Auricular mites in Eurasian badgers (Meles meles) from Romania with a focus on Baloghella melis

Kosta Y. Mumcuoğlu; Harold Salant; Gad Baneth; Yaarit Nachum-Biala; Andrei Daniel Mihalca; Andreea Daniela Iani; Georgiana Deak

doi:10.47121/acarolstud.1934314

EN

Auricular mites in Eurasian badgers (Meles meles) from Romania with a focus on Baloghella melis

Abstract

Out of 55 roadkill mustelid carcasses collected in Romania, 42 (76.4%) belonged to the Eurasian badger, Meles meles. The presence of mites in the external auditory canal of these hosts was investigated. In total, 20 (36.36%) of the Eurasian badgers were positive for Baloghella melis mites. A total of 1,331 mite specimens were isolated from the infested animals, of which 1,328 (99.8%) were deutonymphs (hypopi) and three (0.2%) were tritonymphs. In two badgers, a male of the ear mite Otodectes cynotis, and the larva of an unidentified trombiculid mite were found positive for B. melis. Two pooled samples of B. melis were sequenced and showed high coverage and identity with the Glycyphagus hypudaei complex. To the best of our knowledge B. melis was described for the first time in the Eurasian badger in Romania, while O. cynotis was described for the first time in the Eurasian badger.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

This study was not supported by any foundation.

Ethical Statement

Not applicable.

References

Butler, J.M. and Roper, T.J. 1996. Ectoparasites and sett use in European badgers. Animal Behavior, 52: 621-629. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1996.0203
Cox, R., Stewart, P.D. and Macdonald, D.W. 1999. The ectoparasites of the European badger, Meles meles, and the behavior of the host-specific flea, Paraceras melis. Journal of Insect Behavior, 12: 245-265. doi: 10.1023/A:1020923001987
D’Amico, G., Dumitrache, M.O., Matei, I.A., Ionică, A.M., Gherman, C.M., Sándor, A., Modrý, D. and Mihalca, A.D. 2017. Ixodid ticks parasitizing wild carnivores in Romania. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 71: 139-149. doi: 10.1007/s10493-017-0108-z
da Silva, J., Woodroffe, R. and Macdonald, D.W. 1993. Habitat, food availability and group territoriality in the European badger, Meles meles. Oecologia, 95 (4): 558-564. doi: 10.1007/BF00317441
Deak, G., Ionică, A.M., Péter, Á., Sándor, A.D., Matei, I.A., D’amico, G., Liénard, E., Gherman, C.M., Mihalca, A.D. and Bouhsira, E. 2024. Fleas of wild carnivores in Romania: diversity, distribution, and host-associations. Parasites & Vectors, 17: 148. doi: 10.1186/s13071-024-06235-3
Do Linh San, E., Ferrari, N. and Weber, J.M. 2003. Le blaireau (Meles meles L.) dans le Jura Suisse: succès de capture, paramètres démographiques et ectoparasites. Revue Suisse de Zoologie, 110: 565-580. [In French] doi: 10.5962/bhl.part.80199
Durden, L.A. and Wilson, N. 1990. Ectoparasitic and phoretic arthropods of Virginia opossums (Didelphis virginiana) in central Tennessee. Journal of Parasitology, 1: 581-583. doi: 10.2307/3282847
Fain, A. and Lukoschus, F.S. 1968. Une nouvelle deutonymphe heteromorphe (hypope) parasite du blaireau (Meles meles) en Hollande (Acarina: Sarcoptiformes). Revue de Zoologie et de Botanique Africaines, 78: 175-182. [In French]

