The Mindful Coping Scale: The Validity And Reliability Of Turkish Version

Zeynep Akkuş Çutuk; Tuğba Türk

doi:10.31592/aeusbed.591719

The Mindful Coping Scale: The Validity And Reliability Of Turkish Version

Öz

In this study, it was aimed to make validity and reliability analyses by adapting the mindful coping scale into Turkish. The scale was enhanced by Tharaldsena and Bruc (2011). The sample group consisted of 283 high school students in the adaptation study. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was implemented for construct validity of the scale. DFA results showed that chi-square value (x² = 639.87, N = 283, df = 221, p = 0.00) was significant. Fit index values were found to be RMSEA=.076, CFI=.88, IFI=.88, GFI=.85, SRMR=.074. The reliability of the scale was calculated by Cronbach’s Alpha Coefficient and Item Total Correlation Coefficient. The Cronbach’s Alpha Internal Consistency Reliability Coefficient of the mindful coping scale was found to be .71 for the awareness sub-dimension, .79 for the distraction sub-dimension, .72 for the negative emotion prevention sub-dimension, and .71 for the self-revealing sub-dimension. It was determined that the Mindful Coping Scale of Item-Total Correlations was .31-.57 for the awareness sub-dimension, .33-.69 for the distraction sub-dimension, .38-.53 for the sub-dimension of prevention of negative emotions, that it ranged from 38 to .59 for constructive self-assertion sub-dimension. According to the results of the study, it can be said that mindful coping scale is a valid and reliable.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Mindful coping,validity and reliability

Kaynakça

Alidina, S. (2010). Mindfulness for dummies. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
Alidina,S. ve Marshall, J.J. (2013). Mindfulness workbook for dummies. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
Averill, J. R. (1992). The structural bases of emotional behavior: A metatheoretical analysis. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 1–24.
Bedel, A., Işık, E. ve Hamarta, E. (2014). Ergenler İçin Başa Çıkma Ölçeğinin (EBÇÖ) geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması, Eğitim ve Bilim, 39(176), 227-235.
Bishop, S.R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N.D., Carmody, J…………& Devins, G. (2004). Mindfulness: A proposed operatiınal definition. Clinical psychology: Science and Practice, 11: 230-241.
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2015). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı (Genişletilmiş 21. baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of personality and social psychology, 84(4), 822-848.
Brown, K. W., Ryan, R. M., & Creswell, J. D. 2007. Mindfulness: Theoretical foundations and evidence for its salutary effects. Psychological Inquiry, 18: 211-237.

Bruna, J. (2018). The essential guidebook to mındfulness in recovery. Las Vegas: Central Recovery Press.
Germer, C. K. (2005a). Mindfulness: What is it? What does it matter? In C. K. Germer, R. D. Siegel, & P. R. Fulton (Eds.), Mindfulness and psychotherapy (pp. 3–27). New York: Guilford Press.
Germer, C. K. (2005b). Teaching mindfulness in therapy. In C. K. Germer, R. D. Sie-gel, & P. R. Fulton (Eds.), Mindfulness and psychotherapy (pp. 113–129). New York: Guilford Press.
Halland, E., De Vibe, M., Solhaug, I., Friborg, O., Rosenvinge, J. H., Tyssen, R., ... & Bjørndal, A. (2015). Mindfulness training improves problem-focused coping in psychology and medical students: Results from a randomized controlled trial. College Student Journal, 49(3), 387-398.
Harvey, P. (2000). An introduction to Buddhist ethics: Foundations, values and issues. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hu, L. T. ve Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structural analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 55-65.
Jacobs, S. J., & Blustein, D. L. (2008). Mindfulness as a coping mechanism for employment uncertainty. The Career Development Quarterly, 57(2), 174-180.
Kabat-Zinn, J. (2001). Mindfulness meditation in everyday life. London: Piatkus Books.
Kabat‐Zinn, J. (2003). Mindfulness‐based interventions in context: past, present, and future. Clinical psychology: Science and practice, 10(2), 144-156.
Marcoulides, G. ve Schumacher, R. (2001). New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Assocıates, Publishers.
Mayer, J. D., Chabot, H. F., & Carlsmith, K. (1997). Conation, affect, and cognition in personality. In G. Matthews (Ed.), Cognitive science perspectives on personality and emotion (pp. 31–63). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Seçer, İ. (2015). Psikolojik test geliştirme ve uyarlama süreci. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
Schermelleh, Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods Of Psychological Research Online, Volume: 8 (2), pp: 23-74.
Schumacher, R. ve Lomax, R. (2004). A beginner’s guide to structual equation modelling. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Assocıates, Publishers.
Şimşek, Ö.F. (2007). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş temel ilkeler ve lisrel uygulamaları, Ankara: Ekinoks Yayınları.
Tharaldsena, K.B. ve Bruc, E. (2011). Validation of the mindful coping scale. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 16(1), 87-103.
Thondup, T. (1996). The healing power of mind. London, UK: Penguin.
Westen, D. (1999). Psychology: mind, brain, and culture (2nd ed). New York: Wiley.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

