Halkla İlişkiler Modellerinin Bibliyometrik Analizi

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı, halkla ilişkiler alanındaki değişimi göstermek amacıyla ‘halkla ilişkiler modelleri’ konusunu inceleyerek halkla ilişkiler alanındaki eğilimleri ortaya koymaktır. Bu çalışmada yayın örüntülerini göstermek için, belirli bir disiplinde bilgi akışını ve literatürün gelişimini ortaya koyan bibliometrik analiz, metodoloji olarak seçilmiştir. Bu araştırmada kullanılan veriler Thomson Reuters Web of Science Veritabanından toplanmıştır. Bu bağlamda, arama motoruna ‘halkla ilişkiler modeli’ kavramı yazılarak, kurum ve ülke işbirliği, ortak atıf ağ analizi, ortak kelime ağ analizi ve atıf patlaması bağlamında 595 çalışma incelenmiştir. Bu ağ analizini gerçekleştirmek için Citespace II yazılım paketi kullanılmıştır. Araştırma bulgularına göre ülke olarak ABD, kurum olarak ABD'deki üniversiteler ve yazar işbirliği olarak ABD'den akademisyenler halkla ilişkiler modelleri konusunda merkeziyete göre en üst sırada yer almaktadır. Beklenildiği üzere Grunig ve Grunig’in (2002) halkla ilişkiler ve iletişim modelleri üzerine yaptıkları çalışmaları en yüksek atıf patlamasına sahip çalışma olarak bulunmuştur. Ayrıca en çok araştırılan araştırma konuları sırasıyla küresel değişim, blog aracılı kriz iletişim modeli ve paydaş ilişkileri olarak tespit edilmiştir.

Keywords

• Halkla ilişkiler
• halkla ilişkiler modelleri
• Grunig
• bibliyometrik analiz
• CiteSpace II

A Bibliometric Analysis of Public Relations Models

Abstract

The aim of the study is to reveal the trends in the field of public relations by examining the topic of ‘public relations models’ in order to capture the variation in public relations practice. Bibliometric analysis has been chosen as the methodology in this study to show publishing patterns as it finds out the stream of knowledge and the development of literature in a specific discipline. Data used in this research were collected from Thomson Reuters Web of Science Database. By selecting the topic of ‘public relations model’ in the search button, 595 studies were investigated within the context of institution and country collaboration, co-citation network analysis, co-word network analysis and citation burst. In order to perform these network analyses, the CiteSpace II software package has been used. The findings suggest that the USA as a country, universities in the USA as institutions and academics from the USA as author collaboration are found to be the top ranked items by centrality on the topic of public relations models. Grunig and Grunig’s (2002) paper on public relations and communication models is found to have the strongest citation burst as expected. The most investigated research topics are global flux, the blog-mediated crisis communication model, and stakeholder relationship.

Keywords

• Public relations
• public relations models
• Grunig
• bibliometric analysis
• CiteSpace II

Supporting Institution

The authors declared that this study has received no financial support.

