Öğretmen ve Öğrencilerin Tablet Bilgisayar Kullanımında Yaşadıkları Sorunlar ve Çözüm Önerileri

Abstract

The study aims to determine the problems that are encountered by the teachers and students of high education institutions while using tablet PCs and to develop solution suggestions for these problems. In the study which is conducted as a survey model, the data is categorized by content analysis method. Study group for this research is composed of high educated teachers from different branches (f=47) actively using tablet PCs in the lectures and their students (f=286). As result of the analysis carried out in this research which was performed in this direction, it has been seen that teachers and students evaluate the problems related with tablet PCs under the following five sub-dimensions: problems encountered during learning-teaching process, problems related with hardware, problems related with software, problems related with the context, problems in view of ergonomics and health, and they propose solution suggestions in accordance with these problems. The most common problems that are faced, concerning the usage of the tablet PCs, are the software, context and internet restrictions which limit efficiency, unavailability of suitable materials for lectures, and lack of precautions against insufficient knowledge and skills. Leading solution alternatives suggested by the participants as regards the problems are; needs for lifting restrictions on software and internet, needs for developing appropriate lecture materials, needs for comprehensive training of teachers and students, needs for a fast solution for the existing hardware and software problems.

Keywords

• Tablet PCs
• Tablet PCs Aided Instruction
• Technology Based Instruction
• Information Technology
• FATİH Project

Öğretmen ve Öğrencilerin Tablet Bilgisayar Kullanımında Yaşadıkları Sorunlar ve Çözüm Önerileri

Abstract

Gerçekleştirilen çalışmada ortaöğretim kurumlarında görev yapan öğretmen ve bu kurumlarda öğrenim gören öğrencilerin tablet bilgisayar kullanımı sırasında karşılaştıkları sorunların ve bu sorunlara ilişkin çözüm önerilerinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Tarama modelinde tasarlanan araştırmada veriler, içerik analizi ile çözümlenerek kategorize edilmiştir. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu, tablet bilgisayarları aktif olarak derslerinde kullanan farklı branş öğretmenleri (f=47) ve öğrencileri (f=286) oluşturmuştur. Bu kapsamda gerçekleştirilen çalışmada yapılan analizler sonucunda öğretmen ve öğrencilerin tablet bilgisayarlara ilişkin sorunları; öğrenme-öğretme sürecinde yaşanan sorunlar, donanıma yönelik sorunlar, yazılıma yönelik sorunlar, ders içeriklerine yönelik sorunlar, ergonomi ve sağlık açısından yaşanan sorunlar olmak üzere beş alt boyutta ele aldıkları ve bu doğrultuda çözüm önerileri sundukları belirlenmiştir. Tablet bilgisayarlara yönelik öğretmen ve öğrencilerin karşılaştıkları sorunların başında kısıtlamaların (yazılım, içerik ve internet) etkin kullanımı sınırlandırması, derslere uygun materyal bulunamaması, kullanıma yönelik yetersiz bilgi ve becerilere yönelik tedbir alınamaması yer almaktadır. Yaşanan sorunlara ilişkin katılımcıların öne çıkan çözüm önerileri ise; yazılım ve internete yönelik kısıtlamaların kaldırılması gerektiği, uygun ders materyalleri geliştirilmesi gerektiği, öğretmen ve öğrencilere yönelik kapsamlı eğitimler verilmesi gerektiği, yaşanan donanımsal ve yazılımsal sorunların kısa zamanda çözülmesi gerektiği şeklindedir.

Keywords

• Tablet Bilgisayar
• Tablet Bilgisayar Destekli Öğretim
• Teknoloji Temelli Öğretim
• Bilişim Teknolojileri
• FATİH Projesi

References

1. http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/health/ipads-tablets-eye-problems
2. Amelink, C., Scales, G., & Tront, J. (2012). Student use of the Tablet PC: Impact on student learning
3. behaviors. Advances In Engineering Education, 3(1), 1-17. Baysal, U. (2011). Elektromanyetik alanların sağlık etkilerinin değerlendirilmesi. Elektromanyetik
4. Alanlar ve Etkileri Sempozyumu (258-261), Ezgi Matbaacılık, İstanbul. BBC (2011). Digital textbooks open a new chapter. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-15175962
5. adresinden 20.06.2013 tarihinde alınmıştır. Bozdoğan, A., & Uzoğlu, M. (2012). The development of a scale of attitudes toward tablet pc. Mevlana
6. International Journal Of Education, 2(2), 85-95. CHS (2007). WiFi in public libraries in Paris: Moratorium. The hygiene and security committee of Paris city’s
7. up.org/pdf/France2WiFiInPublicLibrariesInParisMoratorium30112007.pdf
8. 02013 tarihinde alınmıştır. voted this measure. http://www.next- adresinden Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. C. (2007). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for

9. developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication. Council of Europe (2011). The potential dangers of electromagnetic fields and their effect on the
10. environment. http://assembly.coe.int/ASP/Doc/XrefViewPDF.asp?FileID=13137&Language=en
11. adresinden 20.06.2013 tarihinde alınmıştır. Dağtaş, A. (2013). Öğretmenlerin Basılı Sayfa ve Ekrandan Okuma Tercihleri İle Eğitimde Elektronik
12. Metin Kullanımına Yönelik Görüşleri. Electronic Turkish Studies, 8(3), 137-161. Dallas, M. E. (2012).
13. Health Day. Overloaded Backpacks Can Injure Kids: Experts.
14. http://consumer.healthday.com/Article.asp?AID=667521 adresinden 21.06.2013 tarihinde alınmıştır. Dundar, H., & Akcayir, M. (2012). Tablet vs. Paper: The Effect on Learners' Reading Performance.
15. International Electronic Journal Of Elementary Education, 4(3), 441-450. Durusoy, R., Hassoy, H., Karababa, A. O., & Özkurt, A. (2011). Bornova’da 2150 lise öğrencisinin cep telefonu kullanımı ve ilişkili semptomlar. Elektromanyetik Alanlar ve Etkileri Sempozyumu
16. (203-207). Ezgi Matbaacılık, İstanbul. El-Gayar, O., Moran, M., & Hawkes, M. (2011). Students' Acceptance of Tablet PCs and Implications
17. for Educational Institutions. Educational Technology & Society, 14(2), 58-70. Ellington, A. J., Wilson, J. H., & Nugent, J. S. (2011). Use of Tablet PCs to Enhance Instruction and
18. Promote Group Collaboration in a Course to Prepare Future Mathematics Specialists.
19. Mathematics And Computer Education, 45(2), 92-105. EMANET (2011). Elektromanyetik alanlar ve etkileri sempozyumu sonuç bildirgesi. Elektromanyetik
20. Alanlar ve Etkileri Sempozyumu (275-277), Ezgi Matbaacılık, İstanbul. Enriquez, A. G. (2010). Enhancing student performance using tablet computers. College Teaching, 58(3), 77-84. Ferrer, F. F., Belvi´s, E. E., & Pa`mies, J. J. (2011). Tablet PCs, academic results and educational
21. inequalities. Computers & Education, 56(1), 280-288. Fister, K., & McCarthy, M. L. (2008). Mathematics Instruction and the Tablet PC. International Journal
22. Of Mathematical Education In Science And Technology, 39(3), 285-292. Galligan, L., Loch, B., McDonald, C., & Taylor, J. A. (2010). The Use of Tablet and Related
23. Technologies in Mathematics Teaching. Australian Senior Mathematics Journal, 24(1), 38-51. German Federal Government, (2007). Radiation exposure due to wireless Internet-Networks (WLAN).
24. http://www.icems.eu/docs/deutscher_bundestag.pdf alınmıştır. adresinden 23.06.2013 tarihinde Gorgievski, N., Stroud, R., Truxaw, M., & DeFranco, T. (2005). Tablet PC: A Preliminary Report on a
25. Tool for Teaching Calculus. International Journal For Technology In Mathematics Education,
26. 12(3), 95-102. Gök, T. (2012). Real-Time Assessment of Problem-Solving of Physics Students Using Computer-Based
27. Technology. Hacettepe University Journal Of Education, 43, 210-221. Grzybowski, M. (2013). Educational Technologies in South Korea. General and Professional Education. 1/2013, 3-9. Hawkes, M., & Hategekimana, C. (2009). Impacts of Mobile Computing on Student Learning in the
28. University: A Comparison of Course Assessment Data. Journal of Educational Technology
29. Systems, 38(1), 63-74. Heinen, K. (2007). WLAN is to be
30. http://omega.twoday.net/stories/3974159/ adresinden 22.05.2013 tarihinde alınmıştır. banished from the school sphere. Hieb, J. L., & Ralston, P. S. (2010). Tablet PCs in Engineering Mathematics Courses at the J.B. Speed
31. School of Engineering. International Journal Of Mathematical Education In Science And
32. Technology, 41(4), 487-500. Horton, L. M., Kim, K., Kothaneth, S., & Amelink, C. T. (2011). Macroergonomics analysis of
33. instructional technology diffusion: A case study on Tablet PC adoption. Virginia, ABD: Virginia
34. Tech College of Engineering. Ivanova, A., & Smrikarov, A. (2009). The new generations of students and the future of e-learning in
35. higher education. International Conference on e-Learning and the Knowledge Society - e
