Araştırma Makalesi

Determination of late spring frost effects on Monroe peach cultivars in different training systems, planting intervals and height of flower

Cilt: 58 Sayı: 2 30 Haziran 2021
PDF İndir
TR EN

Determination of late spring frost effects on Monroe peach cultivars in different training systems, planting intervals and height of flower

Abstract

Objective: Main purpose of this study is to determine whether the rates of frost damages on pistils caused by the lower temperature varies between different planting distances and the different training systems with the heights of the peach trees. Material and Methods: The flowers of Monroe/GF 677 peach trees grown in different training systems and planting distances, in the pink bud period, on the 1nd day after the frost that occurred in the period, morning of April 1, hours 5:00 AM-7:00 AM, temperatures -0.33 to -1.23° C, 3 replicates with 100 flowers in each replicate were collected from 4 sides of Slender Spindle, Y-Trellis, Central Leader and Open Vase trees planted with different planting distances from both 1m and 2m height. Results: The frost damage rates have been obtained as 5.05% for Slender Spindle training system and 2.05% for Y-Trellis training system in the support systems. In unsupported systems, peach cultivation with the Central Leader training system caused less frost damage. Conclusion: Y-Trellis cultivation system in supported systems and Central Leader in unsupported systems for peach cultivation resulted less frost damage and therefore it was suggested that they were a better systems in terms of productivity.

Keywords

Frost damage , Low temperature , Pistils hardness , Plant management , Y-Trellis

Kaynakça

  1. Augspurger C.K. 2013. Reconstructing patterns of temperature, phenology, and frost damage over 124 years: Spring damage risk is increasing. Ecology, 94: 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1890/12-0200.1
  2. Bennie, J., Kubin, E., Wiltshire, A., Huntley, B. and R. Baxter. 2010. Predicting spatial and temporal patterns of bud‐burst and spring frost risk in north‐west Europe: The implications of local adaptation to climate. Global Change Biology, 16: 1503–1514. https://doi.org/10. 1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02095.x
  3. Blanc, M.L., Geslin, H., Holzberg, I.A. and B. Mason. 1963. Protection against frost damage. WMO Techn. Note No. 51, 62p.
  4. Ertürk, Y. and Güleryüz, M. 2007. Determination of Resistance Degrees of Some Local and Foreign Apricot Varieties to Low Temperatures in Erzincan Conditions (2003-2004 Period) (in Turkish). Journal of Agricultural Sciences 13(2), 128-136.
  5. FAO 2019. Statistical Database. http://faostat3.fao.org/download/Q/QC/E. (Date of access: 16 December, 2019).
  6. Gunes N.T. 2006. Frost hardiness of some Turkish apricot cultivars during the bloom period. HortScience, 41(2): 310-312.
  7. Hansen, J., Sato, M., Ruedy, R., Lo, K., Lea, D.W. M. Medina‐Elizade. 2006. Global temperature change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103: 14288–14293. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas. 0606291103
  8. Imani, A. and Khani, Y.M. 2012. Characteristics of almond selections in relation to late frost spring. International Journal of Nuts and Related Sciences, 2(2): 77-80.
  9. IPCC 2012. Summary for policymakers. In C.B. Field, V. Barros, T.F. Stocker, D. Quin, D.J. Dokken, K.L. Ebi, P. Midgley (Ed.), Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation (pp. 1–19). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  10. Liu, J. and Sheirf, M.S. 2019. Combating Spring Frost With Ethylene. Frontiers in Plant Science, 10:1-6.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Çetinbaş, M., Sarısu, H. C., & Butar, S. (2021). Determination of late spring frost effects on Monroe peach cultivars in different training systems, planting intervals and height of flower. Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University, 58(2), 193-202. https://doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.715754