References

1. Alanazi, A. (1996). Public relations in the Middle East: The case of Saudi Arabia. In H. M. Culbertson, & N. Chen (Eds.), International public relations. A comparative analysis (pp. 239–256). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
2. Balta-Peltekoğlu, F., & Tozlu, E. (2018). The bibliometric profile of articles written by female authors in the field of public relations at refereed journals of communicatıon faculties in Turkey. Marmara Üniversitesi Kadın ve Toplumsal Cinsiyet Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(2), 55-65. https://doi.org/10.26695/mukatcad.2018.17
3. Berger, B. K. (1999). The Halcion affair: Public relations and the construction of ideological world view. Journal of Public Relations Research, 11, 188-189. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr1103_01
4. Bordia, P., Hobman, E., Jones, E., Gallois, C., & Callan, V. J. (2004). Uncertainty during organizational change: types, consequences, and management strategies. Journal of Business and Psychology, 18(4), 507–532. https://doi. org/10.1023/B:JOBU.0000028449.99127.f7
5. Borgman, C. L., & Rice, R. E. (1992). The convergence of information science and communication: a bibliometric analysis. Journal of The American Society for Information Science, 43(6), 397-411. https://doi.org/10.1002/ (SICI)1097-4571(199207)43:6<397::AID-ASI1>3.0.CO;2-M
6. Botan, C. H., & Hazelton, V. (2006). Public relations in a new age. In C. H. Botan, & V. Hazelton (Eds.), Public relations theory II (pp. 1-18). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Buhmann, A., Ihlen, Ø., & Aaen-Stockdale, C. (2019). Connecting the dots: A bibliometric review of Habermasian theory in public relations research. Journal of Communication Management, 23(4), 444-467. https://doi. org/10.1108/JCOM-12-2018-0127
8. Cancel A. E., Cameron G. T., Sallot L. M., & Mitrook M. A (1997). It depends: A contingency theory of accommodation in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 9(1), 31-63. https://doi.org/10.1207/ s1532754xjprr0901_02