36. Learning’09. Europeun Commission, Berlin, Germany. Jones, J. L., & Sinclair, B. (2011). Assessment on the go: Surveying students with an iPad. Journal of
37. Library Innovation, 2(2), 22-35. Karasar, N. (2008). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi (18.Baskı). Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara. Keser, H., & Çetinkaya, L. (2013). Öğretmen ve Öğrencilerin Etkileşimli Tahta Kullanımına Yönelik
38. Sorunları ve Çözüm Önerileri. Electronic Turkish Studies, 8(6), 377- 403. Koile, K., & Singer, D. (2006). Development of a Tablet-PC-based System to Increase Instructor
39. Student Classroom Interactions and Student Learning. In D. Berque, J. Prey, and R. Reed
40. (editors), The Impact of Pen-based Technology on Education: Vignettes, Evaluations, and
41. Future Directions, Purdue University Press. p115-122. Kowalski, S. E., Kowalski, F. V., & Gardner, T. Q. (2009). Lessons learned when gathering real-time
42. formative assessment in the university classroom using Tablet PCs. 39th ASEE/IEEE
43. Frontiers in Education Conference, San Antonio, TX. Lanir, L. (2012). Decoded Science. Digital Information Overload Overwhelms and Distracts Students.
44. http://www.decodedscience.com/digital-information-overload-overwhelms-and-distracts
45. students/19798 adresinden 18.06.2013 tarihinde alınmıştır. Le Ber, J., Lombardo, N., & Quilter, J. (2008). Tablet PC use enhances teaching and student learning.
46. Journal of Electronic Resources In Medical Libraries, 5(1), 17-31. Loch, B., Galligan, L., Hobohm, C., & McDonald, C. (2011). Learner-centred mathematics and statistics
47. education using netbook tablet PCs. International Journal of Mathematical Education in
48. Science & Technology, 42(7), 939-949. Maxwell, J. A. (1996). Qualitative research design: An interpretative approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage MEB (2011). Eğitimde FATİH Projesi Çalıştayı.
49. http://fatihprojesi.meb.gov.tr/site/haberincele.php?id=12 adresinden 09.01.2013 tarihinde alınmıştır. Mendelsohn, T. (2012).
50. The Independent. Ten great free education apps for the
51. iPad. http://www.independent.co.uk/student/student-life/technology-gaming/ten-great-free
52. education-apps-for-the-ipad-6297153.htm adresinden 19.05.2013 tarihinde alınmıştır. Mills, M. (2012). PBS. National PBS Survey Finds Teachers Want More Access to Classroom Tech.
53. http://www.pbs.org/about/news/archive/2012/teacher-survey-fetc/ adresinden 19.05.2013
54. tarihinde alınmıştır. Moran, M. M., Hawkes, M. M., & El Gayar, O. O. (2010). Tablet personal computer integration in
55. higher education: applying the unified theory of acceptance and use technology model to
56. understand supporting factors. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 42(1), 79-101. Mulholland, J. B. (2011). IPads strengthen education. Government Technology, 24(4), 20-24. Ni, K. (2013).
57. The Epoch Times. Managing the Transition to Digital Textbooks.
58. http://www.theepochtimes.com/n2/united-states/managing-the-transition-to-digital
59. textbooks-344930.html adresinden 19.06.2013 tarihinde alınmıştır. Nie, M., Armellini, A., Witthaus, G., & Barklamb, K. (2011) How do e-book readers enhance learning
60. opportunities for distance work-based learners?. Research in Learning Technology, 19(1), 19- 38. Phillips, P., & Loch, B. (2011). Building Lectures and Building Bridges with Socio-Economically
61. Disadvantaged Students. Educational Technology & Society, 14(3), 240-251. PPS (2011). Parent suing portland, oregon public school system indistrict court citing breach of 14th
62. amendment right to choice by installing wifi. http://media.withtank.com/b5e48bb89c.pdf
63. adresinden 23.05.2013 tarihinde alınmıştır. Price, E., & Simon, B. (2009). Ubiquitous Presenter: A Tablet PC-Based System to Support Instructors
64. and Students. Physics Teacher, 47(9), 570-573. Rawat, K. S., Riddick, G. B., & Moore, L. J. (2008). Work in progress-integrating mobile tablet-PC
65. technology and classroom management software in undergraduate electronic engineering
