Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Lessons Learnt from KOYMER Agricultural Extension Project in Turkey

Yıl 2016, , 61 - 66, 19.04.2016
https://doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.179874

Öz

The reducing role of public in economy had encouraged the private
alternatives in technology transfer, and also cost-sharing structures in
agricultural extension services. The structural changes vary according to the
country conditions. In this study, KOYMER Project, which was aimed at
decentralization, cost sharing and creating a pluralistic structure in Turkish
agricultural extension system, had been examined by interviewing with 566
consultants (advisors) in Turkey.  Some
information on personal characteristics, activities and problems have been
gathered through the questionnaires. The project had positive effects on
extension workers–farmers ratios, behavioral changes in technical and
socio-cultural issues in rural areas. But, the planned financial contributions
of farmers and sustainability of the model predicted had not provided in the
project.

Kaynakça

  • Anderson, J. R., Feder, G., 2003, Rural Extension Services, Worldbank Policy Research Working Paper 2976, 33 p.
  • Axinn, G., 1988, Guide on Alternative Extension Approaches, FAO, Rome, Italy, 148p.
  • Celik Ates, H., and Z. Gokce Cakal, 2014, Views of Extension Personnel on Extension Methods and Transition to Private Extension: The Case of Isparta Province, Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, Vol:16 Supplementary Issue, 1529-1541pp.
  • DPT, 2000, Tarimsal Politikalar ve Yapisal Duzenlemeler Ozel Ihtisas Komisyonu Raporu, DPT Sekizinci Bes Yillik Kalkinma Plani, DPT: 2516, OIK:534, Ankara 2000, 61s.
  • Feder, G.,Willet, A., Zijp, W., 1999, Agricultural Extension Generic Challenges and Some Ingredients for Solutions, The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2129, Springer US, 313-353pp.
  • Marcotte, P.,1988, Organizational behavior factors: a brief synopsis of leadership motivation and conflict management, Human Resource Management in National Agricultural Research: Report of a Workshop, ISNAR, The Netherlands, 168-182pp.
  • Rivera, W. M., Qamar, M. K., Van Crowder, L, 2001, Agricultural and Rural Extension Worldwide: Options for Institutional Reform in the Developing Countries, Extension, Education and Communication Services, FAO, Rome, Italy, 49pp.
  • Sigman, A., Swanson, B.E., 1993, Utilization of technology: the corner stone of agricultural development policy and programs, Agricultural Extension a Reference Manual, Second Edition, FAO, Rome, Italy. 227-231pp.
  • Swanson B.E., Farner, B.J., Bahal, R., 1989, The current status of extension worldwide, Global Consultation on Agricultural Extension, FAO, Rome, Italy, 43-76pp.
  • Swanson, B. E., Rajalahti, R. (2010). Strengthening agricultural extension and advisory systems: Procedures for assessing, transforming, and evaluating extension systems, The World Bank Agriculture and Rural Development Discussion Paper:45, Washington, DC.
  • TEDGEM, 2007, http://www.tedgem.gov.tr/koymer.htm
  • TEDGEM, 2009, http://www.tedgem.gov.tr/koymer.htm, access: 01.09.2009.
  • TKB,2009,http://www.ordutarim.gov.tr/subeleler/cey/mevzuat/koymer.htm, access: 01.09.2009.
  • TZOB, http://www.tzob.org.tr/tzob/tzob_ana_sayfa.htm
  • ZMO, 2005, Proje Kapsamında Çalışan Ziraat Mühendisleri Kaderleriyle Baş Başa Kaldı, Tarım ve Mühendislik Dergisi, Sayı:75, Sayfa:42.
  • TUIK, 2014, http://www.tuik.gov.tr, access:14.12.2014

Türkiye’de KÖYMER Tarımsal Yayım Projesinden Çıkarılan Dersler

Yıl 2016, , 61 - 66, 19.04.2016
https://doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.179874

