Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Perinatal outcomes in pregnancies with and without polycystic ovary syndrome assessed by the Composite Adverse Perinatal Outcome score: a propensity score–matched retrospective study

Year 2026, Volume: 8 Issue: 2, 283 - 290, 10.03.2026
https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.1858024
https://izlik.org/JA95SP58KJ

Abstract

Aims: To quantify severity-weighted perinatal morbidity in pregnancies complicated by polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) using the Composite Adverse Perinatal Outcome (CAPO) score and to assess robustness after propensity score matching and BMI-focused sensitivity analyses.
Methods: We conducted a two-center retrospective cohort study (January 2022-October 2025). Among 3.616 eligible singleton deliveries, 318 (8.8%) had documented PCOS. Propensity scores were estimated using maternal age, gravidity, parity, prior abortion/miscarriage, and prior curettage. Using 1:1 nearest neighbor matching (caliper 0.2 SD logit), 262 PCOS pregnancies were matched to 262 controls. CAPO total and subscores were compared in matched pairs; BMI-adjusted conditional regression was performed. Sensitivity analyses included BMI-stratified comparisons and BMI-inclusive rematching.
Results: In the matched cohort (n=524), CAPO total scores were higher in PCOS pregnancies (median [IQR] 150 [0-280] vs 75 [0–200]; p=0.004), and CAPO>0 occurred more frequently (45.0% vs 36.3%; p=0.02). PCOS remained associated with higher CAPO after BMI adjustment (β=+40.2; 95% CI 14.3-66.1; p=0.003). PCOS pregnancies had higher rates of severe preeclampsia, postpartum hemorrhage, preterm birth, low birth weight, and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission >24 h. Under BMI-inclusive matching, 244 pairs were retained with balanced BMI (SMD=0.04); CAPO differences were attenuated but persisted (p=0.045; β=+22.5, p=0.024).
Conclusion: PCOS pregnancies show a higher severity-weighted perinatal morbidity burden by CAPO, distributed across hypertensive and prematurity-linked outcomes. Associations persisted after BMI adjustment and conservative BMI-inclusive sensitivity analyses, suggesting that adiposity explains part but not all-of the excess morbidity signal.

Ethical Statement

This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of Yozgat Bozok University (Approval Date: 03/12/2025, Approval Number: 2025-GOKAEK-2521_2025.12.03_828). The requirement for informed consent was waived by the ethics committee due to the retrospective design and use of anonymized data.

