Nöroteknoloji ve Bilişsel Özgürlük
Abstract
Keywords
References
- BOSTORM Nick, “Human Genetic Enhancement: A Transhumanist Perspective”, Journal of Value Inquiry, Vol:34, No:4, 2003, s.493-506.
- BOSTORM Nick, SANDBERG Anders, “Cognitive Enhancement: Methods, Ethics, Regulatory Challenges”, Science and Engineering Ethics, Vol: 15, No:3, 2009, s.311-341.
- BOSTROM Nick, ROACHE Rebecca, “Smart Policy: Cognitive Enhancement in the Public Interest” 2009, https://nickbostrom.com/papers/smart-policy.pdf, s.1-14, E.T.:07.12.2018.
- BUBLITZ Christoph, “My Mind is Mine!? Cognitive Liberty as a Legal Concept”, HILDT Elisabeth, FRANCHE Andreas (ed), “Cognitive Enhancement” New York, 2013, s.233-264.
- CALVIN J. Craft, GIORDANO James, “ Integrating Brain Science and Law: Neuroscientific Evidence and Legal Perspectives on Protecting Individual Liberties”, Frontiers in Neuroscience, Volume 11, Article 621, s.1-10.
- DECKER Michael, FLEISCHER Torsten, “Contacting the Brain-Aspects of a Technology Assessment of Neural Implants”, Biotechnology Journal, Vol:3, No:12, 2008, s.1502-1510.
- ETHERIDGE Ari U., CHAMBERLIN John R., “Application of Sell vs. United States”, Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, Vol:34, No:2, 2006, s.248-250.
- FRANK Michael J., SAMANTA Johan, MOUSTAFA Ahmed A., SHERMAN Scott J., “Hold Your Horses: Impulsivity, Deep Brain Stimulation and Medication in Parkinsonism”, Science, Vol:318, No:5854, 2007, s.1309-1312.
Details
Primary Language
Turkish
Subjects
Law in Context
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Zeynep Karasulu
*
0000-0002-0964-4182
Türkiye
Publication Date
December 19, 2022
Submission Date
September 16, 2022
Acceptance Date
November 28, 2022
Published in Issue
Year 2022 Volume: 71 Number: 4
Cited By
CEZA MUHAKEMESİNDE POLİGRAFİK İNCELEMELERİN GEÇERLİLİĞİ VE DELİL DEĞERİ SORUNU
Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.33717/deuhfd.1732966