Öz




Kamunun ekonomideki rolünün azalması, teknoloji
transferinde özel alternatifler ve tarımsal yayım hizmetlerinde maliyet
paylaşımını teşvik etmiştir. Yapısal
değişiklikler ülkelerin koşullarına göre farklılık göstermektedir. Bu
çalışmada, Türk tarımsal yayım sisteminde yerelleşme, maliyet paylaşımı ve
çoğulcu yapıyı oluşturmayı amaçlayan KÖYMER Projesi, Türkiye’ de 566 danışman
ile görüşülerek incelenmiştir. Kişisel özellikler, faaliyetler ve sorunlarla
ilgili bazı bilgiler anket yoluyla derlenmiştir. Projenin kırsal alanda,
yayımcı-çiftçi oranına, bazı teknik ve sosyokültürel konularda davranış
değişikliğine pozitif etkileri olmuştur. Ancak, projede, çiftçilerin planlanan
finansal katkıları ve öngörülen modelin sürdürülebilirliği sağlanamamıştır.

Kaynakça

  • Anderson, J. R., Feder, G., 2003, Rural Extension Services, Worldbank Policy Research Working Paper 2976, 33 p.
  • Axinn, G., 1988, Guide on Alternative Extension Approaches, FAO, Rome, Italy, 148p.
  • Celik Ates, H., and Z. Gokce Cakal, 2014, Views of Extension Personnel on Extension Methods and Transition to Private Extension: The Case of Isparta Province, Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, Vol:16 Supplementary Issue, 1529-1541pp.
  • DPT, 2000, Tarimsal Politikalar ve Yapisal Duzenlemeler Ozel Ihtisas Komisyonu Raporu, DPT Sekizinci Bes Yillik Kalkinma Plani, DPT: 2516, OIK:534, Ankara 2000, 61s.
  • Feder, G.,Willet, A., Zijp, W., 1999, Agricultural Extension Generic Challenges and Some Ingredients for Solutions, The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2129, Springer US, 313-353pp.
  • Marcotte, P.,1988, Organizational behavior factors: a brief synopsis of leadership motivation and conflict management, Human Resource Management in National Agricultural Research: Report of a Workshop, ISNAR, The Netherlands, 168-182pp.
  • Rivera, W. M., Qamar, M. K., Van Crowder, L, 2001, Agricultural and Rural Extension Worldwide: Options for Institutional Reform in the Developing Countries, Extension, Education and Communication Services, FAO, Rome, Italy, 49pp.
  • Sigman, A., Swanson, B.E., 1993, Utilization of technology: the corner stone of agricultural development policy and programs, Agricultural Extension a Reference Manual, Second Edition, FAO, Rome, Italy. 227-231pp.
  • Swanson B.E., Farner, B.J., Bahal, R., 1989, The current status of extension worldwide, Global Consultation on Agricultural Extension, FAO, Rome, Italy, 43-76pp.
  • Swanson, B. E., Rajalahti, R. (2010). Strengthening agricultural extension and advisory systems: Procedures for assessing, transforming, and evaluating extension systems, The World Bank Agriculture and Rural Development Discussion Paper:45, Washington, DC.
  • TEDGEM, 2007, http://www.tedgem.gov.tr/koymer.htm
  • TEDGEM, 2009, http://www.tedgem.gov.tr/koymer.htm, access: 01.09.2009.
  • TKB,2009,http://www.ordutarim.gov.tr/subeleler/cey/mevzuat/koymer.htm, access: 01.09.2009.
  • TZOB, http://www.tzob.org.tr/tzob/tzob_ana_sayfa.htm
  • ZMO, 2005, Proje Kapsamında Çalışan Ziraat Mühendisleri Kaderleriyle Baş Başa Kaldı, Tarım ve Mühendislik Dergisi, Sayı:75, Sayfa:42.
  • TUIK, 2014, http://www.tuik.gov.tr, access:14.12.2014
Toplam 16 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Murat Boyacı

Özlem Yıldız Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 19 Nisan 2016
Gönderilme Tarihi 18 Aralık 2015
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2016

Kaynak Göster

APA Boyacı, M., & Yıldız, Ö. (2016). Lessons Learnt from KOYMER Agricultural Extension Project in Turkey. Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University, 53(1), 61-66. https://doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.179874

      27559           trdizin ile ilgili görsel sonucu                 27560                    Clarivate Analysis ile ilgili görsel sonucu            CABI logo                      NAL Catalog (AGRICOLA), ile ilgili görsel sonucu             EBSCO Information Services 

                                                       Creative Commons Lisansı This website is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.