Hancox, M. 2018. The nidicolous fauna of badger setts. Entomology Monthly Magazine, 124: 1484-1487.
Griffiths, D.A. 1966. Nutrition as a factor influencing hypopus formation in Acarus siro species complex (Acarina: Acaridae). Journal of Stored Product Research, 1: 325-340. doi: 10.1016/0022-474X(66)90029-4
Hirst, S. 1921. On three new parasitic mites (Leptus, Schongastia, and Demodex). Annual Magazine of Natural History, 7: 37-39. doi: 10.1080/00222932108632487
Holt, G. and Berg, C. 1990. Sarcoptic mange in red fox and other wild carnivores in Norway. Norsk Veterinærtidsskrift, 102: 427-432.
Izdebska, J.N., Cierocka, K., Rolbiecki, L., Kozina, P. and Kołodziej-Sobocińska, M. 2018. Demodex melesinus (Acariformes: Demodecidae) - the forgotten European badger parasite, rediscovered after 100 years. Acta Parasitologica, 63: 665-668. doi: 10.1515/ap-2018-0078
Izdebska, J.N., Rolbiecki, L. and Rehbein, S. 2024. Two new species of parasitic demodecid mites in the European polecat Mustela putorius and their co-infestation with Miridex putorii (Acariformes: Demodecidae). European Zoological Journal, 91 (1): 568-589. doi: 10.1080/24750263.2024.2347921
Kołodziej-Sobocińska, M., Zalewski, A. and Kowalczyk, R. 2014. Sarcoptic mange vulnerability in carnivores of the Białowieża Primeval Forest, Poland: underlying determinant factors. Ecological Research, 29 (2): 237-244. doi: 10.1007/s11284-013-1118-x
Kraft, W., Kraiss-Gothe, A. and Gothe, R. 1988. Otodectes cynotis infestations in dogs and cats: mite biology, epidemiology, pathology and diagnosis, as well as case reports of generalized mange in dogs. Tierärztliche Praxis, 16 (4): 409-415.
Kurek, P., Piechnik, Ł., Wiatrowska, B., Ważna, A., Nowakowski, K., Pardavila, X., Cichocki, J. and Seget, B. 2022. Badger Meles meles as ecosystem engineer and its legal status in Europe. Animals, 12: 898. doi: 10.3390/ani12070898
Lanszki, J. and Heltai, M. 2011. Feeding habits of sympatric mustelids in an agricultural area of Hungary. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 57: 291-304.
Legain, M., Idee, A., Mardini, D., René-Martellet, M., Mosca, M. and Pin, D. 2024. Efficacy and innocuity of lotilaner in the treatment of otodectic mange in ferrets. Veterinary Parasitology, 332: 110317. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2024.110317
Lovell, C., Li, S., Turner, J. and Carbone, C. 2022. The effect of habitat and human disturbance on the spatiotemporal activity of two urban carnivores: The results of an intensive camera trap study. Ecology and Evolution, 12 (3): e8746. doi: 10.1002/ece3.8746
Lukoschus, F.S., De Cock, A.W. and Fain, A. 1971. Life cycle of Melesodectes auricularis Fain & Lukoschus (Glycyphagidae, Sarcoptiformes). Tijdschrift voor Entomologie, 114: 173-178.
Mahunka, S. 1963. Beitraege zur Kenntnis der Milbenfauna (Acari) von Saeugetiernestern. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 9: 355-372.
Miller, D.S., Eagle, R.P., Zabel, S., Rosychuk, R. and Campbell, T.W. 2006. Efficacy and safety of selamectin in the treatment of Otodectes cynotis infestation in domestic ferrets. Veterinary Records, 159 (22): 748. doi: 10.1136/vr.159.22.748
Nims, T.N., Durden, L.A. and Nims, R.L. 2004. New state and host records for the phoretic fur mite, Glycyphagus hypudaei (Acari: Glycyphagidae). Journal of Entomological Science, 39 (3): 470-471. doi: 10.18474/0749-8004-39.3.470
Nowak, R.M. 2018. Walker’s mammals of the world. Monotremes, Marsupials, Afrotherians, Xenarthrans, and Sundatherians. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, 757 pp. doi: 10.56021/9780801857898
Rojas, A., Germitsch, N., Oren, S., Sazmand, A. and Deak, G. 2024. Wildlife parasitology: sample collection and processing, diagnostic constraints, and methodological challenges in terrestrial carnivores. Parasites & Vectors, 17 (1): 127. doi: 10.1186/s13071-024-06226-4
Santibáñez, P., Palomar, A.M., Portillo, A., Santibáñez, S. and Oteo, J.A. 2015. The role of chiggers as human pathogens. In: An overview of tropical diseases. Samie, A. (Ed.) IntechOpen, Croatia, 173-202. doi: 10.5772/61978
Seo, M.G., Song, B.G., Kim, T.K., Noh, B.E., Lee, H.S., Lee, W.G. and Lee, H.I. 2021. Nationwide incidence of chigger mite populations and molecular detection of Orientia tsutsugamushi in the Republic of Korea, 2020. Microorganisms, 9 (8): 1563. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9081563
Sgroi, G., Iatta, R., Lia, R.P., Latrofa, M.S., Samarelli, R., Camarda, A. and Otranto, D. 2021. Trypanosoma (Megatrypanum) pestanai in Eurasian badgers (Meles meles) and Ixodidae ticks, Italy. Parasitology, 148 (12): 1516-1521. doi: 10.1017/S0031182021001190
Sweatman, G.K. 1958. Biology of Otodectes cynotis, the ear canker mite of carnivores. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 36: 849-862. doi: 10.1139/z58-072
Sweatman, G.K. 1962. Parasitic mites of non-domesticated animals in New Zealand. New Zealand Entomologist, 3 (1): 15-23. doi: 10.1080/00779962.1962.9722809
Thompson, G.B. 1961. The ectoparasites of the badger Meles meles. Entomological Monthly Magazine, 97: 156-158.
Umur, Ş., Bölükbaş, C.S., Açıcı, M., Ateş, C. and Gürler, A.T. 2019. Parasites found in a Eurasian badger (Meles meles). Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 66 (3): 317-320. [In Turkish] doi: 10.33988/auvfd.538077
Veronesi, F., Deak, G. and Diakou, A. 2023. Wild mesocarnivores as reservoirs of endoparasites causing important zoonoses and emerging bridging infections across Europe. Pathogens, 12 (2): 178. doi: 10.3390/pathogens12020178
Whitaker, Jr, J.O. and French, T.W. 1982. Ectoparasites and other associates of some insectivores and rodents from New Brunswick. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 60 (11): 2787-2797. doi: 10.1139/z82-357
Wilson, N. and Zemke, R.L. 1985. Occurrence of the ear canker mite, Otodectes cynotis (Hering) on the wolverine, Gulo gulo. Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 21 (2): 180. doi: 10.7589/0090-3558-21.2.180
Wurst, E. and Pfister, T. 1990. On the biology of Baloghella melis Mahunka, 1963 (Acari: Acaridida: Glycyphagidae). Bonner Zoologische Beiträge, 41: 157-162.
Zhao, Y., Zhang, W.Y., Wang, R.L. and Niul, D.L. 2020. Divergent domains of 28S ribosomal RNA gene: DNA barcodes for molecular classification and identification of mites. Parasites & Vectors, 13: 1-12. doi: 10.1186/s13071-020-04124-z

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Acarology, Parasitology

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Kosta Y. Mumcuoğlu ^*
0000-0001-8125-6099
Israel

