The Caucasian Journal of Science adopts a double-blind peer review system to ensure scientific quality and publication ethics.

Initial Editorial Screening

Submitted manuscripts are first evaluated by the editor and/or field editors based on:

• Scope of the journal

• Scientific originality and contribution

• Compliance with formatting guidelines

• Ethical standards

Manuscripts that do not meet these criteria may be rejected without peer review

Reviewer Assignment

Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are sent to at least two independent reviewers. A third reviewer may be assigned if necessary.

Reviewers:

• Are selected based on subject expertise

• Must not have conflicts of interest

• Must comply with academic ethical standards

 Double-Blind Review

The journal applies a double-blind review process:

• Identities of authors and reviewers are concealed

• The process is conducted objectively and impartially

 Review Criteria

Reviewers evaluate manuscripts based on:

• Scientific originality

• Methodological soundness

• Validity of data and results

• Contribution to the literature

• Clarity and quality of writing

Reviewer reports must be constructive, justified, and academic in tone.

 Editorial Decision

Based on reviewer reports, the editor makes one of the following decisions:

• Accept

• Minor revision

• Major revision

• Reject

The editor’s decision is final and based on scientific quality and journal policies.

 Revision Process

Authors must respond to reviewer comments in detail.

Revised manuscripts may be sent for re-evaluation if necessary.

 Timeline and Tracking

The peer review process is expected to be completed within 4–8 weeks.

All processes are managed through the DergiPark system.

 Ethics and Transparency

• All processes follow COPE guidelines

• Conflicts of interest must be disclosed

• Confidentiality is strictly maintained

 Handling Ethical Misconduct

In cases of ethical violations, the journal may apply:

• Correction

• Retraction

• Expression of Concern