Tarihsel Süreçte Ticari Diplomasi: Türk-Amerikan İlişkileri Üzerinden Kuramsal Bir Değerlendirme

Öz

Bu makale, ticari diplomasinin teorik çerçevesini, temel aktörlerini ve uygulama yöntemlerini tarihsel bir perspektiften ele alarak analiz etmektedir. Ticari diplomasi, devletlerin ekonomik çıkarlarını küresel ölçekte korumak ve geliştirmek amacıyla yürüttükleri çok aktörlü bir dış politika aracıdır. Bu çalışma, ticari diplomasinin teorik temellerini açıklarken, diplomatik temsilciler, çokuluslu şirketler ve devlet başkanları gibi farklı aktörlerin bu süreçteki rollerini vurgulamaktadır. Makale, ticari diplomasiye yön veren teorilerin yalnızca ekonomik değil, aynı zamanda siyasi ve kültürel bağlamlarla da şekillendiğini göstermektedir. Kuramsal değerlendirmeyi somut bir vaka üzerinden temellendirmek amacıyla, 1830’lardan 1950’lere kadar Türk-Amerikan ilişkileri incelenmiştir. Osmanlı İmparatorluğu döneminden Cumhuriyet Türkiye’sine kadar süren bu ilişkiler, ticari diplomasinin hem savaş hem barış dönemlerinde nasıl sürdürüldüğünü göstermesi açısından özgün bir örnek sunmaktadır. Konsolosluk faaliyetlerinden çokuluslu şirketlerin yatırım süreçlerine kadar uzanan bu tarihsel süreç, teorik yaklaşımlar için güçlü bir dayanak oluşturmaktadır. Sonuç olarak, makale ticari diplomasinin uluslararası ilişkilerdeki sürekliliğini ve evrimini ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ticari diplomasi
• Türk-Amerikan ilişkileri
• Çokuluslu şirketler
• Yabancı yatırım
• Ticari diplomatlar
• Ekonomik dış politika
• Tarihsel vaka analizi

Commercial Diplomacy in Historical Perspective: A Theoretical Assessment through Turkish-American Relations

Abstract

This article analyzes the theoretical framework, key actors, and implementation strategies of commercial diplomacy from a historical perspective. Commercial diplomacy is a multi-actor foreign policy tool employed by states to protect and promote their economic interests on a global scale. While outlining the theoretical underpinnings of commercial diplomacy, the study highlights the roles of diplomatic envoys, multinational corporations, and heads of state. It also argues that the theories shaping commercial diplomacy are not only driven by economic logic but also influenced by political and cultural contexts. To ground the theoretical analysis, the article focuses on Turkish-American relations from the 1830s to the 1950s. Spanning from the Ottoman Empire to the early years of the Turkish Republic, this historical case illustrates how commercial diplomacy endured through both conflict and cooperation. From consular activities to multinational investment negotiations, this period offers a rich basis for examining how commercial diplomacy operates in practice. Ultimately, the article seeks to demonstrate the continuity and transformation of commercial diplomacy within the broader field of international relations.

Keywords

• Commercial diplomacy
• Turkish-American Relations
• Multinational corporations
• Foreign investment
• Commercial diplomats
• Economic foreign policy
• Historical case study

References

1. Barker, James. M., “Barker Mission- List of Telephone Names and Telephone Numbers in Turkey,” box 61, file 1320 (1951).
2. Devlet Arşivleri Başkanlığı (DAB), “The Twentieth Century Fund’un Türkiye İktisadiyatını Araştırmak İçin Görevlendirdiği Max Weston Thornburg ve Yardımcısının İstatistik Genel Müdürlüğü’ne Ziyaretine Dair,” 26 Nisan 1947, 26-148-23.
3. DAB, “Barker Misyon Raporu,” 21 Ağustos 1951, 134-873-8.
4. DAB, “Amerikalı Max W. Ball’ın Maden Tetkik ve Arama Enstitüsü Emrinde Çalıştırılmasına İzin Verilmesi,” 30 Ocak 1953, 131-5-15.
5. DAB, “Amerikalı Uzm. Robert Edmiston ve Uzm. Orval White Bryant’ın MTA Enstitüsü Umum Müdürlüğü Petrol Sondajlarında Çalıştırılmasına İzin Verilmesi,” 26 Ağustos 1953, 133-71-2.
6. DAB, “Marmara Petroleum Corporation Amerikan Petrol Şirketi Türkiye Mümessili Nazif İnan Tarafında Hazırlanan Not,” 14 Ocak 1957, 92-579-2.
7. DAB, “Başbakan Adnan Menderes’in Amerika Ziyareti ile İlgili Yazışmalar,” 5 Ekim 1959, 4-21-6.
8. Louis and Jacob Blaustein, Collected Personal and Business Papers, January 31, 1954.

