towards renewables: Inhibitory and catalytic effects on carbon thermochemical conversion during co-gasification of biomass with fossil fuels. Appl. Energy, 140:196–209. https://doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.12.006.
• Nas, B., T. Cay, F. Iscan & A. Berktay, 2010. Selection of MSW landfill site for Konya, Turkey using GIS and multi-criteria evaluation. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 160 (1): 491-500.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0713-8.
• Owusu, P.A & S.A. Asumadu-Sarkodie, 2016. Review of renewable energy sources, sustainability issues and climate change mitigation. Cogent Eng, 3 (1): 1167990. https://doi:10.1080/23311916.2016.1167990.
• Özcan, E.C., S. Ünlüsoy & E. Tamer, 2017. Evaluation of the renewable energy investments in Turkey using ANP and TOPSIS methods. Selcuk University Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology, 5 (2): 204-219.
• Panwar, N.L., S.C. Kaushik & S. Kothari, 2011. Role of renewable energy sources in environmental protection: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 15: 1513–1524. https://doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2010.11.037.
• Rahman, M.A., B. Rusteberg, R.C. Gogu, J.P. Lobo Ferreira & M. Sauter, 2012. A new spatial multicriteria decision support tool for site selection for implementation of managed aquifer recharge. Journal of Environmental Management, 99: 61-75. https://doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.01.003.
• Saaty, T.L., 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resources Allocation. New York, Mcgraw-Hill, 287pp.
• Seik, F.T., 1997. Recycling of domestic waste: early experiences in Singapore. Habitat International, 21 (3): 277-289. https://doi:10.1016/S0197-3975(97)00060-X.
• Silva, S., L. Alçada-Almeida & L.C. Dias, 2014. Biogas plants site selection integrating Multicriteria Decision Aid methods and GIS techniques: A case study in a Portuguese region. Biomass and Bioenergy, 71: 58-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.10.025.
• Sultana, A. & A. Kumar, 2012. Optimal siting and size of bioenergy facilities using geographic information system. Applied Energy, 94: 192-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.01.052.
• Tokar, B., 2015. Democracy, localism, and the future of the climate movement. World Futures, 71 (3-4): 65-75. https://doi:10.1080/02604027.2015.1092785.
• Toklu, E., 2017. Biomass energy potential and utilization in Turkey. Renewable Energy, 107: 235-244. https://doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.02.008.
• Venier, F. & H. Yabar, 2017. Renewable energy recovery potential towards sustainable cattle manure management in Buenos Aires Province: Site selection based on GIS spatial analysis and statistics. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162: 1317-1333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.098.
• Wang, Z., Q. Bui, B. Zhang & T.L.H. Pham, 2020. Biomass energy production and its impacts on the ecological footprint: An investigation of the G7 countries. Science of the Total Environment, 743: 140741. https://doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140741.
• Woo, H., M. Acuna, M. Moroni, M.S. Taskhiri & P. Turner, 2018. Optimizing the location of biomass energy facilities by integrating multi-criteria analysis (MCA) and geographical information systems (GIS). Forests, 9: 585. https://doi: 10.3390/f9100585.
• Zhang, J., Y. Su, J. Wu & H. Liang, 2015. GIS based land suitability assessment for tobacco production using AHP and fuzzy set in shandong province of China. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 114: 202-211. https://doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2015.04.004.