Supporting Institution

No funding

References

  • Azziz R, Carmina E, Chen Z, et al. Polycystic ovary syndrome. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16057. doi:10.1038/nrdp.2016.57
  • Teede HJ, Misso ML, Costello MF, et al. International evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(9):1602-1618. doi:10.1093/humrep/dey256
  • Diamanti-Kandarakis E, Dunaif A. Insulin resistance and the polycystic ovary syndrome revisited: an update on mechanisms and implications. Endocr Rev. 2012;33(6):981-1030. doi:10.1210/er.2011-1034
  • Roos N, Kieler H, Sahlin L, Ekman-Ordeberg G, Falconer H, Stephansson O. Risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: population-based cohort study. BMJ. 2011; 343:d6309. doi:10.1136/bmj.d6309
  • Bahri Khomami M, Joham AE, Boyle JA, et al. Increased maternal pregnancy complications in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a population-based cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2019;34(5):911-919.
  • Palomba S, de Wilde MA, Falbo A, Koster MPH, La Sala GB, Fauser BCJM. Pregnancy complications in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod Update. 2015;21(5):575-592. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmv029
  • Qin JZ, Pang LH, Li MJ, Fan XJ, Huang RD, Chen HY. Obstetric complications in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2013;11:56. doi:10. 1186/1477-7827-11-56
  • Kjerulff LE, Sanchez-Ramos L, Duffy D. Pregnancy outcomes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204(6):558.e1-558.e6. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2011.03.021
  • Lauritsen MP, Bentzen JG, Pinborg A, et al. The influence of body mass index on pregnancy outcome in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(8):1838-1846.
  • Silver RM, Varner MW, Reddy U, et al. Work-up of stillbirth: a review of the evidence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196(5):433-444. doi:10.1016/ j.ajog.2006.11.041
  • Mann S, Pratt S, Gluck P, et al. Assessing quality in obstetrical care: development of standardized measures. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2006;32(9):497-505. doi:10.1016/s1553-7250(06)32065-x
  • Peng Y, Zhang J, Liu X, et al. Enhancing perinatal outcome evaluation with the Composite Adverse Perinatal Outcome (CAPO) score: a modified Delphi consensus study. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2025;170(2):733-740. doi:10.1002/ijgo.70073
  • Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS consensus workshop group. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Hum Reprod. 2004;19(1):41-47. doi:10.1093/humrep/deh098
  • Yu HF, Chen HS, Rao DP, Gong J. Association between polycystic ovary syndrome and the risk of pregnancy complications: a PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(51):e4863. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000004863
  • Bahri Khomami M, Hashemi S, Shorakae S, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of birth outcomes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):5592. doi:10.1038/s41467-024-49752-6
  • Ban M, Sun Y, Chen X, Zhou X, Zhang Y, Cui L. Association between maternal polycystic ovarian syndrome undergoing assisted reproductive technology and pregnancy complications and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Ovarian Res. 2024;17(1):6. doi:10. 1186/s13048-023-01331-x
  • Farland LV, Stern JE, Liu CL, et al. Polycystic ovary syndrome and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes: a registry linkage study from Massachusetts. Hum Reprod. 2022;37(11):2690-2699. doi:10.1093/humrep/deac210
  • Naver KV, Grinsted J, Larsen SO, et al. Increased risk of preterm delivery and pre-eclampsia in women with polycystic ovary syndrome and hyperandrogenaemia. BJOG. 2014;121(5):575-581. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.12558
  • de Wilde MA, Lamain-de Ruiter M, Veltman-Verhulst SM, et al. Increased rates of complications in singleton pregnancies of women previously diagnosed with polycystic ovary syndrome predominantly in the hyperandrogenic phenotype. Fertil Steril. 2017;108(2):333-340. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.06.015
  • Valdimarsdottir R, Vanky E, Elenis E, et al. Polycystic ovary syndrome and risk of pre-eclampsia: a national register-based cohort study. BJOG. 2024;131(7):985-995. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.17734
  • Bajuk Studen K, Pfeifer M. Cardiometabolic risk in polycystic ovary syndrome. Endocr Connect. 2018;7(7):R238-R251. doi:10.1530/EC-18-0129
  • Xiang C, Sui L, Ding X, Cao M, Li G, Du Z. Maternal adiposity measures and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024;24(1):675. doi:10.1186/s12884-024-06788-2
  • Lim SS, Davies MJ, Norman RJ, Moran LJ. Overweight, obesity and central obesity in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2012;18(6):618-637. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dms030
  • Sterling L, Liu J, Okun N, Sakhuja A, Sierra S, Greenblatt E. Pregnancy outcomes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(3):791-797.e2. doi:10.1016/ j.fertnstert.2015.11.019
  • Bahri Khomami M, Joham AE, Boyle JA, et al. Increased maternal pregnancy complications in polycystic ovary syndrome appear to be independent of obesity-a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Obes Rev. 2019;20(5):659-674. doi:10.1111/obr.12829
  • Guan C, Zahid S, Minhas AS, et al. Polycystic ovary syndrome: a "risk-enhancing" factor for cardiovascular disease. Fertil Steril. 2022;117(5): 924-935. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.03.009
  • Subramanian A, Lee SI, Phillips K, et al. Polycystic ovary syndrome and risk of adverse obstetric outcomes: a retrospective population-based matched cohort study in England. BMC Med. 2022;20(1):298. doi:10. 1186/s12916-022-02473-3
  • Chen X, Gissler M, Lavebratt C. Association of maternal polycystic ovary syndrome and diabetes with preterm birth and offspring birth size: a population-based cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2022;37(6):1311-1323. doi:10.1093/humrep/deac050
  • Herman D, Lor KY, Qadree A, Horn D, D'Souza R. Composite adverse outcomes in obstetric studies: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):107. doi:10.1186/s12884-021-03588-w
  • Dall'Asta A, Stampalija T, Mecacci F, et al. Ultrasound prediction of adverse perinatal outcome at diagnosis of late-onset fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022;59(3):342-349. doi:10.1002/uog.23714
There are 30 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Melisa Gölgelioğlu 0000-0002-0008-4078