9. Chen, C., Song, Y., Yuan, X. & Zhang, J. (2008). The thematic and citation landscape of data and knowledge engineering (1985–2007). Data & Knowledge Engineering, 67, 234–259.
10. Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of The American Society For Information Science and Technology, 57(3):359–377. DOI: 10.1002/asi.20317
11. Chen, C., Fu, X., & Chang, C. Y. (2017). A terms mining and clustering technique for surveying network and content analysis of academic groups exploration. Cluster Computing, 20(1), 43-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10586-016-0711-5.
12. Chen, C., Ibekwe-SanJuan, F., & Hou, J. (2010). The structure and dynamics of cocitation clusters: a multiple-perspective cocitation analysis. Journal of The American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(7), 1386-1409.
13. Chen, N., & Culbertson, H. M. (1992). Two contrasting approaches of government public relations in Mainland China. Public Relations Quarterly, 37(3), 36-41. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/openview/5438b cbfdc6bd08cd96d0e56aa9da6ce/1?cbl=49209&pq-origsite=gscholar
14. Pujol M., Matilla K., & Hernandez S. (2018). Strategy and public relations: Bibliometric comparative study. Revista Latina de Comunicacion Social, 73, 748-764. https://doi.org/10.0.16.89/RLCS-2018-1280en
15. Cooper-Chen, A., & Kaneshige, M. (1996). Public relations practice in Japan: Beginning again for the first time. In H. M. Culbertson, & N. Chen (Eds.), International Public Relations. A Comparative Analysis (pp. 223-237). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
16. Curtin, P. A., & Gaither, T. K. (2005). Privileging identity, difference, and power: The circuit of culture as a basis for public relations theory. Journal of Public Relations Research, 17(2), 91-115. https://doi.org/10.1207/ s1532754xjprr1702_3
17. Cutlip, S., Center, A., & Broom, G. (1994). Effective Public Relations. New Jersey, NJ: Prentice Hall International Edit.
18. Dozier, D. M., Grunig, L. A., & Grunig, J. E. (1995). Manager’s Guide to Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management. Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
19. Ehling, W. P. (1992). Estimating the value of public relations and communication to an organisation. In J. E. Grunig (Ed.), Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management (pp. 617-638). Hillsdale, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Ekachai, D., & Komolsevin, R. (1996). Public relations in Thailand: Its functions and practitioners’ roles. In H. M. Culbertson, & N. Chen (Eds.), International Public Relations. A Comparative Analysis (pp. 155-170). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
21. Erendağ-Sümer, F. (2013). Türkiye’de stratejik halkla ilişkiler anlayışı: Türkiye’deki büyük iş örgütlerinin halkla ilişkiler uygulayıcılarına yönelik bir araştırma. Global Media Journal: Turkish Edition. 4(7), 51-80. Retrieved from https://globalmediajournaltr.yeditepe.edu.tr/sites/default/files/Fulya%20ERENDAG%CC%86%20 SU%CC%88MER.pdf
22. Ertürk, K., & Berkman, A. (2016). Corporate governance as a communication policy in two-way symmetrical public relations model. Niğde Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(2), 61-73. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/niguiibfd/issue/19762/211677
23. Ferreira, J. M., Fernandes, C. I., & Ratten, V. (2016). A co-citation bibliometric analysis of strategic management research. Scientometrics, 109, 1-32.
24. Grammer, M. E. (2005). An exploration of the generic principles of public relations excellence in Australia, Italy, Mauritius and Uganda (MA Thesis, University of Maryland, College Park). Retrieved from https://drum.lib. umd.edu/handle/1903/2926
25. Grunig, J. E. (1992). Communication, public relations, and effective organizations: An overview of the book. In J. E. Grunig (Ed.), Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management (pp. 1-28). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
26. Grunig, J. E. (2006). Furnishing the edifice: ongoing research on public relations as a strategic management function. Journal of Public Relations Research, 18(2), 51-176. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr1802_5
27. Grunig, J. E., & Grunig, L. A. (1989). Toward a theory of the public relations behaviour of organizations. Public Relations Research Annual, 1, 27-66. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr0101-4_2
28. Grunig, J. E., & Grunig, L. A. (1996). Implications of symmetry for a theory of ethics and social responsibility in public relations. Paper presented to the Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, Chicago.
29. Grunig, J. E. (2001). Two-Way Symmetrical Public Relations, Past, Present, Future. In R. L. Heath (Ed.), Handbook of Public Relations (pp. 11-50). London: Sage Publications.
30. Grunig, J. E., & Grunig, L. A. (2002). Models of public relations and communication. In J. E. Grunig (Ed.), Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management (pp. 285-325). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
31. Grunig, J. E., & Grunig, L. A. (2000). Research methods for environmental scanning. J. and L. Grunig’s Research: A Supplement of PR Reporter, 7, 1-4.
32. Grunig, J. E., & Hunt, T. (1984). Managing Public Relations. Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
33. Grunig, J. E., Grunig, L. A., Sriramesh, K., Huang, Y.-H., & Lyra, A. (1995). Models of public relations in an international setting. Journal of Public Relations Research, 7, 163-186. https://doi.org/10.1207/ s1532754xjprr0703_01
