Araştırma Makalesi

Analysis of the relationship between agricultural credit utilization and agricultural input price index

Cilt: 62 Sayı: 4 12 Aralık 2025
PDF İndir
TR EN

Analysis of the relationship between agricultural credit utilization and agricultural input price index

Öz

Objective: This study aims to investigate the relationship between agricultural credit—vital for the continuity of agricultural activities—and the Agricultural Input Price Index, which shapes the cost environment in which these activities take place. Material and Methods: The analysis employs monthly data spanning January 2015 to March 2024. Methodologically, it applies the Fractional-Frequency Fourier ADF unit root test, the Fractional-Frequency Fourier ADL cointegration test, and the Fractional-Frequency Fourier TY causality test. Results: The empirical findings indicate that a 1% rise in the Agricultural Input Price Index is associated with increases in agricultural credit utilization of 0.95% in the long-run and 0.18% in the short-run. The results of the cointegration test are further supported by the results of the causality test. Conclusion: The findings suggest that sustaining agricultural production nationwide requires targeted financial support for all producers engaged in farming—particularly small-scale farmers—through low- or zero-interest credit facilities channelled via publicly capitalized commercial banks. Such support would mitigate the adverse effects of rising input prices, reduce underutilization of essential inputs, and help avert productivity losses.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Agricultural credits, agricultural input price index, agricultural sector, financing

Kaynakça

  1. Adanacıoğlu, H., M. Artukoğlu & E. Güneş, 2017. Türkiye’de tarımsal kredi performansının çok boyutlu ölçekleme yaklaşımıyla analizi. Tarım Ekonomisi Dergisi, 23 (2): 195-204. https://doi.org/10.24181/tarekoder.364932
  2. Akçaöz, H., A. Güzel, B. Metin & V. Redzepi, 2022. Tarımsal amaçlı kooperatiflere ortak olan ve olmayan üreticilerin tarımsal kredi kullanımının değerlendirilmesi. Çukurova Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi, 37 (2): 123-138. https://doi.org/10.36846/CJAFS.2022.81
  3. Amanullah, Lakhan, G. R., S. A. Channa, H. Magsi, M. A. Koondher, J. Wang & N. A. Channa, 2020. Credit constraints and rural farmers’ welfare in an agrarian economy. Heliyon, 6 (10): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05252
  4. Aytekin, M. & S. A. Hatırlı, 2021. Türkiye’de işlenmemiş gıda enflasyonunu etkileyen faktörlerin analizi: ARDL yaklaşımı. Avrasya Sosyal ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8 (3): 203-216.
  5. Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency, 2024. BRSA sectoral credit distribution. (Web page: https://www.bddk.org.tr/BultenAylik/) (Date accessed: October 2024).
  6. Bozoklu, Ş., V. Yılancı & M. Ş. Görüş, 2020. Persistence in per capita energy consumption: A fractional integration approach with a Fourier function. Energy Economics, 91: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104926
  7. Chandio, A. A., Y. Jiang, A. Rehman, M. A. Twunasi, A. G. Pathan & M. Mohsin, 2021. Determinants of demand for credit by smallholder farmers': A farm level analysis based on survey in Sindh, Pakistan, Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies, 28 (3): 225-240. https://doi.org/10.1108/JABES-01-2020-0004
  8. Council on Smallholder Agricultural Finance, 2022. Case studies-our impact. (Web page: https://csaf.org/case-studies/) (Date accessed: August 2025).
  9. Çevik, Z. & F. Zeren, 2014. Tarım kredilerinin finansal gelişim üzerindeki etkisinin asimetrik nedensellik testi ile incelenmesi. Journal of Management and Economics Research, 12 (24): 197-208. https://doi.org/10.11611/JMER303
  10. Ekwere, G. E. & I. D. Edem, 2014. Evaluation of agricultural credit facility in agricultural production and rural development. Global Journal of Human Science: B Geography, Geo-Sciences, Environmental Disaster Management, 14 (3): 19-26.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Keskin, Ö., & Medetoğlu, B. (2025). Analysis of the relationship between agricultural credit utilization and agricultural input price index. Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University, 62(4), 511-522. https://doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.1617344
AMA
1.Keskin Ö, Medetoğlu B. Analysis of the relationship between agricultural credit utilization and agricultural input price index. Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University. 2025;62(4):511-522. doi:10.20289/zfdergi.1617344
Chicago
Keskin, Ömer, ve Batuhan Medetoğlu. 2025. “Analysis of the relationship between agricultural credit utilization and agricultural input price index”. Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University 62 (4): 511-22. https://doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.1617344.
EndNote
Keskin Ö, Medetoğlu B (01 Aralık 2025) Analysis of the relationship between agricultural credit utilization and agricultural input price index. Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University 62 4 511–522.
IEEE
[1]Ö. Keskin ve B. Medetoğlu, “Analysis of the relationship between agricultural credit utilization and agricultural input price index”, Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University, c. 62, sy 4, ss. 511–522, Ara. 2025, doi: 10.20289/zfdergi.1617344.
ISNAD
Keskin, Ömer - Medetoğlu, Batuhan. “Analysis of the relationship between agricultural credit utilization and agricultural input price index”. Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University 62/4 (01 Aralık 2025): 511-522. https://doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.1617344.
JAMA
1.Keskin Ö, Medetoğlu B. Analysis of the relationship between agricultural credit utilization and agricultural input price index. Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University. 2025;62:511–522.
MLA
Keskin, Ömer, ve Batuhan Medetoğlu. “Analysis of the relationship between agricultural credit utilization and agricultural input price index”. Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University, c. 62, sy 4, Aralık 2025, ss. 511-22, doi:10.20289/zfdergi.1617344.
Vancouver
1.Ömer Keskin, Batuhan Medetoğlu. Analysis of the relationship between agricultural credit utilization and agricultural input price index. Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University. 01 Aralık 2025;62(4):511-22. doi:10.20289/zfdergi.1617344