SİNGAPUR MİLLETLERARASI TİCARET MAHKEMESİ (SICC)

Onur Can Saatcıoğlu

doi:10.33717/deuhfd.998241

SİNGAPUR MİLLETLERARASI TİCARET MAHKEMESİ (SICC)

Öz

21. Yüzyıl ile birlikte, önceleri tahkim ve geleneksel devlet yargısı şeklinde yapılan ayrım farklı bir boyut kazanmıştır. Bazı devletler, sınıraşan ticarî uyuşmazlıkların çözümü bakımından kendi ülkelerini bir çekim noktası hâline getirmek istemişler ve bu tür uyuşmazlıkları inceleyen özel mahkemeler kurma fikrini geliştirmişlerdir. Tahkimin ve geleneksel devlet yargısının avantajlı yönlerini bir arada barındırma gayesiyle kurulan bu mahkemeler, milletlerarası ticaret mahkemeleri şeklinde adlandırılmaktadırlar. Bu çalışma, hâlihazırda kurulu bulunan örnekler arasında tercih edilebilirlik ve etkinlik yönünden avantajlı bir konumda olduğunu düşündüğümüz Singapur Milletlerarası Ticaret Mahkemesi’ni (SICC) ana hatlarıyla tanıtmak amacıyla kaleme alınmıştır. Aşağıda, öncelikle günümüzde faaliyet gösteren milletlerarası ticaret mahkemeleri hakkında genel bir bilgilendirme yapılacaktır. Ardından, SICC’nin temel yapısı ayrı başlıklar altında incelenecektir. Açıklamalar esnasında yeri geldikçe, özellik arz eden bazı hususlar açısından milletlerarası ticarî tahkim yolu ile karşılaştırmalar yapılacak ve SICC sisteminin güçlü ve zayıf yönlerine temas edilecektir. Sonuç kısmında ise, çalışmada yer verilen tüm açıklamalardan hareketle SICC’nin niçin diğer örneklere kıyasla daha güçlü bir alternatif teşkil edebileceği hususundaki kanaatimize yer verilecektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Akıncı, Ziya: Milletlerarası Tahkim, 4. Baskı, Vedat Kitapçılık, İstanbul, 2016.
Bell, Gary F.: “The New International Commercial Courts - Competing with Arbitration - The Example of the Singapore International Commercial Court”, Contemp. Asia Arb. J., 11(2), 2018, ss. 193-216.
Biard, Alexandre: “International Commercial Courts in France: Innovation without Revolution” Erasmus L. Rev., 12(1), 2019, ss. 24-32.
Chong, Adeline/Yip, Man: “Singapore as a Centre for International Commercial Litigation: Party Autonomy to the Fore”, Journal of Private International Law, 15(1), 2019, ss. 97-129.
Chong, Steven: “Dispute Settlement in the Belt and Road Initiative: Lessons from the Singapore Experience”, The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law, 8(1), 2020, ss. 30-39.
Çelikel, Aysel/Erdem, B. Bahadır: Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk, 16. Bası, Beta, İstanbul, 2020.
Demeter, Dalma R./Smith, Kayleigh M.: “The Implications of International Commercial Courts on Arbitration”, Journal of International Arbitration, 33(5), 2016, ss. 441-470.
Denjakin, Viktor: “The SICC: International Commercial Litigation: A New Major Development in the Field of International Commercial Dispute Resolution”, Keio Law Journal, 41, ss. 237-255.

