Belge Yönetimi Disiplinine Bibliyometrik Bir Bakış: Eş-Kelime Analizi Üzerinden Bir Değerlendirme

Year 2018, , 90 - 99, 28.12.2018

Haydar Yalçın

https://doi.org/10.33721/by.460143

Abstract

Yönetimsel süreçlerin vazgeçilmez bir
parçası olan belge yönetimi, yalnızca kurumlarda üretilen belgelere yönelik bir
süreç olarak algılanmamalıdır. Her bilim alanında olduğu gibi belge yönetiminin
de çağın gereklerine uygun bir şekilde pozisyon alması gerekmektedir. Bu
araştırmada belge yönetimi yayınları, dokümanlarda kullanılan anahtar kelimeler
üzerinden incelenmiştir. Belge yönetimi alanındaki liteartür artışının %15’lik
bir orana ulaştığı tespit edilmiştir. Kavramsal yapı haritasında belge
yönetimine yönelik çalışmaların beş ana başlık altında toplanabileceği
görülmüştür; “Bilgi Sistemi”, “Bilgi Yönetimi”, Birlikte Çalışabilirlik
(Interoperability)”, “Sağlık Bilgi Sistemleri ve Kullanıcı” “Yasal Uyum ve
Kurumsal Gereksinimler”. Diğer yandan belge yönetiminin yalnızca kurumların
doğal işleyişinin birer kanıtı olarak oluşan belgelerle sınırlı kalmadığı, özellikle
hastane bilgi sistemlerinin içerisinde yer alan hasta kayıtlarının da bu
bağlamda incelendiği görülmüştür. Bu tespitten yola çıkarak veri yönetiminin
belge yönetimi bağlamında sürece dâhil edilmesinin alan araştırmacılarının
dikkatine sunulması gerektiği düşünülmektedir. Ulaştığımız kavramsal yapı
haritasına göre belge yönetiminin yalnızca üretilen belgelere dair bir süreç
olmadığı, bilgi sistemi, veri yönetimi, kullanıcı, yasa ve yönetmeliklere
uyumluluk, birlikte çalışabilirlik ve standartlar vb. gibi birçok boyutu tespit edilmiştir. Alanın
bilgibilim, kütüphanecilik ve bilgisayar bilimleri ekseninde yer aldığı açıkça
görülmektedir.

Keywords

Belge Yönetimi, Bibliyometri, Eş-Kelime Analizi, R

A Bibliometric Perspective of Records Management Discipline: An Assessment on Co-Word Analysis

Abstract

Records management, which is an
indispensable part of administrative processes, should not be perceived as a process
directed only to records produced in institutions. As in any scientific
discipline, records management needs to take a position in line with the needs
of todays. In this research, records management publications have been examined
through the keywords used in the scientific papers. The growth rate for the
discipline is 15%. It has been seen that studies on records management under
the conceptual structure map can be gathered under five main headings; "Information
System","Information Management", "Interoperability",
"Health Information Systems and User" "Legal Compliance and
Institutional Requirements". On the other hand, it has been observed that records
management is not limited to the documentation which is the only natural
evidence of the natural functioning of institutions, especially the patient/health
records in the hospital information systems. It is believed that this should be
brought to the attention of field researchers to include data management in the
context of records management. The conceptual structure of the map we are
reaching is not only a documented process of records management, but also the
compatibility of information systems, data management, users, laws and
regulations, interoperability and standards, and so on. Many dimensions have
been identified. The field is located on the axis of information science,
library science and computer science.                                                                                                              

Keywords

Records Management, Bibliometrics, Co-Word Analysis, R

References

• Barata, K. J. (1998). The impact of information technology standards on recordkeeping systems development:: Implications for records professionals.
• Computer Standards & Interfaces, 19(1), 51-64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-5489(97)00007-X
• Bayram, Ö., Özdemirci, F., & Güvercin, T. (2013). Developing Electronic Records Management Software Applications and Managing Institutional Differences:
• A Comparative Study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 73, 526-533. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.02.086
• Chen, X., Chen, J., Wu, D., Xie, Y., & Li, J. J. P. C. S. (2016). Mapping the research trends by co-word analysis based on keywords from funded project. 91, 547-555.
• Cook, M. (1980). 2 - Systems for Records Management. In M. Cook (Ed.), Archives and the Computer (pp. 55-75): Butterworth-Heinemann.
• Demirtel, H., & Bayram, Ö. G. (2014). Efficiency of Electronic Records Management Systems: Turkey and Example of Ministry of Development. Procedia -
• Social and Behavioral Sciences, 147, 189-196. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.151
• Goodman, E. C. (1994). Records management as an information management discipline — A case study from SmithKline Beecham pharmaceuticals.
• International Journal of Information Management, 14(2), 134-143. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0268-4012(94)90032-9
• Goodyear, M. L., & Miller, E. P. (1977). Acquisitions and records management: Help where it is needed. Library Acquisitions: Practice & Theory, 1(3), 157-161. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-6408(77)90025-4
• Grummitt, A. (1977). Real-time record management in general practice. International Journal of Bio-Medical Computing, 8(2), 131-150. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7101(77)90015-0
• Gunnlaugsdottir, J. (2003). Seek and you will find, share and you will benefit: organising knowledge using groupware systems. International Journal of
• Information Management, 23(5), 363-380. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-4012(03)00064-1
• Külcü, Ö., & Çakmak, T. (2010). Evaluation of the ERM application in Turkey within the framework of InterPARES Project. International Journal of
• Information Management, 30(3), 199-211. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.09.001
• Külcü, Ö., & Çakmak, T. (2012). Convergence of the Records Management and Enterprise Content Management in the Digital Environment. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 62, 194-197. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.031
• Mohebbi, A., & Douzandegan, Y. J. J. o. S. R. (2017). Linear Regression Analysis of Title Word Count and Article Time Cited using R. 6(1). Muñoz-Leiva, F., Viedma-del-Jesús, M. I., Sánchez-Fernández, J., López-Herrera, A. G. J. Q., & Quantity. (2012). An application of co-word analysis and bibliometric maps for detecting the most highlighting themes in the consumer behaviour research from a longitudinal perspective. 46(4), 1077-1095.
• Patterson, G., & Sprehe, J. T. (2002). Principal challenges facing electronic records management in federal agencies today. Government Information Quarterly, 19(3), 307-315. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-624X(02)00108-9
• Plocher, D. (1999). The digital age: Challenges for records management. Government Information Quarterly, 16(1), 63-69. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-624X(99)80016-1
• Sprehe, J. T. (2000). Integrating records management into information resources management in U.S. government agencies11The author is grateful to David Plocher, Kenneth Thibodeau, and John Bertot for comments and suggestions on an earlier version of this paper, and to NEC Corporation for financial assistance in the preparation of the paper. Government Information Quarterly, 17(1), 13-26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-624X(99)00022-2
• van Straten, R. H. (1993). Records management handbook for United States senators and their archival repositories: By Karen Dawley Paul. Washington DC, 1992. Senate Historical Office, United States Senate, 179p. Senate publication number 102-7. Government Publications Review, 20(4), 472-473. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9390(93)90047-S
• Van Wingen, R. S., Hathorn, F., & Sprehe, J. T. (1999). Principles for information technology investment in u.s. federal electronic records management. Journal of Government Information, 26(1), 33-42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-0237(98)00086-0
• Weiss, P. N. (1991). Law and technology: Can they keep abreast? Government Information Quarterly, 8(4), 377-380. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0740-624X(91)90004-R