Aims: To compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), derived patellar height indices, the Insall-Salvati Index (ISI), BlackburnePeel Ratio (BPR), and Caton-Deschamps Index (CDI) between adults with Osgood Schlatter disease (OSD) and matched controls, and to determine whether plateau-based indices (BPR, CDI) provide more anatomically reliable assessment of patellar height on MRI than the tuberosity-based ISI in the presence of tibial tuberosity distortion.
Methods: In this retrospective study, 350 adults were evaluated, including 175 patients with radiologically confirmed OSD and 175 age- and sex-matched controls. Knee MRI examinations were reviewed using standardized sagittal T1-weighted sequences. Patellar height was assessed using ISI, BPR, and CDI measured independently by two blinded radiologists.
Results: Median ISI, BPR, and CDI values were significantly higher in the OSD group (ISI: 1.13 vs. 1.00; BPR: 1.17 vs. 1.00; CDI: 1.23 vs. 1.00; all p<0.001), indicating a consistent pattern of patella alta in individuals with OSD. ISI demonstrated elevated values consistent with patella alta, whereas the plateau-based indices (BPR and CDI) likewise showed significantly greater patellar height in the OSD group. Age and sex distribution did not differ between groups (p>0.05).
Conclusion: Adults with OSD exhibit significantly increased patellar height across all MRI-derived indices. In the presence of tibial tuberosity distortion, plateau-based indices (BPR and CDI), which reference stable anatomical landmarks and are validated in normal populations, represent a more anatomically robust option for MRI-based patellar height assessment than the ISI.
: Osgood-Schlatter disease Insall-Salvati Index blackburne-peel ratio caton-deschamps index MRI patella alta
This retrospective study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of [Ankara Bilkent City Hospital] (Approval No: [TABED 2-25-1738]).
None
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Radiology and Organ Imaging |
| Journal Section | Research Article |
| Authors | |
| Submission Date | January 3, 2026 |
| Acceptance Date | February 6, 2026 |
| Publication Date | March 10, 2026 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.1855387 |
| IZ | https://izlik.org/JA65NZ95MM |
| Published in Issue | Year 2026 Volume: 8 Issue: 2 |
TR DİZİN ULAKBİM and International Indexes (1b)
Interuniversity Board (UAK) Equivalency: Article published in Ulakbim TR Index journal [10 POINTS], and Article published in other (excuding 1a, b, c) international indexed journal (1d) [5 POINTS]
Note: Our journal is not WOS indexed and therefore is not classified as Q.
You can download Council of Higher Education (CoHG) [Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK)] Criteria) decisions about predatory/questionable journals and the author's clarification text and journal charge policy from your browser. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/3449/file/4924/show
Journal Indexes and Platforms:
TR Dizin ULAKBİM, Google Scholar, Crossref, Worldcat (OCLC), DRJI, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Turkiye Citation Index, Turk Medline, ROAD, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, ASOS Index, General Impact Factor, Scilit.The indexes of the journal's are;
The platforms of the journal's are;
|
The indexes/platforms of the journal are;
TR Dizin Ulakbim, Crossref (DOI), Google Scholar, EuroPub, Directory of Research Journal İndexing (DRJI), Worldcat (OCLC), OpenAIRE, ASOS Index, ROAD, Turkiye Citation Index, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, Turk Medline, General Impact Factor, Scilit
Journal articles are evaluated as "Double-Blind Peer Review"
All articles published in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND)