Etkinlik çizelgeleri: otizmli çocuklara bağımsızlık, sosyal etkileşim ve seçim yapmayı kazandırma

Yıl 2013, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 01, 61 - 76, 01.02.2013

Binyamin Birkan

https://doi.org/10.1501/Ozlegt_0000000176

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

Etkinlik Çizelgeleri: Otizmli Çocuklara Bağımsızlık, Sosyal Etkileşim ve Seçim Yapmayı Kazandırma

Öz

Etkinlik çizelgeleri, otizmli veya ileri derecede yaygın gelişim bozukluğu olan bireylerin eğitiminde
kullanılan bilimsel dayanaklı etkili bir öğretim yöntemidir. Etkinlik çizelgeleri, otizmli bireylere başkalarının
verdiği yönergelere bağlı kalmadan günlük etkinliklerini kendi başlarına yapmalarına yardımcı olan fotoğraflı
veya yazılı ipuçlarından oluşur. Otizmli bireyler, etkinlik çizelgelerleri kullanarak rutinlerinde değişiklik
yapmayı, etkinlik seçmeyi, etkinliklerini sıraya koymayı ve başkalarıyla iletişime girmeyi öğrenirler. Bu
makalede, öğretmen ve ebeveynlerin çocuklarının oyun, öz-bakım, sosyal etkileşim, akademik ve ev rutinlerini
geliştirmek için etkinlik çizelgelerini nasıl kullandıkları, önkoşul becerilerin neler olduğu, öğretim
materyallerinin nasıl hazırlandığı ve çizelge takip becerisinin nasıl öğretildiği tartışılmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Etkinlik çizelgeleri, otizm, otistik bozukluk, otizm spektrum bozukluğu otizmli çocukların eğitimi

