Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

(THREE DIMENTIONAL FRAMEWORK IN GRAMMAR TE- ACHING: A PROPOSAL FOR DEVELOPING AND USING GRAMMAR TEACHING MATERIALS)

Year 2005, , 7 - 27, 01.06.2005
https://doi.org/10.1501/Dilder_0000000032

Abstract

This article offers ways to teach Turkish grammar consistent with modern linguistic studies on Turkish and contemporary theory in the field of Second Language Acquisition. The article aims to show that in teaching Turkish as a second / foreign language we need to focus on a grammar point within a meaning-based approach and to design grammar teaching materials based on inductive consciousness-raising activities where learners’ awareness is raised towards how a Turkish grammatical structure works in real discourse

References

  • Açıksöz, E., E. Zeytin, S. Doğan (2002) Hitit: Yabancılar İçin Türkçe 1. Ankara: A.Ü. TÖMER Yayınları.
  • Batstone, R. (1994) Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press
  • Chomsky, N. (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Pres.
  • Corder, P. (1967) “The significance of learner’s errors.” IRAL 5, 161-169.
  • Çelen, Polard, A. (2003) Beginner’s Turkish. İngiltere: Hodder Education.
  • Doughty, C. (2001) “Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form.” Cognition and Second
  • Language Instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 206-258
  • Doughty, C., ve J. Williams (1998) Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language
  • Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Pres. Erguvanlı-Taylan, E., A. S. Özsoy (1993) “Türkçedeki bazı kip biçimlerinin öğretimi üzerine”. İçinde K. İmer ve E. Uzun (haz.) VII. Dilbilim Kurultayı Bildirileri.
  • Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Dil-Tarih ve Coğrafya Fakültesi Yayını. 1-9
  • Fidan, Ö. (2005) “Dilbilgisi öğretiminde söylem-dilbilgisi yaklaşımı: Eski köye yeni adet mi, yoksa “biz bunu zaten yapıyoruz” mu?” TÖMER Dil Dergisi, sayı 128.
  • Fotos, S. (1993) “Consciousness raising and noticing through focus on form: Grammar task performance versus formal instruction.” Applied Linguistics. 14 (4), 385-407
  • Fox, G. (1998) “Using corpus data in the classroom.” İçinde B. Tomlinson (haz.) Materialss
  • Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 25- Hengirmen, M. (2001). Türkçe Öğrenelim 1. Ankara: Engin Yayıncılık.
  • Hughes, R. ve M. McCarthy (1998) “From sentence to discourse: Discourse grammar and English language teaching” TESOL Quarterly. Vol. 32, No.2, 257-263.
  • Hymes, D. (1971) “Competence and performance in linguistic theory1. R. Huxley ve E.
  • Ingram (haz.) Language Acquisition: Models and Methods. London: Academic Press. Kavas, Y. (2004) Türkçe Konuşmak İstiyorum: Yabancılar İçin İngilizce Açıklamalı
  • Türkçe Dersleri. İstanbul: Alfa Yayınları. Kocaman, A. (1988) “Modality in Turkish.” İçinde S. Koç (haz.) Studies on Turkish
  • Linguistics. Ankara: METU Yayınları, 463-469. Kocaman, A. ve N. Osam (2000) Uygulamalı Dilbilim – Yabancı Dil Öğretimi Terimleri
  • Sözlüğü. Ankara: Hitit Basım Yayın Ltd. Krashen, S.D. (1982) Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  • Lado, R. (1957) Linguistics Accross Cultures. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
  • Larsen-Freeman, D. (2001) “Teaching grammar.” İçinde M. Celce-Murcia (haz.) Teaching
  • English as a Second or Foreign Language. ABD: Heinle & Heinle. 249-251. Pinker, S. (1984) Language Learnability and Language Development. Cambridge, MA
  • Harvard University Press. Rutherford, W. E. (1977) Modern English. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  • Rutherford, W. E. (1987) Second Language Grammar: Learning and Teaching. London: Longman.
  • Sansa-Tura, S. (1986) “-DIr in modern Turkish.” İçinde A. Aksu-Koç ve E. Erguvanlı
  • Taylan (haz.) Proceedings of the Turkish Linguistics Conference. İstanbul: Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınları, 145-158
  • Scrivener, J. (1998) Learning Teaching. Heinemann.
  • Schmidt, R.W. (1990) “The role of consciousness in second language learning.” Applied Linguistics 11 (2 ), 17-46.
  • Segolowitz, N. ve E. Gatbanton (1994) Assesing the acquisition of second language fluency and determining input conditions for its promotion. Second Language
  • Research Forum, Montreal’de sunulan bildiri. Sharwood-Smith, M. (1986) “Comprehension versus acquisition: Two ways of processing input.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 15(2)
  • Sharwood-Smith, M. (1993) “Input enhancement in instructed SLA: Theoretical bases.”
  • Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 15(2), 165-179
  • Tomlin, R.S. ve V. Villa (1994) “Attention in cognitive science and language acquisition.”
  • Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 16 (2). Trask, R.L. (1993) A Dictionary of Grammatical Terms in Linguistics. New York: Routledge. van Lier, L. (2002) “The role of form in language learning.” İçinde M. Bax (haz.)
  • Reflections on Language and Language Learning: In Honour of Arthur van Essen. Philedelphia, PA, USA: John Benjamins. 253-267. Willis, J. ve D. Willis (haz.) (1997) Challenge and Change in Language Teaching. London: Heinemann.
  • Hughes, R. ve M. McCarthy 1998. From sentence to discourse: Discourse grammar and uarterly. Vol. 32, No.2, 257-263. English language teaching TESOLHymes, D.
  • Competence and performance in inguistic theory1. R. Huxley ve E. Ingram (haz.) Language Acquisition: Models and Methods. London: Academic Press. Kavas, Y. 2004. Türkçe Konuşmak İstiyorum: Yabancılar İçin İngilizce
  • Açıklamalı Türkçe Dersleri. İstanbul: Alfa Yayınları. Kocaman, A. 1988. Modality in Turkish. İçinde S. Koç (haz.) Studies on Turkish
  • Linguistics. Ankara: METU Yayınları. 463-469. Kocaman, A. ve N. Osam 2000. Uygulamalı Dilbilim – Yabancı Dil Öğretimi Terimleri
  • Sözlüğü. Ankara: Hitit Basım Yayın Ltd. Krashen, S.D. 1982. Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  • Lado, R. 1957. Linguistics Accross Cultures. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
  • Larsen-Freeman, D. 2001. Teaching grammar. İçinde M. Celce-Murcia (haz.) Teaching
  • English as a Second or Foreign Language. ABD: Heinle & Heinle. 249-251. Pinker, S. 1984. Language Learnability and Language Development. Cambridge, MA
  • Harvard University Press. Rutherford, W. E. 1977. Modern English. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  • Rutherford, W. E. 1987. Second Language Grammar: Learning and Teaching. London: Longman.
  • Sansa-Tura, S. 1986. -DIr in modern Turkish. İçinde A. Aksu-Koç ve E. Erguvanlı-Taylan
  • (haz.) Proceedings of the Turkish Linguistics Conference. İstanbul: Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınları, 145-158
  • Scrivener, J. 1998. Learning Teaching. Heinemann.
  • Schmidt, R.W. 1990. The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics 11 (2 ), 17-46.
  • Segolowitz, N. ve E. Gatbanton 1994. Assesing the acquisition of second language fluency and determining input conditions for its promotion. Second Language Research
  • Forum, Montreal’de sunulan bildiri. Sharwood-Smith, M. 1986. Comprehension versus acquisition: Two ways of processing input. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 15(2)
  • Sharwood-Smith, M. 1993. Input enhancement in instructed SLA: Theoretical bases.
  • Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 15(2), 165-179
  • Tomlin, R.S. ve V. Villa 1994. Attention in cognitive science and language acquisition.
  • Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 16 (2). Trask, R.L. 1993. A Dictionary of Grammatical Terms in Linguistics. New York: Routledge. van Lier, L. 2002. The role of form in language learning. İçinde M. Bax (haz.) Reflections on Language and Language Learning: In Honour of Arthur van Essen.
  • Philedelphia, PA, USA: John Benjamins. 253-267. Willis, J. ve D. Willis (haz.) 1997. Challenge and Change in Language Teaching. London: Heinemann.