9. Speeches – Reception for Pres. Celal Bayar of Turkey, box 2.102, M-375.
10. International Trade Center (ITC), A Guide to Commercial Diplomacy. Geneva: International Trade Center, 2019.
11. Gillespie, Julian E., “American Chamber of Commerce for the Levant,” Commerce Reports (1921).
12. Grew, Joseph C., Turbulent Era: A Diplomatic Record of Forty Years. London: Hammond, 1953.
13. Straus, Oscar, Under Four Administrations: From Cleveland to Taft. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1932.
14. Thornburg, Max Weston, vd., Turkey: An Economic Appraisal. New York: The Twentieth Century Fund, 1949.
15. Armaoğlu, Fahir, Türk Amerikan İlişkileri 1919–1997. İstanbul: Kronik Kitap, 2017.
16. Avcı, Ayşegül. “Yankee Levantine: David Offley and Ottoman–American Relations in the Early Nineteenth Century.” Doktora Tezi, İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent Üniversitesi, 2016.
17. Cavusgil, S. Tamer, vd., International Business: The New Realities. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, 2008.
18. Coolsaet, Rik, “Trade and Diplomacy: The Belgian Case,” in Business and Diplomacy, ed. Geoffrey Allen Pigman and Shaun Riordan. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2004.
19. Erhan, Çağrı, Türk-Amerikan İlişkilerinin Tarihsel Kökenleri. Ankara: İmge Kitabevi, 2015.
20. Gencer, Ali İhsan, vd. Türk- Amerikan Silah Ticareti Tarihi. İstanbul: Doğu Kütüphanesi, 2008.
21. Gordon, Leland, “American Relations with Turkey 1830–1930: An Economic Interpretation”. Doktora Tezi, University of Pennsylvania, 1932.
22. Harris, Richard ve Li, Q. Cher, Review of the Literature: The Role of International Trade and Investment in Business Growth and Development. UK Trade & Investment, 2005.
23. Kostecki, Michel M. ve Naray, Olivier, Commercial Diplomacy and International Business. The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations Clingendael, 2007.
24. Kurat, Akdes Nimet, Türk-Amerikan Münasebetlerine Kısa Bir Bakış (1800-1959). Ankara: Doğuş Ltd. Şti. Matbaası, 1959.
25. Langensiepen, Bernd, and Güleryüz, Ahmet, The Ottoman Steam Navy 1828–1923. London: Conway Maritime Press, 1995.
26. Mercier, Alison, Commercial Diplomacy in Advanced Industrial States:Canada, the UK, and the US. The Hague: Clingendael Institute, 2007.
27. Nair, Leena ve Hans, Basil, “Outward Foreign Direct Investment in the Globalisation Era: The Indian Experience”. International Journal of Research & Development in Technology and Management Science 21, 5 (2014): 48-63.
28. Nevins, Allan ve Commager, Henry Steele, ABD Tarihi, Çeviren Halil İnalcık, 8. bs. Ankara: Doğu Batı Yayınları, 2016.
29. Ohlin, Bertil, vd., The International Allocation of Economic Activity. London:Macmillan, 1977.
30. Ruel, Huub. Commercial Diplomacy and International Business: A Conceptual and Empirical Exploration. Leiden: Leiden University Press, 2018.
31. Saner, Raymond ve Yiu, Lichia, International Economic Diplomacy:Mutations in Post-modern Times. Netherlands Institute of International Relations Clingendael, 2003.
32. Strange, Susan, States and Markets: An Introduction to International Political Economy. London: Pinter, 1994.,
33. “Amerikalı Misafirler–Amerikan tayyarecileri dün sabah geldi.” Cumhuriyet,19 Mayıs 1930.
