BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

-

Yıl 2014, Cilt: 45 Sayı: 3, 136 - 141, 06.08.2014
https://doi.org/10.16948/zktb.07134

Öz

Objectives: Hysteroscopy is a safe and simple procedure which is performed for evaluation and also for treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding, infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss. In this study we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the local anesthesia techniques for office hysteroscopy.Material and Methods: This randomised, double-blinded and placebo-controlled trial was performed including the 100 patients who had hysterocopy procedure with the indications of habituel abortus, infertility and anormal uterine bleeding. The study was conducted at Zeynep Kamil Women and Children Diseases Training and Research Hospital, department of endoscopy in Istanbul, between January 2011 and December 2012.Results: VAS score at the insertion of vaginal speculum was significantly lower at the patients who had intrauterine lidocaine administration (p<0.05), there was no statistically significant difference between the other groups (p>0,05). When we compare the VAS scores at the hysteroscope insertion and during the procedure, between the groups, patients who had anesthesia rated lower scores. Also, the patients who had intrauterine lidocaine had lower VAS scores when compared to other groups. Although VAS score at the 30 minutes after the procedure was lower at the groups who had intrauterine lidocaine administration, this difference was not statistically significant.Conclusion: Intrauterine topical local anesthesia seems to be effective in decreasing the pain in women undergoing hysteroscopy.

Kaynakça

  • MS Baggish; Operative Laparoscopy. JA Rock, JD Thompson (Eds.), Te Linde's Operative Gynecology (8th ed.), Lippincott Raven, Philadelphia (1997), pp. 415–442
  • Wong AY, Wong K, Tang LC. Stepwise pain score analysis of the effect of local lignocaine on outpatient hysteroscopy: a randomized , double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Fertil Steril, 2000;73(6):1234-7
  • Soriano D, Ajaj S, Chuong T, Devai B, Fauconnier A, Darai E. Lidocaine spray and outpatient hysteroscopy: randomized placebo- controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96(2): 661-4
  • Lau WC, Tam WH, Lo WK, Yuen PM. A randomised double –blind placebo controlled trial of transcervical intrauterine local anaesthesia in outpatient hysteroscopy. BJOG, 2000 7May; 107(5):610-3
  • Zupi E, Luciano AA, Vali E, Marconi D, Maneschi F. The use of topical anesthesia in diagnostic hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy. Fertil Steril , 1995 Feb; 63(2):414-6
  • Topical anaesthesia for diagnostic hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy in postmenopausal women: a randomised placebo-controlled double-blind study. Authors Cicinelli E, Didonna T, Ambrosi G, Schönauer LM, Fiore G, Matteo MG. Journal Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 Mar;104(3):316-9.
  • Shankar M, Davidson A, Taub N, Habiba M. Randomised comparison of distension media for outpatient hysteroscopy. BJOG 2004;111(1):57-62.
  • Kabil N, Tulandi T. A randomized trial of outpatient hysteroscopy with and without intrauterine anesthesia. J Minim İnvasive Gynecol 2008; 15(3): 308-10

OFİS HİSTEROSKOPİDE ANALJEZİ AMAÇLI LOKAL ANESTEZİ YÖNTEMLERİNİN ETKİNLİĞİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI (Efficacy of Local Anesthesia for Office Hysteroscopy)

Yıl 2014, Cilt: 45 Sayı: 3, 136 - 141, 06.08.2014
https://doi.org/10.16948/zktb.07134

Öz

Giriş: Ofis histeroskopi  anormal uterin kanama, infertilite, tekrarlayan gebelik kayıplarınının değerlendirilmesinde kullanılan önemli bir prosedürdür. Klinisyenlerin tecrübesinin artması ve teknolojik gelişmeler histeroskopi uygulama endikasyonlarını her gün daha da arttırmaktadır. Biz de  çalışmamızda tanısal histeroskopi yapılan hastalarda lokal analjezi yöntemlerinin etkinliğini araştırmayı amaçladık.

Materyal ve Metod: Çalışmamıza hastanemiz etik kurulundan onay alındıktan sonra 2011 ile 2012 yılları arasında Zeynep Kamil Kadın ve Çocuk  Hastalıkları Eiğtim ve Araştırma  Hastanesi Kadın Doğum Endoskopi Kliniğinde infertilite, habitüel abortus ve anormal uterin kanama nedeniyle tanısal histeroskopi yapılan  100 hasta dahil edildi. Hastalar  zarf  üsülü ile randomize edilerek ,intrauterin lidokain uygulanan, intrauterin lidokain +servikal sprey uygulanan, servikal sprey uygulanan ve plasebo grubu olarak dört gruba ayrıldı. Verilerin analizinde  SPSS 19.0 programı kullanıldı.