Harold Salant This is me
0000-0002-7792-0759
Israel

Gad Baneth This is me
0000-0002-7549-1305
Israel

Yaarit Nachum-Biala This is me
0000-0001-7336-4698
Israel

Andrei Daniel Mihalca This is me
0000-0001-6076-7914
Romania

Andreea Daniela Iani This is me
0009-0003-7448-0588
Romania

Georgiana Deak This is me
0000-0001-6604-0839
Romania

Publication Date

June 24, 2026

Submission Date

April 20, 2026

Acceptance Date

June 21, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 8 Number: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.47121/acarolstud.1934314

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA48GC38YM

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Mumcuoğlu, K. Y., Salant, H., Baneth, G., Nachum-Biala, Y., Mihalca, A. D., Iani, A. D., & Deak, G. (2026). Auricular mites in Eurasian badgers (Meles meles) from Romania with a focus on Baloghella melis. Acarological Studies, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.47121/acarolstud.1934314

AMA

1.Mumcuoğlu KY, Salant H, Baneth G, et al. Auricular mites in Eurasian badgers (Meles meles) from Romania with a focus on Baloghella melis. Acarol. Stud. 2026;8(2). doi:10.47121/acarolstud.1934314

Chicago

Mumcuoğlu, Kosta Y., Harold Salant, Gad Baneth, et al. 2026. “Auricular Mites in Eurasian Badgers (Meles Meles) from Romania With a Focus on Baloghella Melis”. Acarological Studies 8 (2). https://doi.org/10.47121/acarolstud.1934314.

EndNote

Mumcuoğlu KY, Salant H, Baneth G, Nachum-Biala Y, Mihalca AD, Iani AD, Deak G (June 1, 2026) Auricular mites in Eurasian badgers (Meles meles) from Romania with a focus on Baloghella melis. Acarological Studies 8 2

IEEE

[1]K. Y. Mumcuoğlu et al., “Auricular mites in Eurasian badgers (Meles meles) from Romania with a focus on Baloghella melis”, Acarol. Stud., vol. 8, no. 2, June 2026, doi: 10.47121/acarolstud.1934314.

ISNAD

Mumcuoğlu, Kosta Y. - Salant, Harold - Baneth, Gad - Nachum-Biala, Yaarit - Mihalca, Andrei Daniel - Iani, Andreea Daniela - Deak, Georgiana. “Auricular Mites in Eurasian Badgers (Meles Meles) from Romania With a Focus on Baloghella Melis”. Acarological Studies 8/2 (June 1, 2026). https://doi.org/10.47121/acarolstud.1934314.

JAMA

1.Mumcuoğlu KY, Salant H, Baneth G, Nachum-Biala Y, Mihalca AD, Iani AD, Deak G. Auricular mites in Eurasian badgers (Meles meles) from Romania with a focus on Baloghella melis. Acarol. Stud. 2026;8. doi:10.47121/acarolstud.1934314.

MLA

Mumcuoğlu, Kosta Y., et al. “Auricular Mites in Eurasian Badgers (Meles Meles) from Romania With a Focus on Baloghella Melis”. Acarological Studies, vol. 8, no. 2, June 2026, doi:10.47121/acarolstud.1934314.

Vancouver

1.Kosta Y. Mumcuoğlu, Harold Salant, Gad Baneth, Yaarit Nachum-Biala, Andrei Daniel Mihalca, Andreea Daniela Iani, Georgiana Deak. Auricular mites in Eurasian badgers (Meles meles) from Romania with a focus on Baloghella melis. Acarol. Stud. 2026 Jun. 1;8(2). doi:10.47121/acarolstud.1934314

Title and statement page

All manuscripts must be accompanied by a separate title and statement page (click here to download template file of the title and statement page).

This page should contain the full title. The title should be short and informative, and not contain non-standard acronyms or abbreviations or taxon's authors. The higher taxa containing the taxa dealt with in the manuscript should be indicated in parentheses in the title. The full names of all authors must be given and surname should be typed in the upper case. The address of each author should be given in italic each starting a separate line. Authors are strongly encouraged to include an ORCID with their manuscript submission or revision (for more information on how to register for an ORCID click here). The contact e-mail address should be provided for the clearly identified corresponding author.

Authors’ contributions to the manuscript, ethics approval, funding source(s), conflict of interest statements, and acknowledgements should be given here.

Main text

The manuscripts should be written in English or Turkish. There are no word limits for the manuscript in this journal. The manuscripts should be MS-Word processed, typed with size 12 in Times New Roman font, double-spaced, continuous line numbered, with 2.5 cm margins on each side. All pages should be numbered consecutively in the bottom. The manuscript should be compiled in the following order: title, abstract, keywords; introduction, material and methods, results and discussion, acknowledgments, references, tables with captions on individual pages and figure captions. The figures should be saved separately from the text. The file of main manuscript does not contain identification information about the authors such as name, e-mail address, affiliation and etc. (click here to dowload template file of the main text).

Abstract

The abstract should present the general scope, and give summarize information on the main results and conclusions of the paper. In the manuscripts written in Turkish, the abstract in English must be included in addition to the Turkish abstract. Any new names or new combinations proposed in the manuscript should be referred in the abstract. The abstract should preferably be kept below 350 words, and citations should generally be avoided where possible.

Keywords

Keywords are used for indexing purposes. For this reason, it is better to give keywords that are not present at the title. Abbreviations and acronyms should be avoided.

Introduction

The introduction should provide concisely description of the basic background, rationale, aims and objectives of the study. It should not include the findings.

