Öğretmenlerin Çevrim içi Eğitime İlişkin Hizmet İçi Eğitim Gereksinimlerinin Belirlenmesi

Year 2021, Issue: 51, 345 - 367, 30.06.2021

Barış Avcı , Meral Güven

https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.882866

Cited By: 8

Abstract

MEB hizmet içi gelişime yönelik seminer ve kurs planları, üniversitelerin ders katalogları, alanyazın taraması ile ulusal ve uluslararası raporlardaki veriler incelendiğinde öğretmenlerin çevrim içi programa yönelik yeterli donanıma sahip olmadığı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Bu doğrultuda, bu temel nitel araştırmanın amacı öğretmenlerin çevrim içi eğitime ilişkin hizmet içi eğitim gereksinimlerinin belirlenmesidir. Bu bağlamda altı alan uzmanının görüşleri doğrultusunda geliştirilen pedagoji, yönetsel, sosyal ve teknik olmak üzere 4 bölümden oluşan yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme formları ile veriler toplanmıştır. Görüşmeler, analiz edilmek üzere katılımcıların da onayıyla ses kaydına alınmıştır. Kodlamaların geçerlik-güvenirliğini sağlamak amacıyla da bir alan uzmanın görüşüne başvurulmuş ve kodlamaların %30’u kontrol edilerek yüksek bir uyum elde edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak öğretmenlerin etkileşim sağlama, öğrencilerin farklı alanlardaki gelişiminin desteklenmesi ve değerlendirme alanlarının yanı sıra, dijital araç kullanımı, içerik üretimi, açık eğitim kaynakları alanları başta olmak üzere öğrenme desteği ile öğrenme ortamı oluşturmaya yönelik olarak eğitim gereksinimleri bulunmaktadır. Buna ek olarak, yabancı dil yeterliğinin arttırılması, öğrenme stil/stratejilerinin uyarlanması, telif hakları, öğrencilere psikolojik ve sosyal destek sağlanması ile test hazırlama ve yöntem-teknik kullanımı alanlarında mesleki gelişim gereksinimleri bulunduğu sonucuna ulaşılmaktadır.

Keywords

çevrim içi eğitim, hizmet içi eğitim, gereksinim belirleme, K-12

Identifying Training Needs of In-Service Teachers for Online Education

Abstract

When the Ministry of Education’s seminars and course plans intended for in-service training, the academic catalogues of the universities, the literature review and national and international reports are analyzed, it has been inferred that the teachers aren’t equipped with the necessary skills needed for online education. The aim of this basic qualitative study is to identify training needs of in-service teachers for online education. In this context, data were collected with semi-structured interview forms consisting of 4 sections: pedagogy, managerial, social and technical developed in accordance with the suggestions of six field experts. The interviews were recorded with the approval of the participants for analysis. In order to ensure the validity and reliability of coding, a field expert checked 30% of the codes and high level of intercoder reliability established. As a result, teachers need training to provide interaction, supporting the development of students in different fields and creating a supportive learning environment, especially in the areas of use of digital tools, content production, open educational resources, as well as evaluation. In addition, it is found that there are professional development requirements in the fields of increasing foreign language proficiency, adapting learning styles/strategies, copyrights, providing psychological and social support to students, and preparing tests and using methods and techniques.

