SİNGAPUR MİLLETLERARASI TİCARET MAHKEMESİ (SICC)

Yıl 2021, , 1405 - 1442, 26.11.2021

Onur Can Saatcıoğlu

https://doi.org/10.33717/deuhfd.998241

Öz

21. Yüzyıl ile birlikte, önceleri tahkim ve geleneksel devlet yargısı şeklinde
yapılan ayrım farklı bir boyut kazanmıştır. Bazı devletler, sınıraşan ticarî
uyuşmazlıkların çözümü bakımından kendi ülkelerini bir çekim noktası hâline
getirmek istemişler ve bu tür uyuşmazlıkları inceleyen özel mahkemeler kurma
fikrini geliştirmişlerdir. Tahkimin ve geleneksel devlet yargısının avantajlı
yönlerini bir arada barındırma gayesiyle kurulan bu mahkemeler, milletlerarası
ticaret mahkemeleri şeklinde adlandırılmaktadırlar. Bu çalışma, hâlihazırda
kurulu bulunan örnekler arasında tercih edilebilirlik ve etkinlik yönünden
avantajlı bir konumda olduğunu düşündüğümüz Singapur Milletlerarası Ticaret
Mahkemesi’ni (SICC) ana hatlarıyla tanıtmak amacıyla kaleme alınmıştır.
Aşağıda, öncelikle günümüzde faaliyet gösteren milletlerarası ticaret mahkemeleri hakkında genel bir bilgilendirme yapılacaktır. Ardından, SICC’nin temel
yapısı ayrı başlıklar altında incelenecektir. Açıklamalar esnasında yeri geldikçe,
özellik arz eden bazı hususlar açısından milletlerarası ticarî tahkim yolu ile
karşılaştırmalar yapılacak ve SICC sisteminin güçlü ve zayıf yönlerine temas
edilecektir. Sonuç kısmında ise, çalışmada yer verilen tüm açıklamalardan
hareketle SICC’nin niçin diğer örneklere kıyasla daha güçlü bir alternatif teşkil
edebileceği hususundaki kanaatimize yer verilecektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Singapur, Milletlerarası ticaret mahkemesi, Taraf özerkliği, Yetki anlaşması, New York Sözleşmesi