General Information

The manuscripts should be written in English or Turkish. There are no word limits for the manuscript in this journal. The manuscripts should be MS-Word processed, typed with size 12 in Times New Roman font, double-spaced, continuous line numbered, with 2.5 cm margins on each side. All pages should be numbered consecutively in the bottom. The manuscript should be compiled in the following order: title, abstract, keywords; introduction, material and methods, results and discussion, acknowledgments, references, tables with captions on individual pages and figure captions. The figures should be saved separately from the text. The file of main manuscript does not contain identification information about the authors such as name, e-mail address, affiliation and etc.

Tables should be editable tables in a word document or main text. All columns must have headings. If a table continues on more than one page, repeat column headings on subsequent page(s). Use approved abbreviations already defined in the text and define them in the general footnote.

The figures should be saved separately from the text. They should be in their native format for best quality. The figures should be at least 600 dpi, or 1200 dpi for line graphs. The following file types of figures are accepted: png (preferred), tiff, gif or jpeg.

All tables and figures should have a caption or legend, they should be labelled, and the labels should be numbered unless there is only one table or figure. All tables and figures should be referred to in the text (e.g., “Table 1”, “Fig. 2”, “Figs 3-5”).

Citations should be arranged chronological and alphabetical within year. All references cited in the text must appear in the literature cited section, and all items in this section must be cited in the text. Citation of unpublished studies or reports is not permitted, i.e., a volume and page number must be available for serials and a publisher, city, state, and full pagination for books. Work may be cited as “in press” only when the paper has been accepted for publication. Personal communications do not appear in the literature-cited section.

Electronic Publication & Nomenclatural Information

Article 8.5.3. To be considered published, a work issued and distributed electronically must be registered in the Official Register of Zoological Nomenclature (ZooBank) and contain evidence in the work itself that such registration has occurred.

The requirements for electronic publications are that the work be registered in ZooBank before it is published. This is a recent change to the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. The papers published in Zootaxa and Zookeys by International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (2012) explain how to do this, to make the new names available. Here is the web site for registration of your paper in ZooBank: http://zoobank.org/. We remind you that the data entered in ZooBank are your responsibility and we thank you making sure that the information provided is accurate and complete.

Materials and Methods

In this section, it should be provided concise but complete information about the materials and the analytical and statistical procedures used. This part should be as clear as possible to enable other scientists to repeat the research presented. Brand names should be supplied for all mentioned equipment, instruments, consumables etc.

Authors are responsible for verifying whether collection permit is necessary in the country from which their specimens originate, and for timely acquisition of such a permit. DNA sequences must be deposited in a public database (e.g., Genbank) and accession numbers should be provided in the manuscript.

Results

In this section it should be presented only the data which support the objective without any discussion of the results. Figures and tables are used to present the results, but information in figures and tables should not be duplicated in the text.

Discussion

In this section the results are discussed and interpreted in the context of the existing knowledge. It can be presented here the relationships and generalizations shown by the results. Information in the Introduction and Results sections should not be repeated here. Main conclusion of the study can be clearly given in the end of this section.

Authors’ contributions

All authors should make substantial, meaningful contributions to the manuscript. In the title page and main manuscript text, the authors must include a statement outlining their individual contributions to the manuscript by using the relevant CRediT roles (Brand et al., 2015; https://doi.org/10.1087/20150211). The necessary CRediT roles are: Conceptualization; Data curation; Formal analysis; Funding acquisition; Investigation; Methodology; Project administration; Resources; Software; Supervision; Validation; Visualization; Writing - Original draft; Writing - Review & Editing.

Authors must meet at least three of the criteria, please click here for details of the criteria. When there are multiple people serving in the same role, a degree of contribution may optionally be specified as ‘lead’, ‘equal’, or ‘supporting’.

An example of an authors’ contribution statement using CRediT roles with degree of contribution:

Author 1: Conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis (lead), visualization (supporting), writing - original draft (lead). Author 2: Investigation, formal analysis (supporting), methodology (equal), visualization (lead), software, writing - original draft (supporting). Author 3: Project administration, supervision, methodology (equal), writing - review & editing.

It is recommended that corresponding authors assume responsibility for role assignment, and that all contributors be given the opportunity to review and confirm assigned roles.

A contribution statement is not required for a manuscript with a single author.

All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in the section, ‘Acknowledgements’.

Statement of ethics approval

If the work involves the use of human subjects, the author(s) should ensure that the work described has been carried out in accordance with The Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki, 2013). The author(s) should include a statement in the manuscript that informed consent was obtained for experimentation with human subjects. The privacy rights of human subjects must always be observed. In addition, the manuscript must include the name of the ethics committee that approved the study and the committee’s reference number/ID.

For work involving data of minors/children/infants, author(s) should confirm that statements of written informed consent from legally authorized representatives/parents/guardians are available; if verbal informed consent was obtained, reasons for this must be mentioned.

If the work involves animal experiments, it should be carried out in accordance with the relevant national institute of health guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals and the author(s) should clearly state in the manuscript that such guidelines have been followed and also provide an approval number for the research protocol granted by an Animal Ethics Committee in accordance with international principles in this section.

If the manuscript does not report on or involve any human data or animal experiments, please state “Not applicable.” in this section.

If authors use AI tools for content generation, editing, coding and analytical assistance, this must be clearly stated in an appropriate section of the manuscript or in this section.

Funding

List here all funding details required by your funding and grant-awarding bodies. Names of funding organisations should be written in full.

Conflict of interest

The authors should declare whether they have conflict of interest or not.

Acknowledgements

It should be given in a separate section at the end of the manuscript before the references, and included them on the title page. It should be listed here those individuals who provided help during the research.

References

Citations should be arranged chronological and alphabetical within year. All references cited in the text must appear in the literature cited section, and all items in this section must be cited in the text. References should be arranged alphabetically. Citation of unpublished studies or reports is not permitted, i.e., a volume and page number must be available for serials and a publisher, city, state, and full pagination for books. Abstracts not subjected to peer review may not be cited in the text or in the literature cited section. Work may be cited as “in press” only when the paper has been accepted for publication. Personal communications do not appear in the literature-cited section.

Citation style in the text

One author

Fain (1998) or (Kontschán, 2020).

Two authors

Seeman and Baker (2013) or (Fan and Zhang, 2005).

Three and more authors

Lindquist et al. (2009) or (Khaustov et al., 2017).

(Grandjean, 1944; Düzgüneş, 1963; Khanjani, 2005; Keskin, 2016) Chronological.

(Ermilov, 2010, 2015; Bochkov and Oconnor, 2015) Chronological and alphabetical within the same year.

(Ueckermann et al., 2015a,b) As long as the first author and the year are the same, it should be used the letter designators to distinguish between publications.

Style of the literature cited section

Journal article, 1 author

Ewing, H.E. 1911. New predaceous and parasitic Acarina. Psyche, 18: 37-43.

doi: 10.1155/1911/234794

Journal article, 2 authors

Fan, Q.-H. and Ueckermann, E.A. 2016. Resurrection of the genus Nonocaligus Habeeb with redefination of Nonocaligus and Mullederia Wood (Acari: Stigmaeidae). Systematic and Applied Acarology, 21 (11): 1447-1449.

doi: 10.11158/saa.21.11.1

Journal article, 3 and more authors

Cakmak, I., Janssen, A., Sabelis, M.W. and Baspinar, H. 2009. Biological control of an acarine pest by single and multiple natural enemies. Biological Control, 50: 60-65.

doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2009.02.006

Note that titles of serial publications must be written in full. DOI (if available) should be given. If there are more than 10 authors, then include names of the first 10, followed by et al.

Electronic resource

OConnor, B. and Klimov, P. 2012. Family Cheyletidae Leach, 1815. Available from http://insects.ummz.lsa.umich.edu/beemites/Species_Accounts/Cheyletidae.htm (Last accessed: 19 May 2018).

Book

Krantz, G.W. and Walter, D.E. 2009. A manual of acarology. Third edition. Texas Tech University Press, Lubbock, Texas, USA, 807 pp.

Book Chapter

Kethley, J. 1990. Acarina: Prostigmata (Actinedida). In: Soil biology guide. Dindal, D.L. (Ed.). John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA, 667-756.

Thesis

Le Goff, G. 2011. Benefits of aggregation in Tetranychus urticae. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. Earth and Life Institute, Biodiversity Research Centre, Faculty of Sciences, Catholic University of Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium, 298 pp.

Congress

Sullivan, G.T and Ozman-Sullivan, S.K. 2018. Is a cataclysmic mass extinction of mite species occurring in the shadows of high profile insect and vertebrate extinctions? XV International Congress of Acarology, 2-8 September 2018, Antalya, Türkiye, p. 117.

Ethical Principles

Acarological Studies (AS) is committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics and expects all parties (authors, referees, editors and publisher) in the publishing process to bear the following ethical responsibilities.

In keeping with its commitment to best practices in academic publishing, AS strongly supports and adheres to the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publication adopted by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA) and World Association of Medical Editors (WAME). Acarological Studies utilises the process flow sheets developed by COPE in collaboration with Springer Nature when dealing with cases of fraudulent manipulation of the publication process.

Authors’ Responsibilities

The persons who participate in the design of studies, data collection or the analysis or interpretation of the data in a study, or meaningfully contribute to arrangement of the content, are described as authors. Only people who meet these criteria can be included in the list of authors of a paper.

Before you undertake any research you should familiarize yourself with the full meaning and application of ethics in research. There are numerous resources available, including the following link: https://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/bioethics/whatis/index.cfm

In addition, authors should:

guarantee the accuracy and authenticity of the paper they submit.
all agree to its submission and that the corresponding author has been authorized by co-authors to submit on their behalf. It should be confirmed that neither the manuscript nor its main content have already been published in any language (including full-texts of papers presented at scientific meetings) or under consideration for publication elsewhere.
appropriately cite other authors or contributors or sources.
only use copyrighted materials such as data collection tools, questionnaires, interview forms, tables, graphics, figures, maps and photos after obtaining written permission or making a copyright agreement; however, use without obtaining permission is allowed if the source is clear; for example, authors can download and use a map if the source is written on the map.
verify whether a collection permit or receiving ethics committee approval is necessary in the country from which specimens originate, and allow for timely acquisition of such a permit.
always comply with the privacy rights of human participants; authors should include a statement in their manuscript that informed consent was obtained to conduct experiments with human participants.
deposit their molecular data in a public database (e.g., GenBank) and accession numbers should be provided in the manuscript.
respond promptly to editors’ requests for raw data, evidence of the accuracy of their data, ethical approval documents, informed consent forms and copyright permissions.
explain any financial relationship or conflict of interest that could potentially affect the findings or scientific conclusions of the study.
clearly report all funding details required by their funding and grant-awarding bodies.
not include people on the author list who provide help during the work such as writing, editing and technical assistance but who do not meet the criteria of authorship; they should be listed in the "Acknowledgments" section after obtaining their written permission.
not use information that they personally obtain (conversation, correspondence or interviews with third parties) without written permission from the source.
contact the editor as quickly as possible in order to withdraw the paper or correct as an erratum/errata when inaccurate information or scientific errors are found in the paper.
act in accordance with all details stated in the copyright release form.