66. technology courses. 38th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, Saratoga Springs, NY. Rogers, J. W., & Cox, J. R. (2008). Integrating a Single Tablet PC in Chemistry, Engineering, and
67. Physics Courses. Journal of College Science Teaching, 37(3), 34-39. Romney, C. A. (2010). Tablet PCs in undergraduate mathematics. 40th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in
68. Education, Washington, DC. Romney, C. A. (2011). Tablet PC use in freshman mathematics classes promotes STEM retention. 41
69. th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Rapid City, SD. Roschelle, J., Tatar, D., Chaudhury, S., Dimitriadis, Y., Patton, C., & DiGiano, C. (2007). Ink,
70. Improvisation, and Interactive Engagement: Learning with Tablets. Computer, 40(9), 42-48. Rosenfield M. (2011). Computer vision syndrome: a review of ocular causes and potential
71. treatments. Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics, 31(5), 502–515. Russian National Committee, (2008). Children and mobile phones: the health of the following
72. generations is in danger.
73. adresinden 24.05.2013 tarihinde alınmıştır. http://www.radiationresearch.org/pdfs/rncnirp_children.pdf Schroer, W. J. (2008). Generations X, Y, Z and the Others. The Journal of the Household Goods
74. Forwarders Association of America Inc., XL, 9-11. Shurtz, S., Halling, T. D., & McKay, B. (2011). Assessing user preferences to circulate iPads in an
75. Academic Medical Library. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 8(4), 311-324. Siozos, P., Palaigeorgiou, G., Triantafyllakos, G., & Despotakis, T. (2009). Computer based testing
76. using “digital ink”: Participatory design of a Tablet PC based assessment application for
77. secondary education. Computers & Education, 52(4), 811-819. Sneller, J. (2007). The tablet PC classroom: Erasing borders, stimulating activity, enhancing
78. communication. 37th Annual ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference Prooceeding Book,
79. (S3J-6- S3J-10). Stickel, M. students
80. Frontiers in Education Conference, San Antonio, TX. with styles. PC on different learning 39th ASEE/IEEE Tavşancıl. E., & Aslan. E. A. (2001). İçerik analizi ve Uygulama Örnekleri. Ankara: Epsilon Yayınları. Tofan, D. C. (2010). Using a Tablet PC and OneNote 2007 to Teach Chemistry. Journal of Chemical
81. Education, 87(1), 47-48. Toppo, G. (2012).
82. USA TODAY. Obama wants schools to speed digital transition.
83. http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/education/story/2012-01-31/schools-e
84. textbooks/52907492/1 adresinden 18.05.2013 tarihinde alınmıştır. Tront, J. G., & Prey, J. C. (2007). Workshop - tablet PCs in engineering education & research. Uzoglu, M., & Bozdogan, A. (2012). An examination of Preservice Science Teachers' views related to use of tablet PCs in science and technology course in terms of different variables. Mevlana
85. International Journal of Education, 2(1), 1-14. Smart Education in Korea (2011). Smart Education in Korea: South Korea’s Making the Switch to
86. Digital Textbooks. http://www.advancedtechnologykorea.com/8000 adresinden 18.05.2013
87. tarihinde alınmıştır. Wimmer, R. D. ve Dominick, J. R. (2003). Mass Media Research: An Indroduction (7th ed.). Belmont,
88. CA: Wadsworth. Wolcott, H. F. (1990). On seeking-and rejecting-validity in qualitative research. (Ed.) E. W. Eisner. &
89. A. Peshkin Qualititative Inquiry in Education the Coutinuing Debate (121-152). New York:
90. Teachers Collage Press. Yan, Z., Hu, L, Chen, H., & Lu, F. (2008). Computer Vision Syndrome (CVS): A widely spreading but
91. largely unknown epidemic among computer users. Computers in Human Behavior,
92. 24(5), 2026-2042. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri (6.Baskı). Ankara:
93. Seçkin Yayıncılık. Yoon, C., & Sneddon, J. (2011). Student perceptions of effective use of tablet PC recorded lectures in
94. undergraduate mathematics courses. International Journal of Mathematical Education In
95. Science And Technology, 42(4), 425-445.