Deskovski, Toni/Dokovski, Vangel/Kocev, Ljuben: “The Birth and Rise of the International Commercial Courts in Paris - Boosting Litigation Or Alternative to Arbitration,” Iustinianus Primus Law Review, 10(2), 2019, ss. 29-41.
DIFC/LCIA Arbitration Centre Erişim Tarihi: 04.02.2021
Doğan, Vahit: Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk, 6. Bası, Savaş, Ankara, 2020.
FOSFA International Arbitration Rules, Guide and Code of Practice (fosfa.org) < https://www.fosfa.org/arbitration/guide-and-rules/> Erişim Tarihi: 04.02.2021
GAFTA Arbitration Rules No:125 (gafta.com) < https://www.gafta.com/ write/MediaUploads/Contracts/2020/Sept%202020/125_2020.pdf> Erişim Tarihi: 04.10.2021
Gaillard, Emmanuel/Banifatemi, Yas/Vialard, Chloe: “France: The International Chambers of the Paris Courts and Their Innovative Rules of Procedure”, Mondaq Business Briefing, 25th April 2018, (LexisNexis).
Godwin, Andrew/Ramsay, Ian/Webster, Miranda: “International Commercial Courts: The Singapore Experience” Melbourne J of Intl L, 18(2), 2017, ss. 219-259.
Hwang, Michael: “Commercial courts and international arbitration— competitors or partners?”, Arbitration International, 31, 2015, ss. 193- 212.
Kuo, Lily/Kommenda, Niko: What is China’s Belt and Road Initiative? (The Guardian) Erişim Tarihi: 04.02.2021
Landbrecht, Johannes: “The Singapore International Commercial Court (SICC) – an Alternative to International Arbitration?”, ASA Bulletin, 34(1), 2016, ss. 112-125.
Legal Profession Act (Chapter 161), 36P (Singapore Statutes Online) < https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/LPA1966#pr36P-> Erişim Tarihi: 04.10.2020
Lehmann, Matthias: “Law Made in Germany-The Export Engine Stutters” in International Business Courts A European and Global Perspective (KRAMER Xandra/SORABJI John (Eds.)), Eleven International Publishing, The Hague, 2019.
Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd, “Developing Commercial Law Through the Courts: Rebalancing the Relationship Between the Courts and Arbitration”, (The Bailii Lecture 2016) Erişim Tarihi: 04.10.2020
Lye, KC/Chan, Darius: “The Singapore International Commercial Court: A challenge to arbitration?”, Norton Rose Fulbright Thought Leadership Publications (Research Collection School Of Law), 2015, ss. 6-7 < https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3039> Erişim Tarihi: 04.02.2021
Mesci, Barış/Esen, Emre: “Milletlerarası Ticarî Uyuşmazlıkların Yargısal Yolla Çözümünde Tahkime Rakip Olarak Milletlerarası Ticaret Mahkemeleri: Hollanda Ticaret Mahkemesi Üzerinden Bir Analiz”, Public and Private International Law Bulletin, 40(2), ss. 1223-1259.
Menon, Sundaresh: “International Commercial Courts: Towards a Transnational System of Dispute Resolution”, (Opening lecture for the DIFC Courts Lecture Series 2015) Erişim Tarihi: 04.10.2020
Qatar International Court and Dispute Resolution Center Erişim Tarihi: 04.02.2021
Queen Mary University of London, 2018 International Arbitration Survey: The Evolution of International Arbitration Erişim Tarihi: 04.10.2020
Ramesh, Kannan: “International Commercial Courts: Unicorns on a Journey of a Thousand Miles” in Conference on the Rise of International Commercial Courts (Doha, 2018) Erişim Tarihi: 04.10.2020
Requejo Isidro, Marta: International Commercial Courts in the Litigation Market - Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for Procedural Law Research Paper Series, 2, 2019.
Reciprocal Enforcement of Commonwealth Judgements Act (Chapter 264, 1985 ve 2001 Rev. Ed) < https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/RECJA1921> Erişim Tarihi: 04.10.2020
Reyes, Anselmo: “Recognition and Enforcement of Interlocutory and Final Judgments of the Singapore International Commercial Court”, J of Intl & Comparative L, 2(2), 2015, ss. 337-358.
Ruckteschler, Dorothee/Stooss, Tanja: “International Commercial Courts: A Superior Alternative to Arbitration?”, Journal of International Arbitration, 36(4), 2019, ss.431-450.
Rules of Court (Chapter 322, Section 80), Order 110 Erişim Tarihi: 04.10.2020
Saitou, Akira: “Kokusai shouji chuusai to kokusai shouji saiban-kyousou to kyouryoku no tame no kankei riron ni mukete”, Kokusai shoutorihiki gakkai nenpou, 18, 2016, ss. 81-96 (齋藤彰, 国際商事仲裁と国際商事裁判: 競争と協力のための関係理論に向けて, 国際商取引学会年報頁 , 18, 2016, 81- 96).
Singapore International Arbitration Centre Rules 2016 (SIAC, 2020) Erişim Tarihi: 04.10.2020
Singapore International Commercial Court (‘SICC’) Committee, “Report of the Singapore InternationalCommercial Court Committee” (Report, SICC Committee, November 2013) Erişim Tarihi: 04.10.2020
Singapore International Commercial Court Practice Directions -Effective 20 July 2020-(SICC) Erişim Tarihi: 04.10.2020
Sorabji, John/Kramer, Xandra: “Introduction-The International Business of Courts” in International Business Courts A European and Global Perspective (KRAMER Xandra/SORABJI John (Eds.)), Eleven International Publishing, The Hague, 2019.
Sökmen Güler, Ekin: “Forum Non Conveniens Doktrini ve Uluslararası Paralel Davalar”, D. E. Ü Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi (Prof.Dr. Durmuş Tezcan’a Armağan), 21(Özel Sayı), 2019, ss. 2629- 2658.
Stamboulakis, Drossos: Legal Transfer and ‘Hybrid’ International Commercial Dispute Resolution Procedures: Lessons from the Singapore International Commercial Court in Legal Transplants in East Asia and Oceania (BREDA Vito (Ed.)), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2019.
Stamboulakis, Drossos/Crook, Blake: “Joinder of Non-Consenting Parties: The Singapore International Commercial Court Approach Meets Transnational Recognition and Enforcement”, Erasmus Law Review, 12(1), 2019, ss. 98-110.
Status: Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York, 1958) (UNCITRAL) Erişim Tarihi: 04.02.2021.
Status Table: Convention of 30 June 2005 on Choice of Court Agreements (HCCH) Erişim Tarihi: 04.02.2021
Stephenson, Andrew/Hogan, Lindsay/Smith, Jaclyn L.: Australia: What Constitutes an Offshore Case?: An Analysis of the Singapore International Commercial Court’s Second Decision, Monday Business Briefing, 27th July 2016, (LexisNexis).
Supreme Court of Judicature Act (Chapter 322, Act 24 of 1969) Revised Edition 2007 (Singapore Statutes Online) Erişim Tarihi: 04.10.2020
Şanlı, Cemal/Esen, Emre/Ataman Figanmeşe, İnci: Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk, 8. Bası, Beta, İstanbul, 2020.
Takahashi, Gen/Sze, Yao Tan/Sook, Zhen Ng/Maeda, Atsutoshi: “Shingapooru kokosai shouji saibansho (SICC) no zousetsu oyobi kanren suru shomondai (jou)”, Kokusai shouji houmu, 43(1), 2015, ss. 1471-1479 (髙橋玄, 陳世耀, 黄淑臻, 前田敦利シンガポール国際商事裁判所 , (SICC)の創設及び関連する諸問題下国際商事法務 ( ), , 43(1), 2015, 頁1471- 1479).
Teh, Lawrence: “The Singapore International Commercial Court”, Dipute Resolution International, 11(2), 2017, ss. 143-150.
Tiba, Firew: “The Emergence of Hybrid International Commercial Courts and the Future of Cross Border Commercial Dispute Resolution in Asia”, Loyola U Chicago Intl L Rev, 14(1), 2016, ss. 31-53.
Wilske, Stephan: “International Commercial Courts and Arbitration - Alternatives, Substitutes or Trojan Horse”, Contemp. Asia Arb. J., 11(2), 2018, ss. 153-192.
Yeo, Justin: “On Appeal from Singapore International Commercial Court”, Singapore Academy of Law Journal, 29(2), 2017, ss. 574-595.
Yip, Man: “The Resolution of Disputes Before the Singapore International Commercial Court”, International and Cooperative Law Quarterly, 65, 2016, ss. 439-473.
Yip, Man: “The Singapore International Commercial Court: The Future of Litigation?” in International Business Courts A European and Global Perspective (KRAMER Xandra/SORABJI John (Eds.)), Eleven International Publishing, The Hague, 2019.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

