Grain yield and quality characteristics of some grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) genotypes grown as summer and winter crop under ecological conditions of Yozgat

Abstract

Objective: There has been a shortage of quality roughage in Turkey for many years. This causes a decrease in the quality and yield of livestock. On the other hand, Turkey is in the arid and semi-arid climate zone and is among the countries that are expected to be most affected by climate change. The shortage of forage crops and the expected negativities in climatic conditions make it necessary to grow plants suitable for stress conditions. Grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.), which is in the legume family, has a very important place in terms of animal nutrition, and it is highly drought tolerant and can grow easily in many different soils. Materials and Methods: This study; It was aimed to determine the grain yield and quality of the grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) genotypes (Gap Mavisi, Eren, İptaş, Karadağ, 1603, 2006, 2401, 4301, 4403, 5001, 6408, 6410 and S3) in winter and summer sowing in Yozgat ecological conditions. The study was established in 2019-2020 vegetation period and according to the randomized blocks split plots experimental design with 3 replications. Results: Grain yield, crude protein ratio, ODAP (N-oxalyl-L-alpha, beta-diaminopropionic acid), total phenolic, total flavonoid, radical repellent activity (DPPH), and condensed tannin contents were determined in the seeds of plants. Conclusion: According to the data obtained from the study, it has been determined that summer sowing is superior to winter sowing, and some populations show better results than varieties in terms of animal nutrition and productivity.

Keywords

• Sowing time
• genotype
• grass pea
• feed
• quality
• yield

Yozgat Ekolojik Koşullarında Yazlık ve Kışlık Olarak Yetiştirilen Bazı Mürdümük (Lathyrus sativus l.) Genotiplerinin Tane Verimi ve Kalite Özellikleri

Öz

Amaç: Türkiye’de uzun yıllardır kaliteli kaba yem açığı bulunmaktadır. Bu durum hayvanların kalitesinde ve verimlerinde düşüşler meydana getirmektedir. Diğer taraftan kurak ve yarı kurak iklim kuşağında yer alan Türkiye iklim değişikliğinden en fazla etkilenmesi beklenen ülkeler arasında yer almaktadır. Yem bitkileri açığı ve iklim koşullarında beklenen olumsuzluklar koşullarına uygun bitkilerin yetiştirilmesini zorunlu hale getirmektedir. Baklagiller familyasında yer alan mürdümük (Lathyrus sativus L.) hayvan besleme açısından oldukça önemli bir yere sahip olup, kuraklığa toleransı yüksektir ve çok farklı topraklarda rahatlıkla gelişme gösterebilmektedir. Materyal ve Metot: Bu çalışmada; Yozgat ekolojik koşullarında kışlık ve yazlık olarak ekilen farklı mürdümük genotiplerinin (Gap Mavisi, Eren, İptaş, Karadağ, 1603, 2006, 2401, 4301, 4403, 5001, 6408, 6410 ve S3) tane verimi ve kalitesinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Çalışma 2019-2020 vejetasyon döneminde ve Bölünmüş Parseller Deneme Desenine göre 3 tekerrürlü olarak kurulmuştur. Araştırma Bulguları: Bitkilerin tohumlarında, tane verimi, ham protein oranı, ODAP (N-oxalyl-L-alpha,beta-diaminopropionic acid), toplam fenolik, toplam flavonoid, radikal kovucu aktivite (DPPH) ve kondanse tanen içerikleri belirlenmiştir. Sonuç: Çalışmadan elde edilen verilere göre, yazlık ekimlerin kışlık ekimlere göre daha üstün olduğu, hayvan besleme ve verimlik açısından ise bazı popülasyonların çeşitlerden daha iyi sonuçlar sergilediği tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ekim zamanı
• genotip
• mürdümük
• yem
• kalite
• verim

References

1. Abd El Moneim, A. M., Van Dorrestein B., Baum, M., & Mulugeta W. (1999). Role of ICARDA in improving the nutritional quality and yield potential of grass pea (Lathyrus sativus) for subsistence farmers in developing countries. CGIAR-wide conference on AgricultureNutrition, 5–6.
2. Acar, Z., Tan, M., Ayan, İ., Önal Aşçı, Ö., Mut, H., Başaran, U., ... & Kaymak, G. (2020). Türkiye’de yem bitkileri tarımının durumu ve geliştirme olanakları. Türkiye Ziraat Mühendisleri IX. Teknik Kongresi, 13(17), 529-553.
3. Akarken, N., Cengiz, R., Esmeray, M., Sezer, C., Duman, A., & Cerit, S. (2017) Mısırda Kuraklık Stresi. 12.Tarla Bitkileri Kongresi, (s 42), Kahramanmaraş.
4. Arvouet-Grand, A., Vennat, B., Pourrat, A., & Legret, P. (1994). Standardisation d`un extrait de propolis et identification desprincipaux constituants. Journal de pharmacie de Belgique, 49, 462-468.
5. Barry, TN (1987). Secondary compounds of forages. Nutrition of Herbivores. Sydney, Australia: Academic Press Başaran, U., Acar, Z., Önal, Ö., Mut, H., & Ayan, i. (2007). Mürdümük (Lathyrus Sp.) Türlerinin Önemi, Tarımda Kullanım Olanakları Ve Zararlı Madde İçerikleri. Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 22(1), 139-148.
6. Bate-Smith, E. C. (1975). Phytochemistry of proanthocyanidins. Phytochemistry, 14, 1107-1113.
7. Çotuk, Z., & ALTINOK, S., (2015). Türkiye'de Yem Bitkisi Tohumculuğu . 11. Tarla Bitkileri Kongresi (pp.100-103) Turkey.
8. Deshpande, S.S., & Campbell, C. G. (1992). Genotype variation in BOAA, condensed tannins, phenolics and enzyme inhibitors of grass pea (Lathyrus sativus). Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 72(4), 1037-1047.

