Yayım Penceresinden Tarımsal Bilgi ve Enformasyon Sistemi: Türkiye Örneği

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 54 Sayı: 1, 37 - 44, 20.03.2017

Murat Boyacı , Özlem Yıldız

https://doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.297945

Cited By: 3

Öz

Bu çalışmada,
Türkiye’deki 1104 yayımcıdan derlenen verilerin yorumlanmasıyla kamu yayım
hizmetleri incelenmiştir. Bilgi ile yeni teknolojilerin benimsenmesi ve
yayılması yoluyla insanların davranışlarını gönüllü olarak değiştirmelerini
sağlayan yayım, Tarımsal Bilgi ve Enformasyon Sistemi’nin önemli bir
parçasıdır. TBES farklı aktörler ve çok boyutlu bakış açılarından oluşan bir
ağdır. Bu çalışma Türk TBES’deki yayımın bağlantı, bütünleşme ve uyum düzeyleri
ile sistemdeki tıkanıklıkları tanımlamaktadır. TBES bileşenleri olan yayımın
başarısını etkileyen unsurlar, bilgi kaynakları, yayım yöntemleri, aktör
etkinliği ve uyumu Çok Boyutlu Ölçekleme Analizinde kullanılmıştır. Bulgulara
göre, teknoloji benimseme düzeyinin düşüklüğü, çoğunlukla verimlilik artışına
odaklanılması, yerel katılımın sınırlı olması Türk TBES’deki genel aksaklıklar
olarak belirlenmiştir. Yayım etkinlikleri hedefe yönelik programlama
yaklaşımına dayandırılmalıdır. TBES’de yerel aktörlerin güçlendirilmesi
yanında, aktörler arası ilişkilerinin eklemlenmesine izin veren çok paydaşlı
programlama ve değerlendirme süreci kullanılmalıdır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Tarımsal Yayım, Tarımsal Bilgi ve Enformasyon Sistemi (TBES), Türkiye

Agricultural Knowledge and Information System from Extension Window: the Turkish Case

Öz

In this study, public extension service was examined through
interpretation of data collected from 1104 extension workers in Turkey.
Extension as a one of the most important component in an AKIS is concerned with
inducing people to change their voluntary behavior through the dissemination of
information and adoption of new technologies. An AKIS is a network consisted of the different actors and multidimensional
perspectives. This study investigates the linkages, integration and
compatibility levels of extension in Turkish AKIS, and defines the bottlenecks
in the system. The components of the AKIS such as factors affecting extension
performance, information sources, extension methods, actor effectiveness and
compatibility were used in the multidimensional scaling (MDS) analysis.
According to the findings low technology adoption levels, mostly focusing on
production increases, limited local participation were emphasized as the common
disorders in Turkish AKIS. Extension activities must be based on the objective
oriented programming approach. Besides, empowering of local actors,
multi-stakeholder programming and evaluation process should be employed for
allowing to articulation of actors’ relations in the AKIS.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Agricultural extension, agricultural knowledge and information system (AKIS), Turkey