AS utilises the process flow sheet prepared by COPE in situations potentially related to ethical problems. Please click here to access the flow sheet prepared by the committee.

Reviewers’ Responsibilities

After initial evaluation, the manuscript is reviewed by at least two independent, expert referees. If there are substantial inconsistencies between the referees, more reviewers are asked to review the manuscript. In every stage of the evaluation process, the double-blind peer review process, in which the names of the referees and the authors are not disclosed, is used.

Reviewers should:

immediately inform the editor whether they will review or decline to review when an invitation to review a manuscript is received.
inform the editor and withdraw from the review process if the content of the submitted manuscript is outside their own scientific field or knowledge, or if they cannot make their assessment in the stated period sassessment in duration of peer review process, or if there is any other reason that would disqualify them from being a reviewer.
have no conflicts of interest related to the study, the authors and/or the research funder.
act fairly and objectively and try to be constructive while maintaining scientific neutrality when evaluating manuscripts.
not make personal criticisms of the authors during the evaluation process.
make suggestions to the authors to improve the manuscript and to eliminate possible errors.
indicate important papers not cited in the text or references cited in the text but not in the reference list.
keep confidential all the information and ideas in the manuscript; they should not be shared with third parties, and not used for personal advantage. The confidentiality rule also covers people who decline to review.
inform to the editor if there are any ethical problems, plagiarism concerns or copyright infringements in the study.

Reviewers must follow COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers prepared by the COPE. Please click here to access the guidelines.

Editors’ Responsibilities

Editors should facilitate the sharing of scientific output with the target readership group by meeting the needs of both readers and the authors. In addition, they should record the opinions and ideas of authors, readers, reviewers and members of the editorial board to help improve journal processes. Editors should also adhere to the highest standards and best practices in academic publishing, and reconsider the journal’s processes in the light of new information and circumstances.

At AS, the chief editor has overall responsibility and the section editors appointed by the chief editor manage the peer review processes of the relevant manuscripts on behalf of the chief editor. The section editors are responsible for deciding whether manuscripts are published in the journal. The section editors should also provide feedback on the journal’s performance and have input to the selection of editorial board members.

Editors should:

have good knowledge of scientific English and publication ethics.
actively conduct scientific research.
have a broad knowledge of the science environment.
not have personal, economic or political connections that would affect in any way their duties and responsibilities.
carefully check the suitability of submitted manuscripts for the journal and conformity to the journal style for the manuscript.
carefully check manuscripts for scientific authenticity, originality and conformity to the journal’s ethical standards.
ensure that all information in submitted manuscripts is kept confidential until published.
impartially and independently manage the peer review process.
declare whether they have a conflict of interest or not, for example, when they are asked to manage the process of a manuscript submitted from their own institution.
not allow any activities that constitute conflict of interest or prejudice between the authors and the reviewers.
not make their publication decision entirely according to the reviewers’ suggestions; the editors should be aware that the reviewers are only advisers.
be aware that they have ethical responsibility for their publication decision.
not change their acceptance decision unless there is a serious problem with the manuscript, for example, when an ethics violation is detected.
not change editorial decisions given in the previous editorial period, unless there is a serious problem in the manuscript.
not hesitate to publish errata, amendments and declarations.
defend freedom of expression.
maintain ethical standards throughout all processes.

All editors are obliged to follow the guidelines in the Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors developed by COPE. In this combined version of the documents, the mandatory Code of Conduct for Journal Editors standards are shown in regular script and with numbered clauses, and the more aspirational ‘Best Practice’ recommendations are shown in italics. In addition, you can find a handbook, which is the main reference guide for editors, translated to Turkish (click here) with the support of Trakya University and TÜBİTAK – ULAKBİM, and distributed to the editors of scientific journals in Türkiye.

Publisher’s Responsibilities

The publisher:

provides all the necessary technical conditions for an online journal management system and helps ensure the maintenance of the journal’s standards.
ensures that the content on the publisher's page is accurate and up to date.
determines the fee policy.
appoints and authorizes the Chief Editor.
supports efforts to increase the journal’s international visibility.
ensures that the highest standards and the best practices in academic publishing are maintained.
provides the appropriate data for national and international indexes.
delivers permanent accessibility and the preservation of scientific works, and ensures digital archiving of publications by partnering with other organizations.

Readers’ Responsibilities

AS expects readers to bear the following responsibilities, even if they are not in the publishing process.

Readers:

must refrain from any action that would infringe the copyrights of published papers.
are encouraged to provide feedback to the journal regarding potential improvements in all aspects of journal performance.
should notify the Chief Editor (acarolstud@gmail.com) in cases where published papers are suspected of ethical misconduct, contain factual errors, or include significant typographical or spelling errors.
are encouraged to share or disseminate published content responsibly, ensuring the integrity and proper attribution of the original work.
are welcome to suggest new topics, special issues, or ideas that could enhance the scientific scope and outreach of the journal.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) Use Policy

The primary purpose of the policy on the use artificial intelligence (AI) tools in academic processes is to preserve scientific accuracy, transparency and research ethics. This policy requires all stakeholders to use AI technologies exclusively in accordance with these principles and to disclose their use of such tools clearly when necessary.

Acarological Studies (AS) takes an ethical and responsible approach to the use of AI, placing human-centred values at the forefront. AS complies with the international standards of organisations such as The Council of Higher Education (YÖK), the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), World Association of Medical Editors (WAME), the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Wiley and Springer Nature regarding the use of AI in research and publishing processes. AS stays up to date with the rapid developments in AI technologies and reserves the right to update its policies as necessary.

