Araştırma Makalesi

Assessing ecosystem services of urban blue-green infrastructure in Karşıyaka, Izmir

Cilt: 62 Sayı: 1 14 Mart 2025
PDF İndir
EN TR

Assessing ecosystem services of urban blue-green infrastructure in Karşıyaka, Izmir

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to calculate the regulating ecosystem services such as carbon storage, air pollution, runoff retention, and urban heat island reduction provided by the blue-green infrastructure of Karşıyaka, Izmir (Türkiye). Material and Method: Regulating ecosystem services provided by urban blue-green infrastructure were calculated with remote sensing techniques and geographic information system. Data preparation and analyzes were performed in ArcGIS 10.8 software. Results: The findings showed that the carbon storage potential of blue-green infrastructure was 2.45 kg C m2 while the particulate matter removal potential was 4.73 g/m2. The total rate of runoff in the BGI has been calculated to be 0.008 m^3/m^2. The urban heat island intensity index showed that the hot islands were located in the middle and north, and the cool islands were located in the south of the city. Conclusion: It has been determined that the blue-green infrastructure in Karşıyaka has predominantly low values in terms of the regulating ecosystem services evaluated. It has been concluded that the blue-green infrastructure needs to be improved to boost ecosystem services and urban resilience.

Keywords

Blue infrastructure , GIS , green infrastructure , urban areas , urban ecosystem services

Kaynakça

  1. Beckett, K., P. Freer-Smith & G. Taylor, 2000. Particulate pollution capture by urban trees: effect of species and windspeed. Global Change Biology, 6 (8): 995-1003. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00376.x
  2. Berberoğlu, S., A. Çilek & Y. Ünlükaplan, 2019. A Framework for Resilient Cities to Climate Change: Green Revision Guidebook. In: PARDUS (Eds. H. Alphan& Ç. Coşkun Hepcan), Ankara, 168 pp.
  3. Bossard, M., J. Feranec & J. Otahel, 2000. CORINE land cover technical guide. Addendum, 2000 (40).
  4. Bottalico, F., G. Chirici, F. Giannetti, A. D. Marco, S. Nocentini, E. Paoletti, F. Salbitano, G. Sanesi, C. Serenelli, D. Travaglini, 2016. Air pollution removal by green infrastructures and urban forests in the city of Florence. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 8: 243-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AASPRO.2016.02.099
  5. Caneva, G., E. Cicinelli, A. Scolastri & F. Bartoli, 2020. Guidelines for urban community gardening: proposal of preliminary indicators for several ecosystem services (Rome, Italy). Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 561: 26866. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.UFUG.2020.126866
  6. Codemo, A., A. Pianegonda, M. Ciolli, S. Favargiott & R. Albatici, 2022. Mapping pervious surfaces and canopy cover using high-resolution airborne imagery and digital elevation models to support urban planning. Sustainability, 14 (10): 2-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106149
  7. Coşkun Hepcan, Ç. & Ş. Hepcan, 2020. Air pollution removal by trees in Asik Veysel recreation area, Izmir, Turkey. Fresenıus Environmental Bulletin, 29 (9): 7379-7385.
  8. Derkzen, M. L., A. J. A. van Teeffelen & P. H. Verburg, 2015. REVIEW: Quantifying urban ecosystem services based on high-resolution data of urban green space: an assessment for Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Journal of Applied Ecology, 52 (4): 1020-1032. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12469
  9. Dobbs, C., A. Hernández-Moreno, S. Reyes-Paecke & M. D. Miranda, 2018. Exploring temporal dynamics of urban ecosystem services in latin america: the case of Bogota (Colombia) and Santiago (Chile). Ecological Indicators, 85: 1068-1080. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2017.11.062
  10. Durkaya, B., T. Varol & A. Durkaya, 2019. ‘Calculation of carbon stock change; Çaycuma example, 325 -334.’ International Congress on Agriculture and Forestry Research (8-10 April 2019, Marmaris), 530 s.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Yüksel, A. T., & Coşkun Hepcan, Ç. (2025). Assessing ecosystem services of urban blue-green infrastructure in Karşıyaka, Izmir. Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University, 62(1), 19-33. https://doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.1464135