The Effect of Digital Material Preparation Training on Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Self-Confidence of Pre-service Social Studies Teachers

Year 2022, , 475 - 503, 31.07.2022

Fatih Kayaalp , Bayram Gökbulut , Elif Meral , Zeynep Başcı Namlı

https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.1061527

Cited By: 5

Abstract

This study examines whether digital material preparation training provided to pre-service teachers’ using instructional technologies affects their levels of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) Self-Confidence. The research is conducted using the Embedded Design, one of the Mixed Methods Research Designs. Study group consists of 24 pre-service social studies teachers. Data is collected using TPACK Self-Confidence Scale (TPACK-SCS) and Semi-Structured Questionnaire. Pre-service teachers are trained on different Web 2.0 tools throughout the implementation phase and thereafter were asked to prepare different digital materials specific to social studies. Quantitative data collected were analyzed using descriptive and predictive statistics. Content analysis of qualitative data was performed using MaxQda 2020 qualitative data analysis software. Research findings revealed a statistically significant difference between pre-test and post-test scores of pre-service teachers’ TPACK self-confidence levels. Pre-service teachers’ fear of failure, presumed failure and reluctance for being a part of the process turned into a perception of success and self-efficacy following the training and their learned helplessness disappeared. Teachers should be supported with a practice-based training that will allow to integrate technological, pedagogical and content knowledge for developing TPACK, as a comprehensive answer to 21st century teaching competencies.

Keywords

TPACK self-confidence, digital material, Web 2.0

References

• Acarli, D. S. (2020). Investigation of pre-service biology teachers' self-confidence concerning technological pedagogical content knowledge with respect to some variables. MIER Journal of Educational Studies Trends and Practices, 47-63.
• Adipat, S. (2021). Developing technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) through technology-enhanced content and language-integrated learning (T-CLIL) Instruction. Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 6461-6477. doi 10.10 07/s10639-021-10648-3.
• Aisyah, R. N., Setiawan, S., & Munir, A. (2021). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) in Action: Unraveling Indonesian English as a foreign language teachers’ TPACK by implementing telegram. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(3), 17-32.
• Aktaş, İ., & Özmen, H. (2020). Investigating the impact of TPACK development course on pre-service science teachers’ performances. Asia Pacific Education Review, 21(4), 667-682. doi: 10.1007/ s10639-021-10757-z
• Aktaş, İ., & Özmen, H. (2021). Assessing the performance of Turkish science pre-service teachers in a TPACK-practical course. Education and Information Technologies, 1-34.
• Araújo-Filho, R., & Gitirana, V. (2022). Pre-service teachers' knowledge: analysis of teachers' education situation based on TPACK. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 19(2), 594-631.
• Avcı, Ş. K., Coklar, A. N., & İstanbullu, A. (2019). The effect of three dimensional virtual environments and augmented reality applications on the learning achievement: A meta-analysis study. Education and Science, 44(198), 149-182.
• Bahriah, E. S., & Yunita, L. (2019, June). Investigating the competencies of technological pedagogical content knowledge and self-efficacy of chemistry teachers. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1233(1), IOP Publishing.
• Bal, M. S., & Kandemir, N. (2013). Determining social science teachers’ self-assessment levels with regard to their technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK), Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 34, 15-32.
• Bayrak, N., & Bayrak, G. (2021). The change of primary school teachers’ technological pedagogic content knowledge self-confidence and web 2.0 self-efficıencies for science course with in service training. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 50(232), 51-69.
• Becker, H. J. (2000). Who's wired and who's not: Children's access to and use of computer technology. The Future of Children, 10(2), 44-75.
• Brown, S. A. (2012). Seeing Web 2.0 in context: A study of academic perceptions. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 50-57.
• Can, A. (2017). SPPS ile bilimsel araştırma sürecinde nicel veri analizi [Quantitative data analysis in the scientific research process with SPSS] (5. Baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Çelik, H. C., & Kahyaoğlu, M. (2007). The Cluster analysis of primary school candidate teachers’ attitudes toward technology. The Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 5(4), 571-586.
• Cesur-Özkara, E., Yavuz-Konokman, G., & Yanpar-Yelken, T. (2018). The examination of teachers' self-confidence on TPCK, participating in ınservice education on "Technology Use in Education" in the Scope of Fatih Project. Amasya Education Journal, 7(2), 371-412.
• Chee, J., Mariani, M. N., Othman, A. J., & Mashitah, M. N. (2017). Exploring the issue of content, pedagogical and technological knowledge among preschool teachers. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 4(3), 130-136.
• Christensen, R. (2002). Effects of technology integration education on the attitudes of teachers and students. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(4), 411-433.
• Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (2000). Internal consistency reliabilities for 14 computer attitude scales. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8(4), 327-336.
• Collis, B., & Moonen, J. (2008). Web 2.0 tools and processes in higher education: Quality perspectives. Educational Media International, 45(2), 93-106.
• Cox, S., & Graham, C. R. (2009). Using an elaborated model of the TPACK framework to analyze and depict teacher knowledge. TechTrends, 53(5), 60-69.
• Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Baston: Pearson.
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano-Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting: Mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publication.
• Creswell, J.W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
• Crook, C. (2008). Web 2.0 technologies for learning: the current landscape–opportunities, challenges and tensions: supplementary materials, Digital Education Resource Archive, [Online]. [https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/1475/].
• Çömez, C. B., Çavumirza, E., & Yıldırım, M. (2021). Investigation of the effect of Web 2.0 supported 5E learning model on students' success and opinion in teaching pressure unit in distance education. Participatory Educational Research, 9(1), 73-97.
• Dikkartın-Övez, F. T., & Akyüz, G. (2013). Modelling technological pedagogical content knowledge constructs of preservice elementary mathematics teachers. Education and Science, 38(170), 321-335.
• Drexler, W., Baralt, A., & Dawson, K. (2008). The teach Web 2.0 consortium: A tool to promote educational social networking and Web 2.0 use among educators. Educational Media International, 45(4), 271-283.
• Durusoy, O. (2019).The effect of instructional material desıgn process on technological pedagogical content knowledge of mathematics teacher candidates (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Balıkesir University, Balıkesir.
• Elmas, R., & Geban, Ö. (2012). Web 2.0 tools for 21st century teachers, International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(1).
• Ergen, B. (2021). A meta‐analysis study on the researches related to the technological pedagogical content knowledge (Unpublished Doctoral Distertation) Mersin University, Mersin.
• Friedman, T. L. 2005. The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century, New York, NY: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
• Graham, R. C., Burgoyne, N., Cantrell, P., Smith, L., St Clair, L., & Harris, R. (2009). Measuring the TPACK confidence of in service science teachers. TechTrends, 53(5), 70-79.
• Green, S. B., & Salkind, N. J. (2005). Using Spss for windows and Macintosh: Analyzing and understanding data. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458.
• Güder, O., & Demir, M. (2018). The examination of primary school teachers’ technological pedagogical field knowledge self-confidence perceptions towards science lessons in terms of gender, age and school types. Uşak Üniversitesi Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(2), 51-68.
• Günüç, S., Odabaşı, H., & Kuzu, A. (2013). The defining characteristıcs of students of the 21st century by student teachers: a twitter activity. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 9(4), 436-455.
• Hammond, T. C., & Manfra, M. M. (2009). Giving, prompting, making: Aligning technology and pedagogy within TPACK for social studies instruction. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(2), 160-185.
• Hartati, S., & Fahrurrozi. (2021). The effect of self-regulation and creative thinking skills on the technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) competencies of early childhood teachers. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 11(2), 221-231.
• Hignite, M. A., & Echternacht, L. J. (1992). Assessment of the relationships between the computer attitudes and computer literacy levels of prospective educators. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 24(3), 381-91.
• Huang, L., & Lajoie, S. P. (2021). Process analysis of teachers’ self-regulated learning patterns in technological pedagogical content knowledge development. Computers & Education, 166, 104169.
• İnce-Aka, E., Doğan, A., & Sert-Çıbık, A. (2018). An investigation on change of pre-service teachers’ self-confidence in technological pedagogical content knowledge. E-Kafkas Journal of Educational Research, 5(1), 1-9.
• Jimoyiannis, A. (2015). TPACK 2.0: Towards a framework guiding Web 2.0 integration in educational practice. In M.S. Khine (Ed.). New directions in technological pedagogical content knowledge research multiple perspectives, (pp.83-108). Charlotte NC: Informatino Age Publishing.
• Jimoyiannis, A., Tsiotakis, P., Roussinos, D., & Siorenta, A. (2013). Preparing teachers to integrate Web 2.0 in school practice: Toward a framework for Pedagogy 2.0. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(2).
• Joo, Y. J., Park, S., & Lim, E. (2018). Factors influencing preservice teachers’ intention to use technology: TPACK, teacher self-efficacy, and technology acceptance model. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 48-59.
• Kapici, H. O., & Akcay, H. (2020). Improving student teachers’ TPACK self-efficacy through lesson planning practice in the virtual platform. Educational Studies, 1-23. doi: 10.1080/03055698.2020 .1835610
• Karakuş-Yılmaz, T. (2020). Öğrenme ve öğretimde dijitalleşme ve web araçları [Digitization and web tools in learning and teaching]. M. A. Özerbaş (Ed.), Öğretim teknolojileri [Instructional technologies] içinde (ss.179-216). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Knapp, W. (2017). The impact of TPACK and teacher technology efficacy on social studies teachers' use of technology in the classroom (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). University of Minnesota, Minnesota.
• Koehler, M. J. & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)?. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.
• Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)?. Journal of Education, 193(3), 13-19.
• Kozma, R. B. (2003). Technology and classroom practices: An international study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(1), 1-14.
• Kurt, S. (2014). Creating technology-enriched classrooms: Implementation challenges in Turkish education. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(1), 90-106.
• Lachner, A., Fabian, A., Franke, U., Preiß, J., Jacob, L., Führer, C., & Thomas, P. (2021). Fostering pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): A quasi-experimental field study. Computers & Education, 174, 104304.
• Lawton, J., & Gerschner, V. T. (1982). A review of the literature on attitudes towards computers and computerized instruction. Journal of Research & Development in Education, 16(1), 50–55.
• Lee, M. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Exploring teachers’ perceived self-efficacy and technological pedagogical content knowledge with respect to educational use of the World Wide Web. Instructional Science, 38(1), 1-21.
• Lin, T. C., Tsai, C. C., Chai, C. S., & Lee, M. H. (2013). Identifying science teachers’ perceptions of technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK). Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(3), 325-336.
• Lu, J., Lai, M., & Law, N. (2010). Knowledge building in society 2.0: Challenges and opportunities. In New science of learning (pp. 553-567). Springer, New York, NY.
• Lundeberg, M., Bergland, M., Klyczek, K., & Hoffman, D. (2003). Using action research to develop preservice teachers’ confidence, knowledge and beliefs about technology. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 1(4), 1-16.
• Ma, W. W., Andersson, R., & Streith, K. O. (2005). Examining user acceptance of computer technology: An empirical study of student teachers. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(6), 387-395.
• Makawawa, J. C., Mustadi, A., Sampouw, F., & Najoan, R. A. (2021). Primary school teacher’s perception of technological pedagogical content knowledge in online learning due to Covid 19. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 9(1), 85-95.