Kaynakça

• Akıncı, Ziya: Milletlerarası Tahkim, 4. Baskı, Vedat Kitapçılık, İstanbul, 2016.
• Bell, Gary F.: “The New International Commercial Courts - Competing with Arbitration - The Example of the Singapore International Commercial Court”, Contemp. Asia Arb. J., 11(2), 2018, ss. 193-216.
• Biard, Alexandre: “International Commercial Courts in France: Innovation without Revolution” Erasmus L. Rev., 12(1), 2019, ss. 24-32.
• Chong, Adeline/Yip, Man: “Singapore as a Centre for International Commercial Litigation: Party Autonomy to the Fore”, Journal of Private International Law, 15(1), 2019, ss. 97-129.
• Chong, Steven: “Dispute Settlement in the Belt and Road Initiative: Lessons from the Singapore Experience”, The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law, 8(1), 2020, ss. 30-39.
• Çelikel, Aysel/Erdem, B. Bahadır: Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk, 16. Bası, Beta, İstanbul, 2020.
• Demeter, Dalma R./Smith, Kayleigh M.: “The Implications of International Commercial Courts on Arbitration”, Journal of International Arbitration, 33(5), 2016, ss. 441-470.
• Denjakin, Viktor: “The SICC: International Commercial Litigation: A New Major Development in the Field of International Commercial Dispute Resolution”, Keio Law Journal, 41, ss. 237-255.
• Deskovski, Toni/Dokovski, Vangel/Kocev, Ljuben: “The Birth and Rise of the International Commercial Courts in Paris - Boosting Litigation Or Alternative to Arbitration,” Iustinianus Primus Law Review, 10(2), 2019, ss. 29-41.
• DIFC/LCIA Arbitration Centre <http://www.difc-lcia.org/overview.aspx> Erişim Tarihi: 04.02.2021
• Doğan, Vahit: Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk, 6. Bası, Savaş, Ankara, 2020.
• FOSFA International Arbitration Rules, Guide and Code of Practice (fosfa.org) < https://www.fosfa.org/arbitration/guide-and-rules/> Erişim Tarihi: 04.02.2021
• GAFTA Arbitration Rules No:125 (gafta.com) < https://www.gafta.com/ write/MediaUploads/Contracts/2020/Sept%202020/125_2020.pdf> Erişim Tarihi: 04.10.2021
• Gaillard, Emmanuel/Banifatemi, Yas/Vialard, Chloe: “France: The International Chambers of the Paris Courts and Their Innovative Rules of Procedure”, Mondaq Business Briefing, 25th April 2018, (LexisNexis).
• Godwin, Andrew/Ramsay, Ian/Webster, Miranda: “International Commercial Courts: The Singapore Experience” Melbourne J of Intl L, 18(2), 2017, ss. 219-259.
• Hwang, Michael: “Commercial courts and international arbitration— competitors or partners?”, Arbitration International, 31, 2015, ss. 193- 212.
• Kuo, Lily/Kommenda, Niko: What is China’s Belt and Road Initiative? (The Guardian) <https://www.theguardian.com/cities/ng-interactive/ 2018/jul/30/what-china-belt-road-initiative-silk-road-explainer> Erişim Tarihi: 04.02.2021
• Landbrecht, Johannes: “The Singapore International Commercial Court (SICC) – an Alternative to International Arbitration?”, ASA Bulletin, 34(1), 2016, ss. 112-125.
• Legal Profession Act (Chapter 161), 36P (Singapore Statutes Online) < https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/LPA1966#pr36P-> Erişim Tarihi: 04.10.2020
• Lehmann, Matthias: “Law Made in Germany-The Export Engine Stutters” in International Business Courts A European and Global Perspective (KRAMER Xandra/SORABJI John (Eds.)), Eleven International Publishing, The Hague, 2019.
• Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd, “Developing Commercial Law Through the Courts: Rebalancing the Relationship Between the Courts and Arbitration”, (The Bailii Lecture 2016) <https://www.bailii.org/bailii/ lecture/04.pdf> Erişim Tarihi: 04.10.2020
• Lye, KC/Chan, Darius: “The Singapore International Commercial Court: A challenge to arbitration?”, Norton Rose Fulbright Thought Leadership Publications (Research Collection School Of Law), 2015, ss. 6-7 < https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3039> Erişim Tarihi: 04.02.2021
• Mesci, Barış/Esen, Emre: “Milletlerarası Ticarî Uyuşmazlıkların Yargısal Yolla Çözümünde Tahkime Rakip Olarak Milletlerarası Ticaret Mahkemeleri: Hollanda Ticaret Mahkemesi Üzerinden Bir Analiz”, Public and Private International Law Bulletin, 40(2), ss. 1223-1259.
• Menon, Sundaresh: “International Commercial Courts: Towards a Transnational System of Dispute Resolution”, (Opening lecture for the DIFC Courts Lecture Series 2015) <https://www.supremecourt.gov.sg/ docs/default-source/default-document-library/media-room/openinglecture---difc-lecture-series-2015.pdf> Erişim Tarihi: 04.10.2020
• Qatar International Court and Dispute Resolution Center <https://www.qicdrc.gov.qa/arbitration/overview> Erişim Tarihi: 04.02.2021
• Queen Mary University of London, 2018 International Arbitration Survey: The Evolution of International Arbitration <http://www.arbitration. qmul.ac.uk/research/2018/> Erişim Tarihi: 04.10.2020
• Ramesh, Kannan: “International Commercial Courts: Unicorns on a Journey of a Thousand Miles” in Conference on the Rise of International Commercial Courts (Doha, 2018) <https://www.sicc.gov.sg/docs/ default-source/modules-document/news-and-article/internationalcommercial-courts-unicorns_23108490-e290-422f-9da8-1e0d1e59ace5 .pdf> Erişim Tarihi: 04.10.2020
