The Late Roman–Early Eastern Roman Red Slip Ware Assemblage from the Hurmalık Bath at Patara

Dilek Şen

doi:10.5281/zenodo.21248617

EN TR

Abstract

The Late Roman–Early Eastern Roman Red Slip Ware Assemblage from the Hurmalık Bath at Patara

Abstract

This article examines the Late Roman–Early Eastern Roman red slip ware assemblage recovered from the Hurmalık Bath (Northern Bath/Harbor Bath) at Patara, one of the principal urban centers of ancient Lykia in southwestern Anatolia. Constructed in the late first or early second century CE and intensively used throughout Late Antiquity, the bath complex yielded, during the 2005–2008 excavations, a substantial ceramic assemblage dating primarily from the fourth to the early seventh century CE. The study investigates imported red slip wares as archaeological evidence for Patara’s economic vitality and its integration into Mediterranean exchange networks. The assemblage is dominated by Late Roman D (LRD) ware, followed by Aegean Late Roman C (LRC) ware and African Red Slip Ware (ARSW). Within this repertoire, LRC Hayes Form 3 is particularly well represented, while the ARSW group comprises both widely distributed types and forms that are rarely attested outside the western Mediterranean. The chronological distribution indicates that imports increased from the second half of the fourth century CE, reached their peak during the late fifth and early sixth centuries CE, and gradually declined until disappearing in the early seventh century CE. The Hurmalık Bath assemblage thus provides the first concrete archaeological evidence for imported red slip wares at Patara and contributes to a broader understanding of Lykia’s role in Late Antique Mediterranean trade.

Keywords

Thanks

This work is a revised section of the author's PhD thesis (La céramique protobyzantine de Lycie: étude du mobilier des “bains portuaires” de Patara), which was defended at the Institute of Archaeology, Paris 1-Panthéon Sorbonne University in June 2017. I would like to extend my special thanks to Dr. Şevket Aktaş, the director of the Patara archaeological excavations, and express my gratitude to Prof. Dr. Fahri Işık and Prof. Dr. Havva İşkan Işık, who directed the excavations during my time on the team. I would also like to express my sincere thanks to Prof. Dr. Feriştah Soykal Alanyalı, who directed the Hurmalık Hamam / Harbor Baths project between 2005-2008, and to Assoc. Prof. Dr. Serap Akca, who took over the project from 2009 onwards.

Patara Hurmalık Hamamı'nın Geç Roma–Erken Doğu Roma Dönemi Kırmızı Astarlı Seramik Topluluğu

Abstract

Bu makale, Güneybatı Anadolu’da antik Lykia’nın başlıca kent merkezlerinden biri olan Patara’daki Hurmalık Hamamı’nda (Kuzey Hamamı/Liman Hamamı) ele geçen Geç Roma–Erken Doğu Roma Dönemi kırmızı astarlı seramik topluluğunu incelemektedir. MS 1. yüzyılın sonlarında ya da 2. yüzyılın başlarında inşa edilen ve Geç Antik Çağ boyunca yoğun biçimde kullanılan hamam kompleksi, 2005–2008 yıllarında gerçekleştirilen kazılarda, ağırlıklı olarak MS 4. yüzyıldan 7. yüzyılın başlarına tarihlenen zengin bir seramik topluluğu vermiştir. Çalışma, ithal kırmızı astarlı seramikleri, Patara’nın ekonomik canlılığını ve Akdeniz değişim ağlarına entegrasyonunu ortaya koyan arkeolojik veriler olarak değerlendirmektedir. Buluntu topluluğunda baskın grubu Geç Roma D (LRD) seramikleri oluşturmakta; bunu Ege kökenli Geç Roma C (LRC) ve Afrika Kırmızı Astarlı Seramikleri (ARSW) izlemektedir. Bu repertuvar içinde LRC Hayes Form 3 en yoğun temsil edilen form olurken, ARSW grubu hem Akdeniz genelinde yaygın dolaşıma sahip tipleri hem de Batı Akdeniz dışında nadiren belgelenen formları içermektedir. Kronolojik dağılım, ithalatın MS 4. yüzyılın ikinci yarısından itibaren arttığını, MS 5. yüzyılın sonları ile 6. yüzyılın başlarında en yüksek düzeye ulaştığını ve MS 7. yüzyılın başlarında sona eren kademeli bir gerileme süreci izlediğini göstermektedir. Hurmalık Hamamı buluntuları, böylece Patara’da ithal kırmızı astarlı seramiklerin varlığına ilişkin ilk somut arkeolojik kanıtları ortaya koymakta ve Lykia’nın Geç Antik Çağ Akdeniz ticaretindeki rolünün daha iyi anlaşılmasına önemli katkılar sağlamaktadır.

Keywords

References

Abadie-Reynal C. 2005, “Les sigillées africaines à Zeugma”. Mélanges Jean-Pierre Sodini, Travaux et Mémoires 15. Paris, 523–546.
Abadie-Reynal C., Martz A. S. & Cador A. 2007, “Late Roman and Byzantine Pottery in Zeugma: Groups of the Beginning of the 5th Century”. Eds. B. Böhlendorf-Arslan, A. O. Uysal & J. Witte-Orr, ÇANAK: Late Antique and Medieval Pottery and Tiles in Mediterranean Archaeological Contexts. İstanbul, 181-194.
Adak-Adıbelli İ. 2006, Tarsus Geç Roma Seramiği. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi. Ankara. Akca S. & Şen D. 2025, “Side Doğu Nekropol Üretim Alanları: Seramik Buluntular ve Kullanım Evrelerine Dair Ön Değerlendirmeler”. MJH XV/2, 121-151.
Aktaş R. 2018, Antandros Kazısı Yamaç Ev Roma Dönemi Seramikleri. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ege Üniversitesi. İzmir.
Aktaş R. 2020, “Antandros Yamaç Ev Sektörü’nde Ele Geçen Açık Renkli Seramikler”. Ed. V. Keleş, Propontis ve Çevre Kültürleri (Parion Studies III). İstanbul, 35-73.
Aktaş R. 2021, “Antandros Sur Sektöründe Ele Geçen Bir Grup Roma Dönemi Seramiğinin Tipolojik İncelemesi”. TÜBA-AR 28, 11-38.
Alanyalı F. S. 2007, “Hurmalık Hamamı”. Ed. F. Işık, Patara 2005 Yılı KST 28/1. Ankara, 19-32.
Alanyalı F. S. 2008, “Hurmalık Hamamı”. Ed. F. Işık, Patara 2006 KST 29/1. Ankara, 77-92.