• Marcinkiewicz, H. R. (1993). Computers and teachers: Factors influencing computer use in the classroom. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26(2), 220–237.
• McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2014). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (7th ed.). London: Pearson.
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2016). Nitel veri analizi [Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook] (S. Akbaba ve A. A. Ersoy, çev. ed.). Ankara: Pegem Ankara.
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
• Muhaimin, M., Habibi, A., Mukminin, A., Saudagar, F., Pratama, R., Wahyuni, S., & Indrayana, B. (2019). A sequential explanatory investigation of TPACK: Indonesian science teachers’ survey and perspective. JOTSE, 9(3), 269-281.
• Mutiani, M., Supriatna, N., Abbas, E. W., Rini, T. P. W., & Subiyakto, B. (2021). Technological, pedagogical, content knowledge (TPACK): A discursion in learning innovation on social studies. The Innovation of Social Studies Journal, 2(2), 135-142.
• Niess, M. (2008). Mathematics teachers developing technology, pedagogy and content knowledge (TPACK). In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 5297-5304). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
• Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 509-523.
• Onbaşılı, Ü. I. (2020). The effects of science teaching practice supported with Web 2.0 tools on prospective elementary school teachers' self-efficacy beliefs. International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(2), 91-110.
• O'Reilly, T. (2009). What is Web 2.0. O'Reilly Media, Inc.
• Pallant, J. (2005). SPSS survival manual: A Step by Guide to data analysis using spss for windows (2nd ed.). National Library of Australia.
• Pence, H. E. (2007). Preparing for the real web generation. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 35(3), 347–356.
• Ramnarain, U., Pieters, A., & Wu, H. K. (2021). Assessing the technological pedagogical content knowledge of pre-service science teachers at a South African University. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education (IJICTE), 17(3), 123-136.
• Rosenberg, J. M., & Koehler, M. J. (2015). Context and technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): A systematic review. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 47(3), 186-210.
• Roussinos, D., & Jimoyiannis, A. (2013). Analysis of students’ participation patterns and learning presence in a wiki-based project. Educational Media International, 50(4), 306-324.
• Sancar-Tokmak, H., & Yanpar-Yelken, T. (2015). Effects of creating digital stories on foreign language education pre-service teachers’ TPACK self-confidence. Educational Studies, 41(4), 444-461.
• Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2016). Self-efficacy theory in education. Handbook of Motivation at School Routledge, 2, 34-54.
• Shapley, K., Sheehan, D., Maloney, C., & Caranikas-Walker, F. (2011). Effects of technology immersion on middle school students’ learning opportunities and achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 104(5), 299-315.
• Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
• Smith, M. S. & Broom, M. (2003). The landscape and future of the use of technology in K-12 education, in H. F. O' Neil, J. R., & R. S. Perez (Eds.). Technology Applications in Education: A Learning View (pp.3-30). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey, London. doi.org/10.4324/9781410606754
• So, H. J., & Kim, B. (2009). Learning about problem based learning: Student teachers integrating technology, pedagogy and content knowledge. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(1), 101-116.
• Tatlı, Z., İpek-Akbulut, H. İ., & Altınışık, D. (2016). The impact of Web 2.0 tools on pre-service teachers’ self-confidence levels about TPCK. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 7(3), 659-678. doi:10.16949/turkbilmat.277878
• Thohir, M. A., Jumadi, J., & Warsono, W. (2020). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) of pre-service science teachers: A Delphi study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 1-16. doi:10.1080/15391523.2020.1814908
• Timur, B., & Taşar, M. F. (2011). The Adaptation of the technological pedagogical content knowledge confidence survey into Turkish. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 10(2), 839-856.
• Torun, F. (2020). The effect of a textbook preparation process supported by instructional technology tools on the TPACK self-confidence levels of prospective social studies teachers. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 10(2), 115-140. doi:10.33403/rigeo.691943
• U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. (1995). Teachers and technology: Making the connection (OTA-EHR-616). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
• Uçar, M. B., Demir, C., & Hiğde, E. (2014). Exploring the self-confidence of preservice science and physics teachers towards technological pedagogical content knowledge. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3381-3384.
• Üredi, L., & Ulum, H. (2021). Primary school teachers’ views about technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in mathematics education process. Journal of Society Research (JSR), 16 (29 October Special issue), 3642-3669. doi: 10.26466/opus.766702
• Wang, W., Schmidt-Crawford, D., & Jin, Y. (2018). Preservice teachers' TPACK development: A review of literature. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 34(4), 234-258. doi:10.1080/21532974.2018.1498039
• Woodrow, J. E. (1992). The influence of programming training on the computer literacy and attitudes of preservice teachers. Journal of research on Computing in Education, 25(2), 200-219.
• Yücel, C., Acun, I., Tarman, B., & Mete, T. (2010). A model to explore Turkish teachers' ICT Integration Stages. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 9(4), 1-9.