Halenur Öner Soy This is me 0009-0005-6413-0677

Nuseybe Artıran This is me 0000-0001-8431-6122

Submission Date January 7, 2026
Acceptance Date February 9, 2026
Publication Date March 10, 2026
DOI https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.1858024
IZ https://izlik.org/JA95SP58KJ
Published in Issue Year 2026 Volume: 8 Issue: 2

Cite

AMA 1.Gölgelioğlu M, Soy HÖ, Artıran N. Perinatal outcomes in pregnancies with and without polycystic ovary syndrome assessed by the Composite Adverse Perinatal Outcome score: a propensity score–matched retrospective study. Anatolian Curr Med J / ACMJ / acmj. 2026;8(2):283-290. doi:10.38053/acmj.1858024

TR DİZİN ULAKBİM and International Indexes (1b)

Interuniversity Board (UAK) Equivalency:  Article published in Ulakbim TR Index journal [10 POINTS], and Article published in other (excuding 1a, b, c) international indexed journal (1d) [5 POINTS]

Note: Our journal is not WOS indexed and therefore is not classified as Q.

You can download Council of Higher Education (CoHG) [Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK)] Criteria) decisions about predatory/questionable journals and the author's clarification text and journal charge policy from your browser. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/3449/file/4924/show

Journal Indexes and Platforms: 

TR Dizin ULAKBİM, Google Scholar, Crossref, Worldcat (OCLC), DRJI, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Turkiye Citation Index, Turk Medline, ROAD, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, ASOS Index, General Impact Factor, Scilit.


The indexes of the journal's are;

18596


asos-index.png

f9ab67f.png

WorldCat_Logo_H_Color.png

      logo-large-explore.png

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQgDnBwx0yUPRKuetgIurtELxYERFv20CPAUcPe4jYrrJiwXzac8rGXlzd57gl8iikb1Tk&usqp=CAU

index_copernicus.jpg


84039476_619085835534619_7808805634291269632_n.jpg





The platforms of the journal's are;

COPE.jpg

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTbq2FM8NTdXECzlOUCeKQ1dvrISFL-LhxhC7zy1ZQeJk-GGKSx2XkWQvrsHxcfhtfHWxM&usqp=CAUicmje_1_orig.png


ncbi.png

ORCID_logo.pngimages?q=tbn:ANd9GcQlwX77nfpy3Bu9mpMBZa0miWT2sRt2zjAPJKg2V69ODTrjZM1nT1BbhWzTVPsTNKJMZzQ&usqp=CAU


images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTaWSousoprPWGwE-qxwxGH2y0ByZ_zdLMN-Oq93MsZpBVFOTfxi9uXV7tdr39qvyE-U0I&usqp=CAU






The
 
indexes/platforms of the journal are;

TR Dizin Ulakbim, Crossref (DOI), Google Scholar, EuroPub, Directory of Research Journal İndexing (DRJI), Worldcat (OCLC), OpenAIRE, ASOS Index, ROAD, Turkiye Citation Index, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, Turk Medline, General Impact Factor, Scilit 


Journal articles are evaluated as "Double-Blind Peer Review"

All articles published in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND)