Sürdürülebilirlik için Dijital Adımlar: HelpSteps Mobil Uygulaması Üzerine Nitel Bir İnceleme

Abstract

Kullanıcıların fiziksel adımlarını sosyal amaçlar için bağışlara dönüştürmelerini sağlayan HelpSteps mobil uygulaması; dijital sağlık, davranış değişikliği ve sürdürülebilir kalkınma ilkelerini birleştiren hibrit bir platformdur. Bu çalışma, HelpSteps mobil uygulamasının sürdürülebilirlik bağlamında kullanıcı algılarını ve kullanım motivasyonlarını incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Keşfedici nitel desende yürütülen araştırmada, HelpSteps’i düzenli kullanan 24 katılımcı (16 kadın, 8 erkek) ile çevrimiçi yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler yapılmıştır. Veriler tematik analiz yöntemiyle değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular, altı ana tema ortaya koymuştur: Bireysel Amaç (sosyal fayda, yardım, fiziksel aktivite), Anlam (iyilik aracı, kişisel tatmin), Sürdürülebilirlik (çevresel, sosyal, ekonomik katkılar), Duygusal Deneyim (mutluluk, motivasyon, empati), Güven Sebebi (kurumsal iş birlikleri, görünür geri bildirimler, ücretsiz kullanım/sponsorluk) ve Ağızdan Ağıza İletişim (bilgi paylaşımı, birlikte yürüyüş, hatırlatmalar). Sonuçlar, dijital sürdürülebilirlik davranışlarının tekil değil çoklu motivasyonlarla (sağlık, toplumsal sorumluluk, aidiyet) beslendiğini; somut geri bildirim ve kurumsal ortaklıkların güveni güçlendirdiğini göstermektedir. Bu bağlamda bu çalışma, mobil sağlık ve sosyal fayda uygulamalarında tasarım ve politika açısından çıkarımlar sunmakta; mikro eylemlerin dijital platformlar aracılığıyla kolektif sürdürülebilirlik sonuçlarına dönüştürülebileceğini ortaya koymaktadır.

Keywords

• Mobil Uygulama
• Sürdürülebilirlik
• HelpSteps

Ethical Statement

Bu çalışmada ulusal ve uluslararası araştırma ve yayın etiği ilkelerine uyulmuştur. Aksi bir durumun tespiti halinde GSI Journals Serie A: Advancements in Tourism, Recreation and Sports Sciences Dergisinin herhangi bir sorumluluğu bulunmamakta olup, tüm sorumluluk makale yazarlarına aittir. Bu çalışma için Eskişehir Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Beşerî Bilimler Etik Kurulu’ndan 12.05.2023 tarihli ve E-18467716-604.02.02-2300024618 sayılı Etik Kurul Onayı alınmıştır. Makalede herhangi bir çıkar çatışması ya da kazancı yoktur.

Digital Steps for Sustainability: A Qualitative Study on the HelpSteps Mobile Application

Abstract

The HelpSteps mobile application enables users to convert their physical steps into donations for social causes, representing a hybrid platform that combines digital health, behavior change, and sustainable development principles. This study aims to examine users’ perceptions and motivations regarding the HelpSteps mobile application within the context of sustainability. Employing an exploratory qualitative design, online semi-structured interviews were conducted with 24 regular users of HelpSteps (16 women, 8 men). The data were analyzed using thematic analysis. The findings revealed six main themes: Personal Purpose (social benefit, helping others, physical activity), Meaning (tool for goodness, personal satisfaction), Sustainability (environmental, social, economic contributions), Affect (happiness, motivation, empathy), Reason for Trust (institutional collaborations, visible feedback, free use/sponsorship), and Word of Mouth (information sharing, collective walking, reminders). The results indicate that digital sustainability behaviors are shaped by multiple motivations (health, social responsibility, sense of belonging) and that visible feedback and institutional partnerships strengthen trust. Accordingly, this study provides implications for the design and policy of mobile health and social benefit applications, highlighting how micro-actions can be transformed into collective sustainability outcomes through digital platforms.

Keywords

• Mobile Application
• Sustainability
• HelpSteps

Ethical Statement

This study was conducted in accordance with national and international research and publication ethics. In case of any violation, GSI Journals Serie A: Advancements in Tourism, Recreation and Sports Sciences bears no responsibility, and all responsibility belongs to the author(s). Ethics committee approval for this study was obtained from Eskişehir Technical University Social and Human Sciences Ethics Committee with the decision dated 12.05.2023 and numbered E-18467716-604.02.02-2300024618. There is no conflict of interest or financial gain in this study.

References

1. Andreoni, J. (1990). Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. The Economic Journal, 100(401), 464-477. https://doi.org/10.2307/2234133
2. Adhiarso, D. S., Utari, P., & Hastjarjo, S. (2019). The impact of digital technology to change people’s behavior in using the media. Digit. Press Soc. Sci. Humanit, 2(2018), 5. https://doi.org/10.29037/digitalpress.42256
3. Aknin, L. B. (2020). Does spending money on others promote happiness? Current Opinion in Psychology, 33, 197–203. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/mye3g
4. Arndt, J. (1967). Role of product-related conversations in the diffusion of a new product. Journal of marketing Research, 4(3), 291-295. https://doi.org/10.2307/3149462
5. Appleton, A.F. (2006). Sustainability: A practitioner's reflection. Technology in Society, 28 (1-2), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.10.001
6. Bartschat, M., Cziehso, G., & Hennig-Thurau, T. (2022). Searching for word of mouth in the digital age: Determinants of consumers’ uses of face-to-face information, internet opinion sites, and social media. Journal of Business Research, 141, 393-409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.035
7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage.
8. Brundtland, G. (1987). Our common future: Report of the 1987 World Commission on Environment and Development. United Nations, Oslo, 1, 59. https://doi.org/10.2307/2621529

9. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Sage.
10. Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into practice, 39(3), 124-130. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2
11. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The" what" and" why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01
12. Dennison, L., Morrison, L., Conway, G., & Yardley, L. (2013). Opportunities and challenges for smartphone applications in supporting health behavior change: qualitative study. Journal of medical Internet research, 15(4), e2583. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2583
13. Dunn, E. W., Aknin, L. B., & Norton, M. I. (2008). Spending money on others promotes happiness. Science, 319(5870), 1687–1688. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1150952
14. Finkbeiner, M., Schau, E. M., Lehmann, A., & Traverso, M. (2010). Towards life cycle sustainability assessment. Sustainability, 2(10), 3309-3322. https://doi.org/10.3390/su2103309
15. Fogg, B. J. (2009). A behavior model for persuasive design. In Proceedings of the 4th international Conference on Persuasive Technology (pp. 1-7). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1541948.1541999
16. Galárraga, O., Bohlen, L. C., Dunsiger, S. I., Lee, H. H., Emerson, J. A., Boyle, H. K., ... & Williams, D. M. (2020). Small sustainable monetary donation-based incentives to promote physical activity: A randomized controlled trial. Health Psychology, 39(4), 265. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000818
17. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS quarterly, 51-90. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036519
18. Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The Circular Economy–A new sustainability paradigm?. Journal of cleaner production, 143, 757-768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048
19. Glass, L. M., & Newig, J. (2019). Governance for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals: How important are participation, policy coherence, reflexivity, adaptation and democratic institutions?. Earth System Governance, 2, 100031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2019.100031
20. Hartmann, P., Eisend, M., Apaolaza, V., & D'Souza, C. (2017). Warm glow vs. altruistic values: How important is intrinsic emotional reward in proenvironmental behavior?. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 52, 43-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.05.006
21. Herden, C. J., Alliu, E., Cakici, A., Cormier, T., Deguelle, C., Gambhir, S., ... & Edinger-Schons, L. M. (2021, March). “Corporate Digital Responsibility” New corporate responsibilities in the digital age. In Sustainability Management Forum| NachhaltigkeitsManagementForum (Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 13-29). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00550-020-00509-x
22. Isensee, C., Teuteberg, F., & Griese, K. M. (2022). Exploring the use of mobile apps for fostering sustainability-oriented corporate culture: A qualitative analysis. Sustainability, 14(12), 7380. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127380
23. Jerit, J., Shin, H., & Barabas, J. (2024). Warm glow feelings can promote green behavior. PNAS nexus, 3(12), page 509. https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae509
24. Johansson, T. B., & Goldemberg J. (2002). UNDP Energy for Sustainable Development, A Policy Agenda. UN.
25. Khuan, H., Bakri, A. A., & Lusianawati, H. (2023). Sustainability and corporate social responsibility in digital platform companies. West Science Journal Economic and Entrepreneurship, 1(08), 358-367. https://doi.org/10.58812/wsjee.v1i03.152
26. Kozinets, R. V., de Valck, K., Wojnicki, A. C., & Wilner, S. J. (2010). Networked narratives: Understanding word-of-mouth marketing in online communities. Journal of marketing, 74(2), 71-89. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.74.2.71
27. Kuhlman, T., & Farrington, J. (2010). What is sustainability?. Sustainability, 2(11), 3436-3448. https://doi.org/10.3390/su2113436
28. Liébana-Cabanillas, F., García-Maroto, I., Muñoz-Leiva, F., & Ramos-de-Luna, I. (2020). Mobile payment adoption in the age of digital transformation: The case of Apple Pay. Sustainability, 12(13), 5443. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135443
29. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
30. Mensah, J. (2019). Sustainable development: Meaning, history, principles, pillars, and implications for human action: Literature review. Cogent social sciences, 5(1), 1653531. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2019.1653531
31. Michie, S., Van Stralen, M. M., & West, R. (2011). The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation science, 6, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-42
32. Middelweerd, A., Mollee, J., Klein, M. M., Manzoor, A., Brug, J., & Te Velde, S. J. (2020). The use and effects of an app-based physical activity intervention “Active2Gether” in young adults: quasi-experimental trial. JMIR Formative Research, 4(1), e12538. https://doi.org/10.2196/12538
33. Milne-Ives, M., Lam, C., De Cock, C., Van Velthoven, M. H., & Meinert, E. (2020). Mobile apps for health behavior change in physical activity, diet, drug and alcohol use, and mental health: systematic review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 8(3), e17046. https://doi.org/10.2196/17046
34. Nkwo, M., Suruliraj, B., & Orji, R. (2021). Persuasive apps for sustainable waste management: a comparative systematic evaluation of behavior change strategies and state-of-the-art. Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 4, 748454. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2021.748454
35. Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice. SAGE Publications.
36. Purvis, B., Mao, Y., & Robinson, D. (2019). Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins. Sustainability science, 14(3), 681-695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5
37. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research Methods for Business Students (8th ed.). Pearson Education, New York.
38. Shi, L., Han, L., Yang, F. & Gao, L. (2019). The evolution of sustainable development theory: Types, goals, and research prospects. Sustainability, 11(24), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247158
39. Vaghefi, I., & Tulu, B. (2019). The continued use of mobile health apps: insights from a longitudinal study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 7(8), e12983. https://doi.org/10.2196/12983
40. Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & health sciences, 15(3), 398-405. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048
41. Xiao, J. (2024). The Digitalization Dialectic: A Critical Analysis of Technology's Role in Cultural Formation and Social Change. Advances in Social Behavior Research, 6, 38-42. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7102/6/2024047
42. Yang, C. H., Maher, J. P., & Conroy, D. E. (2015). Implementation of behavior change techniques in mobile applications for physical activity. American journal of preventive medicine, 48(4), 452-455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2014.10.010
43. Yüce, A. ve Katırcı, H. (2020). Sürdürülebilir Spor Tüketicisi Davranışı. Akademisyen Kitabevi. https://doi.org/10.37609/akya.371
44. Zhao, J., Freeman, B., & Li, M. (2016). Can mobile phone apps influence people’s health behavior change? An evidence review. Journal of medical Internet research, 18(11), e287. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5692