Alanyalı F. S. 2009a, “Liman (Hurmalık) Hamamı”. Ed. F. Işık, Patara 2007 KST 30/4. Ankara, 41-48.
Alanyalı F. S. 2009b, “Patara Hurmalık Hamamı 2005-2008 Yılı Arkeoloji ve Belgeleme Çalışmalarına Genel bir Bakış”. Eds. A. Çabuk & F. S. Alanyalı, Kültür Varlıklarının Belgelenmesi. Eskişehir, 117-133.
Alanyalı F. S. & Şen D. 2007, “Patara Hurmalık Hamamı Frigidariumu ve Seramiklerinin Stratigrafik Olarak Değerlendirilmesi”. SERES 2007. Eskişehir, 412-423.
Anderson Stojanovič V. R. 1992, Stobi: The Hellenistic and Roman Pottery. New Jersey.
Arslan N. 2004, “Antiocheia (Pisidya) Kazılarında Bulunan Seramikler”. Olba X, 209-224.
Ateş G. 2003, Die Rote Feinkeramik von Aizanoi als lokaler Kulturträger. Dissertation, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg. Heidelberg.
Atik N. 1995, Die Keramik aus den Südthermen von Perge (IstMit 40). Tübingen.
Atik N. 1998, “Çanak Çömlek Buluntuları”. Ed. J. İnan, Toros'larda bir Antik Kent: Lyrbe? - Seleukia? İstanbul, 92-108.
Atlı-Akbuz L. 2008, Hadrianopolis Roma Dönemi Seramiği. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi. İzmir.
Bailey D. M. 1998, Excavations at El-Ashmunein V. British Museum Expedition to Middle Egypt. London.
Ballance M., Boardman J., Corbett S. & Hood S. 1989, “Excavations in Chios 1952-1955: Byzantine Emporio”. BSA Suppl. 20, 1-145.
Ballet P., Bosson N. & Debergh M. R. 2003, Kellia II. 2 (IFAO Excavations 49). Cairo.
Başaran C. & Ergürer H. E. 2012, “Parion Odeion’u (Bouleuterion?) 2010 Çalışmaları ve Odeion’da Bulunan Seramikler”. OLBA 20, 235-290.
Beaumont L., Archontidou Argyri A., Beames H., Tsigkou A. & Wardle N. 2004, “Excavation at Kato Phana, Chios: 1999, 2000 and 2001”. BSA 99, 201-272.
Berndt M. 2003, Funde aus dem Survey auf der Halbinseln von Milet (1992-1999) (Internationale Archäologie 79). Leidorf.
Bes P. 2015, Once Upon a Time in the East. The Chronological and Geographical Distribution of Terra Sigillata and Red Slip Ware in the Roman East (Roman and Late Antique Mediterranean Pottery 6). Oxford.
Biers J.-C. 1985, The Great Bath on the Lechaion Road (Corinth Vol. 17). Princeton.
Bilgin M., Kaya E., Bilgin-Kopçuk S., Kopçuk İ., Kızıltepe-Bilgin P. & Ülker-Küçük M. 2024, “Aspendos Yüzey Araştırması 2022”. AST 39, Ankara, 85-103.
Bonifay M. 1986, “Observations sur les amphores tardives à Marseille d'après les fouilles de la Bourse (1980-1984)”. Revue archéologique de Narbonnaise 19, 269-301.
Bonifay M. 2004, Etudes sur la céramique romaine tardive d’Afrique (BAR 1301). Oxford.
Bonifay M. 2005, “Observations on the distribution of African pottery in the eastern Mediterranean during late antiquity”. Travaux et Mémoires 15. Paris, 565-581.
Bonifay M., Carre M. B. & Rigoir Y. 1998, Fouilles à Marseille. Les mobiliers (Ier-VIIe s.) (Etudes Massaliètes 5). Paris.
Bonifay M. & Pelletier J. P. 1983, “Éléments de l'évolution de la céramique de l'Antiquité tardive à Marseille d'après les fouilles de la Bourse (1980-1981)”. Revue archéologique de Narbonnaise 16, 285-306.
Bonifay M. & Raynaud P. 2007, “La céramique”. Eds. A. Ben Abed Ben Khader et al., Sidi Jdidi I, La Basilique Sud (Efr 339). Paris, 229-238.
Böhlendorf Arslan B. 2007, “Stratified Byzantine Pottery from the City Wall in the Southwestern Sector of Amorion”. Eds. B. Böhlendorf Arslan, A. O. Uysal & J. Witt, Çanak (Byzas 7). İstanbul, 273-294.
Bourgeois A. & Mayet F. 1991, Belo IV: Les sigillées (Collection de la Casa de Velasquez, Archeology 14). Madrid. Cann S. J. & Lloyd J. A. 1984, “Late Roman and Early Medieval Pottery from the Molise”. Archeologia Medievale XI, 425-436.
Carandini A., Anselmino L., Pavolini C., Sagui L., Tortorella S. & Tortorici E. 1981, Atlante delle forme ceramiche I. Ceramica fine romana nel bacino mediterraneo (medio e tardo impero). Roma.
Congès G., Leguilloux M. & Brien Poitevin F. 1991, “Un dépotoir de l'Antiquité tardive dans le quartier de l'Esplanade à Arles”. Revue archéologique de Narbonnaise 24, 201-234.
Cottica D. 2000, “Late Roman Imported and Locally Produced Pottery from Hierapolis (Pamukkale, Turkey): Preliminary Evidence”. RCRF Acta 36. Abingdon, 49-55.
Çokay Kepçe S. 2022, “Perge’de Roma İmparatorluk ve Geç Antik Dönem’de Görülen İthal Keramik Malzeme Üzerine Genel Bir Değerlendirme”. Höyük 9, 67-84.
Crawford J. S. 1990, The Byzantine Shops at Sardis. London.
Crowfoot J. W., Crowfoot G. M. & Kenyon K. M. 1957, The Objects from Samaria. London.
Diedrichs C. 1980, Salamine de Chypre IX: céramique hellénistique, romaine et byzantine. Paris.
Dikbaş G. 2010, “Aizanois anatolisches Erbe. Zum Verhältnis der grauen Keramik zur roten Glanztonkeramik”. Ed. K. Rheidt, Aizanoi und Anatolien. Mainz am Rhein, 44-55.
Doksanaltı E. 2006, Knidos Kap-Krio Kazı Alanı. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Selçuk Üniversitesi. Konya.
Doğer L. 2007, “Byzantine Ceramics: Excavations at Smyrna Agora (1997-98, 2002-03)”. Eds. B. Böhlendorf-Arslan, A. O. Uysal & J. Witte-Orr, Çanak: Proceeding of the First International Symposion on Late Antique, Byzantine, Seljuk and Ottoman Pottery and Tiles in Archaeological Context, Çanakkale 31 May – 3 June 2005 (Byzas 7). İstanbul, 97-122.
Domžalski K. 2000, “Notes on the Late Roman Red Slip Wares in the Bosphoran Kingdom”. RCRF acta 36. Abingdon, 161-168.
Domžalski K. 2011, “Late Roman Pottery from Pompeiopolis”. Ed. L. Summerer, Pompeiopolis I: eine Zwischenbilanz aus der Metropole Paphlagoniens nach funf Kampagnen (2006 - 2010) (Schriften des Zentrums für archäologie und Kulturgeschichte des Schwartzmeerraumes 21). Oxford, 163-178.
Duman B. 2016, “African Red Slip Ware in Lydian Tripolis”. Rei Cretariae Romanae Fautorum Acta 44, 699-706. Egloff M. 1977, Kellia III. Coptic Pottery. Geneva.
Eisenmenger U. 2003, “Late Roman Pottery in Limyra”. Ed. C. Abadie Reynal, Les Céramiques en Anatolie aux Epoques Hellénistique et Romaine (Varia Anatolica XV). İstanbul, 193-196.
Empereur J.-Y. & Picon M. 1986, “A propos d’un nouvel atelier de 'Late Roman C'”. Figlina 7, 143-146.
Ergürer H. E. 2014, “Late Roman Light-Coloured Ware from Parion”. Eds. M. Meyza & K. Domzalski, Late Hellenistic to Mediaeval Fine Wares of the Aegean Coast of Anatolia, Their Production, Imitation and Use. Varşova, 175-219.
Erkoç S. A. 2012, “Hurmalık / Liman Hamamı”. Ed. H. İşkan Işık, Patara 2010 Yılı KST 33/3. Ankara, 18-31.
Erkoç S. A. 2013, “Hurmalık Hamam / Liman Hamamı ve Palaestrası”. Ed. H. İşkan Işık, Patara 2011 KST 34/3. Ankara, 182-201.
Erkoç S. A. 2014, “Liman Hamamı Palaestra (?) Çalışmaları”. Eds. H. İşkan et al., Patara 2012 KST 35/2. Ankara, 282-301.
Erkoç S. A. 2015, “Liman Hamamı Çalışmaları”. Eds. H. İşkan et al., Patara 2013 Kazıları (Anadolu 41). Ankara, 303-313.
Erkoç S. 2018, “Patara Liman Hamamı: Mimarisi ve Yapı Evrelerine Dair İlk Gözlemler”. Phaselis IV, 239-258. Erol A. F. & Tamer D. 2020, “Zeugma’dan Ele Geçen Geç Roma Kırmızı Astarlı Seramikleri”. Anadolu 46, 49-121. Erol D. 2010, Smyrna Agorasında ele geçen Terra Sigillata ve Geç Roma Seramiği. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi. İzmir.
Erol D. 2014, Terra Sigillata ve Late Roman Ware Seramik Grupları. Ankara.
Ferrazzoli A. F. 2003, “Tipologia dei reperti ceramici ed aspetti delle produzioni e della circolazione dei materiali”. Ed. E. Equini Schneider, Elaiussa Sebaste 2. Roma, 649-756.
Fırat N. 1999, Perge Konut Alanı Kullanım Keramiği. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi. İstanbul.
Fırat N. 2000, “So-called 'Cypriot red slip ware' from the habitation area of Perge (Pamphylia)”. RCRF Acta 36. Abingdon, 35-42.
Fırat N. 2003, “Perge Konut Alanı Kullanım Seramiği”. Ed. C. Abadie Reynal, Les Céramiques en Anatolie aux Epoques Hellénistique et Romaine (Varia Anatolica XV). İstanbul & Paris, 91-100.
Gassner V. 1997, Das Südtor der Tetragonos-Agora (Ephesus XIII.1.1). Vienna.
Gerrit Bruer S. & Kunze M. 2010, Der Stadtplan von Patara und Beobachtungen zu den Stadtmauern. Patara I.1. İstanbul.
Haidar Vela N. & Pieri D. 2013, “Faciès céramiques de la Syrie du Nord protobyzantine”. Topoi Suppl. 12, 111-137.
Hansen S. L. 2003, “Roman and Late Roman Fine Wares from the Danish Excavations of a Late Roman Villa in Halikarnassos”. Ed. C. Abadie Reynal, Les Céramiques en Anatolie aux Epoques Hellénistique et Romaine (Varia Anatolica XV). İstanbul, 197-206.
Hayes J. W. 1968, “A Seventh-Century Pottery Group”. Eds. R. M. Harrison et al., Excavations at Saraçhane in Istanbul: Fifth Preliminary Report (DOP 22). Washington DC, 195-216.
Hayes J. W. 1972, Late Roman Pottery. London.
Hayes J. W. 1980, Supplement to the Late Roman Pottery. London.
Hayes J. W. 1991, Paphos Vol. III: The Hellenistic and Roman Pottery. Nicosia.
Hayes J. W. 1992, Excavations at Saraçhane in İstanbul Vol. 2. New Jersey.
Hayes J. W. 2007, “Pottery”. Ed. A. H. S. Megaw, Kourion, Excavations in the Episcopal Precinct (Dumbarton Oaks Studies XXXVIII). Washington DC, 435-475.
Hayes J. W. 2008, Roman Pottery Fine-Ware Imports (The Athenian Agora XXXII). Princeton.
Heath S. & Tekkök B. 2007, Greek, Roman and Byzantine Pottery at Ilion (Troia). Cincinnati.
Hellenkemper H. & Hild F. 2004, Lykien und Pamphylien (TIB 8). Wien.
Hellström P. 1965, Pottery of Classical and Later Date, Terracotta Lamps, and Glass (Labraunda II: 1). Lund. Işık F. 1991, “Patara 1989”. KST 12/2, 29-45.
Işık F. 1992, “Patara 1990 Etkinlikleri”. KST 13/2, 235-251.
Işık F. 1993, “Patara 1991”. KST 14/2, 385-404.
Işık F. 1994, “Patara 1992”. KST 15/2, 279-293.
Işık F. 1997, “Patara 95”. KST 18/2, 191-209.
Işık F. 1999, “Patara 1997”. KST 20/2, 159-173.
Işık F. 2000, Patara: History and Ruins of the Capital City of Lycian League. Antalya.
Ivantchik A. I. 2002, “An Early Christian Well in the Agora of Argos”. BCH 126-1, 331-366.
Jackson M., Zelle M., Vandeput L. & Köse V. 2012, “Primary Evidence for Late Roman D Ware Production in Southern Asia Minor: A Challenge to Cypriot Red Slip Ware”. Anatolian Studies 62, 89-114.
Johnson B. L. 1988, “The Pottery”. Ed. G. D. Weinberg, Excavations at Jalame. Missouri, 137-226.
Johnson B. L. 2008a, Ascalon 2: Imported Pottery of the Roman and Late Roman Periods. Indiana.
Johnson B. L. 2008b, “The Pottery”. Ed. J. Patrich, Archaeological Excavation at Caesarea Maritima. Field I: The Objects. Jerusalem, 14-114.
Jones F. F. 1950, “The Pottery”. Ed. H. Goldman, Excavation at Gözlü Kule, Tarsus I. Princeton, 149-210. Kavaz Kındığılı B. 2020, “Zeytinliada Kırmızı Astarlı Seramikleri”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 24 (Aralık Özel Sayı), 239-264.
Kaya I. 2007, Demre Aziz Nikolaos Kilisesi Kazılarında Ele Geçen Terra Sigillata ve Red Slip (Kırmızı Astarlı) Seramikler (1998-2004). Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi. Ankara.
Kenkel F. 2007, “The Cypriot Red Slip Wares and Its Derivatives from Pednelissos in Pisidia”. Eds. B. Böhlendorf Arslan et al., Çanak (Byzas 7). İstanbul, 131-150.
Kenrick P. M. 1985, Excavation at Sidi Khrebish Benghazi (Berenice) III-1: Fine Pottery (Supplements to Libya Antiqua V). Tripoli.
Kenrick P. M. 2013, “Pottery Other Than Transport Amphorae”. Ed. W. Aylward, Excavations at Zeugma. Los Altos California, 1-81.
Kızgut İ. & Özhanlı M. 1995, “Hurmalık Hamam”. Ed. F. Işık, Patara KST 16/2. Ankara, 165-174.
Kızgut İ., Özhanlı M., Aktaş Ş. & Gülşen F. 1996, “Hurmalık Hamam Kazısı”. Ed. F. Işık, Patara 1994, KST 17/2. Ankara, 199-212.
Kızılarslanoğlu A. & Aktaş R. 2023, “Elaiussa Sebaste’den Bir Grup Afrika Kırmızı Astarlı Seramikleri”. Ed. M. Kısa, Sosyal, Beşerî ve İdari Bilimler Alanında Uluslararası Araştırmalar XXI, 111-151.
Korkmaz Z. & Tekocak, M. 2024, “Late Roman Red Slip Ware found in Newly Excavated Buildings A and B in Anemurium: A Building Based Evaluation”. Anatolian Research 30, 235-270.
Ladstätter S. & Sauer R. 2005, “Late Roman C Ware in Ephesos”. Ed. F. Krinzinger, Spätantike und mittelalterliche Keramik aus Ephesos (Archäologische Forschungen 13). Wien, 143-158.
Lafli E. 2000, “Sagalassos Table and Common Wares from Seleucia Sidera in Pisidia”. RCRF Acta 36. Abingdon, 43-48.
Langlotz E. 1969, “Beobachtungen in Phokaia”. Archäologischer Anzeiger 84, 377-385.
Loffreda P. S. 1970, “La Ceramica della Sinagoga di Cafarnao”. Ed. V. Corbo, La Sinagoga di Cafarnao dopo gli scavi del 1969. Jerusalem, 61-123.
Mackensen M. 1998, “Centres of African Red Slip Ware Production in Tunisia from the Late 5th to the 7th Century”. Ed. L. Sagui, Ceramica in Italia VI-VII secolo. Florence, 23-39.
Mader I. 1998, “Keramik der Feldforschungen auf dem Gebiet von Kyaneai”. Ed. F. Kolb, Lykische Studien 4 (Asia Minor Studien 29). Bonn, 91-115.
Magness J. 1993, Jerusalem Ceramic Chronology circa 200-800 CE. Sheffield.
Marksteiner T., Lemaître S. & Yener Marksteiner B. 2007, “Die Grabungen am Südtor von Limyra”. JÖAIW 76, 171-193.
Marksteiner T. & Yener Marksteiner B. 2009, “Die Grabungen in Survey 30/36/37 in the Weststadt of Limyra”. JÖAIW 78, 221-255.
Marty F. 2011, “Note sur les sigillées orientales tardives du port de Fos”. Eds. M. A. Cau et al., LRFW 1. Oxford, 155-171.
Mayet F. & Picon M. 1986, “Une sigillée phocéenne tardive (« Late Roman C ware ») et sa diffusion en Occident”. Figlina 7, 129-142.
Meyza H. 2007, Nea Paphos V. Warsaw.
Mimaroğlu S. 2020, “Letoon Geç Roma–Erken Doğu Roma Dönemi Kırmızı Astarlı Seramikleri’nin Ön Değerlendirilmesi”. Cedrus VIII, 279-297.
Ok M. 2023, “African Red Slip Ceramics from Germanicia in the Light of Recent Archaeological Research”. Cedrus XI, 359–376.
Oransay B. S. A. & Şen Yıldırım D. 2011, “Work on the Ceramics”. Ed. H. S. Alanyalı, Side 2010 (ANMED 9). İstanbul 104.
Oransay B. S. A. & Şen Yıldırım D. 2013, “Pottery Studies”. Ed. H. S. Alanyalı, Side 2011-2012 Yılı Çalışmaları (ANMED 11). İstanbul 129-131.
Öz C. 2024, “Andriake Limanı’nda Bulunan Afrika Kırmızı Astarlı Seramikleri”. Lycus 9, 21-52.
Özden Gerçeker G. S. 2020, “2019 Yılı Syedra-Büyük Hamam Kazı Çalışmalarında Bulunan Geç Roma D Seramikleri”. Seramik Araştırmaları Dergisi 2, 103-135.
Öztaşkın M. 2009, “Olympos Antik Kentinden Bir Grup Erken Doğu Roma Dönemi Seramiği”. Ed. A. O. Alp, Ebru Parman'a Armağan. Ankara, 287-308.
Özyiğit Ö. 2007, “2005 Yılı Phokaia Kazı Çalışmaları”. KST 28/2, 341-358.
Pellegrino E. 2002, “Le matériel céramique issu des fouilles menées en 1995 et 2000 sur l’acropole lycienne de Xanthos”. Anatolia Antiqua X, 245-256.
Pellegrino E. 2003, “Présentation des céramiques issues des fouilles menées en 1998-1999 sur l’acropole lycienne de Xanthos”. Anatolia Antiqua XI, 215-231.
Pellegrino E. 2004, “Note sur un dépotoir de céramique du IIIe siècle apr. J.-C. de Xanthos”. Anatolia Antiqua XII, 123-146.
