Araştırma Makalesi

Evaluation of the sufficiency of urban green spaces: Nigde city example

Cilt: 58 Sayı: 2 30 Haziran 2021
PDF İndir
TR EN

Evaluation of the sufficiency of urban green spaces: Nigde city example

Abstract

Objective: In this study, the numerical values that will guide the planner and the manager depending on the accessibility, adequacy and effective service areas of the Niğde urban green areas (GA) have been obtained. Material and Methods: The usage of GA of Niğde City is examined as children's playground, park and sports areas. The data was obtained from ASTER, Landsat 7-ETM and SPOT satellite images, the Niğde Development Plan (2017) with a scale of 1/1000 and ArcGIS software was used in spatial competence and accessibility analyzes of green spaces. Results: Active GA of Niğde city center is distance between neighborhood centers and percentages are calculated for each neighborhood. There are sport areas only in 4 parks in 61 neighborhood. 91% of the neighborhood and district parks are below 1 ha, while 9% are between 0.001-0.004 ha. Sports areas, 6% is between 4-6 ha, while 1% is 0.1 ha. Conclusion: Nigde urban green space assets quite low when compared with cities of the European Union, within the framework of the Reconstruction Act in Turkey have also been found to be inadequate.

Keywords

Children Playground , city , green area , Niğde , urbanization

Kaynakça

  1. Akpınar, A., Cankurt, M. 2015. Türkiye'de Kişi Başına Düşen Yeşil Alan Miktarı İle Ölüm Oranı Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi. Adnan Menderes Üniv. Zir. Fak. Dergisi 2015; 12(2) :101-107
  2. Altunkasa, M.F. (2004). Adana'nın kentsel gelişim süreci ve yeşil alanlar. Adana Kent Konseyi Çevre Çalışma Grubu Bireysel Raporu. Adana. Annear, M.J., Cushman, G., Gidlow, B. 2009.Leisure time physical activity differences among older adults from diverse socioeconomic neighborhoods. Health and Place 15:482-490.
  3. Anonymous, 2012. Niğde Valiliği Çevre ve Kentcilik İl Müdürlüğü. Niğde İl Çevre Durum Raporu 2011. www.csb.gov.tr/turkce/dosya/ced/icdr2011/nigde_icdr2011.pdf
  4. Anonymous, 2017. Mevzuatı geliştirme ve yayın genel müdürlüğü, Mevzuat Bilgi sistemi.e.mevzuat. Mekânsal Planlar Yapım Yönetmeliği. Birinci bölüm.17.05.2017
  5. Anonymous, tarihsiz. (www.tepav.org.tr/tr/blog/s/4059). Alıntı Tarihi.27.11.2019.
  6. Aydemir, S. 2004. Kentsel Açık Ve Yeşil Alanlar “Rekreasyon”, Kentsel Alanların Planlanması ve Tasarımı, 285-337, Trabzon.
  7. Bağcı, Ö. 2010. YeniKent (Mersin) Kentsel Alanında Peyzaj Mimarlığı Disiplini Kapsamında Kentsel Gönenç Araştırması. Çukurova Üniv., Fen Bil. Ens. YL Tezi. Adana
  8. Brown, B., Bentley, D.L. 1993. Residential burglars judge risk: the role of territoriality. J Environ Psychol 13: 51-61.
  9. Bruch, S.P. 2006. EnvironmentalEquity of Lansing’s Urban Park Policy, Michigan State University Department of Geography, Doctorate Thesis
  10. Burgess, J., Harrison, C.M., Limb, M. 1988. People, parks and the urban green: a study of popular meanings and values for open spaces in the city. Urban Stud. 25: 455–473 Coles, R.W., Bussey, S.C. 2000. Urban forest landscapes in the UK – progressing the social agenda. Landscape and Urban Planning 52: 181–188.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Sandal Erzurumlu, G. (2021). Evaluation of the sufficiency of urban green spaces: Nigde city example. Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University, 58(2), 181-192. https://doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.740080