9. Eyiiş, E., & Pekgöz, A. K. (2021). Radical Scavenging Activity of Some Lathyrus Taxa Distributed in Burdur-Isparta Regio. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 25(1), 121-126.
10. Fırıncıoğlu, H. K., Unal, S., Pank, Z., & Beniwal, S. P. S. (2012). Growth and development of narbon vetch (Vicia narbonensis L.) genotypes in the semi-arid central Turkey. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 10(2), 430-442.
11. Hanbury, C. D., White, C. L., Mullan, B.P. & Siddique, K. H. M.,(2000). Are View of The Potential of Lathyrus sativus L. and Lathyrus Cicera L. Grain for Use as Animal Feed. Animal Feed Science andTechnology, 87(1-2),1-27.
12. Hanbury, C. D., Siddique, K. H. M., Galwey, N. W., & Cocks, P. S. (1999). Genotype-environment interaction for seed yield and ODAP concentration of Lathyrus sativus L. and L. cicera L. in Mediterranean-type environments. Euphytica, 110, 45-60.
13. Harbowy, M. E., Balentine, D. A., Davies, A. P., & Cai, Y. (1997). Tea chemistry. Critical reviews in plant sciences, 16(5), 415-480.
14. Heydari, H., Saltan, G., Bahadır Açıkara, Ö., Yılmaz, S., Çoban, T., & Tekin, M. (2015). Antioxidant activity of five Lathyrus L. species growing in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 12(3), 369-376.
15. Jiao, C. J., Xu, Q. L., Wang, C. Y., Li, F. M., Li, Z. X., & Wang, Y. F. (2006). Accumulation pattern of toxin β-ODAP during lifespan and effect of nutrient elements on β-ODAP content in Lathyrus sativus seedlings. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 144(4), 369-375.Kumar, R. & M. Singh. (19849. Tannins: Their adverse role in ruminant nutrition. J Agric Food Chem. 32:447- 453.
16. Kuhnen, S., Moacyr, J. R., Mayer, J. K., Navarro, B. B., Trevisan, R., Honorato, L. A., Maraschin, M., & Pinheiro Machado Filho, L. C. (2014). Phenolic content and ferric reducing-antioxidant power of cow’s milk produced in different pasture-based production systems in southern Brazil. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 94, 3110–3117.
17. Kumar, S., & Pandey, A. K. (2013). Chemistry and biological activities of flavonoids: an overview. The scientific world journal, 2013.
18. Lambein, F., Khan, J. K., Kuo, Y. H., Campbell, C. G., & Briggs, C. J. (1993). Toxins in the seedlings of some varieties of grass pea (Lathyrus sativus). Natural Toxins, 1(4), 246-249.
19. Mammadov, R. (2014). Tohumlu Bitkilerde Sekonder Metabolitler. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık, Yayın No: 841. Fen Bilimleri, (978-605), 133-743.
20. Mehta, S. L., Ali, K., & Barna, K. S. (1994). Somaclonal variation in a food legume—Lathyrus sativus. Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 3, 73-77.
21. O’connell, J. E., & Fox, P. F. (2001). Significance and applications of phenolic compounds in the production and quality of milk and dairy products: a review. International Dairy Journal, 11(3), 103-120.
22. Plitmann, U., Gabay, R., & Cohen, O. (1995). Innovations in the tribe Vicieae (Fabaceae) from Israel. Israel Journal of Plant Sciences, 43(3), 249-258.
23. Rao, S. L. N., Adiga, P. R., & Sarma, P. S. (1964). The isolation and characterization of β-N-oxalyl-L-α, β-diaminopropionic acid: a neurotoxin from the seeds of Lathyrus sativus. Biochemistry, 3(3), 432-436.
24. Rao, S. L. N. (1978). A sensitive and specific colorimetric method for the determination of α, β-diaminopropionic acid and the Lathyrus sativus neurotoxin. Analytical Biochemistry, 86(2), 386-395.
25. Sayar, M. S., & Han, Y. (2015). Determination of seed yield and yield components of grasspea (Lathyrus sativus L.) lines and evaluations using GGE Biplot analysis method. Tarim Bilimleri Dergisi, 21(1), 78-92.
26. Singleton, V. L., & Rossi, J. A. (1965). Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdicphosphotungstic acid reagents. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 16, 144-158.
27. Undi, M., Wittenberg, K., McGeough, E. J., & Ominski, K. H. (2016). Impact of forage legumes on greenhouse gas output and carbon footprint of meat and milk. The journal of the International Legume Society, (12), 26-28.
28. Xiao, J., Kai, G., Yamamoto, K., & Chen, X. (2013). Advance in dietary polyphenols as α-glucosidases inhibitors: a review on structure-activity relationship aspect. Critical reviews in food science and nutrition, 53(8), 818-836.
29. Yazici, S. O., Ozmen, I., Yildirim, B., Genc, H., Ozeloglu, B., Gulsun, M., & Ozcaka, S. (2019). Biochemical composition of Lathyrus l. seeds: antioxidant activities, phenolic profiles, β-odap and protein contents. Legume Research-An International Journal, 43(5), 723-727.
30. Zhan, J., Liu, M., Su, X., Zhan, K., Zhang, C., & Zhao, G. (2017). Effects of alfalfa flavonoids on the production performance, immune system, and ruminal fermentation of dairy cows. Archive of Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 30(10), 1416-1424.
31. Zhang, L., Zhang, S., Ye, G., & Qin, X. (2020). Seasonal variation and ecological importance of tannin and nutrient concentrations in Casuarina equisetifolia branchlets and fine roots. Journal of Forestry Research, 31(5), 1499-1508.