Pellegrino E. 2007, “Les céramiques de la maison du nord-est de l’acropole lycienne de Xanthos”. (BAR Int Ser 1662). Oxford, 659-673.
Poblome J. 1999, Sagalassos Red Slip Ware: Typology and Chronology. Turnhout.
Poblome J., Degryse P., Schlitz M., Degeest R., Viaene W., Librecht I., Paulissen E. & Waelkens M. 2000, “The Ceramic Production Centre of Sagalassos”. RCRF Acta 36. Abingdon, 39-42.
Poblome J., Degryse P., Cottica D. & Fırat N. 2001, “A New Early Byzantine Production Centre in Western Asia Minor”. RCRF Acta 37. Abingdon, 119-126.
Poblome J. & Waelkens M. 2003, “Sagalassos and Alexandria”. Ed. C. Abadie Reynal, Les Céramiques en Anatolie aux Epoques Hellénistique et Romaine. İstanbul &Paris, 91-129.
Poblome J. & Fırat N. 2011, “Late Roman D. A Matter of Opening or Closed Horizons?”. Eds. M. A. Cau et al., LRFW 1. Oxford, 49-55.
Rautman M. L. 1995, “Two Late Roman Wells at Sardis”. ASOR 53, 37-52.
Reynolds P. 2011a, “A Note on the Development of Cypriot Late Roman D Forms 2 and 9”. Eds. M. A. Cau et al., LRFW 1. Oxford, 57-65.
Reynolds P. 2011b, “Fine Wares from Beirut Contexts, c. 450 to the Early 7th Century”. Eds. M. A. Cau et al., LRFW 1. Oxford, 207-230.
Reynolds P. 2011c, “A 7th Century Pottery Deposit from Byzantine Carthago Spartaria”. Eds. M. A. Cau et al., LRFW 1. Oxford, 99-125.
Riley J. A. 1975, “The Pottery from the First Session of Excavation in the Caesarea Hippodrome”. BASOR 218, 25-63.
Rodziewicz M. 1976, Alexandria I. Late Roman Ceramics from Alexandria. Warsaw.
Romanchuk A. & Sazanov A. 1991, Srednevekovyy Kherson. Istoriya, stratigrafiya, nakhodki. Yekaterinburg. Rowe A. H. 2004, Reconsidering Late Roman Cyprus. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Sydney.
Sackett L. H. 1992, “Knossos from Greek City to Roman Colony”. BSA Suppl. 21, 192-234.
Sazanov A. 1994, “Krasnolakovaya keramika Severnogo Prichernomor'ya rannevizantiyskogo vremeni”. Materials in Archeology, History and Ethnography of Tauria 4, 406-433.
Sekban M. B. 2007, Antandros Yamaç Ev Terra Sigillata Buluntuları. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi. İzmir.
Sözel S. 2024, “Knidos Afrika Kırmızı Astarlı Seramikleri”. SRMKA 6, 160-219.
Şahin R. 2020, “Spätantike Sigillaten aus Adramytteion (Ören/Balıkesir): Eine überregionale Material Analyse”. Anadolu Araştırmaları / Anatolian Research 23, 215-259.
Şen D. & Oransay B. S. A. 2014, “2013 Side Excavations: Pottery Studies”. Ed. H. S. Alanyalı, Side Excavations (ANMED 12). İstanbul 105-107.
Şen Yıldırım D. 2012, “Hurmalık Hamamı Buluntuları Işığında Patara'nın Geç Roma-Erken Doğu Roma Dönemi Kuzey Afrika Kökenli Seramikleri”. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 12/4, 151-166.
Şen D. 2017, Céramiques romaines tardives de Lycie: Étude du mobilier des « thermes portuaires » (Hurmalık Hamam) de Patara. Thèse de doctorat non publiée, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne. Paris.
Şen D. 2025, “Side Antik Kentinin Geç Antik Dönem Seramik Repertuvarına Dair İlk Gözlemler”. Eds. H. S. Alanyalı & S. Akca, 2009-2019 Yılları Arasındaki Araştırmalar (Side Antik Kenti Araştırmaları 2). İstanbul, 185-238.
Şengül A. 2022, “2020 Yılı Syedra Kazı Çalışmalarında Bulunan Bir Grup Geç Roma D Seramiği”. SRMKA 4, 168-185.
Sodini J. P. 2000, “Productions et échanges dans le monde protobyzantin (IVe-VIIe siècles)”. Eds. K. Belke et al., Byzanz als Raum. Wien, 181-198.
Tekkök Karaöz B., Tamer D. & Kırkanlı E. 2022, “Idyma Akyaka Kalesi Roma Dönemi İthal ve Yerel/Bölgesel Kırmızı Astarlı Seramikleri”. Lycus 7, 1-40.
Tekkök Karaöz B. 2023, “Late Roman West Asia Minor Light-Colored Ware from Granicus Surveyed Sites Year 2023”. SRMKA 5, 104–132.
Tekocak M. 2006, Kelenderis Roma Çağı Seramiği. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Selçuk Üniversitesi. Konya.
Tekocak M. 2007, “Kelenderis Aşağı Şehir Sondajında Bulunan Kıbrıs Kırmızı Astarlı Kapları”. İDOL 33, 16-24.
Tekocak M. 2009, “African and Cypriot red slip wares from Kelenderis”. Ed. H. Öniz, SOMA 2008 Proceedings of the XII Symposium on Mediterranean Archaeology, Eastern Mediterranean University, Famagusta, North Cyprus, 5-8 March 2008 (BAR IntSer 1909). Oxford, 132-142.
Tekocak M. 2019, “Stratonikeia Kazılarında Bulunan Kırmızı Astarlı Seramikler”. Stratonikeia Çalışmaları-4, Mimari, Heykel ve Küçük Buluntu Araştırmaları. İstanbul, 85-122.
Topoleanu F. 2000, “Roman and Byzantine Pottery from Halmyris”. Istro-Pontica. Tulcea, 257-271.
Tosun M. 2020, “Dara (Anastasiopolis) Verileri Işığında Yukarı Mezopotamya’da Geç Roma-Erken Doğu Roma Dönemi Phokaia Kırmızı Astarlı Seramikleri”. Amisos 5/9, 343-361.
Tuchelt K. 1971, “Didyma Bericht über die Arbeiten”. Istanbuler Mitteilungen 21, 45-108.
Tuğcu I. 2024, “Syedra Büyük Hamam Yapısı’ndan Ele Geçen Bir Grup Geç Roma D Seramiği Üzerine Değerlendirmeler”. Akdeniz İnsani Bilimler Dergisi 14, 381-406.
Turnovsky P. 2005, “Late Antique and Byzantine Pottery of the Church of St. Mary in Ephesos”. RCRF Acta 39. Abingdon, 217-224.
Türker A. Ç. 2010, “Demre-Myra aziz Nikolaos Kilisesi ve Kazılarda Ortaya Çıkarılan Küçük Buluntular”. Ed. N. Çevik, Myra/Demre ve Çevresi. Ankara, 137-152.
Uygun Ç. & Dökü E. 2008, “Examples of Local Red Slip Wares from Kibyra”. Adalya XI, 133-152.
Uygun Ç. 2011, Tepecik Kırmızı Astarlı Seramikleri (İÖ II. yy - İS IV. yy) (Patara IV.2). İstanbul.
Uysal E. 2000, Demre Aziz Nikolaos Kilisesi Kazılarında Ele Geçen Geç Roma-Erken Doğu Roma Dönemine Ait Sırsız Seramikler (Kırmızı Astarlı ve Terra Sigillata Seramikleri, 1989-1997). Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi. Ankara.
Vaag L. E. 2003, “A Closer Look at the Making of Phocaean Red Slip Ware Bowls”. Varia Anatolica XV, 197-202.
Vapur Ö. 2001, Magnesia Ad Maeandrum Gymnasion'u Roma Dönemi Seramikleri. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi. Ankara.
Vazquez Paz J. & Garcia Vargas E. 2011, “Sigillatas africanas y orientales de mediados del siglo VI en Hispalis”. Eds. M. A. Cau et al., LRFW 1. Oxford, 87-98.
Vogt C. 2004, “Échanges et économie protobyzantine d’Eleutherna d'après les témoins céramiques”. Creta Romana e Proto-Bizantina Vol. III-1. Padova, 923-944.
Vroom J. 2004, “Late Antique Pottery, Settlement and Trade in the Eastern Mediterranean: A Preliminary Comparison of Ceramics from Limyra (Lycia) and Boeotia”. Eds. W. Bowden et al., Late Antique Archaeology, Recent Research on the Late Antique Countryside. Leiden, 281-332.
Waage F. O. 1933, “The American Excavations in The Athenian Agora: First Report”. Hesperia 2/2, 279-328.
Waage F. O. 1948, Antioch-on-the-Orontes IV-1. Princeton.
Williams C. 1989, Anemurium: The Roman and Early Byzantine Pottery. Belgium.
Wintermeyer U. 1980, “Didyma 1975-1979, Katalog ausgewählter Keramik und Kleinfunde”. IstMit 30, 122-160.
Yeşilova H. 2007, Allianoi Antik Ilıcası Erken Doğu Roma Dönemi Seramikleri (1999-2005). Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi. Ankara.
Yıldız V. 2022, “Soli Pompeiopolis Afrika Kırmızı Astarlı Seramikleri”. Arkhaia Anatolika 5, 94-153.
Yılmaz Z. 2007, “Spätantike Sigillaten aus Priene”. Eds. B. Böhlendorf Arslan et al., Çanak (Byzas 7). İstanbul, 123-130.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Ceramics in Archeology