34. Grunig, J. E. (1983). Communication behaviors and attitudes of environmental publics: Two studies. Journalism Monographs, 81. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/239466448_Communication_ Behaviors_and_Attitudes_of_Environmental_Publics_Two_Studies
35. Grunig, J. E., Grunig, L. A., & Dozier, D. M. (2002). Excellent Public Relations and Effective Organisations: A Study of Communication Management in Three Countries. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
36. Güzeller, C. O., & Çeliker, N. (2019). Bibliometrical analysis of Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 24(1), 108-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2018.1541182
37. Holtzhausen D., & Voto, R. (2002). Resistance from the margins: the postmodern public relations practitioner as organizational activist. Journal of Public Relations Research, 14(1), 57-84. https://doi.org/10.1207/ S1532754XJPRR1401_3
38. Holtzhausen, D. R., Petersen K., & Tindall, N. T. J. (2003) Exploding the myth of the symmetrical/asymmetrical dichotomy: public relations models in the New South Africa. Journal of Public Relations Research, 15(4), 305- 341. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532754XJPRR1504_02
39. Hu, C., & Racherla, P. (2008). Visual representation of knowledge networks: A social network analysis of hospitality research domain. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 27, 302-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ijhm.2007.01.002
40. Jiang, Y., Ritchie, B. W., & Benckendorff, P. (2017). Bibliometric visualisation: An application in tourism crisis and disaster management research. Current Issues in Tourism, 22(16), 1925-1957. https://doi.org/10.1080/136835 00.2017.1408574
41. Ki, E., Pasadeos, Y., & Ertem-Eray, T. (2019). Growth of public relations research networks: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Public Relations Research, 31(1), 25-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2019.1577739
42. Kim, Y., & Hon, L. C. (1998). Craft and professional models of public relations and their relation to job satisfaction among Korean public relations practitioners. Journal of Public Relations Research, 10, 155-175. https://doi. org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr1003_01
43. Köseoğlu, M. A. (2016). Growth and structure of authorship and co-authorship network in the strategic management realm: Evidence from the strategic management journal. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 19(3), 153-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2016.02.001
44. Laskin, A. V. (2009). The evolution of models of public relations: An outsider’s perspective. Journal of Communication Management, 13(1), 37-54. https://doi.org/10.1108/13632540910931382
45. Ledingham, J. A. (2003). Explicating relationship management as a general theory of public relations. Journal of PublicRelations Research, 15(2), 181-198. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532754XJPRR1502_4
46. Leichty, G., & Springston J. (1993). Reconsidering public relations models. Public Relations Review, 19(4), 327-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/0363-8111(93)90055-H
47. Li, X., Ma, E., & Qu, H. (2017). Knowledge mapping of hospitality research A visual analysis using CiteSpace. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 60, 77-93.
48. Li, J., Reniers, G., Cozzani, V., & Khan, F. (2017). A bibliometric analysis of peer-reviewed publications on domino effects in the process industry. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 49, 103-110.
49. Liu, B. F., & Horsley, J. S. (2007). The government communication decision wheel: Toward a public relations model for the public sector. Journal of Public Relations Research, 19(4), 377-393. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627260701402473
50. Liu, M., & Mei, S. (2016). Visualizing the GVC research: A co-occurrence network based bibliometric analysis Scientometrics, 109, 953–977. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2100-5
51. Miguez-Gonzalez, M. İ., Baamonde-Silva X. M., & Corbacho-Valencia, J. M. (2014). A bibliographic study of public relations in Spanish media and communication journals, 2000–2012. Public Relations Review, 40(5), 818-828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.08.002
52. Moloney, K. (2004). Debate papers: Democracy and public relations. Journal of Communication Management, 9(1), 89-92.
53. Morehouse, J., & Saffer, A. J. (2018). A bibliometric analysis of dialogue and digital dialogic research: Mapping the knowledge construction and invisible colleges in public relations research. Journal of Public Relations Research, 30(3), 65-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2018.1498343
54. Murphy, P. (1991). The limits of symmetry: A game theory approach of symmetric and asymmetric public relations. In J. E. Grunig, & L. A. Grunig (Eds.), Public Relations Research Annual 3 (pp. 115-131). Hillsdale, NI: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
55. Newman, M. E. (2004). Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks. Physical Review E, 69, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.69.066133.
56. Ni, L. (2006). Relationships as organizational resources: examining public relations impact through its connection with organizational strategies. Public Relations Review. 32(3), 276-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. pubrev.2006.05.007