Keywords

online education, in-service training, needs analysis

References

• Akeredolu-Ale, B., Sotiloye, B., Bodunde, H. & Aduradola. (2014). Impact of the digital age on the teaching and learning of English and communication skills (ECS): exploratory observations from a Nigerian university. Paper Presented at the 7th Edition of the International Conference on “ICT for Language Learning.” Firenze – Italy.
• Alshehri, Y. A., Mordhah, N., Alsibiani, S., Alsobhi, S., & Alnazzawi, N. (2020). How the regular teaching converted to fully online teaching in Saudi Arabia during the Coronavirus COVID-19. Creative Education, 11, 985-996. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2020.117071
• Altınay, F., Altınay, Z. ve İşman, A. (2004). Roles of the students and teachers in distance education. TOJDE, 5(4).
• Aydın, C.H. (2005). Turkish mentors’ perception of roles. competencies and resources for online teaching. TOJDE, 6(3)
• Bâcă, E. (2020). Teaching and learning on the edge of a pandemic: providing continuity and re-building an online learning community. “Ovidius” University Annals, Economic Sciences Series. (20) 1 Bagley, C.A. & Creswell, W.H. (2012). The Role of Social Media as a Tool for Learning. (s.18-38) in Elspeth McKay (Ed.) ePedagogy in Online Learning: New Developments in Web Mediated Human Computer Interaction. IGI Global
• Balta, Y., Türel, Y. K. (2013). Çevirim içi uzaktan eğitimde kullanılan farklı ölçme ve değerlendirme yaklaşımlarına ilişkin bir inceleme. Turkish Studies- International Periodical for The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic 8(3), 37-45.
• Berge, Z. L. (1995). Facilitating computer conferencing: recommendations from the field. Educational Technology 15(1): 22–30.
• Bergstrom, B., Fryer, J. & Norris, J. (2005). Defining online assessment fort he adult learning market in Hricko, M & Howell, S.L (Ed.) Online Assessment and Measurement: Foundations and Challenges. (p.46-67).
• Bowman, L. (2010). Online learning: a user friendly approach for high school and college students. Plymouth: Rowman &. Littlefield Education.
• Bozkurt, A. & Sharma, R.C (2020). Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to CoronaVirus pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education Volume 15, Issue 1, 2020
• Caena, F. (2014). Initial teacher education in Europe: an overview of policy issues. European Commission
• Chan, K. (2016, December). These are the most powerful languages in the world. . Retrived from: These are the most powerful languages in the world | World Economic Forum (weforum.org)
• Choi, B.Y., Song, S. & Zaman, R. (2020). Smart education: opportunities and challenges induced by Covid-19 pandemic (a survey based study). 2020 IEEE International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2), Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2020, pp. 1-8, doi: 10.1109/ISC251055.2020.9239063
• Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language. UK: Cambridge University Press
• Davidson-Shivers, G., Rasmussen, K.L. & Lowenthal, P.R. (2018) Web-based learning design, implementation and evaluation. Springer International Publishing.
• De la Varre, C., Keane, J., Irvin, M. J., & Hannum, W. (2009). Social Support for Online Learning. In Whitworth, B., & de Moor, A. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Socio-Technical Design and Social Networking Systems (pp. 575-588). IGI Global. http://doi:10.4018/978-1-60566-264-0.ch038
• Dhull I., Sakshi M. (2017). Online learning. International Education & Research Journal, (3) 8.
• Doğan, N., Kıbrıslıoğlu Uysal, N., Kelecioğlu, H. & Hambleton, R. K. (2020). An overview of e-assessment. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 35 (Special Issue), 1-5. doi: 10.16986/HUJE.2020063669
• Dong C., Lee, D.W.C. & Aw, C.W. (2020). Tips for medical educators on how to conduct effective online teaching in times of social distancing. Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare.
• Ehlers, U. D. (2013). Open learning cultures: A guide to quality, evaluation, and assessment for future learning. New York: Springer.
• Eurydice (2011). Key data on learning and innovation through ICT at school in Europe. Brussels: EACEA.
• European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice. (2019). Digital Education at School in Europe. (TR Ed.) Eurydice Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
• Foronda, C. (2018). Connecting with students through creative teaching. Nurse Educator, Vol. 43 No. 1, p. 27.