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Dilek Şen ^*
0000-0001-5035-7305
Türkiye

Publication Date

July 14, 2026

Submission Date

March 24, 2026

Acceptance Date

June 18, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 14

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21248617

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA89CP88KN

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Şen, D. (2026). The Late Roman–Early Eastern Roman Red Slip Ware Assemblage from the Hurmalık Bath at Patara. Cedrus, 14, 147-184. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21248617

AMA

1.Şen D. The Late Roman–Early Eastern Roman Red Slip Ware Assemblage from the Hurmalık Bath at Patara. Cedrus. 2026;14:147-184. doi:10.5281/zenodo.21248617

Chicago

Şen, Dilek. 2026. “The Late Roman–Early Eastern Roman Red Slip Ware Assemblage from the Hurmalık Bath at Patara”. Cedrus 14 (July): 147-84. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21248617.

EndNote

Şen D (July 1, 2026) The Late Roman–Early Eastern Roman Red Slip Ware Assemblage from the Hurmalık Bath at Patara. Cedrus 14 147–184.

IEEE

[1]D. Şen, “The Late Roman–Early Eastern Roman Red Slip Ware Assemblage from the Hurmalık Bath at Patara”, Cedrus, vol. 14, pp. 147–184, July 2026, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.21248617.

ISNAD

Şen, Dilek. “The Late Roman–Early Eastern Roman Red Slip Ware Assemblage from the Hurmalık Bath at Patara”. Cedrus 14 (July 1, 2026): 147-184. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21248617.

JAMA

1.Şen D. The Late Roman–Early Eastern Roman Red Slip Ware Assemblage from the Hurmalık Bath at Patara. Cedrus. 2026;14:147–184.

MLA

Şen, Dilek. “The Late Roman–Early Eastern Roman Red Slip Ware Assemblage from the Hurmalık Bath at Patara”. Cedrus, vol. 14, July 2026, pp. 147-84, doi:10.5281/zenodo.21248617.

Vancouver

1.Dilek Şen. The Late Roman–Early Eastern Roman Red Slip Ware Assemblage from the Hurmalık Bath at Patara. Cedrus. 2026 Jul. 1;14:147-84. doi:10.5281/zenodo.21248617

The article submitted to Cedrus should be unpublished and should follow the publishing guidelines of the journal accessible from the Journal’s web site. The text should be written in 11,5 point Minion Pro Display (for PC and for Macintosh), the footnotes should be written in 10 point. Please use the New Athenean Unicode/ Minion Pro Display font for Greek (free to download from http://apagreekkeys.org/NAUdownload.html). Footnotes should be placed at the foot of the page, employing continuous numbering. For all photographs, drawings and maps, only the abbreviation (Fig.) should be employed in continuous numbering. The plate numbers will be given by the editors. For this reason, remarks such as plate, picture, drawing, graphic, chart, plan, map other word or abbreviation should not be used, only Fig. followed by the consecutive number.

It is required that the submitted article must be written in the Microsoft Word template attached at the website of the journal. Any visual images in the article should be in .jpeg or .tiff format with a minimum resolution of 300 dpi and they must be sent as an e-mail to cedrus@akdeniz.edu.tr. An abstract consisting of a 150 to 200 word summary of the article is required, together with a list of 4 to 6 keywords. An article in Turkish is to have its abstract in both Turkish and English, and an article in other languages is to have an abstract in both the language of the article and in Turkish. The text of the article should not exceed 20 pages, the maximum number of figures should be 20, and a figure should contain a maximum of 3 photographs/drawings (e.g.: Fig. 1a, b, c). The submission form requires the author’s name, surname, academic title, institution, address, e-mail address, telephone number and/or fax number, and ORCID ID that can be obtained free at orcid.org.

Abbreviations of any work cited should be given at the end of the article. References used in the texts are shown as; the author’s surname, date of publication and page (and if used, figure or plate number). References including the author’s name should be written as in the original publication. Subtitles in an article should be written in small letters and all initial letters of words should be written in bold. An author who has several cited articles published within the same year should have the reference marked a., b., c., etc. in both the footnotes and in the bibliography. Roman numerals are to be used when referring to centuries prior to and including the X century A.D. (e.g. IV century B.C., etc.). After the X century A.D. Arabic numerals are to be used e.g. 19th century. In articles related to Antiquity and Late Antiquity, the term East Roman has to be used instead of the term Byzantine. In addition, for articles within the same scope, unless there is a special case, the term Hellas has to be used for Greece, and for the language Ancient Greek is preferred.

Each article submitted for publication is examined by the editor-in-chief, the journal’s editor and field editors. The article will be evaluated by at least two referees. Decision concerning publication will be conveyed to the author in May. Once articles whose refereeing process has been completed and are made ready for publication by the Cedrus editorship, only word and letter errors can be corrected. Changes, such as to the bibliography, text, visual addition or removal cannot be permitted at this stage in the process. Due to the limited number of articles published in Cedrus each year, a publication commitment for every article whose refereeing process is completed positively within that year’s issue cannot be made. After an editorial evaluation, the articles to be included in the issue of the relevant year are determined and the decisions are forwarded to the authors on June 21. In case of the withdrawal of an article whose refereeing process is ongoing, or the referee evaluations have been forwarded to the author(s), and upon request by the author(s), both the relevant article and any further studies of the author(s) will not be accepted, even if they are evaluated by our journal. In addition, articles with more than three authors are not accepted. An author cannot publish articles in consecutive volumes.

The opinion(s) and contents of any article published in Cedrus remain the responsibility of the author(s), not of the publication.

(For the template file see, https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/journal-file/26654)

(For the ancient sources and epigraphical abbreviations see https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/3025/file/4684/download ).

Monographs
Özüdoğru Ş. 2020, Kibyra Kazı ve Araştırmaları Monografi Serisi I, KIBYRA: Kibyra Maior / Caesarea Cibyra. İstanbul.
¹ Özüdoğru 2020, 365.

Book by a single author
Goldsworthy A. 2020, Philip and Alexander: Kings and Conquerors. New York.
¹ Goldsworthy 2020, 123 dn. 85.

Book by two or more authors
Heckel W. & Yardley J. C. 2004, Alexander the Great, Historical Texts in Translation. Malden – Oxford.
¹ Heckel & Yardley 2004, 27.

Chapter in an edited work
Matthews R. 2011, “A History of the Preclassical Archaeology of Anatolia”. Eds. S. R. Steadman & G. McMahon, The Oxford Handbook of Ancient Anatolia. Oxford, 34-55.
¹ Matthews 2011, 38.

Occasional publications
Jones D. W. 2021, Four Economic Topics for Studies of Antiquity: Agriculture, Trade, Population, and the Behaviour of Aggregate Economies (BAR IntSer 3018). Oxford.
¹ Jones 2021, 77.

Supplements
Durugönül S. 2007, Dağlık Kilikia’da Bir Antik Kent Kazısının Sonuçları – NAGIDOS / Results of an Excavation in an Ancient City in Rough Cilicia (Adalya Suppl 6). İstanbul.
¹ Durugönül 2007, 59.

Thesis-Dissertation (PhD & MA)
Coşkun Abuagla A. 2012, Roma Dönemi Küçük Asya Procuratorleri. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Akdeniz Üniversitesi. Antalya.
¹ Coşkun Abuagla 2012, 73.

Journal article
Duggan T. M. P. 2015, “From Mid-October to the End of March – Voyaging in the Medieval Mediterranean”. Cedrus III, 277-310.
¹ Duggan 2015, 280-285.

Articles by two or more authors
Dökü F. E. & Baytak İ. 2017, “Kabalis Bölgesi Demirçağ Yerleşim Tipleri ve Gözetleme/Haberleşme Kaleleri”. MJH VII/2, 223-242.
1 Dökü & Baytak 2017, 45.

Durukan A., S. Kılıç & H. Tuncer 2020, "The Architecture of the Antalya Pazar Baths and a Suggestion of Experiential Marketing Modules for its Re-functioning as a Shopping Space". Cedrus VIII, 659-673.
¹ Durukan et al. 2020, 665.

Journal without volume number
Nikolaou I. 2019, “A Hellenistic and Roman Tomb at Eurychou – Phoenikas”. RDAC, 234-257.
¹ Nikolaou 2019, 266 lev. 60.

Book reviews
Köker H. 2020, “The Storm before the Storm. The Beginning of the End of the Roman Republic”. Yazar: M. Duncan, Libri VI, 361-363.
¹ Köker 2020, 368.