Hukuk

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Onur Can Saatcıoğlu Bu kişi benim
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

26 Kasım 2021

Gönderilme Tarihi

15 Nisan 2021

Kabul Tarihi

-

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2021 Cilt: 23 Sayı: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.33717/deuhfd.998241

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA33DZ98DC

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Saatcıoğlu, O. C. (2021). SİNGAPUR MİLLETLERARASI TİCARET MAHKEMESİ (SICC). Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(2), 1405-1442. https://doi.org/10.33717/deuhfd.998241

AMA

1.Saatcıoğlu OC. SİNGAPUR MİLLETLERARASI TİCARET MAHKEMESİ (SICC). DEÜHFD. 2021;23(2):1405-1442. doi:10.33717/deuhfd.998241

Chicago

Saatcıoğlu, Onur Can. 2021. “SİNGAPUR MİLLETLERARASI TİCARET MAHKEMESİ (SICC)”. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 23 (2): 1405-42. https://doi.org/10.33717/deuhfd.998241.

EndNote

Saatcıoğlu OC (01 Kasım 2021) SİNGAPUR MİLLETLERARASI TİCARET MAHKEMESİ (SICC). Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 23 2 1405–1442.

IEEE

[1]O. C. Saatcıoğlu, “SİNGAPUR MİLLETLERARASI TİCARET MAHKEMESİ (SICC)”, DEÜHFD, c. 23, sy 2, ss. 1405–1442, Kas. 2021, doi: 10.33717/deuhfd.998241.

ISNAD

Saatcıoğlu, Onur Can. “SİNGAPUR MİLLETLERARASI TİCARET MAHKEMESİ (SICC)”. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 23/2 (01 Kasım 2021): 1405-1442. https://doi.org/10.33717/deuhfd.998241.

JAMA

1.Saatcıoğlu OC. SİNGAPUR MİLLETLERARASI TİCARET MAHKEMESİ (SICC). DEÜHFD. 2021;23:1405–1442.

MLA

Saatcıoğlu, Onur Can. “SİNGAPUR MİLLETLERARASI TİCARET MAHKEMESİ (SICC)”. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 23, sy 2, Kasım 2021, ss. 1405-42, doi:10.33717/deuhfd.998241.

Vancouver

1.Onur Can Saatcıoğlu. SİNGAPUR MİLLETLERARASI TİCARET MAHKEMESİ (SICC). DEÜHFD. 01 Kasım 2021;23(2):1405-42. doi:10.33717/deuhfd.998241