Araştırma Makalesi

Determination of chemical composition of some blackthorn genotypes (Prunus spinosa L.)

Cilt: 61 Sayı: 4 16 Aralık 2024
PDF İndir
EN TR

Determination of chemical composition of some blackthorn genotypes (Prunus spinosa L.)

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to analyze the chemical and functional properties of fruits from five selected Prunus spinosa L. genotypes grown in Seydişehir district of Konya province, and determine the differences among the genotypes. Material and Methods: In the research, fruit properties such as fruit weight, pericarp color, flesh color were determined, while total soluble solids (TSS), pH, titratable acid (TA), total phenol content, antioxidant level and volatile organic compounds were analyzed. PCA analysis was employed to distinguish variations among the genotypes. Results: Five different blackthorn genotypes were examined for fruit properties, revealing variations. Fruit weight ranged from 1.31 g to 2.67 g. TSS content was determined to be between 11.9% and 13.2%. pH values varied from 3.35 to 4.22, while TA ranged from 0.83% to 1.30%. Total phenol content ranged from 356.92 mg GAE/100 g to 387.56 mg GAE/100 g. Total antioxidant levels were determined to be between 65.13% and 77.06%. Thirty different compounds were detected in the analysis of volatile organic compounds, including seven different acids. Conclusion: Significant diversity among the blackthorn genotypes has been identified. Statistical analyses have shown that B01T genotype has the highest total phenol content, while B05T genotype has the highest antioxidant level. The presence of various volatile organic compounds in blackthorn indicates the diversity of its chemical profile. The findings support the notion that blackthorn has a beneficial potential for health and is a valuable candidate for the development of health-focused food products.

Keywords

DPPH , HS/SPME/GC/MS , total phenol , volatile organic compounds

Kaynakça

  1. Aparajita, M., M. Juan Pedro & A. Itziar, 2002. Population genetic analysis of European Prunus spinosa (Rosaceae) using chloroplast DNA markers. American Journal of Botany, 89: 1223-1228.
  2. Argon, Z.Ü., N. İlhan, A. Gökyer, S.B. Öztürk & B. Koparal, 2019. Phytochemical evaluation of Morus alba seeds and cold pressed oil. Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section A: Chemistry, 6 (1): 41-50.
  3. Ayla, Ş., M.Y. Günal, A.A. Sayın Şakul, Ö. Biçeroğlu, E.M. Özdemir, M.E. Okur, D.Ç. Polat, N. Üstündağ Okur & B.E. Bilgiç, 2017. Effects of Prunus spinosa L. fruits on experimental wound healing. Medeniyet Medical Journal, 32: 152-158.
  4. Baysan, E.V., 2021. Optimization of Phenolics Substance and Antioxidant Activities, in The Extraction from Prunus spinosa L. Fruits by Response Surface Methodology. Health Science Institute, Bezmialem Vakıf University, (Unpublished) MSc Thesis, İstanbul, Türkiye, 80 pp.
  5. Borkowski, B., J. Lutomski, E. Skrzydlewska & B. Zygmunt, 1994. Rosliny lecznicze w fitoterapii, IRiPZ, Poznan, 470-471.
  6. Browics, K., 1972. "Prunus, 8-12". In: Flora of Turkey and East Aegean Islands. (Eds. P.H. Davis, J. Cullen & M.J.E. Coode Davis), University Press, Edinburgh, 568 pp.
  7. Brunton, N.P., D.A. Cronin, F.J. Monahan & R. Durcan, 2000. A comparison of solid-phase microextraction (SPME) fibres for measurement of hexanal and pentanal in cooked turkey. Food Chemistry, 68 (3): 339-345.
  8. Burits, M. & F. Bučar, 2000. Antioxidative activity of Nigella sativa essential oil. Phytotherapy Research, 14: 323-328.
  9. Chan, W.K., L.T.H. Tan, K.G. Chan, L.H. Lee & B.H. Goh, 2016. Nerolidol: A sesquiterpene alcohol with multi-faceted pharmacological and biological activities. Molecules, 21 (5): 529.
  10. Chitwood, D.J., 2002. Phytochemical based strategies for nematode control. Annual Review of Phytopathology. Annual Reviews, 40 (1): 221-249.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Bükücü, Ş. B., Süslüoğlu, Z., Özcan, A., Yaşa Kafkas, N. E., & Sütyemez, M. (2024). Determination of chemical composition of some blackthorn genotypes (Prunus spinosa L.). Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University, 61(4), 401-412. https://doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.1425197