Kaynakça

• Abudu, 2015. Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge and Information Systems (AKIS) in Extension Information Delivery in Nigeria, International Journal of Materials, Methods and Technologies Vol. 3, No. 1, October 2015.
• Anonymous, 1938. Turkish Agriculture, I. Congress on Village and Agricultural Development, (in Turkish), State Publishing House, Istanbul, (1938), 304p.
• Anonymous, 1990. Agricultural Extension the Next Step, Agricultural and Rural Development Policy and Research Series, No:13, Agricultural and Rural Development Department, The World Bank, Washington D.C.
• Babu, S.C., Ramesh, N., Shaw, C., 2015. The Current Status and Role of Private Extension,: a Literature Review and Conceptual Framework, Knowledge Driven Development: Private Extension and Global Lessons, Eds: Zhou, Y., Babu, S.C. Academic Press.
• Blandford, D., 2011. Recap of Some Issues Raised in the Meeting and the Policy Agenda for OECD Countries, OECD Conference on Agricultural Knowledge Systems (AKS): Responding to Global Food Security and Climate Change Challenges, 15-17 June, Paris, France
• Blum, A., 1995. Comparative research on agricultural extension in Europe, Proceeding of The 12th. European Seminar on Extension Education, Thessalonica, Greece.
• Boyaci, M., 1996. Agricultural Extension in European Union Countries and Turkey, (in Turkish), Ege University Agricultural Research and Extension Centre, Extension Series(3), Bornova, Izmir Turkey 21p.
• Christoplos, I and Nitsch, U., 1993. Changing extension paradigm, IRDC Currents 6, Pp: 22-26.
• Csaki, C., 1999. Agricultural higher education in transforming Central and Eastern Europe, Agricultural Economics 21 Pp: 109-120.
• Expere, J.A., 1974. A Comparative Study of Job Performance under Two Approaches to Agricultural Extension Organization, Land Tenure Centre, Research Paper (61), USA, 62p.
• Falloon, K., 2011. Institutional reforms of AKS in New Zealand and International Networks in AKS, New Zealand Mission to the European Union, Ministry of Science and Innovation, 15 June.
• Hartwich, F. and Scheidegger, U., 2010. Fostering innovation networks the missing piece in rural development, Rural Development News 1/2010, Pp: 70-75.
• Islam, F., 2010. Institutionalization of agricultural knowledge, Management System for Digital Marginalized Rural Farming Community, Innovation and Sustainable Development in Agriculture and Food, June 28 to July 1, Montpellier France.
• ISNAR, 1998. Strengthening the Role of Universities in the National Agricultural Research Systems in Sub-Saharan Africa, Cotonou, Benin, The Hague: International, Service for National Agricultural Research (ISNAR)
• Malhotra, N. K., 1996. Marketing Research an Applied Orientation: Second Edition, Prentice-Hall International Inc. 890p.
• MARA, 1987. Extension Guide, Part I, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, (in Turkish), TYUAP, Ankara, Turkey, 28p.
• MARA, 2009. Some Indicators on Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, http://www.tarim.gov.tr/arayuz/9/habergoster.asp?ID =967, Access: 7.10.2009
• Munyua, C., Adams, P., Thomson, T., 2002. Designing effective linkages for sustainable agricultural extension information systems among developing countries in Sub-Saharan Africa, AIAEE 2002, Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference Durban, South Africa, 301-307p.
• O’Reilly, P., 2010. Public/Private Roles, OECD Conference Agricultural Knowledge Systems Session 3.B. Business NZ, 16 June.
• Oakley, P. and Garforth, C., 1992. Guide to Extension Training, FAO Training Series No:11, Rome Italy, 144p.
• Perez., S.A., Klerkx, L., and Leeuwis, C., 2010. Innovation brokers and their roles in value chain-network innovation, ISDA 2010, Innovation and Sustainable Development in Agriculture and Food, 28 June-1 July, Montpellier France.
• Raj, S., 2010. Agricultural Knowledge Information Systems and innovations for technology dissemination and sustainable agricultural development, ISDA 2010, Innovation and Sustainable Development in Agriculture and Food, June 28 to July 1, Montpellier France.
• Rogers, A., 1993. Third generation extension towards and alternative model, Extension Bulletin (3), The University of Reading, Reading, UK.
• Roling, N., 1988. Extension Science, Information Systems in Agricultural Development, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Roling, N., 1989. The Agricultural Research Technology Transfer Interface: A Knowledge System Perspective, ISNAR, Hague, Netherlands.
• TUIK, 2015. Agricultural Census, Turkish Statistical Institute, http://www.tuik.gov.tr, Access: 16.9.2016
• Werrij, F., 2005. An Agriculture Knowledge System for Europe, EURAGRI Secretary General XIX EURAGRI Members Conference, 22/23 September, Central Science Laboratory, York, UK.