Araştırma Makalesi

Effects of different nitrogen doses and cultivars on some nutritive value of annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum var. westerwoldicum) silage

Cilt: 59 Sayı: 2 4 Temmuz 2022
PDF İndir
TR EN

Effects of different nitrogen doses and cultivars on some nutritive value of annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum var. westerwoldicum) silage

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the effects of different nitrogen doses and cultivars on some nutritive value of annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum var. westerwoldicum) silage. Material and Methods: The study was conducted as a field experiment at Ege University, Department of Field Crops during the growing season of 2019-2020. Four annual ryegrass cultivars (Elif, Big Boss, Baquend, and Medoacus) and five nitrogen doses (0, 75, 150, 225, and 300 kg ha-1) were investigated. Some characteristics tested in the experiment were silage dry matter, crude ash, crude protein contents, NDF and ADF contents and silage RFV. Results: The characteristics studied were affected by the applications. While the highest silage dry matter ratio was obtained with 225 kg N ha-1, 300 kg N ha-1 application gave the highest crude protein rate and RFV. The lowest NDF and ADF rates were obtained at a fertilizer rate of 300 kg N ha-1 application. Baquend cv. gave the highest silage dry matter ratio and crude ash ratio.The highest crude protein ratio, lowest NDF and ADF ratios and highest silage RFV were obtained from Elif cv. Conclusion: Elif cultivar had acceptable silage properties at a nitrogen dose of 225 kg ha-1.

Keywords

Cultivar , nitrogen dose , nutritive value , silage , annual ryegrass

Kaynakça

  1. Acikgoz, E., 1995. Yem Bitkileri (II. Baskı), Uludağ Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Basımevi No:7-025-0210, Bursa, 456 s.
  2. Aganga, A. A., U. J. Omphile, T. Thema & L. Z. Wilson, 2004. Chemical composition of ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) at different stages of growth and ryegrass silages with additives. Journal of Biological Sciences, 4 (5): 645-649. https://doi.org/10.3923/jbs.2004.645.649
  3. Amrane, R. & B. Michalet-Doreau, 1993. Effect of maturity stage of annual ryegrass and lucerne on ruminal nitrogen degradability. Annales de Zootechnie, 42 (1): 31-37. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00888860
  4. Aykan, Y. & V. Saruhan, 2018. Farklı oranlarda silolanan yem bezelyesi (Pisum sativum L.) ve arpa (Hordeum vulgare L.) karışımlarının silaj kalite özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. Dicle Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 11 (2): 64-70.
  5. Ball, D.M., C.S. Hovelend & G.D. Lacefield, 1996. Forage quality in Southern Forages. Potash & Phosphate Institute, Norcross, Georgia, 124-132.
  6. Baytekin, H., M. Kızılsimsek & G Demiroglu, 2009. “Çim ve Ayrık Türleri, 561-572”. In: Yem Bitkileri Buğdaygil ve Diiğer Familyalardan Yem Bitkileri Cilt III (Eds. R. Avcıoğlu, R. Hatipoğlu & Y. Karadağ), Tarım ve Köy İşleri Bakanlığı, Izmir, 843 s.
  7. Bengisu, G., 2019. A Study on the silage properties of hungarian vetch (Vicia pannonica Crantz.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) grass mixtures in different rates. Legume Research, 42 (5): 680-683. https://doi.org/10.18805/LR-494
  8. Bernard, J. K., 2003. “Feeding ryegrass silage in the South East US, 45-51”. Proceedings of the 40th annual Florida Dairy Production Conference (29-30 April, 2003, Gainesville), 149 pp.
  9. Bernard, J. K., J. W. West & D. S. Trammell, 2002. Effect of replacing corn silage with annual ryegrass silage on nutrient digestibility, intake, and milk yield for lactating dairy cows. Journal of dairy science, 85 (9): 2277-2282. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302 (02)74307-5
  10. Bolat, İ. & Ö. Kara, 2017. Bitki Besin Elementleri: Kaynakları, İşlevleri, Eksik ve Fazlalıkları. Bartın Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 19 (1): 218-228.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Orou Ouennon Assouma, S. M. S., & Çelen, A. E. (2022). Effects of different nitrogen doses and cultivars on some nutritive value of annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum var. westerwoldicum) silage. Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University, 59(2), 225-234. https://doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.970316