Kaynakça

• Akgül, H. (2010). Otizmli çocuklara fotoğraflı etkinlik çizelgesi takip etme becerisi kazandırma. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Marmara Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
• Alberto, P.A., & Troutman, A.C. (2013). Applied behavior analysis for Teachers, 9nd ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson Prentice Hall.
• Anderson, M.D., Sherman, J.A., Sheldon, J.B., & McAdam, D. (1997). Picture activity schedule and engagement of adults with mental retardation in a group home. Research in Development Disabilities, 18, 231-250.
• Baer, D.M., Wolf, M.M., & Risley, T.R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied BehaviorAnalysis, 1, 91-97.
• Bellovin, E.R., Burck, S.E., Tarnoski, J.M., Cammilleri, A.P., & Brothers, K.J. (2003). A comparison of the effects of textual activity schedules on paper versus textual activity of a personal data assistant (PDA). Poster presented at the Frst Annual Conference of the Princeton Child Development Institute, Princeton, NJ.
• Bijou, S.V. (1996). Reflections on some early events related to behavior analysis of child development. The Behavior Analyst, 19, 49-60.
• Birkan, B. (2011). Otizmli çocuklara konuşma becerilerinin öğretimi: Replikli öğretim. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 12(1), 57-69.
• Birkan, B., McClannahan, L.E., & Krantz, P.J. (2007). Effects of superimposition and background fading on the sight-word reading of a boy with autism, Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 1(2007), 117-125.
• Buggey, T., Toombs, K., Gardener, P., & Cervetti, M. (1999). Training responding behaviors in students with autism: Using videotaped self-modeling. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions 4, 205-214.
• Carr, D., Wilkinson, K.M., Blackman, D., & Mcllvane, W.J. (2000). Equivalence classes in individuals with minimal verbal repertoires. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 101-114.
• Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson Prentice Hall.
• Charlop, M.H., & Milstein, J.P. (1989). Teaching autistic children conversational speech using video modeling. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 22, 275-285.
• Demchak, M. (1990). Response prompting and fading methods: A review. American Journal on Mental Retardation. 94, 603-615.
• Eikeseth, S., Smith, T., Jahr, E., & Eldevik, S. (2002). Intensive behavioral treatment at school for 4- to 7-year- old children with autism: A 1-year comparison controlled study. Behavior Modification, 26, 49-68.
• Eikeseth, S., Smith, T., Jahr, E., & Eldevik, S. (2007). Outcome for children with autism who began intensive behavioral treatment between ages 4 and 7: A comparison controlled study. Behavior Modification, 31, 264-278.
• Etzel, B.C., & LeBlanc, J.M. (1979). The simplest treatment alternative: The law of parsimony applied to choosing appropriate instructional control and errorless-learning procedures for the difficult-to-teach child. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 9, 361-382.
• Ferster, C.B., & DeMyer, M.K. (1961). The development of performances in autistic children in an automatically controlled environment. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 13, 312-345.
• Frost, LA., & Bondy, A.S. (1994). The Picture Exchange Communication System Training Manual. Cherry Hill, NJ: Pyramid Educational Consultants, mc.
• Green, G. (1996). Early behavioral intervention for autism: What does research tell us? In C. Maurice, G. Green, & S. Luce (Eds.), Behavioral intervention for young children with autism: A manual for parents and professionals. Austin, TX: Pro-ed.
• Hall, L.J. (1997). Effective behavioural strategies for the defining chaıacteristics of autism. Behavior Change, 4, 139-154.
• Harin, T.G., Kennedy, C.H., Adams, M.J., & Pitts-Conway, V. (1987). Teaching generalization of purchasing skills across community settings to autistic youth using videotape modeling. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 20, 89-96.American children. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
• Heckamon, K.A., Alber,S., Hooper, S., & Heward, W.L (1998). A comparison of least-to-most prompts and progressive time delay on the disruptive behavior of students with autism. Journal of Behavioral Education. 8, 171-201.
• Howard, J., Sparkman, C., Cohen, H., Green, G., & Stanislaw, H. (2005). A comparison of intensive behavior analytic and eclectic treatments for young children with autism. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 26, 359-383.
• Koegel,R.L., O’Dell, M.C., & Koegel, L.K. (1987). A natural language paradigm for teaching non-verbal autistic children. Journa1 of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 17, 187-199.
• Krantz, P.J., MacDuff, M.T., & McClannahan, L.E. (1993). Programming participation in family activities for children with autism: Parents’ use of photographic activity schedules. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 137-138.
• Krantz P.J., & McClannahan, L.E. (1993). Teaching children with autism to initiate to peers: Effects of a script- fading procedure. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 26, 12 1-132.
• Lovaas, O.I., Ackerman, A., Alexander, D., Firestone, P., Perkins, M., Young, D.B., Carr, E.G., & Newsom, C. (1981). Teaching developmentally disabled children: The ME book. Austin,TX: PROED.
• Lovaas, O.I., & Smith, T. (1989). A comprehensive behavioral theory of autistic children: Paradigm for research and treatment. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 20, 17-29.
• MacDuff, G.S., Krantz, P.J., & McClannahan, L.E. (1993). Teaching children with autism in use photographic activity schedules: Maintenance and generalization of complex response chains. Journal of App1ied Behavior Analysis, 26, 89-95.
• McClannahan, L. E., & Krantz, P. J. (2010). Otizmli çocukların eğitiminde etkinlik çizelgelerinin kullanımı. (Çev. B.Birkan) İstanbul: Sistem Yayıncılık. (Orijinal eserin yayın tarihi 1999)
• McClannahan, L. E., & Krantz, P. J. (2010). Otizmli çocuklara konuşma becerilerinin öğretimi: Replikler ve replik silikleştirme.(Çev. B.Birkan) İstanbul: Sistem Yayıncılık. (Orijinal eserin yayın tarihi 2005)
• McCannahan, L.E., & Krantz, P.J. (1999). Activity schedules for children with autism: Teaching independent behavior. Bethesda, MD: Woodbine House.
• McClannahan, L.E., MacDuff, G.S., & Krantz, P.J. (2009). Activity schedule for adults with autism spectrum disorder. P. Reed (Eds.) Behavioral theories and intervention for autism. Nova Science Publishers, Inc. New York.
• McGee, G.G., Krtanz, P.J., Mason, D., & McClannahan, L.E. (1983). A modified incidental-teaching procedure for autistic youth: Acquisition and generalization of receptive object labels. Journal of App1ied Behavior Analysis, 16, 329-338.
• Sidman, M., & Tailby, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5-22.
• Stromer, R., & Osborne, J.G. (1982). Control of adolescents’ arbitrary matching-to-sample by positive and negative stimulus relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 329-348.
• Terrace, H.S. (1963). Discrimination learning with and without errors. Journal of the Experimental Ana1ysis of Behavior, 6, 1-27.
• Zygmont, D.M., Lazar, R.M., Dube, W.V., & Mcllvane, W.J. (1992). Teaching arbitrary matching via sample stimulus control shaping to young children and mentally retarded individuals: A methodological note. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 57, 109-117.