'Robinson' ve 'Fremont' mandarin çeşitlerinde yabancı tozlanmanın meyve verim ve kalitesine etkisi

Yıl 2017, , 107 - 112, 20.03.2017

Ercan Yıldız , Mustafa Kaplankıran

https://doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.297992

Cited By: 6

Öz

Farklı turunçgil tür ve
çeşitlerinde yapılan tozlama çalışmaları, farklı tozlayıcıların meyve tutum
oranı, meyve iriliği ve meyve başına tohum sayısı üzerine etkilerinin oldukça
geniş bir varyasyon gösterdiğini ortaya koymuştur. Bu çalışmada, 'Robinson' ve 'Fremont'
mandarin çeşitlerinin meyve tutumu ve bazı meyve kalite özellikleri üzerine
dört farklı tozlayıcı çeşidin ('Rhode Red Valencia', 'Midknight Valencia' ve
'Valencia Late' portakalları ile 'Rio Red' altıntopu) etkileri araştırılmıştır. Denemede her bir
çeşit Tesadüf Parselleri Deneme Desenine göre 3 tekerrürlü olarak yer almıştır.
Meyve tutumu ile meyve ağırlığı, suda çözünebilir kuru madde (SÇKM) miktarı, SÇKM/Asit
oranı, meyve başına tohum miktarı gibi pomolojik özellikler üzerine tozlayıcıların
etkisi istatistiksel olarak önemli bulunmuştur. Olgunluk döneminde her iki ana
ebevyn çeşidinde de en yüksek meyve tutumu sırasıyla %23.08 ve %21.57 ile 'Valencia Late' portakalı ile melezlendiğinde elde
edilmiştir. 'Robinson'
mandarininde en ağır meyveler 'Rhode Red Valencia'
melezinden elde edilmişken, 'Fremont' mandarininde serbest tozlanma koşularında melezlemeye göre
daha büyük meyveler alınmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre, en iyi tozlayıcılar 'Robinson' mandarini için 'Rhode Red Valencia' ve 'Valencia Late' çeşitleri,
Fremont mandarini için ise 'Midknight Valencia' ve 'Rio Red' çeşitleri
olmuştur. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Yapay melezleme, Citrus reticulata, meyve tutumu, meyve kalitesi

The Effect of Cross-Pollination on Fruit Set and Quality in 'Robinson' and 'Fremont' Mandarins

Öz

 Previous studies on
cross-pollination of Citrus varieties
have shown the existence of a wide variation in fruit set ratio, fruit size,
and number of seeds per fruit with different pollinators. In the current study,
the effects of four pollinator cultivars ('Rhode Red Valencia', 'Midknight
Valencia', and 'Valencia Late' oranges and 'Rio Red' grapefruit) on the fruit
set, and some fruit quality characters of 'Robinson' and 'Fremont' mandarin
cultivars were determined. The experimental setup was a complete randomized
design with three replications of each combination. The effects of
cross-pollination on fruit set and pomological characters, such as fruit
weight, total soluble solids (TSS), TSS:TA (total acids) ratio, and number of
seeds per fruit were statistically significant. At maturity, female parent
cultivars’ flowers that were cross-pollinated with 'Valencia Late' orange, had
the highest fruit set with 23.08% and 21.57%, respectively. The heaviest fruits
of 'Robinson' mandarin were obtained by cross-pollination with 'Rhode Red
Valencia' orange. Avarege fruit weight from open-pollinated was higher than those
from cross-pollination in 'Fremont' mandarin. According to the results, 'Rhode
Red Valencia' and 'Valencia Late' oranges for 'Robinson' mandarin and
'Midknight Valencia' orange, and 'Rio Red' grapefruit for Fremont mandarin,
were determined as the best crossings.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Artificial cross-pollination, Citrus reticulata, fruit set, quality