Published papers
Burragato F., M. Nezza, A. F. Ferrazzoli & M. Ricci 2007, “Late Roman 1 Amphora Types Produced at Elaiussa Sebaste”. Eds. M. Bonifay & J. C. Treglia, Late Roman Coarse Wares, Cooking, Wares and Amphorae in the Mediterranean: Archaeology and Archaeometry 2. (BAR IntSer 1662). Marseille and Arles, 13-16 April 2005. Oxford, 689-700.
¹ Burragato et al. 2007, 692.

Citation for an author with more than one cited publication within the same year
McGing B. C. 1986a, The Foreign Policy of Mithridates VI Eupator King of Pontus. Leiden.
¹ McGing 1986a, 7.
McGing B. C. 1986b, “The Kings of Pontus: Some Problems on Identity and Date”. RhM 129, 248-259.
² McGing 1986b, 250 pl. 30 no: 35.

Magazine article
Tassinari P. 2014, “Antik Dünyada Tıp ve Sağlık”. Aktüel Arkeoloji 24, 56-67.
¹ Tassinari 2014, 58.

Newspaper article
Şahin S. (25 Kasım 2000), “Kültürel Miras, Kültürel Kimlik ve Eskiçağ Bilimleri”. Cumhuriyet Gazetesi Bilim-Teknik Eki 714, 18-19.
¹ Şahin 2000, 18-19.

Publication or author names unwritten with Latin alphabet
Τσαραβοπογλος A. N. 2019, “Η αρχαία πόλη της Χίου”. Horos 29, 124-144.
¹ Τσαραβοπογλος 2019, 138.

Works of standard reference
Oberhummer E. 19702, “Bosporos (1)”. RE III/1, col. 741-757.
¹ Oberhummer 19702, col. 744.

Translated Works
Selz G. J. 2020, Sümerler ve Akadlar: Tarih: Toplum, Kültür. Çev. F. G. Gerhold, İstanbul.
¹ Selz 2020, 115.

Translated Article
Oktan M. 2018, “Quintus Asconius Pedianus, Yüceliğe Hakaret Davasında Cornelius Savunması”. Libri IV, 251-313.
¹ Oktan 2018, 286.

Encyclopedies
Ansiklopedi maddesi | Encyclopedia article
Bergmann J. 1993, “Relativity”. The New Encyclopedia Britannica, vol. 10. Chicago, 501-508.
¹ Bergmann 1993, 505.

Newspaper Reference (for articles see above)
Yazarlı gazete yazısı | Newspaper article, with author
Cemal H. 21 Eylül 2019, “Enseyi Karartmayın İyi Yoldayız”. Milliyet.
¹Cemal 2019.

Newspaper article, without author
“Katalonya’yı Bağımsızlık Ateşi Sardı”. Milliyet, 21 Eylül 2020.
¹ Milliyet, 21 Eylül 2020.

T.C. Resmi Gazete | Official Gazette of the Republic of Türkiye
“Nafia Vekâleti teşkilât ve vazifelerine dair kanun”. T.C. Resmi Gazete 4219, 30 Mayıs 1939, 11832-11837.
¹Resmi Gazete, 30 Mayıs 1939, 11832.

Electronic Sources
Citation from an Internet-only journal’s article
Taşkıran M. 2021, “Phaselis Merkezi Kule”. Phaselis VII, 7-19. Kaynak: http://dx.doi.org/10.18367/Pha.21002
¹ Taşkıran 2021, 14.

PUBLICATION ETHICS & MALPRACTICE STATEMENT
Cedrus: The Journal of Mediterranean Civilizations Studies

Cedrus: The Journal of Mediterranean Civilizations Studies (Cedrus) is an international electronic journal which does not disclose either the authors submitting articles to the journal or the reviewers who evaluate the articles as the experts of the field through a double-blind peer review process without compromising on the principles of transparency and justice, which are the most delicate elements of the publication and review process. It is also an open access journal which gives an undertaking to provide a universal platform prioritising publication ethics.

The peer review process of an article submitted to Cedrus: The Journal of Mediterranean Civilizations Studies begins by being sent to two expert reviewers within the scope of the double-blind peer review process. The article is accepted if both reviewers present positive opinions. Should the reviewers present negative opinions, the process of rejecting the work is applied. Should one of the blind reviewers evaluate the article as positive and the other as negative then the article is sent to a third reviewer. According to the final decision, the acceptance or the refusal of the article is reported to the author together with the reasoned reports of the reviewers. Subsequently, the editorial process begins. In line with this the author is asked to make the necessary amendments on the article (if not applied in advance) with regard to the publication principles formed on the basis of the Harvard style as well as to the abbreviations, citations in footnotes and bibliography. In addition to this, he or she should the probable/necessary amendments stated by the reviewers and provide the necessary reasons, supplying examples if he or she does not agree to apply the amendments which have been requested. After this addendum and corrigendum process, the article is read by the proofreaders of the journal several times. Afterwards, the reading process carried out by the journal editors and the editor in-chief is completed. After that, the Cedrus publication format is applied by the publication editors and the article is submitted to the approval of the editor-in-chief. Following the evaluation of the editor-in-chief, the final version of the article is sent to the author for his or her approval and is included in the publication process of the relevant issue.

The Publication Ethics & Malpractice Statement of Cedrus: The Journal of Mediterranean Civilizations Studies is prepared on the basis of the guidelines and suggestions for the execution, reporting and regulation of the policy statements of the COPE (Committee of Publication Ethics) and the CSE (Council of Science Editors).

The duties and expectations of all parties such as reviewers, editors, critics, authors etc. included in the publication process of the Cedrus: The Journal of Mediterranean Civilizations Studies is to comply with instructions of the publication ethics and malpractice statement given below. Otherwise, it will not be possible to publish an article within the scope of the Cedrus: The Journal of Mediterranean Civilizations Studies.

Submitting Articles and Authorship

The articles submitted by the authors are expected to be in accordance with the objectives, aims and scope of the Cedrus: The Journal of Mediterranean Civilizations Studies. In addition, authors should submit a statement explaining in which way their article complies with the content of the journal, either verbally or in writing. The articles submitted to the journal should be prepared in accordance with the journal publication principles formed on the basis of the Harvard style (see: Publication principles). Otherwise, it would be an unnecessary waste of time and energy. Authors should not send their articles to another journal to be published simultaneously. Should the Cedrus Journal be informed of such a malpractice/process – and one of our colleagues was caught in such an undesirable position – the aforesaid author would not be allowed to publish any article in the journal for 5 years. The same process is also applied to authors who withdraw their articles after the peer review process and the necessary amendments have been completed.

The articles submitted to the Cedrus Journal should not be published or applications sent for publishing in any other journal either in the same or a similar form. Moreover, the identical parts of an MA or PhD Dissertation may not be published as an article in the journal. A similarity rate of %15 to %20, excluding the bibliography, is allowed on condition that proper quotation and citations are provided. Should the similarity score exceed this percentage, the article cannot be published. In articles based on Mater's and Doctoral theses the author of the thesis should be listed first, in accordance with ethical guidelines.

The Cedrus Journal publishes common articles written by a maximum of three joint authors. Should the article be written by more than three authors, the article only undergoes the editorial evaluation on condition that each author clearly explains which part was written by him/her and the reasons for this, in a reasoned statement.

THE DUTIES OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE BOARD, PUBLISHER AND EDITOR

The Publishing Policy and the administration of unethical publication

The publisher with the aid of the editors carries out the necessary examinations and investigations in order to determine the articles which are a subject for malpractice. Should any malpractice be detected, the publisher would take necessary precautions to prevent it being publishing. Neither the administrative board nor the editors encourage or permit any type of malpractice.

The administrative board, Publisher and editor(s) take all the necessary precautions to clarify the uncertainties or inaccuracies in the article, to amend the said article, to eliminate any alleged or proven scientific abuse, fraudulent publication, plagiarism or close cooperation with the editors. Should such an article exist, it should be proved with certainty, with the assistance of reviewers, editors and the editorial board with justified evidence or the article should be withdrawn.

Participation and Investigation

Cedrus: The Journal of Mediterranean Civilizations Studies is responsible for responding to all allegations and doubts suggested by students, readers, academics, critics and other editors related to the article. Probable plagiarism and unnecessary/repeated articles will be evaluated by the journal. In other cases, an investigation may be requested by the administrative board or related authorised body. Under these circumstances, the journal may provide aid to the relevant institutions/authorities by presenting information or documents from its archives.

Each reported unethical publishing act undergoes examination even if discovered after several years of publication. The responsibility of the article which has been published in the journal rests solely with the author(s).

THE DUTIES OF EDITORS

Publication Decisions

Editors ensure that all applications undergo a swift and just editorial process. Even if the peer-review process is affirmative, the editor in-chief takes all responsibility relating to the article which will be published in the Cedrus: The Journal of Mediterranean Civilizations Studies. Thus, whether the article is accepted or not depends on the decision of the editor in-chief.

