Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Sorgulamaya Dayalı Basit Araç Gereçlerle Yapılan Fizik Etkinliklerinin Fen Öğretmenlerinin Görüşlerine Etkisi

Year 2017, , 1153 - 1165, 30.10.2017
https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.334072

Abstract


Bu çalışma TUBİTAK tarafından desteklenen “Neşeli Fen
Dersleri, Sorgulayan Öğrenci ve Sevilen Bilim” projesine katılan fen bilimleri
öğretmenlerinin Basit Araç-Gereçlerle yapılan Etkinliklerle (BAGYE) ilgili
görüşlerinde bir değişim olup olmadığını incelemek amacıyla yapılmıştır.
Çalışmaya Bingöl, Elazığ, ve Tunceli illerindeki 58 gönüllü fen bilimleri
öğretmenleri katılmıştır. Yani çalışmada uygun örnekleme kullanılmıştır.
Öğretmenler proje kapsamında mekanik, termodinamik ve optik konuları gibi fizik
konularını kapsayan bazı seçilmiş BAGYE’leri sorgulamaya dayalı öğretimle
yapmışlardır. Çalışmada sadece tek grup vardır ve çalışmanın öncesinde ve
sonrasında veri toplama aracı olarak Uzal vd. (2010) tarafından geliştirilen ve
12 maddelik bir Likert ölçeği olan BAGYE’lerle ilgili görüş anketi
uygulanmıştır. Aynı zamanda proje sonunda öğretmenlerle odak grup mülakatı
gerçekleştirilerek nicel veriler nitel verilerle de desteklenmiştir. Sonuç
olarak fen öğretmenlerinin BAGYE’lerle ilgili son-test ön-test puanları
arasında anlamlı bir fark çıkmasa da bayan fen öğretmenlerinin görüş
puanlarının çalışma neticesince bir miktar yükselirken bay öğretmenlerin
görüşlerinde çok az düşme gözlenmiştir. Bu etkileşim küçük bir etki büyüklüğüne
sahiptir. Odak grup mülakatında ise öğretmenler daha önceden değişik nedenlerle
fen derslerinde BAGYE’lere ya da deneylere yer vermediklerini dile
getirmişlerdir. Proje neticesinde bahsettikleri problemlerin BAGYE’lerin fen
derslerinde kullanımıyla ortadan kalkacağını dile getirmişlerdir. Nitel olarak
fen öğretmenlerinin BAGYE’lerle ilgili görüşlerinde olumlu ilerlemeler olduğu
görülmüştür.

References

  • Arı, Ü., Peşman, H. vd. (2016). Fen bilimleri öğretmenlerinin bilimsel süreç becerilerinin gelişimi. Uluslararası Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(7), 44-52.
  • Balagun, T.A., ve Odubunni, O. (1991). The effect of lecture teaching methods on cognitive achievement in integrated science. Journal Research in Science Teaching, 28, 213-224.
  • Blanchard, M. R., Southerland, S. A. vd. (2010). Is inquiry possible in light of accountability?: A quantitative comparison of the relative effectiveness of guided inquiry and verification laboratory instruction. Science Education, 94(4), 577-616.
  • Bogdan, R. C. ve Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K. vd. (2014). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara, Türkiye: Pegem Akademi.
  • Colburn, A. (2000). An inquiry primer. Science Scope, 23(6), 42 – 44.
  • Fraenkel, J. R., ve Wallen, N. E. (1996). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill.
  • George, D., ve Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step a simple guide and referance 11.0 update (4th Ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
  • Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66 (1), 64.
  • Huber, R. A., ve Moore, C. J. (2001). A Model for Extending Hands‐On Science to Be Inquiry Based. School Science and Mathematics, 101(1), 32-42.
  • Lee, O. (1995). Subject matter knowledge, classroom management, and instructional practices in middle school science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(4), 423-440.
  • National Research Council (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Rao, D. B., ve Kumari, U. N., (2008). Science process skills of school students. Arora Offset Press, Laxmi Nagar, Delhi-92.
  • Savran, A. ve Çakıroğlu, J. (2003). Differences between elementary and secondary preservice science teachers’ perceived efficacy believes and their classroom management believes. The Turkish Online Journal of Educaitonal Tezhnology, 2(4), 15-20.
  • Schwab, J. J. (1962). The teaching of science as enquiry. In J. J. Schwab ve P. F. Brandwein, The teaching of science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Settlage, J., ve Southerland, S. A. (2007). Teaching science to all children: Using culture as a starting point. New York: Routledge.
  • Welch, W.W., Klopfer, L.E. vd. (1981). The role of inquiry in science education: Analysis and recommendations, Science Education, 65, 33–50.
  • Uzal, G., Erdem, A. vd. (2010). The evaluation of teachers’ opinions about hands-on science experiments and the performed in-service training. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(1), 64-84.
  • Yılmaz, H. ve Çavaş, P. H. (2008). The effect of the teaching practice on pre-service elementary teachers’ science teaching efficacy and classroom management beliefs. Eurasia Journal of Mathmatics, Science, ve Technology Education, 4(1), 45-54.