• Requejo Isidro, Marta: International Commercial Courts in the Litigation Market - Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for Procedural Law Research Paper Series, 2, 2019.
• Reciprocal Enforcement of Commonwealth Judgements Act (Chapter 264, 1985 ve 2001 Rev. Ed) < https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/RECJA1921> Erişim Tarihi: 04.10.2020
• Reyes, Anselmo: “Recognition and Enforcement of Interlocutory and Final Judgments of the Singapore International Commercial Court”, J of Intl & Comparative L, 2(2), 2015, ss. 337-358.
• Ruckteschler, Dorothee/Stooss, Tanja: “International Commercial Courts: A Superior Alternative to Arbitration?”, Journal of International Arbitration, 36(4), 2019, ss.431-450.
• Rules of Court (Chapter 322, Section 80), Order 110 <https://sso.agc.gov.sg/SL/SCJA1969-R5?ProvIds=PO110-#PO110-> Erişim Tarihi: 04.10.2020
• Saitou, Akira: “Kokusai shouji chuusai to kokusai shouji saiban-kyousou to kyouryoku no tame no kankei riron ni mukete”, Kokusai shoutorihiki gakkai nenpou, 18, 2016, ss. 81-96 (齋藤彰, 国際商事仲裁と国際商事裁判: 競争と協力のための関係理論に向けて, 国際商取引学会年報 頁 , 18, 2016, 81- 96).
• Singapore International Arbitration Centre Rules 2016 (SIAC, 2020) <https://www.siac.org.sg/our-rules/rules/siac-rules-2016> Erişim Tarihi: 04.10.2020
• Singapore International Commercial Court (‘SICC’) Committee, “Report of the Singapore InternationalCommercial Court Committee” (Report, SICC Committee, November 2013) <https://www.sicc.gov.sg/docs/ default-source/modules-document/news-and-article/-report-of-thesingapore-international-commercial-court-committee-_90a41701-a5fc4a2e-82db-cc33db8b6603-1.pdf> Erişim Tarihi: 04.10.2020
• Singapore International Commercial Court Practice Directions -Effective 20 July 2020-(SICC)<https://www.supremecourt.gov.sg/docs/defaultsource/default-document-library/rules/singapore-internationalcommercial-court-practice-directions-v2.pdf> Erişim Tarihi: 04.10.2020
• Sorabji, John/Kramer, Xandra: “Introduction-The International Business of Courts” in International Business Courts A European and Global Perspective (KRAMER Xandra/SORABJI John (Eds.)), Eleven International Publishing, The Hague, 2019.
• Sökmen Güler, Ekin: “Forum Non Conveniens Doktrini ve Uluslararası Paralel Davalar”, D. E. Ü Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi (Prof.Dr. Durmuş Tezcan’a Armağan), 21(Özel Sayı), 2019, ss. 2629- 2658.
• Stamboulakis, Drossos: Legal Transfer and ‘Hybrid’ International Commercial Dispute Resolution Procedures: Lessons from the Singapore International Commercial Court in Legal Transplants in East Asia and Oceania (BREDA Vito (Ed.)), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2019.
• Stamboulakis, Drossos/Crook, Blake: “Joinder of Non-Consenting Parties: The Singapore International Commercial Court Approach Meets Transnational Recognition and Enforcement”, Erasmus Law Review, 12(1), 2019, ss. 98-110.
• Status: Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York, 1958) (UNCITRAL) <https://uncitral.un.org/en/ texts/arbitration/conventions/foreign_arbitral_awards/status2> Erişim Tarihi: 04.02.2021.
• Status Table: Convention of 30 June 2005 on Choice of Court Agreements (HCCH) <https://www.hcch.net/en/instruments/conventions/statustable/?cid=98> Erişim Tarihi: 04.02.2021
• Stephenson, Andrew/Hogan, Lindsay/Smith, Jaclyn L.: Australia: What Constitutes an Offshore Case?: An Analysis of the Singapore International Commercial Court’s Second Decision, Monday Business Briefing, 27th July 2016, (LexisNexis).
• Supreme Court of Judicature Act (Chapter 322, Act 24 of 1969) Revised Edition 2007 (Singapore Statutes Online) <https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/ SCJA1969> Erişim Tarihi: 04.10.2020
• Şanlı, Cemal/Esen, Emre/Ataman Figanmeşe, İnci: Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk, 8. Bası, Beta, İstanbul, 2020.
• Takahashi, Gen/Sze, Yao Tan/Sook, Zhen Ng/Maeda, Atsutoshi: “Shingapooru kokosai shouji saibansho (SICC) no zousetsu oyobi kanren suru shomondai (jou)”, Kokusai shouji houmu, 43(1), 2015, ss. 1471-1479 (髙橋玄, 陳世耀, 黄淑臻, 前田敦利 シンガポール国際商事裁判所 , (SICC)の創設及び関連する諸問題下 国際商事法務 ( ), , 43(1), 2015, 頁1471- 1479).
• Teh, Lawrence: “The Singapore International Commercial Court”, Dipute Resolution International, 11(2), 2017, ss. 143-150.
• Tiba, Firew: “The Emergence of Hybrid International Commercial Courts and the Future of Cross Border Commercial Dispute Resolution in Asia”, Loyola U Chicago Intl L Rev, 14(1), 2016, ss. 31-53.
• Wilske, Stephan: “International Commercial Courts and Arbitration - Alternatives, Substitutes or Trojan Horse”, Contemp. Asia Arb. J., 11(2), 2018, ss. 153-192.
• Yeo, Justin: “On Appeal from Singapore International Commercial Court”, Singapore Academy of Law Journal, 29(2), 2017, ss. 574-595.
• Yip, Man: “The Resolution of Disputes Before the Singapore International Commercial Court”, International and Cooperative Law Quarterly, 65, 2016, ss. 439-473.
• Yip, Man: “The Singapore International Commercial Court: The Future of Litigation?” in International Business Courts A European and Global Perspective (KRAMER Xandra/SORABJI John (Eds.)), Eleven International Publishing, The Hague, 2019.