Bulgular: Bütün  hasta gruplarında en fazla ağrının işlem sırasında olduğu ifade edildi. Işlem sırasında ( histereskop insersiyonu ve kavite değerlendirilmesi) kaydedilen VAS puanları intrauterin lidokain  kullanılan iki grupta diğer gruplara kıyasla istatistiksel olarak daha düşük saptandı. Tenakulum uygulanması sırasında kaydedilen ağrı puanı servikal sprey kullanılan 2 grupta daha düşük saptandı.

Sonuç: Servikal sprey uygulanan hastalarda tenakulum takılması sırasında ağrının plaseboya kıyasla daha az olduğu izlendi. İntrauterin topikal anestezinin ise işlem sırasında ve işlemden sonra ağrıyı azalttığı tespit edildi.

 

ABSTRACT:

Objectives: Hysteroscopy is a safe and simple procedure which is performed for evaluation and also for treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding, infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss. In this study we  aimed  to evaluate the efficacy of the local anesthesia techniques for office  hysteroscopy.

Material and Methods: This randomised, double-blinded and placebo-controlled trial was performed including the 100 patients who had hysterocopy procedure with the indications of habituel abortus, infertility and anormal uterine bleeding. The study was conducted at Zeynep Kamil Women and Children Diseases Training and Research Hospital, department of endoscopy in Istanbul, between January 2011- December 2012

Results: VAS score at the insertion of vaginal speculum was significantly lower at the patients who had intrauterine lidocaine administration (p<0,05), there was no statistically significant difference between the other groups (p>0,05) When we compare the VAS scores at the hysteroscope insertion and during the procedure, between the groups, patients who had anesthesia rated lower scores. Also, the patients who had intrauterine lidocaine had lower VAS scores when compared to other groups. Although VAS score at the 30 minutes after the procedure was lower at the groups who had intrauterine lidocaine administration , this difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusion: Intrauterine topical local anesthesia seems to be effective  in decreasing the pain in women undergoing hysteroscopy

Key words:  Office hysterescopy, pain, local anesthesia

Kaynakça

  • MS Baggish; Operative Laparoscopy. JA Rock, JD Thompson (Eds.), Te Linde's Operative Gynecology (8th ed.), Lippincott Raven, Philadelphia (1997), pp. 415–442
  • Wong AY, Wong K, Tang LC. Stepwise pain score analysis of the effect of local lignocaine on outpatient hysteroscopy: a randomized , double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Fertil Steril, 2000;73(6):1234-7
  • Soriano D, Ajaj S, Chuong T, Devai B, Fauconnier A, Darai E. Lidocaine spray and outpatient hysteroscopy: randomized placebo- controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96(2): 661-4
  • Lau WC, Tam WH, Lo WK, Yuen PM. A randomised double –blind placebo controlled trial of transcervical intrauterine local anaesthesia in outpatient hysteroscopy. BJOG, 2000 7May; 107(5):610-3
  • Zupi E, Luciano AA, Vali E, Marconi D, Maneschi F. The use of topical anesthesia in diagnostic hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy. Fertil Steril , 1995 Feb; 63(2):414-6
  • Topical anaesthesia for diagnostic hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy in postmenopausal women: a randomised placebo-controlled double-blind study. Authors Cicinelli E, Didonna T, Ambrosi G, Schönauer LM, Fiore G, Matteo MG. Journal Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 Mar;104(3):316-9.
  • Shankar M, Davidson A, Taub N, Habiba M. Randomised comparison of distension media for outpatient hysteroscopy. BJOG 2004;111(1):57-62.
  • Kabil N, Tulandi T. A randomized trial of outpatient hysteroscopy with and without intrauterine anesthesia. J Minim İnvasive Gynecol 2008; 15(3): 308-10
Toplam 8 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Orjinal Araştırma
Yazarlar