The following sections outline the responsibilities and principles relating to the use of AI for different roles.

For Authors

Use of AI-Generated Data or Visuals

AI-based translation tools may be used only for support. It is incumbent upon the authors to ensure the accuracy of the produced text and to verify its final version. Tables and analytical outputs generated by AI may be used provided they are not presented directly as real data. The publication of videos and images, including figures and micrographs, generated by AI is not permitted, except for those specifically used in a paper related to AI. The use of fabricated or synthetic data generated by AI or other means in the production of scientific results is strictly prohibited.

Authors’ Responsibility for Scientific Content and Accuracy

Content produced by AI tools may contain factual inaccuracies, fabricated references or erroneous data. Therefore, it is fully the authors’ responsibility to verify all AI-generated outputs, correct them when necessary and confirm their scientific appropriateness. AI-assisted content generation cannot replace scientific evaluation or scientific judgement.

Confidentiality and Personal Data Security

Authors should not upload confidential data, personal information and private data from human subjects or unpublished research results to general-purpose online AI models. When such content must be processed, only institution-approved, secured and closed AI systems can be used.

Plagiarism and Originality Responsibility

Any texts created by AI must be checked for plagiarism. Authors are responsible for ensuring the originality, proper attribution and ethical use of AI-assisted content. AI outputs may not be directly copied into a manuscript. The author must review them and make any necessary changes to ensure they fit with the scientific framework.

AI Systems Not Listed in Authors

AI tools cannot be listed as authors on a manuscript. All scientific content, evaluations and conclusions in the manuscript are the responsibility of the human authors. Because AI-generated content does not meet international authorship criteria, AI tools can’t be authors.

Disclosure of AI Use

If authors use AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Gemini) for content generation, editing, coding and analytical assistance, this must be clearly stated in an appropriate section of the manuscript (e.g., Methods) or in the section of ethics statement. The statement must include the tool name, version, purpose of use and usage rate. Disclosure is not required when AI tools are used solely for translation, simple language editing or cross-reference checking.

For Reviewers

Protection of Confidential Materials

Reviewers should not upload the manuscript under review —or any supplementary files, figures, tables, datasets or other confidential materials— to any AI system. This restriction applies to online large language models, cloud-based analytical tools and any platform that transmits content to external servers. In accordance with author confidentiality and double-blind review principles, no information obtained during peer review can be transferred to AI models.

Limited Use of AI When Preparing Review Reports

Reviewers can use AI tools solely to improve the linguistic clarity of the review report text that they themselves have written. AI tools cannot be used for scientific assessment, data interpretation or decision-making. Academic evaluations must rely entirely on the reviewer’s expertise.

Responsibility for Review Report Content

Suggestions generated by AI tools should not be accepted automatically; they must be checked and verified by the reviewer. Reviewers are responsible for the content, scientific accuracy and appropriateness of their reports. AI systems can’t replace the reviewer’s expert judgement.

Disclosure of AI Use in Review Reports

If a reviewer uses AI tools when preparing a review report, this should be disclosed to the editor when necessary.

Journal’s Right to Audit

If improper AI use is suspected in a review report, AS reserves the right to investigate, invalidate the report, appoint a new reviewer or request further clarification. These measures aim to ensure transparency and uphold ethical standards in the editorial process.

For Editors

Permissible Uses of AI Tools

Editors may use AI tools for mechanical tasks such as checking the suitability of manuscripts, reviewing formatting, conducting preliminary linguistic screening and drafting cover letters. However, scientific decisions such as desk rejection, returning manuscripts to authors, requesting revisions or acceptance/rejection decisions must rely solely on the editor’s academic judgement.

Insights produced through AI-assisted evaluations (e.g., potential plagiarism and linguistic issues) are only preliminary indicators. They cannot be used directly in decision-making without editor verification. AI tools are assistive in nature and cannot replace editorial expertise.

Data Storage and Confidentiality

When using AI, editors should adhere to the principles of transparency, accountability, and human oversight. Confidential editorial files, unpublished data and reviewer reports should not be uploaded to AI systems. Editors must ensure that any AI platform they use does not use uploaded information for training model or for third-party purposes. All systems must operate solely in accordance with confidentiality agreements and in non-training (closed) modes.

For Readers

Critical Evaluation

Readers should be aware that although AI-based analyses in scientific manuscripts have passed through editorial and peer review filters, it is still important to evaluate the results critically. AS may request disclosure statements from authors regarding AI contributions when necessary. Readers should be aware that AI may be used for formatting, statistical summarization or content refinement, but scientific data, interpretations and conclusions are solely the authors’ responsibility.

Respect for Confidentiality and Copyright

Readers should avoid uploading published papers or datasets in bulk to AI tools for reprocessing, as such actions may violate copyright and confidentiality. Before using published content for model training or commercial data generation, users must consider applicable licensing terms.

For Data Repositories and Libraries

AI-Assisted Metadata and Archival Processing
Data repositories and libraries can use AI tools for tasks such as metadata verification, content classification and archival processing. However, confidential or unpublished materials, as well as user-specific private data cannot be used for AI model training.

Institutional archives and libraries should offer licensing options to prevent papers, datasets or other uploaded materials from being used automatically in AI model training. All AI-based operations and outputs must be subject to human oversight and must not be finalized without human approval.

AI in the Context of Licensing and Copyright

Libraries must clearly and transparently communicate in their policy documents the legal boundaries of AI tools regarding access to licensed resources, text and data mining, bulk data extraction and commercial uses.