34. “Gazi Hz. Bugün Hava Kahramanlarını Kabul Edecek.” Cumhuriyet, 1 Ağustos 1930.
35. “13 Ekim 1934 ile 1 Haziran 1963 Tarihleri Arasında Türkiye’de Yapılan Petrol Sondajları.” Mobil Gazetesi, Ağustos-Eylül 1963.
36. “Petrol Kanunu.” Resmî Gazete, March 16, 1954, no 8659.
37. Alexander, Chris ve Warwick, Ken. “Governments, Exports and Growth:Responding to the Challenges and Opportunities of Globalisation.”The World Economy 30, 1 (2007): 177-194, DOI:10.1111/j.1467- 9701.2007.00877.x.
38. Cohen, Naomi W., “Ambassador Straus in Turkey, 1909–1910: A Note on Dollar Diplomacy.” The Mississippi Valley Historical Review 45, 4 (1959): 632-642, https://doi.org/10.2307/1888714
39. Dunning, John H., “The Eclectic Paradigm of International Production: A Restatement and Some Possible Extensions.” Journal of International Business Studies 19, 1 (1988): 1-31, http://www.jstor.org/stable/154984
40. Edwin, Agwu M., “Foreign Direct Investments: A Review From the Nigerian Perspective.” Research Journal of Business and Management 1, 3 (2014): 318-337, https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/rjbm/ issue/32457/360946.
41. Johanson, Jan ve Vahlne, Jan-Erik. “The Uppsala Internationalization Process Model Revisited: From Liability of Foreignness to Liability of Outsidership.” Journal of International Business Studies, 40 (2009): 1411-1431, DOI:10.1057/jibs.2009.24
42. Kotabe, Masaaki ve Czinkota, Michael R. “State Government Promotion of Manufacturing Exports: A Gap Analysis.” Journal of International Business Studies 23, 4 (1992): 637-658, DOI:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490281
43. Lee, Donna, “The Growing Influence of Business in U.K. Diplomacy.” International Studies Perspectives, 5 (2004): 50-54, DOI:10.1111/j.1528-3577.2004.00154.x
44. Naray, Olivier, “Commercial Diplomacy: A Conceptual Overview.” paper presented at the 7th World Conference of TPOs, The Hague, 2008.
45. Naray, Olivier, “Commercial Diplomats in the Context of International Business.” The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 6 (2011): 121-148, DOI:10.1163/187119111X557382
46. Ruel, Huub ve Visser, René. “Commercial Diplomats as Corporate Entrepreneurs: Explaining Role Behavior from an Institutional Perspective.” International Journal of Diplomacy and Economy 1, 1 (2012): 42-79. DOI:10.1504/IJDIPE.2012.049942
47. Rose, Andrew K., “The Foreign Service and Foreign Trade: Embassies as Export Promotion.” The World Economy, 30 (2005): 22-38, DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9701.2007.00870.x.
48. Sanyal, Rajib N. ve Güvenli, Tuğrul. “Relations Between Multinational Firms and Host Governments: The Experience of American-Owned Firms in China.” International Business Review 9, 1 (2000): 119-134, DOI:10.1016/S0969-5931(99)00032-3
49. Spence, Michael, “Evaluating Export Promotion Programmes: U.K. Overseas Trade Missions and Export Performance.” Small Business Economics 20, 1 (2003): 83-103, DOI:10.1023/A:1020200621988
50. Trask, Roger, “The United States and Turkish Nationalism: Investments and Technical Aid during the Atatürk Era.” The Business History Review 38, 1 (1964): 58-77, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3112487
51. Üner, A. Turgay, “Ottoman-American Trade in the Nineteeth Century.” The Journal of Ottoman Studies, 3 (1992): 189-246