-

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Zeynep Akkuş Çutuk Bu kişi benim
0000-0001-8364-4431
Türkiye

Tuğba Türk
0000-0002-4361-3769
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

24 Aralık 2019

Gönderilme Tarihi

14 Temmuz 2019

Kabul Tarihi

22 Kasım 2019

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2019 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31592/aeusbed.591719

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA94ZD55RR

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Akkuş Çutuk, Z., & Türk, T. (2019). The Mindful Coping Scale: The Validity And Reliability Of Turkish Version. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5(2), 299-311. https://doi.org/10.31592/aeusbed.591719

AMA

1.Akkuş Çutuk Z, Türk T. The Mindful Coping Scale: The Validity And Reliability Of Turkish Version. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2019;5(2):299-311. doi:10.31592/aeusbed.591719

Chicago

Akkuş Çutuk, Zeynep, ve Tuğba Türk. 2019. “The Mindful Coping Scale: The Validity And Reliability Of Turkish Version”. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 5 (2): 299-311. https://doi.org/10.31592/aeusbed.591719.

EndNote

Akkuş Çutuk Z, Türk T (01 Aralık 2019) The Mindful Coping Scale: The Validity And Reliability Of Turkish Version. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 5 2 299–311.

IEEE

[1]Z. Akkuş Çutuk ve T. Türk, “The Mindful Coping Scale: The Validity And Reliability Of Turkish Version”, Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, c. 5, sy 2, ss. 299–311, Ara. 2019, doi: 10.31592/aeusbed.591719.

ISNAD

Akkuş Çutuk, Zeynep - Türk, Tuğba. “The Mindful Coping Scale: The Validity And Reliability Of Turkish Version”. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 5/2 (01 Aralık 2019): 299-311. https://doi.org/10.31592/aeusbed.591719.

JAMA

1.Akkuş Çutuk Z, Türk T. The Mindful Coping Scale: The Validity And Reliability Of Turkish Version. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2019;5:299–311.

MLA

Akkuş Çutuk, Zeynep, ve Tuğba Türk. “The Mindful Coping Scale: The Validity And Reliability Of Turkish Version”. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, c. 5, sy 2, Aralık 2019, ss. 299-11, doi:10.31592/aeusbed.591719.

Vancouver

1.Zeynep Akkuş Çutuk, Tuğba Türk. The Mindful Coping Scale: The Validity And Reliability Of Turkish Version. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 01 Aralık 2019;5(2):299-311. doi:10.31592/aeusbed.591719

Cited By

Amor Fati, Mindful Coping, and Psychological Adjustment in Adults: A Test of a Mediation Model

Journal of Humanistic Psychology

https://doi.org/10.1177/00221678251318769