Responsible Use of AI-Based Search Engines

When providing AI-based search services, libraries must offer transparent information regarding the model’s training sources, data privacy safeguards, content filtering (e.g., risks of generating inaccurate or fabricated information —hallucinations) and reliability scoring.

Publication Policy

Acarological Studies (AS) is a peer-reviewed, international scientific journal that publishes and promotes research in acarology worldwide. It is a fully open access journal, published continuously by DergiPark for the “Turkish Academic Network and Information Center (ULAKBİM)”, a unit of “The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TÜBİTAK)”. DergiPark provides online hosting services and an editorial workflow management system for academic journals published in Türkiye. The DergiPark project, undertaken by TÜBİTAK – ULAKBİM, is a public service in Türkiye whose mission is the web-based publication of academic journals and the operation of an online journal management system.

All manuscripts submitted for publication in AS will be pre-reviewed by the editor. Manuscripts that fall outside the aims and scope of the journal, are inadequate in terms of language and writing, not original or not sufficient for the requirements of a scientific study, will be rejected or may have revisions requested at this initial stage.

After initial evaluation, the manuscript will be double blind, peer reviewed by at least two independent, expert referees. If there are inconsistencies between the referees, more reviewers will be asked to review the manuscript. The editor will decide on the acceptance or rejection of the manuscript according to the reports of these referees. However, a manuscript may be rejected without external review by the editor if it is considered unacceptable, for example, a manuscript will be rejected without peer review if it does not comply with the instructions for authors or if it is beyond the scope of the journal.

AS uses a plagiarism checker to detect potential plagiarism in the manuscript. If the editor, editorial board member or reviewer detects plagiarism at any stage of the evaluation process, the corresponding author will be immediately notified that the manuscript has been refused. AS utilises the process flow sheets developed by COPE when dealing with cases of potential plagiarism in a submitted manuscript or a published article.

There is almost always similarity between published papers and a new manuscript that cites them but the similarity has to be limited and the works have to be correctly referenced.

The names and e-mail addresses entered in the journal system DergiPark will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party. Responsibility for technical content and for protection of proprietary material rests solely with the author(s) and their organizations and is not the responsibility of the publisher, the journal or its editorial staff.

AS provides full open access to its publications according to the principle that providing scientific research to the public free of charge increases global information sharing. There is no publication fee in AS. The journal does not charge authors any fee for submitting, processing or open access publishing. All published papers in AS are freely available online.

Chief Editor

SD

Salih DOĞAN

Biological Sciences, Animal Systematics and Taxonomy, Acarology, Conservation and Biodiversity, Biology Education

Co-editor

AK

Adem KESKIN

Host-Parasite Interactions, Acarology, Entomology, Parasitology

Section Editors

MN

Mohamed W. NEGM

Acarology in Agriculture, Entomology in Agriculture

EU

Edward A. UECKERMANN

Acarology in Agriculture

İD

İsmail DÖKER

Acarology in Agriculture

SO

Sebahat K. OZMAN-SULLIVAN

Acarology in Agriculture

JK

Jenő KONTSCHÁN

Acarology in Agriculture, Veterinary Parasitology

İÇ

İbrahim ÇAKMAK

Acarology in Agriculture

KM

Kosta Y. MUMCUOĞLU

Acarology, Medical Parasitology

FH

Fabio Akashi HERNANDES

Agricultural, Veterinary and Food Sciences, Acarology in Agriculture

Statistics Editor

KÖ

Kürşad ÖZKAN

Forest Biodiversity, Forestry Biomass and Bioproducts, Forest Ecosystems, Forestry Sciences (Other)

Language Editor

GS

Gregory SULLIVAN

Acarology in Agriculture

Copy & Layout Editors

NB

Naci BAYRAK

Acarology, Education, Instructional Technologies, Science and Mathematics Education, Biology Education

AT

Abdulkadir TAŞDEMIR

Animal Systematics and Taxonomy, Acarology, Animal Physiology-Ecophysiology, Neurosciences, Medical Physiology

GE

Gökhan EREN

Host-Parasite Interactions, Acarology, Parasitology, Medical Parasitology, Veterinary Parasitology

Social & Media Editor

SP

Sedat PER

Biological Sciences, Animal Systematics and Taxonomy, Acarology, Animal Physiology-Ecophysiology

Editorial (Advisory) Board

MB

Mohammad BAGHERI

Acarology in Agriculture

YE

Yunus ESEN

Acarology

SÇ

Sultan ÇOBANOĞLU

Nematology, Acarology in Agriculture, Entomology in Agriculture, Forest Entomology and Forest Protection, Agroforestry

YB

Yunus Ömer BOYACI

Hydrobiology, Freshwater Ecology, Animal Systematics and Taxonomy, Acarology, Aquaculture and Fisheries

FA

Fahad Jaber ALATAWI

Acarology, Entomology in Agriculture, Plant Protection (Other)

NA

Nusret AYYILDIZ

Biological Sciences, Terrestrial Ecology, Acarology, Invertebrate Biology

OE

Orhan ERMAN

Animal Systematics and Taxonomy, Acarology

SB

Sergio BERMUDEZ CASTILLERO

Acarology, Entomology

SK

Serge KREITER

Population Ecology, Animal Systematics and Taxonomy, Oenology and Viticulture, Acarology in Agriculture, Plant Protection (Other), Organic Agriculture

SE

Sergey ERMILOV

Acarology

RA

Rana AKYAZI

Acarology

PA

Philippe AUGER

Acarology

SB

Samuel J. BOLTON

Acarology in Agriculture