However, it must be highlighted that any article review process of which the result is negative or which does not undergo the review process cannot be published in the journal under any circumstances.

Impartiality

Editors evaluate submitted articles in terms of its problem, authenticity, quality and intellectual content rather than its author, institution or political tendencies. Editors should not be affected by other factors such as ethnicity, race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, political opinion and personal disputes. Should editors state their concerns about an article and examine the subject and find any evidence of abuse of research or publication, they will take action immediately.

Confidentiality

The editor and editorial staff will not disclose any information about a submitted article to anyone other than reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers and publishers, even if they insist.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

Unpublished materials, ideas and hypotheses disclosed in a submitted article will not be used by the editor and editorial board for their own research purposes without the authors’ explicit consent in writing. Privileged information or ideas obtained by editors as a result of handling the manuscript will be kept confidential and not used for their personal gain. Editors should request explanations of conflicts of interest of authors or all other contributors. Should conflicts of interest arise after the publication of the article, other alternative precautions such as amendment or withdrawal of the article can be taken.

THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE AUTHORS

Reporting Standards

Authors are expected to make necessary endeavours to control and verify the publication process. All information provided by the author should be stated as being produced by the author and being accurate

The authors of the results of survey studies or the inter-disciplinary authors of the excavation reports should present a correct narration of the studies which have been carried out, as well as an objective discussion of their importance. The findings which have been revealed in the studies carried out that year should be stated correctly, in these types of preliminary examinations. The expressions stated and the findings set forth here should be able to be utilised as references in the scientific studies carried out by other researchers who are interested in the subject matter and their colleagues, as well as containing sufficient details and references which they can refer to. The authors are required to provide information concerning the methodologies of research they have used in the matters they are discussing. This is especially valid where biological materials, in the anthropological, zoological, floral and faunal sense have been collected and used in the study. Any unethical behaviour, in the form of the use of dishonest or knowingly incorrect expressions by the authors in their articles will not be accepted by the administrators of the journal and such studies will not be published in the journal.

Authenticity and Plagiarism

Where necessary, the authors may be required to provide the raw data of their studies for an editorial control and, if applicable, their data should be ready to be made public. In any event, subject to the protection of the confidentiality of the participants and the prevention of release of legal rights in connection with registered data, the authors should ensure that this data is accessible to other authorised professionals for a period of 10 years following publication (preferably through an institutional or subject based data store or other data centre).

The authors should be certain that they have written and sent only original works, and if they have used the works and / or expressions of others, should specify these in the appropriate manner, with the necessary references. The authors may only send original works to the journal and quote the works and / or statements of others by specifying so in the appropriate manner. The publications and periodicals which were effective in determining the characteristics of the quoted study should also be stated. No forms of unethical publishing behaviour, such as the copying of any part of a different article, book, study or thesis (Master’s – Doctorate Degree thesis) either of the author’s own work or the work of anyone else, the stating (paraphrasing) of a significant part of another article without showing references, or the self-accrediting of the results of the studies carried out by others, will be accepted by the administrators of the journal. Where articles have been written by utilising theses, the thesis on which the article is based must be stated in the first footnote of the article or immediately underneath the identity of the author.

Articles sent to the Cedrus: The Journal of Mediterranean Civilizations Studies should be original and not plagiarised. All articles sent to the journal will be checked for plagiarism using software such as Turnitin and iThenticate. If the similarity index (SI) of the article is above 20%, apart from in the introduction, materials and methods, tables and references sections and the bibliography of the article, it will be returned to the relevant author for revision, in order for the SI to be reduced to less than 20%. In this sense, the first stage of the article will be concluded with the study being rejected. In the event that any plagiarism or abuse is determined and this is proven after the article has been published, the article will immediately be removed and taken off the website. It will then be deemed that any applications by the relevant author(s) to the Cedrus: The Journal of Mediterranean Civilizations Studies are not suitable for acceptance for a period of 5 years, as a result of this.

Acceptance of Sources

The author(s) should be certain that he/she/they has/have understood the works of other correctly when citing references to them and also cite references to the publications which have been effective in determining the characteristics of the referenced works. Information which has been obtained privately (conversations, written communications or discussions with third parties) should not be used or reported in the study without obtaining express written permission from the source. Authors should not use the information obtained through the provision of confidential services, such as applications for arbitration for handwritten manuscripts or grants, unless they have obtained the express permission of the authors involved in such services. The list of abbreviations related to the ancient sources used in the article and the standard and periodic publications used in the texts is shown in the relevant tabs in the publication principles of the journal website.

Article Writing

Authors who meet these writing criteria should be listed in the article to ensure that they take responsibility in the public domain. First of all, the authors must have made significant contributions to the correct understanding, design, conduct, obtaining of data or analysis / interpretation of the study. Secondly, authors are expected to ensure that the work they have prepared has been critically revised for significant intellectual content, contains general assessments on the subject matter, enlightens problems in the light of examples, synthesises, sets forth hypothetical ideas or brings analytical solutions to the subject. Thirdly, the authors should have seen, checked and approved the final version of the article, as well as having accepted that the article will be published in that particular edition of the journal and signed a declaration on copyright. Any other individuals who have made a significant contribution to the work (technical support, support with authoring and editing, general support, unnecessary acknowledgements, etc.), but who do not meet the writing criteria should not be listed as authors, and should be stated in the “notifications” section after having obtained written permission. This should especially be written in the relevant areas of the reports where annual assessments are made concerning Archaeological Excavations and Surface Studies and above the sections related to the names of the academicians working in the disciplines, with the identity details and ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributor ID) number of the author being given in the footnote section, immediately below it.

The relevant author should ensure that all appropriate joint authors (according to the definition set out above) and inappropriate joint authors are not included in the list of authors and verify that all joint authors have seen and approved the final version of the article and agreed to it being published. Applications to the journal should only be made once these approvals have been obtained.

The Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Article Preparation Process

Cedrus adheres to the guidelines established by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) regarding the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and AI-assisted technologies in the article preparation process. Authorship involves a set of responsibilities that can only be carried out by humans; therefore, authors must ensure the originality of the article and possess the necessary qualifications for authorship. AI can be used for tasks such as language corrections during the writing process (with this clearly indicated in the article), but in order to maintain originality and uphold the quality of the article, AI cannot be credited as an author.

Multiple, Unnecessary and Simultaneous Publications

In general, an article which presents studies which are fundamentally the same should not be published in more than one journal. The submission of the same article to more than one journal constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and cannot be accepted. Moreover, withdrawal of articles publishing process of which are still continuing, whether with a justified reason or not, will also be evaluated within this scope. They result in the loss of additional time and energy for the journal and referees. Therefore, it will be deemed that any applications by the relevant author(s) to the Cedrus: The Journal of Mediterranean Civilizations Studies are not suitable for acceptance for a period of 5 years.

Articles which have been published as materials which are protected under copyright elsewhere cannot be submitted to the journal. In addition to this, any articles which have been examined by the journal should not be re-submitted to publications which are protected under copyright. Authors only protect the publication rights of published materials by submitting articles. They permit the use of their studies under the CC-BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by3.0/) if they are published. This allows others to copy, distribute and transmit the published work, while at the same time adapting the work and using it in their own studies, subject to citing references.

Explanations, Conflicts of Interest and Financial Support

Authors should disclose any conflicts of interest (if any), which can be interpreted as possibly having an effect on their conclusions or inferences in the article, as early as possible, in particular by adding an explanatory note at the time of submission and by making a statement to that effect in the article. Examples of any potential conflicts of interest which need to be disclosed are complimentary teaching or other forms of financing, participation in speakers rostrums, memberships, employment, consultancy, share ownerships or other interests related to shares, statements made by specialists in return for a fee, patent licensing arrangements, personal or professional relationships, related parties, non-financial matters, such as information or beliefs or the materials being discussed in the article. All sources of financial support for the study should be disclosed (including grant numbers or other reference numbers if any). If the study is supported by any national / international bursaries or by a project, this should also be stated with a relevant footnote, at the start of the article.

Risks and Human or Animal Related Subjects

Where studies involve chemicals, procedures or equipment which constitute extraordinary dangers when used, the authors should state this in their articles. Where studies involve use by animals or human participants and experiments related to these, the authors must ensure that all procedures are in accordance with relevant laws and institutional directives and that the relevant institutional committees have approved these. A statement to this effect should be written in the introduction to the article. The authors should also have informed human participants regarding the content of the experiments to be carried out and include a statement to the effect that their approval has been obtained, in the article. The rights of confidentiality of the human participants should always be protected within the article.