Effect of Inquiry Based Hands-on Physics Activities on Views of Science Teachers

Year 2017, , 1153 - 1165, 30.10.2017
https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.334072

Abstract

This study was performed to explore whether there
is a change in views about handson physics activities of the science teachers
participated in the project “Amazing Science Lessons, Inquiring Students, and
Popular Science” supported by TUBITAK. 58 volunteer science teachers in Bingöl,
Elazığ, and Tunceli provinces of Turkey participated in the study. Convenience
sampling was utilized. Teachers performed some selected hands-on activities
covering physics contents such as mechanics, thermodynamics, and optics through
inquiry teaching. There is one group in the study and the survey with 12
four-point Likert items for measuring views about hands-on activities developed
by Uzal et al. (2010) was used just prior and after the treatment. In addition,
a focus group interview was conducted after the treatment to support the
quantitative data qualitatively. Consequently, although there was not a
significant difference between pre-test and post-test scores, there was a
slight decrease in views of males while females’ views were rising at one
level. 

References

  • Arı, Ü., Peşman, H. vd. (2016). Fen bilimleri öğretmenlerinin bilimsel süreç becerilerinin gelişimi. Uluslararası Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(7), 44-52.
  • Balagun, T.A., ve Odubunni, O. (1991). The effect of lecture teaching methods on cognitive achievement in integrated science. Journal Research in Science Teaching, 28, 213-224.
  • Blanchard, M. R., Southerland, S. A. vd. (2010). Is inquiry possible in light of accountability?: A quantitative comparison of the relative effectiveness of guided inquiry and verification laboratory instruction. Science Education, 94(4), 577-616.
  • Bogdan, R. C. ve Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K. vd. (2014). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara, Türkiye: Pegem Akademi.
  • Colburn, A. (2000). An inquiry primer. Science Scope, 23(6), 42 – 44.
  • Fraenkel, J. R., ve Wallen, N. E. (1996). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill.
  • George, D., ve Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step a simple guide and referance 11.0 update (4th Ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
  • Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66 (1), 64.
  • Huber, R. A., ve Moore, C. J. (2001). A Model for Extending Hands‐On Science to Be Inquiry Based. School Science and Mathematics, 101(1), 32-42.
  • Lee, O. (1995). Subject matter knowledge, classroom management, and instructional practices in middle school science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(4), 423-440.
  • National Research Council (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Rao, D. B., ve Kumari, U. N., (2008). Science process skills of school students. Arora Offset Press, Laxmi Nagar, Delhi-92.
  • Savran, A. ve Çakıroğlu, J. (2003). Differences between elementary and secondary preservice science teachers’ perceived efficacy believes and their classroom management believes. The Turkish Online Journal of Educaitonal Tezhnology, 2(4), 15-20.
  • Schwab, J. J. (1962). The teaching of science as enquiry. In J. J. Schwab ve P. F. Brandwein, The teaching of science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Settlage, J., ve Southerland, S. A. (2007). Teaching science to all children: Using culture as a starting point. New York: Routledge.
  • Welch, W.W., Klopfer, L.E. vd. (1981). The role of inquiry in science education: Analysis and recommendations, Science Education, 65, 33–50.
  • Uzal, G., Erdem, A. vd. (2010). The evaluation of teachers’ opinions about hands-on science experiments and the performed in-service training. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(1), 64-84.
  • Yılmaz, H. ve Çavaş, P. H. (2008). The effect of the teaching practice on pre-service elementary teachers’ science teaching efficacy and classroom management beliefs. Eurasia Journal of Mathmatics, Science, ve Technology Education, 4(1), 45-54.
There are 19 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Articles
Authors

Haki Peşman

Üzeyir Arı

Oktay Baykara This is me

Publication Date October 30, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2017

Cite

APA Peşman, H., Arı, Ü., & Baykara, O. (2017). Effect of Inquiry Based Hands-on Physics Activities on Views of Science Teachers. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 6(3), 1153-1165. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.334072

All the articles published in the journal are open access and distributed under the conditions of CommonsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License 

88x31.png


Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education