Aims: Denture cleaners are commonly used to maintain denture hygiene; however, limited data are available on dentists’ knowledge, awareness, and clinical practices regarding their use. This study aimed to assess dentists’ current levels of knowledge, awareness, and clinical approaches toward denture cleaners.
Methods: A total of 276 dentists participated in this descriptive cross-sectional study. Data were collected using a 19-item online questionnaire. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 25. Descriptive statistics were presented as frequencies and percentages. A one-sample chi-square goodness-of-fit test was used to descriptively assess whether observed response distributions deviated from an equal expected distribution, with the aim of identifying response concentration patterns rather than inferring causality.
Results: A total of 63.0% of participants were aged 36 years or older, and 47.8% had more than 11 years of professional experience in dentistry. Although 68.6% of dentists reported having basic knowledge of denture cleaners, more than half (54.0%) reported a need to improve their knowledge. For several questionnaire items related to clinical practices and recommendations, observed response distributions showed statistically significant deviations from an equal expected distribution (p<0.05), reflecting a concentration of responses in specific categories.
Conclusion: The findings suggest that dentists’ knowledge of denture cleaners may be insufficient to provide patients with optimal guidance. These results highlight the need to strengthen denture hygiene education in undergraduate dental curricula and to support dentists through continuing postgraduate education programs.
Ethics approval The study was carried out with the permission of the Çankırı Karatekin University Ethics Committee (Date: 10/11/2023; Decision No: 10)
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Prosthodontics |
| Journal Section | Research Article |
| Authors | |
| Submission Date | December 17, 2025 |
| Acceptance Date | February 10, 2026 |
| Publication Date | March 10, 2026 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.1844010 |
| IZ | https://izlik.org/JA66JZ66BW |
| Published in Issue | Year 2026 Volume: 8 Issue: 2 |
TR DİZİN ULAKBİM and International Indexes (1b)
Interuniversity Board (UAK) Equivalency: Article published in Ulakbim TR Index journal [10 POINTS], and Article published in other (excuding 1a, b, c) international indexed journal (1d) [5 POINTS]
Note: Our journal is not WOS indexed and therefore is not classified as Q.
You can download Council of Higher Education (CoHG) [Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK)] Criteria) decisions about predatory/questionable journals and the author's clarification text and journal charge policy from your browser. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/3449/file/4924/show
Journal Indexes and Platforms:
TR Dizin ULAKBİM, Google Scholar, Crossref, Worldcat (OCLC), DRJI, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Turkiye Citation Index, Turk Medline, ROAD, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, ASOS Index, General Impact Factor, Scilit.The indexes of the journal's are;
The platforms of the journal's are;
|
The indexes/platforms of the journal are;
TR Dizin Ulakbim, Crossref (DOI), Google Scholar, EuroPub, Directory of Research Journal İndexing (DRJI), Worldcat (OCLC), OpenAIRE, ASOS Index, ROAD, Turkiye Citation Index, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, Turk Medline, General Impact Factor, Scilit
Journal articles are evaluated as "Double-Blind Peer Review"
All articles published in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND)