Öğretmenlerin Mesleki Gelişiminde Yeni Bir Uygulama Olarak “Ders Araştırması Modeli”: Perspektif, Avantajlar, Sınırlılıklar

Öz

Uluslararası düzeyde hizmet öncesinde öğretmen adaylarının ve hizmet içinde ise öğretmenlerin daha nitelikli hale getirilmesi çabaları artarak devam etmektedir. Bu kapsamda öğretmen adaylarının mesleki anlamda daha deneyimli ve donanımlı olabilmeleri için uluslararası anlamda bir model olan ders araştırması modeli kullanılmaktadır. Ders araştırması modeli; bir grup öğretmen adayının bir araya getirilerek bir dersin planlandığı, planlanan dersin uygulandığı, uygulama esnasında gözlem yapıldığı, ders sonrası gözlemler doğrultusunda dersin değerlendirildiği, ders planının revize edildiği ve son olarak da yeni plan doğrultusunda dersin yeniden uygulandığı döngüsel bir süreci içermektedir. Modelin uygulanma sürecinin; mesleki açıdan önemli deneyimler sunduğu ve bu deneyimlerin paylaşılabileceği bir ortam yarattığı bilinmektedir. Bu çalışmanın Türk Eğitim Sistemi’nde yeni tanınmaya başlanan modelin daha iyi anlaşılabilmesine kuramsal anlamda katkı sunacağı düşünülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ders Araştırması Modeli
• Sürekli Mesleki Gelişim
• Öğretmen Aday
• Öğretmen

“Lesson Study Model” as A New Implementation in Professional Development of Teachers: Perspective, Advantages, Limitations

Abstract

Efforts to make pre-service teachers and in service teachers more qualified continue to increase. In this context, one of the important tools for pre-service teachers to be trained more professionally is an internationally accepted and applied lesson study model. Lesson study model includes a cyclical process in which a group of pre-service teachers are brought together, a course is planned, the planned course is applied, observation is made during the application, the course is evaluated in line with the post-course observations, the course plan is revised, and finally the course is re-applied according to the new plan. It is known that the application process of the model offers significant professional experiences and creates an environment where these experiences can be shared. It is thought that this study can contribute to better understanding of the model, which has just become known in Turkish Education System, in a theoretical sense.

Keywords

• Lesson Study Model
• Teacher
• Pre-service Teacher
• Continuous Professional Development

References

1. Adams, J. W. (2013). A case study: Using lesson study to understand factors that affect teaching creative and critical thinking in the elementary classroom. Doktora Tezi. U.S: Drexel University,
2. Akbaba Dağ, S. (2014). Mikroöğretim ders imecesi modeli ile sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının kesir öğretim bilgilerinin geliştirilmesine yönelik bir uygulama. Doktora Tezi. Kütahya:Dumlupınar Üniversitesi.
3. Almanzar, A. (2014). Impact of professional learning community practices on morale of urban high school teachers. Doktora Tezi. Nova Southeastern University, U.S.
4. Alvine, A., Judson, T. W., Schein, M. & Yoshida, T. (2007). What graduate students (and the rest of us) can learn from lesson study. College Teaching, 55(3), 109-113.
5. Arani, M. R. S. & Matoba, M. (2006). Challenges in japanese teachers' professional development: A focus on an alternative perspective. Comparative Education in Teacher Training, 4, 107-115.
6. Armstrong, A. (2011). Lesson Study puts a collaborative lens on student learning. Tools for schools, 14(4), 2-7.
7. Aykan, A. (2019). Öğretmen adayları açısından ders araştırması modelinin mesleki gelişim kapsamında incelenmesi. Doktora Tezi. Tokat: Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi.
8. Aykan, A. & Kıncal, R. Y. (2016). Ders araştırması kapsamında farklı ülkelerde yayınlanan bilimsel çalışmaların içerik analizi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Kazım Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 32, 19-31.

9. Back, J. & Joubert, M. (2011). Lesson study as a process for professional development: working with teachers to effect significant and changes in practice. Proceedings of 7th Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, Rzeszow, Poland, February içinde (s. 2559-2568).
10. Baki, M. (2012). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının matematiği öğretme bilgilerinin gelişiminin incelenmesi: Bir ders imecesi (lesson study) çalışması. Doktora Tezi. Trabzon: Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi.
11. Barber, M. & Mourshed, M. (2007). How the world's best-performing schools systems come out on top. McKinsey ve Company.
12. Bayram, D. (2010). Türkiye, ABD, Japonya, İngiltere ve Avustralya’da fen ve fizik öğretmenlerine yönelik mesleki gelişim programlarının karşılaştırılması. Doktora Tezi. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi.
13. Bruce, C. D. & Ladky, M. S. (2011). What’s going on backstage? Revealing the work of lesson study with mathematics teachers. Lesson Study Research and Practice in Mathematics Education içinde (s. 243-249). Springer, Dordrecht.
14. Bümen, N. T., Alev, Çakar, E., Gonca, U. & Veli, A. (2012). Türkiye bağlamında öğretmenlerin mesleki gelişimi: Sorunlar ve öneriler. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 42(194), 31-50.
15. Cajkler, W., Wood, P., Norton, J., Pedder, D., & Xu, H. (2015). Teacher perspectives about lesson study in secondary school departments: a collaborative vehicle for professional learning and practice development. Research Papers in Education, 30(2), 192-213.
16. Carroll, C. (2013). Exploring the ımpact of lesson study on the theory-practice gap in pre-service teacher education. Doktora Tezi. Ireland: Mary Immaculate College, University of Limerick.
17. Cavey, L. O. & Berenson, S. B. (2005). Learning to teach high school mathematics: Patterns of growth in understanding right triangle trigonometry during lesson plan study. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24(2), 171-190.
18. Chassels, C. & Melville, W. (2009). Collaborative, reflective, and ıterative japanese lesson study in an initial teacher education program: Benefits and challenges. Canadian Journal of Education, 32(4), 734-763.
19. Chen, X. (2017). Theorizing Chinese lesson study from a cultural perspective. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 6(4), 283-292.
20. Chen, X. & Yang, F. (2013). Chinese teachers’ reconstruction of the curriculum reform through lesson study. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 2(3), 218-236.
21. Cheng, L. P. & Lee, P. Y. (2011). A Singapore case of lesson study. The Mathematics Educator, 21(2), 24-57.
22. Cheung, W. M. & Wong, W. Y. (2014). Does Lesson Study work? A systematic review on the effects of Lesson Study and Learning Study on teachers and students. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 3(2), 137-149.
23. Chichibu, T. & Kihara, T. (2013). How Japanese schools build a professional learning community by lesson study. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 2(1), 12-25.
24. Chokshi, S. & Fernandez, C. (2004). Challenges to importing Japanese lesson study: Concerns, misconceptions, and nuances. Phi Delta Kappan, 85(7), 520-525.
25. Chong, W. H. & Kong, C. A. (2012). Teacher collaborative learning and teacher self-efficacy: The case of lesson study. The Journal of Experimental Education, 80(3), 263-283.
26. Cohan, A., & Honigsfeld, A. (2007). Incorporating ‘lesson study’in teacher preparation. The Educational Forum (71, (1), s. 81-92).
27. Collinson, V. (2000, June). Staff development by any other name: Changing words or changing practices? The Educational Forum, 64(2),124-132.
28. Collinson, V. & Ono, Y. (2001). The professional development of teachers in the United States and Japan. European Journal of Teacher Education, 24(2), 223-248.
29. Copriady, J. (2013). The implementation of lesson study programme for developing professionalism in teaching profession. Asian Social Science, 9(12), 176.
30. Darling-Hammond, L., Hammerness, K., Grossman, P., Rust, F. ve Shulman, L. (2005). The design of teacher education programs. (In L. Darling Hammond and J. Bransford Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: what teachers should learn and be able to do. (390-441). Jossey-Bass. USA: San Francisco.
31. Demir, K., Czerniak, C. M. & Hart, L. C. (2013). Implementing japanese lesson study in a higher education context. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(4), 22 - 27.
32. Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181-199.
33. Dudley, P. (2011). Lesson Study development in England: from school networks to national policy. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 1(1), 85-100.
34. Dudley, P. (2013). Teacher learning in lesson study: what ınteraction-level discourse analysis revealed about how teachers utilised ımagination, tacit knowledge of teaching and fresh evidence of pupils learning to develop practice knowledge and so enhance their pupils’ learning. Teaching and Teacher Education 34, 107-121.
35. Dudley, P. (2014). Lesson Study: A Handbook. (Erişim: 25.08.2018), http://lessonstudy.co.uk.
36. Eurydice, (2010). Türk Eğitim Sisteminin Örgütlenmesi. Erişim: 18.07.2018), https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/national-policies/eurydice/content/teachers-and-education-staff.
37. Fernandez, C. (2002). Learning from japanese approaches to professional development: The case of lesson study. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(5), 393-405.
38. Fernandez, M. L., 2010. Investigating How and What Prospective Teachers Learn Through Microteaching Lesson Study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 351-562.
39. Fernandez, C. &Yoshida, M. (2004). Lesson study: A Case of A Japanese Approach to Improving Instruction Through School-Based Teacher Development. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40. Fernandez, C. & Yoshida, M. (2012). Lesson study: A Japanese approach to improving mathematics teaching and learning. London: Routledge.
41. Fujii, T. (2014). Implementing Japanese Lesson Study in Foreign Countries: Misconceptions Revealed. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 16(1), n1.
42. Groves, S., Doig, B., Widjaja, W., Garner, D. & Palmer, K. (2013). Implementing Japanese lesson study: An example of teacher-researcher collaboration. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 69(3), 10-17.
43. Guskey, T. R. (2007). Results-Oriented Professional Development, içinde: A. C. Onstein, E. F. Pajak, ve S. B. Ornstein, Contemporary Issues in Curriculum (334–346), Pearson Education, Boston.
44. Günay, R., Yücel-Toy, B. & Bahadır, E. (2016). Öğretmen eğitiminde ders araştırması modeli ve Türkiye'de hizmet öncesi öğretmenlik uygulamalarına yönelik bir model önerisi. Journal Of International Social Research, 9(42). 1224-1237.
45. Hart, L. C., Alston, A. S., & Murata, A. (2011). Lesson study research and practice in mathematics education (p. 10). Netherlands: Springer.
46. Hassel, E. (1999). Professional development: Learning from the best. Oak Brook, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.
47. Huang, R., Su, H. & Xu, S. (2014). Developing teachers’ and teaching researchers’ professional competence in mathematics through Chinese Lesson Study. ZDM, 46(2), 239-251.
48. Hurd, J. & Lewis, C. (2011). Lesson study step by step: How teacher learning communities improve instruction. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
49. Isoda, M. (2007). Japanese lesson study in mathematics: Its impact, diversity and potential for educational improvement. London: World Scientific Publishing.
50. Isoda, M. (2010). Lesson study: problem solving approaches in mathematics education as a Japanese experience. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 8, 17-27.
51. Kanauan, W. & Inprasitha, N. (2014). Collaboration between Inservice Teachers and Student Intern in Thai Lesson Study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 28-32.
52. Kılıçer, K. (2011). Bilgisayar ve öğretim teknolojileri eğitimi öğretmen adaylarının bireysel yenilikçilik profilleri. Doktora Tezi. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi.
53. Kıncal, R. Y. & Beypınar, D. (2015). Ders araştırması uygulamasının matematik öğretmenlerinin mesleki gelişimlerine ve öğrenme sürecinin geliştirilmesine etkisi. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(33), 186-210.
54. Kostas, K., Galini, R., & Maria, M. (2014). The practicum in pre-service teachers’ education in Greece: the case of lesson study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 808-812.
55. Lee, J. F. (2008). A Hong Kong case of lesson study—Benefits and concerns. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(5), 1115-1124.
56. Lewis, C. (2002). Does lesson study have a future in the United States? Journal of the Nagoya University Department of Education. Nagoya Journal of Education and Human Development,1, 1-23.
57. Lewis, C. (2005). How Do Teachers Learn During Lesson Study? In P. Wang-Iverson M. Yoshida (Eds.), Building Our Understanding of Lesson Study. Philadelphia, PA: Research For Better School Inc.
58. Lewis, C., Perry, R. & Murata, A. (2006). How should research contribute to instructional improvement? The case of lesson study. Educational Researcher, 35(3), 3-14.
59. Lewis, C. (2009). What is the nature of knowledge development in lesson study?. Educational Action Research, 17(1), 95-110.
60. Lewis, C. & Tsuchida, I. (1998). A lesson is like a swiftly flowing river. American Educator, 22(4), 12-17.
61. Lewis, C. & Takahashi, A. (2013). Facilitating curriculum reforms through lesson study. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 2(3), 207-217.
62. Lewis, C. & Perry, R. (2014). Lesson Study with mathematical resources: A sustainable model for locally-led teacher professional learning. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 16(1), 1.
63. Lyding, L. (2012). Using lesson study to help teachers design lessons with purposeful planned movement and build efficacy. Doktora Tezi. Arizona State University, U.S.
64. Maitree, I., Masami, I. &Ban-har, Y. (Eds.). (2015). Lesson study: Challenges in mathematics education (Vol. 3). Singapore:World Scientific.
65. Makinae, N. (2010). The origin of lesson study in Japan. In The 5th East Asia Regional Conference on Mathematics Education: In Search of Excellence in Mathematics Education (Vol. 15).
66. Meiliasari, S. (2013). Lesson study with pre-service teachers: Investigating the learning of pre-service teachers in lesson study model of teaching practice course. Fifth International Conference on Science and Mathematics Education. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270883964.adresinden alınmıştır.24.08.2018.
67. Mostofo, J. (2014). The impact of using lesson study with pre-service mathematics teachers. Journal of Instructional Research, 3, 55-63.
68. Norwich, B. & Ylonen, A. (2013). Design based research to develop the teaching of pupils with moderate learning difficulties (MLD): Evaluating lesson study in terms of pupil, teacher and school outcomes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 34, 162-173.
69. Norwich, B. & Ylonen, A. (2015). A design-based trial of Lesson Study for assessment purposes: evaluating a new classroom based dynamic assessment approach. European Journal of Special Needs Education. (Erişim: 20.07.2018) doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2015.1009702.
70. Özer, B. (2005). Ortaöğretim öğretmenlerinin mesleki gelişime ilgisi. Journal Of Educational Sciences ve Practices, 4(8).
71. Özoğlu, M. (2010). Türkiye’de öğretmen yetiştirme sisteminin sorunları. Seta Analiz, 17(26), 131-155.
72. Saito, E. (2012). Key issues of lesson study in Japan and the United States: A literature review. Professional Development in Education, 38 (5), 777-789.
73. Saito, E. & Atencio, M. (2013). A conceptual discussion of lesson study from a micro-political perspective: Implications for teacher development and pupil learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 31 (4), 87-95.
74. Saito, E. & Atencio, M. (2015). Lesson study for learning community (LSLC): conceptualising teachers’ practices within a social justice perspective. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(6), 795-807.
75. Saracaloğlu, A. S., Dursun, F. & Arabacıoğlu, T. (2016). Bilgisayar ve öğretim teknolojileri eğitimi bölümü öğretim elemanlarının alan öğretmeni yeterliklerine ilişkin düşünceleri. Kuramsal Eğitim Bilim Dergisi, 9(4), 555-570.
76. Sato, M. (2008, December). Japanese lesson studies, looking back and thinking forward. The World Association of Lesson Studies International Conference, Hong Kong Institute of Education, Hong Kong.
77. Sato, M. (2009). Kyoshi kadensho [Book on style and the flower of teachers]. Tokyo: Shogakkan.
78. Serbest, A. (2014). Ders imecesi yönteminin etki alanları üzerinde bir meta-sentez çalışması. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Trabzon: Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi.
79. Shimizu, Y. (2002, July). Sharing a new approach to teaching mathematics with the teachers from outside the school: The role of lesson study at ‘Fuzoku’schools. In US-Japan cross cultural seminar on the professionalization of teachers through lesson study, Park City, UT.
80. Shúilleabháin, A. N. (2015). Lesson study as a form of in-School Professional Development. (Erişim: 22.08.2018) https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275262988.
81. Sims, L. & Walsh, D. (2009). Lesson study with preservice teachers: Lessons from lessons. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(5), 724-733.
82. Skott, C. K., & Møller, H. (2017). The individual teacher in lesson study collaboration. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 6(3), 216.
83. Stigler, J. W. & Hiebert, J. (2009). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world's teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: Simon and Schuster.
84. Takahashi, A. & Yoshida, M. (2004). Lesson-study communities. Teaching Children Mathematics, 10(9), 436-437.
85. Taylor, A. R., Anderson, S., Meyer, K., Wagner, M. K. & West, C. (2005). Lesson study: A professional development model for mathematics reform. The Rural Educator, 26(2).
86. Villegas-Reimers, E. & Reimers, F. (2000). Professional development of teachers as lifelong learning: Models, practices and factors that influence it. Board on International Comparative Studies in Education (BISCE) of the National Research Council, Washington DC.
87. Wang-Iverson, P. & M. Yoshida. (2005). Building of understanding of lesson study. Philadelphia, PA: Research for Better Schools.
88. Ylonen, A. & Norwich, B. (2013). Professional learning of teachers through a Lesson Study process in England: contexts, mechanisms and outcomes. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 2(2), 137-154.