In accordance with national and international index criteria, as of 2020 Ethics Committee Permissions are required in order for articles possessing the following characteristics (in general) to be published in the Cedrus Journal:

• The use of humans and animals (including material and data related to them) for experimental and other scientific purposes;

• Clinical research carried out on humans;

• Research carried out on animals;

• All types of studies conducted with quantitative or qualitative approaches requiring the collection of data from participants using surveys, interviews, focus group studies, observations, experiments and discussion techniques;

• Retrospective studies, in accordance with the legislation concerning the protection of personal data.

Blind Reviews

Authors are required to respond immediately to any requests for raw data, explanations, ethics approvals and copyright permissions by the editors, and to participate in blind reviews and cooperate in full. Where an initial decision has been made that “revision is necessary”, authors should provide systematic and timely answers to the comments of reviewers and re-submit their articles to the journal by the final due date, after having reviewed them.

Involvement in the same edition of the Cedrus Journal as both a blind reviewer and an author is not permitted. The articles of any authors who are employed as blind reviewers in the edition which is to be published cannot be published in the same edition. Similarly, the editorial group of the Cedrus Journal may not appoint an author in one edition of the journal as a blind reviewer in the same edition.

Fundamental Errors in Unpublished Works

Where authors have discovered significant errors or mistakes in their own works, which have been published, they have an obligation to notify the editors or published of the journal immediately and to cooperate with them to correct or retract the article. Where editors or the publisher learn from a third party that a study which has been published contains significant errors or mistakes, the authors have an obligation to prove to the editors that the said information is correct, or to correct or retract the article, immediately. Under these circumstances, if the article has not been placed on national and international indices, or sent to the publishing house for publication, or where any revisions or corrections would not constitute any problems, the editors may correct important errors and mistakes in the study.

Data Access and Storage

Authors may be required to provide the raw data of their studies for an editorial control and, if applicable, their data should be ready to be made public. In any event, subject to the protection of the confidentiality of the participants and the prevention of release of legal rights in connection with registered data, the authors should ensure that this data is accessible to other authorised professionals for a period of 10 years following publication (preferably through an institutional or subject based data store or other data centre). Authors should only send notifications concerning studies which have been conducted in an ethical and responsible manner and which abide by all the relevant regulations.

THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF COMMENTATORS

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Reviewer reports assist the editor in the making of editorial decisions at the stage where the article is being assessed. At the same time, the editor may also assist the author to improve the article. The editor may share any inconsistencies in the narrative of the subject of the article, the fluidity of the language of the narrative, grammatical mistakes and errors in the terminology with the author, providing advice in this way. Similarly, the editor may also warn the author about any methodological, logical or speculative errors in the study and any problems with the article. The editor may guide the author on matters such as consistency / inconsistency between the title and content of the work and situations where the author has diverged from the focus and main problem of the study.

The Cedrus Journal expressly declares that it has an obligation to carry out a fair assessment of all articles submitted to the journal by all academicians who wish to make a contribution to the cultural and historical accumulation and the scientific process regarding the ancient history, medieval history and contemporary-modern history of the Mediterranean Basin, especially in the Turkish geography.

Confidentiality

Articles which have been received for examination should be treated as confidential documents by double-blind reviewers. Unless permission has been given by the Executive Editor who is to perform this, in only exceptional and special circumstances, reviewers may not disclose or discuss studies which have been received to be examined, with anyone else. This is also valid for reviewers who have not accepted the invitation to examine articles.

Standards of Objectivity

Examinations in the journal are carried out in an objective manner. Any persona or unnecessary criticism of the author is not appropriate. Reviewers should express their views clearly, with a supporting argument.

Acceptance of Sources

The reviewers and the editorial team should define the relevant studies which have been published, but not stated or overlooked by the authors. Any expressions to the effect that an observation, derivation or independent variable has been reported previously should be provided together with the relevant reference.

Should a reviewer find a significant similarity or overlap with other published works related to the published article, by taking into consideration anything overlooked by the editors, he/she may notify the editors of the journal on this matter, in a clear manner. The administrators of the journal will only be happy to receive such notifications.

Explanations and Conflicts of Interest

Privileged information or ideas which have been obtained through double-blind reviews will be kept confidential by the administrators of the journal. They cannot be used for personal gain under any circumstances. This is also valid for reviewers who have not accepted the invitation to examine articles. Academicians should not assess the work where they have joint interests or a conflict of interest with the authors, companies or organisations related to the article, through competition, cooperation or other relationships or ties. They should also notify the relevant editors concerning the said circumstances, immediately.

Waiver

Neither the editors, nor the editorial committee, nor the administrators of the Cedrus Journal can be held responsible for any of the views of the authors or the content of any of the articles published in the journal. Authenticity, the reading of the articles and individual errors are the responsibility of the authors. All articles submitted for publication to Cedrus: The Journal of Interdisciplinary Mediterranean Studies, for the purposes of examination, research, complication, critique, etc., will be subjected to double-blind reviews in connection with authenticity, ethical matters and beneficial contributions. The decisions of the reviewers are the final and sole vehicle for the articles to be published in the journal.

Owned by

MA

Murat ARSLAN

Ancient History, Classical Greek and Roman History

Editor-in-Chief

MA

Murat ARSLAN

Ancient History, Classical Greek and Roman History

Editor

Tuncer DEMIR

Physical Geography and Environmental Geology, Watershed Management, Hydrography, Geomorphology and Earth Surface Processes, Physical Geography, Climatology

Field Editors (Ancient History)

NT

Nihal TÜNER ÖNEN

Latin and Classical Greek Languages, Latin and Classical Greek Literature, Habitat Archeology, Classical Greek and Roman History

Field Editors (Medieval History)

OE

Osman ERAVŞAR

History of Architecture, Art History, Turkish-Islamic Archeology in the Middle Ages, Archaeology, Urban Archeology, Medieval Age Archeology, History of Central Asia, Turkish-Islamic Arts History

Field Editors (Early Modern and Modern History)

FŞ

Fatma ŞIMŞEK TOUATI

Archeology of Ottoman, Late Modern Mediterranean History, Early Modern Mediterranean History, Economic History

Advisory Board

R. Eser KORTANOĞLU

Architectural History, Theory and Criticism, History of Architecture, Archaic Period Archeology, Archaeological Science, Archaeology of Europe, The Mediterranean and The Levant, Hellenistic Period Archeology, Urban Archeology, Classical Period Archeology, Greek and Roman Period Archeology

TB

Tönnes BEKKER-NIELSEN

Archaeology, Archaeology of Europe, The Mediterranean and The Levant, Greek and Roman Period Archeology, History of Old Asia Minor, Classical Greek and Roman History

SD

Serra DURUGÖNÜL

Archaeology, Classical Period Archeology

AŞ

Ahmet Kaan ŞENOL

Maritime Archaeology, Hellenistic Period Archeology, Greek and Roman Period Archeology

TK

Turhan KAÇAR

Classical Greek and Roman History, Medieval European History

Editorial Assistant

Tanju Hakan DÖNMEZ

Ceramics in Archeology, Medieval Age Archeology, Greek and Roman Period Archeology, Classical Greek and Roman History, History of The Byzantine

Language Editors (English)

OK

Orkun KOCABIYIK

British and Irish Language, Literature and Culture, Popular and Genre Literature, Romantic Literature

TD

Terrance Michael Patrick DUGGAN

Art History, Fine-Arts in Turkish Islamic Art, Medieval European History

Language Editors (German)

Safiye GENÇ

Language Studies (Other), Cognitive Linguistics, Linguistics (Other), German Language, Literature and Culture, Communication Theories, Media Literacy

Multimedia and Graphic Design

Tanju Hakan DÖNMEZ

Ceramics in Archeology, Medieval Age Archeology, Greek and Roman Period Archeology, Classical Greek and Roman History, History of The Byzantine

	ASOS Index
	Ebsco Host
	International Index Copernicus
	EZB Electronic Journals Library
	SOBİAD

Abstract

Abstract

The Late Roman–Early Eastern Roman Red Slip Ware Assemblage from the Hurmalık Bath at Patara

Abstract

Keywords

Thanks

Patara Hurmalık Hamamı'nın Geç Roma–Erken Doğu Roma Dönemi Kırmızı Astarlı Seramik Topluluğu

Abstract

Keywords

References

Details

Primary Language

Subjects

Journal Section

Authors

Publication Date

Submission Date

Acceptance Date

Published in Issue

DOI

IZ

Cite

Aim & Scope

Author Guidelines

Ethical Principles and Publication Policy

PUBLICATION ETHICS & MALPRACTICE STATEMENTCedrus: The Journal of Mediterranean Civilizations Studies

Price Policy

Indexes

Citation Indexes

Other Indexes

Journal Boards

Owned by

Editor-in-Chief

Editor

Field Editors (Ancient History)

Field Editors (Medieval History)

Field Editors (Early Modern and Modern History)

Advisory Board

Editorial Assistant

Language Editors (English)

Language Editors (German)

Multimedia and Graphic Design

PUBLICATION ETHICS & MALPRACTICE STATEMENT
Cedrus: The Journal of Mediterranean Civilizations Studies