Resul Karakuş

Ahmad Namazov Bu kişi benim

Selçuk Ayas Bu kişi benim

Mesut Polat

Sevcan Arınkan

Ali Doğukan Angın

Sultan Seren Karakuş Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 6 Ağustos 2014
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2014 Cilt: 45 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA Karakuş, R., Namazov, A., Ayas, S., Polat, M., vd. (2014). OFİS HİSTEROSKOPİDE ANALJEZİ AMAÇLI LOKAL ANESTEZİ YÖNTEMLERİNİN ETKİNLİĞİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI (Efficacy of Local Anesthesia for Office Hysteroscopy). Zeynep Kamil Tıp Bülteni, 45(3), 136-141. https://doi.org/10.16948/zktb.07134
AMA Karakuş R, Namazov A, Ayas S, Polat M, Arınkan S, Angın AD, Karakuş SS. OFİS HİSTEROSKOPİDE ANALJEZİ AMAÇLI LOKAL ANESTEZİ YÖNTEMLERİNİN ETKİNLİĞİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI (Efficacy of Local Anesthesia for Office Hysteroscopy). Zeynep Kamil Tıp Bülteni. Ağustos 2014;45(3):136-141. doi:10.16948/zktb.07134
Chicago Karakuş, Resul, Ahmad Namazov, Selçuk Ayas, Mesut Polat, Sevcan Arınkan, Ali Doğukan Angın, ve Sultan Seren Karakuş. “OFİS HİSTEROSKOPİDE ANALJEZİ AMAÇLI LOKAL ANESTEZİ YÖNTEMLERİNİN ETKİNLİĞİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI (Efficacy of Local Anesthesia for Office Hysteroscopy)”. Zeynep Kamil Tıp Bülteni 45, sy. 3 (Ağustos 2014): 136-41. https://doi.org/10.16948/zktb.07134.
EndNote Karakuş R, Namazov A, Ayas S, Polat M, Arınkan S, Angın AD, Karakuş SS (01 Ağustos 2014) OFİS HİSTEROSKOPİDE ANALJEZİ AMAÇLI LOKAL ANESTEZİ YÖNTEMLERİNİN ETKİNLİĞİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI (Efficacy of Local Anesthesia for Office Hysteroscopy). Zeynep Kamil Tıp Bülteni 45 3 136–141.
IEEE R. Karakuş, A. Namazov, S. Ayas, M. Polat, S. Arınkan, A. D. Angın, ve S. S. Karakuş, “OFİS HİSTEROSKOPİDE ANALJEZİ AMAÇLI LOKAL ANESTEZİ YÖNTEMLERİNİN ETKİNLİĞİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI (Efficacy of Local Anesthesia for Office Hysteroscopy)”, Zeynep Kamil Tıp Bülteni, c. 45, sy. 3, ss. 136–141, 2014, doi: 10.16948/zktb.07134.
ISNAD Karakuş, Resul vd. “OFİS HİSTEROSKOPİDE ANALJEZİ AMAÇLI LOKAL ANESTEZİ YÖNTEMLERİNİN ETKİNLİĞİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI (Efficacy of Local Anesthesia for Office Hysteroscopy)”. Zeynep Kamil Tıp Bülteni 45/3 (Ağustos 2014), 136-141. https://doi.org/10.16948/zktb.07134.
JAMA Karakuş R, Namazov A, Ayas S, Polat M, Arınkan S, Angın AD, Karakuş SS. OFİS HİSTEROSKOPİDE ANALJEZİ AMAÇLI LOKAL ANESTEZİ YÖNTEMLERİNİN ETKİNLİĞİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI (Efficacy of Local Anesthesia for Office Hysteroscopy). Zeynep Kamil Tıp Bülteni. 2014;45:136–141.
MLA Karakuş, Resul vd. “OFİS HİSTEROSKOPİDE ANALJEZİ AMAÇLI LOKAL ANESTEZİ YÖNTEMLERİNİN ETKİNLİĞİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI (Efficacy of Local Anesthesia for Office Hysteroscopy)”. Zeynep Kamil Tıp Bülteni, c. 45, sy. 3, 2014, ss. 136-41, doi:10.16948/zktb.07134.
Vancouver Karakuş R, Namazov A, Ayas S, Polat M, Arınkan S, Angın AD, Karakuş SS. OFİS HİSTEROSKOPİDE ANALJEZİ AMAÇLI LOKAL ANESTEZİ YÖNTEMLERİNİN ETKİNLİĞİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI (Efficacy of Local Anesthesia for Office Hysteroscopy). Zeynep Kamil Tıp Bülteni. 2014;45(3):136-41.

Cited By

Outpatient Hysteroscopy
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17907

Local anaesthesia for office hysteroscopy: A systematic review & meta-analysis
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Prathiba M. De Silva
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.05.062