57. Ni, C., Sugimoto, C. R. & Robbin, A. (2017). Examining the evolution of the field of public administration through a bibliometric analysis of public administration review. Public Administration Review, 77(4), 496-509.
58. Özköse, H., & Gencer, C. (2017). Bibliometric analysis and mapping of management information systems field. Gazi University Journal of Science, 30(4), 356-371.
59. Pasadeos, Y., Berger, B., & Renfro, R. B. (2010). Public relations as a maturing discipline: An update on research networks. Journal of Public Relations Research, 22(2), 136-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627261003601390
60. Pasadeos, Y., Renfro, R. B., & Hanily, M. L. (1999). Influential authors and works of the public relations scholarly literature: a network of recent research. Journal of Public Relations Research, 11(1), 29-52. https://doi. org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr1101_02
61. Pieczka, M. (1996). Paradigms, systems theory and public relations. In J. L’Etang, & M. Pieczka (Eds.), Critical Perspectives in Public Relations (pp. 124-156). London, UK: International Thomson Business Press.
62. Plowman, K. D. (1998). Power in conflict for public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 10(4), 237-261. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr1004_02
63. Pratt, C., & Ugboajah, F. O. (1985). Social responsibility: A comparison of Nigerian public relations with Canadian and U.S. public relations. International Public Relations Association Review, 9, 22-29.
64. Raman, N., & Karan, K. (2006). Cultural influences on public relations practices in multicultural societies: A study of multinational organizations in Singapore. China Media Research, 2(1), 31-42. Retrieved from https://www. chinamediaresearch.net/readmore/vol2no1/04_N_R_Kavita_K_Re-1.jpg
65. Rousseeuw, P. J., & Kaufman, L. (1990). Finding groups in data. Series in Probability & Mathematical Statistics, 34(1), 111-112.
66. Sharpe, M. L., & Simoes, R. P. (1996). Public relations performance in South and Central America. In H. M. Culbertson, & N. Chen (Eds.), International Public Relations: A Comparative Analysis (pp. 273-297). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
67. Shi, Y. & Liu, X. (2019). Research on the literature of green building based on the web of science: A scientometric analysis in CiteSpace (2002–2018). Sustainability 11, 3716. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133716
68. Sriramesh, K. (1992). The impact of societal culture on public relations: Ethnographic evidence from India. Public Relations Review, 18(2), 201-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0363-8111(92)90010-V
69. Sriramesh, K., & Vercic, D. (2001). International public relations: a framework for future research. Journal of Communication Management, 6(2), 103-117. https://doi.org/10.1108/13632540210806973
70. Sriramesh, K., Kim, Y., & Takasaki, M. (1999). Public relations in three Asian cultures: An analysis. Journal of Public Relations Research, 11, 271-292. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr1104_01
71. Steyn B., & Niemann, L. (2010). Enterprise strategy: A concept that explicates corporate communication’s strategic contribution at the macro-organisational level. Journal of Communication Management, 14(2), 106- 126. https://doi.org/10.1108/13632541011034574
72. Steyn, B. (2009). The strategic role of public relations is strategic reflection: A South African research stream. American Behavioural Scientist, 53(4), 516-532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764209347628
73. Su, X., Li, X., & Kang, Y. (2019). A bibliometric analysis of research on intangible cultural heritage using CiteSpace. SAGE Open, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019840119
74. Synnestvedt, M. B., Chen, C., & Holmes, J. H. (2005). CiteSpace II: Visualization and knowledge discovery in bibliographic databases. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceeding, 724-728. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1560567/
75. Tindal, N. T. J. (2007). Fund-raising models at public historically Black colleges and universities. Public Relations Review, 33(2), 201-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2007.02.004
76. van Raan, A. F. J. (2005). Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics, 62(1), 133-143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0008-6
77. Vogel, R., & Güttel, W. (2013). The dynamic capability view in strategic management: A bibliometric review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15, 426-446. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12000
78. White Paper Bibliometrics. (2020). Retrieved from http://ips.clarivate.com/m/pdfs/325133_thomson.pdf
79. Yalçıntaş, A. (2018). Büyük veri, veri obezitesi ve kaybolan nedensellikler. Yıldız Social Science Review, 4(2), 153-166.
80. Youngblood, M., & Lahti, D. (2018). A bibliometric analysis of the interdisciplinary field of cultural evolution. Palgrave Communications, 4(120). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0175-8.
81. Yu, D. J., Xu, Z. S., & Fujita, H. (2019). Bibliometric analysis on the evolution of applied intelligence. Applied Intelligence, 49(2), 449-462.
82. Zhang, X., Chen, H., Wang, W., & Ordóñez de Pablos, P. (2016). What is the role of IT in innovation? A bibliometric analysis of research development in IT innovation. Behaviour & Information Technology, 35(12), 1130-1143. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2016.1212403