• García-Martínez, J.-A., Rosa-Napal, F.-C., Romero-Tabeayo, I., López-Calvo, S., & Fuentes-Abeledo, E.-J. (2020). Digital tools and personal learning environments: an analysis in higher education. Sustainability, 12(19), 8180. MDPI AG. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12198180
• Golding, J. & Bretscher, N. (2018), Developing pedagogies for a synchronous online course on teaching pre-university mathematics. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, Vol. 37 No. 2, pp. 98-112.
• Gotanda, L. (2014). K-12 Online: An Action Research Project on Professional Development for High School Online Pedagogy. PhD Thesis. University of California.
• Hilton, J. (2016). Open educational resources and college textbook choices: A review of research on efcacy and perceptions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4), 573–590.
• Hilton, J., Wiley, D., Stein, J., & Johnson, A. (2010). The four ‘R’s of openness and ALMS analysis: frameworks for open educational resources. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 25(1), 37–44. doi:10.1080/02680510903482132
• Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T. & Bond, A. (2020, March). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Retrived from The Difference Between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning | EDUCAUSE
• Hotaman, D. (2020). Online eğitimin başarısı açısından biçimlendirici değerlendirmenin önemi. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi. Cilt: 13 Sayı: 73
• Huber, S. G., & Helm, C. (2020). Covid-19 and schooling: evaluation, assessment and accountability in times of crises—reacting quickly to explore key issues for policy, practice and research with the school barometer. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 1–34. doi:10.1007/s11092-020-09322-y.
• Jansen, M., Scherer, R. & Schroeders, U. (2015), Students’ self-concept and self-efficacy in the sciences: Differential relations to antecedents and educational outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, Vol. 41, pp. 13-24.
• Jasminka, T. & Tamara, P. (2015). Student perception of assessment at an institution of higher education. ESERA. 2015 At: Finland, Helsinki
• Kavrat, B. & Türel, Y.K. (2013). Çevrim içi uzaktan eğitimde öğretmen rollerini ve yeterliliklerini belirleme ölçeği geliştirme. The Journal of Instructional Technologies &Teacher Education Vol.1 No3, 23-33
• Kırmacı, Ö. ve Kılıç-Çakmak. (2020). Çevrim içi Öğrenme Ortamlarında Değerlendirme. (s.387-416) Ebru Kılıç Çakmak ve Serçin Karataş (Ed.) içinde Çevrim içi Öğrenme: Farklı Bakış Açıları. Pegem Akademi Publishing.
• Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13–19. doi:10.1177/002205741319300303
• König, J., Jäger-Biela, D.J. & Glutsch, N. (2020) Adapting to online teaching during COVID-19 school closure: teacher education and teacher competence effects among early career teachers in Germany, European Journal of Teacher Education, 43:4,608-622, DOI: 10.1080/02619768.2020.1809650
• Liu, X., C. J. Bonk, R. J. Magiuka, S. Lee, & B. Su. (2005). Exploring four dimensions of online instructor roles: A program level case study. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 9(4): 29– 48, 2005
• Mackay, J. (2013). Online schools. USA: Gale Cengage Learning.
• MEB (2017) Öğretmenlik mesleği genel yeterlikleri. Erişim adresi http://oygm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2017_12/11115355_YYRETMENLYK_MESLEYY_GENEL_YETERLYKLERY.pdf
• MEB. (2020a, Mart). Tedbirler. Erişim adresi Bakan Selçuk, Koronavirüs'e karşı eğitim alanında alınan tedbirleri açıkladı (meb.gov.tr)
• MEB. (2020b, Mart). Uzaktan eğitim. Erişim adresi "Uzaktan eğitim" bakan Selçuk'un verdiği dersle başladı (meb.gov.tr)
• MEB. (2020c, Nisan). Canlı sınıf. Erişim adresi Pazartesi günü kullanıma açılacak "canlı sınıf" uygulamasına ilişkin videolu bilgilendirme (meb.gov.tr)
• MEB. (2020d, Ağustos). Yüz yüze eğitim. Erişim adresi "Okulları birlikte açacağız" (meb.gov.tr)
• MEB. (2020e, Eylül). Yüz yüze eğitim. Erişim adresi Yüz yüze eğitim, anasınıfı ve ilkokul 1'inci sınıflarda başladı (meb.gov.tr)
• MEB. (2020f, Ekim). Yüz yüze eğitim. Erişim adresi Okullarda yüz yüze eğitimde ikinci aşama 12 ekim pazartesi günü başlıyor (meb.gov.tr)
• MEB. (2020g, Ekim). Yüz yüze eğitim. Erişim adresi Okullarda yüz yüze eğitimde üçüncü aşama 2 kasım pazartesi günü başlıyor (meb.gov.tr)
• MEB. (2020h, Kasım). Online eğitim. Erişim adresi Eğitim-öğretim, 31 aralık 2020'ye kadar online olarak sürdürülecek (meb.gov.tr)
• MEB. (2020i). Kurslar. Erişim adresi 01_Kurslar.zip 23308KB 30 11 2020 (meb.gov.tr)
• MEB. (2020j). Seminerler. Erişim adresi 02_Seminerler.zip 3501KB 30 11 2020 (meb.gov.tr)