Kaynakça

• Akgul, F. and O. Tuzcu. 1993. The effect of different citrus rootstocks on the fruit yield and quality of 'Clementine', Satsuma and 'Fremont' mandarin cultivars. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 17:359-371.
• Anonymous, 2013. http://fao.org/page/collections?subset=agriculture. <Accessed January 2016>
• Barry, GH. and S. Roux. 2010. Preharvest foliar sprays of prohexadione–calcium, a gibberellin biosynthesis inhibitor, induce chlorophyll degradation and carotenoid synthesis in citrus rinds. HortScience, 45:242-247.
• Chao, CCT. 2005. Pollination study of mandarins and the effect on seediness and fruit size: Implications for seedless mandarin production. HortScience, 40:362-365.
• Davies, FS. and LG. Albrigo. 1994. Citrus. CABI Publication, Florida, USA. 254 p.
• Demir, G, Turgutoglu, E. and Kurt, S. 2015. The variation of fruit quality at different pollination combinations in Batem Sarısı and Batem Pınarı lemon varieties. (in Turkish with an English summary). 7th National Symposium on Horticulture (25-29 August, Turkey), p. 608-612.
• Demirkeser, TH., S. Eti and M. Kaplankiran. 2001. The effects of self and cross-pollination on the fruit set and quality of 'Nova' mandarin. 6th International Congress of Citrus Nurserymen (9-17 July, Brazil), p. 305-308.
• Demirkeser, TH, M. Kaplankiran, C. Toplu and E. Yildiz. 2009. Yield and fruit quality performance of 'Nova' and 'Robinson' mandarins on three rootstocks in Eastern Mediterranean. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 4:262-268.
• Domingues, Eta and NA. Tulmann. 1999. Influence of pollination and floral morphology on fruit setting in sweet orange varieties. Scientia Agricola, 56:163-170.
• Eken, I. 2006. The effects of different pollinators on fruit set and fruit quality in Robinson mandarin. Cukurova University, Ms Thesis 76 p. (in Turkish).
• El-Otmani, M., CW. Coggins, M., Agusti and CL. Lovatt. 2000. Plant growth regulators in citriculture: World current uses. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 19:395-447.
• Eti, S., M. Kilavuz and N. Kaska. 1989 The effect on fruit set and quality of self and cross pollination in 'Robinson' mandarin (in Turkish with an English summary). Bahce, 18:62-68.
• Fang, JG., J. Wu, YS. Zheng and CT. Chao. 2008. Cross pollination, seediness, and stimulated parthenocarpy of 'Nules' Clementine, 'Fina Sodea' Clementine and 'W. Murcott' mandarin. 11th International Citrus Congress (26-30 October, China), p. 26-30.
• Ferraro, AE., RM. Pio and FA. Azevedo. 2006. Pollination influence of sweet orange varieties on 'Nova tangelo' seeds production. Revista Brasileria de Fruticultura, 28:244-246.
• Futch, SH. and LK. Jackson. 2003. Cross-pollination planting plans. Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences. http:// edis.ifas.ufl.edu/ch070. <Accessed December 2015>.
• Hearn, CJ., PC. Reece and R. Fenton. 1968. Effects of pollen source on fruit characteristics and set of four citrus hybrids. Proceedings of the Florida State Horticultural Society, 81:94-98.
• Hossein, MI. and MG. Rabbani. 2011. Study on the cross compatibility of some lemon genotypes (Citrus limon L.). Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Resources, 36:241-246.
• Kaygisiz, H. and HC. Aybak. 2005. Citrus Cultivation (in Turkish). Hasad Publication, Turkey. 219 p.
• Keogh, RC., PW. Anthony, APW. Robinson and IJ. Mullins. 2010. Pollination Aware Case Study: Citrus. The Real Value of Pollination in Australia. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. RIRDC Publication No. 10/081.
• Ozkan, M. and S. Eti. 1992. The pollination in 'Minneola' tangelo (in Turkish with an English summary). 1th National Symposium on Horticulture (13-16 October, Turkey), p. 197-201.
• Papadakis, IE., EE. Protopapadakis and IN. Therios. 2009. Yield and fruit quality of 'Nova' hybrid [Citrus clementina hort. ex Tanaka (C. reticulata Blanco x C. paradisi Macfad)] and two Clementine varieties (C. clementina hort. ex Tana ka) as affected by self- and cross-pollination. Scientia Horticulture, 121:38–41.
• Reece, PC. and RO. Register. 1961. Influence of pollinators on fruit set in 'Robinson' and 'Osceola' tangerine hybrids. Proceedings of the Florida State Horticultural Society, 74:104-106.
• Saunt, J. 1990. Citrus varieties of the world. Sinclair International Limited, Norwich, England. 160 p.
• Seday, U. 2010. Determination of self compatibility and of appropriate pollinators of clementine mandarin types derived from selection. Cukurova University, Ms Thesis 1l9 p. (in Turkish).
• Siddiqui, MW. 2015. Postharvest Biology and Technology of Horticultural Crops: Principles and Practices for Quality Maintenance. CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA. 572 p.
• Stephen, HF. and Larry, KJ. 2009. Pollination of Citrus hybrids. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu. <Accessed December 2015>.
• Thomas, RJ., Goswami, AM., Saxena, SK., Sharma, HC. and Shanti, C. 2000. Effect of different pollen parents on fruit set and physicochemical qualities of lemon cv. Kagzi Kalan. Indian Journal of Horticulturae, 57(3):231-235.
• Tuzcu, O. 1990. Main Citrus Varieties Cultivated in Turkey. Mediterranean Exporter Unions, Mersin-Turkey. 71 p.
• Vithanage, V. 1991. Effect of different pollen parents on seediness and quality of 'Ellendale' tangor. Scientia Horticulture, 48:253–260.
• Wallace, HM. and LS. Lee. 1999. Pollen source, fruit set and xenia in mandarins. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 74:82-86.
• Wallace, HM. 2004. Pollination effects on quality in 'Oroval' Clementine mandarin in Australia. Acta Horticulturae, 632:99-103.
• Waqar, A., Khurram, Z., Azher, NM., Saleem, BA. and Ayyub, CM. 2007. Studies on combining ability of Citrus hybrids with indigenous commercial cultivars. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 39(1):47-55.
• Wright, GC. 2007. Pollination of W. Murcott Afourer mandarins. Citrus Research Report, 153 p. http://extension.arizona.edu/pubs/az1441- 03.pdf. <Accessed December 2015>.
• Zekri, M., TA. Obreza and R. Koo. 2009. Irrigation, Nutrition, and Citrus Fruit Quality. Florida University IFAS Extension. SL-207: 1-3.