• Mei, X.Y., Aas, E. & Medgard, M. (2019). Teachers’ use of digital learning tool for teaching in higher education: Exploring teaching practice and sharing culture. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 522-537
• Merriam, S.B. & Tisdell, E.J. (2015). Qualitative research a guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass
• Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.
• Moore, M. G. & Kearsley, G. (2012). Distance education: A systems view of online learning, (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
• Nash, J. A. (2015). Future of online education in crisis: a call to action. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14, 80-88.
• OECD. (2020). Turkey: country note. Retrived from http://www.oecd.org/education/Turkey-coronavirus-education-country-note.pdf
• Paechter, M., Maier, B. & Macher, D. (2010). Students’ expectations of, and experiences in e-learning: Their relation to learning achievements and course satisfaction. Computers & Education 54 (2010) 222–229
• Pagliari, L., Batts, D., & McFadden, C. (2009). Desired versus actual training for online instructors in community colleges. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 12(4).
• Park, C., Kier, C., & Jugdev, K. (2011). Debate as a teaching strategy in online education: a case study. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 37(3), 1-17.
• Rose, S. M. (2018). What are some key attributes of effective online teachers? Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 22(2), 32–48.
• Sakarya MEM. (2020, Nisan). EBA canlı sınıf uygulaması yaygınlaştırıldı. Erişim adresi EBA canlı sınıf uygulaması yaygınlaştırıldı (meb.gov.tr)
• Shapiro, N. S., & Levine, J. H. (1999). Creating learning communities: A practical guide to winning support, organizing for change, and implementing programs. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
• T.C. Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı. (2020). Eğitim faaliyetlerinde telif hakları konulu seminer gerçekleştirildi. Erişim adresi Eğitim Faaliyetlerinde Telif Hakları Konulu Seminer Gerçekleştirildi - Telif Hakları Genel Müdürlüğü
• Tang, H. (2020). Implementing open educational resources in digital education. Educational Technology Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09879-x
• Taylor, B. & Holley, K. (2009). Providing academic and support services to students enrolled in online degree programs. The College Student Affairs Journal.
• TEDMEM. (2020). COVID-19 sürecinde eğitim: uzaktan öğrenme, sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri. Erişim adresi yayınlar | tedmem
• Titan, F. & Lena, GG F.P.D (2017). A comparative study of teaching styles in online learning environment. 25-30. 10.1109/ICIMTech.2017.8273505. 15-17 November 2017, Melia Purosani Hotel, Yogyakarta, Indonesia 2017 International Conference on Information Management and Technology (ICIMTech)
• Titov, I., Kulmamirov, S. & Titov, E. (2014). Programming literacy level needed for modern teachers: Fragile border between content creator and a programmer, IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON2014, Paper number 6826164, pp. 667- 669
• Turgut, Y. (2014). Verilerin kaydedilmesi, analizi, yorumlanması: nicel ve nitel. Abdurrahman T. (Ed.) (193-247) Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri içinde Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
• UNESCO. (2020). COVID-19 education response webinar distance learning strategies what do we know about effectiveness? Retrived from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000373350
• United Nations. (2020). Policy brief: education during Covid-19 and beyond. Retrived from https://www.un.org/development/desa/dspd/wp-content/uploads/sites/22/2020/08/sg_policy_brief_covid-19_and_education_august_2020.pdf
• Vitez, K. (2018). Open 101: An action plan for affordable textbooks. (PIRG Report 3–033). Washington, DC: Student Public Interest Research Group. Retrived from Microsoft Word - OPEN 101 draft [KV.01.24.2018] (studentpirgs.org)
• Wiesenberg, F., & Stacey, E. (2008). Teaching philosophy: Moving from face-to-face to online classrooms. Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education, 34(1), 63–69.
• Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin
• Zapalska, A. & Brozik, D. (2006). Learning styles and online education. Campus-Wide Information Systems. 23. 10.1108/10650740610714080.
• Zimmerman, J. (2020, March). Coronavirus and the great online-learning experiment. Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrived from https://www.chronicle.com/article/Coronavirusthe-Great/248216