DİLBİLGİSİ ÖĞRETİMİNDE BİÇİM-ANLAMKULLANIM ÜÇLÜSÜ: DERS MALZEMESİ HAZIRLAMA VE UYGULAMA ÖNERİSİ

Year 2005, , 7 - 27, 01.06.2005
https://doi.org/10.1501/Dilder_0000000032

Abstract

Bu makalede, dilbilgisi yapılarının öğretiminde Dilbilim bulgularından ve İkinci Dil Edinimi alanındaki çağdaş yaklaşımlardan yararlanarak Türkçe dilbilgisinin yabancılara öğretimi konusunda öneriler geliştirmeyi amaçlamaktayız. Makaledeki temel önerimiz, ders malzemesi hazırlayanların ya da öğretmenlerin Türkçe dilbilgisini yabancılara öğretirken anlam odaklı bir yaklaşımdan yola çıkmaları ve ders malzemesini, sınıfta, öğrenicilerin Türkçedeki bir dilbilgisi yapısının işleyişine ilişkin farkındalık geliştirmeleri sağlayacak tümevarımlı bilinçlendirme çalışmaları ile desteklemeleridir

References

  • Açıksöz, E., E. Zeytin, S. Doğan (2002) Hitit: Yabancılar İçin Türkçe 1. Ankara: A.Ü. TÖMER Yayınları.
  • Batstone, R. (1994) Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press
  • Chomsky, N. (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Pres.
  • Corder, P. (1967) “The significance of learner’s errors.” IRAL 5, 161-169.
  • Çelen, Polard, A. (2003) Beginner’s Turkish. İngiltere: Hodder Education.
  • Doughty, C. (2001) “Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form.” Cognition and Second
  • Language Instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 206-258
  • Doughty, C., ve J. Williams (1998) Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language
  • Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Pres. Erguvanlı-Taylan, E., A. S. Özsoy (1993) “Türkçedeki bazı kip biçimlerinin öğretimi üzerine”. İçinde K. İmer ve E. Uzun (haz.) VII. Dilbilim Kurultayı Bildirileri.
  • Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Dil-Tarih ve Coğrafya Fakültesi Yayını. 1-9
  • Fidan, Ö. (2005) “Dilbilgisi öğretiminde söylem-dilbilgisi yaklaşımı: Eski köye yeni adet mi, yoksa “biz bunu zaten yapıyoruz” mu?” TÖMER Dil Dergisi, sayı 128.
  • Fotos, S. (1993) “Consciousness raising and noticing through focus on form: Grammar task performance versus formal instruction.” Applied Linguistics. 14 (4), 385-407
  • Fox, G. (1998) “Using corpus data in the classroom.” İçinde B. Tomlinson (haz.) Materialss
  • Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 25- Hengirmen, M. (2001). Türkçe Öğrenelim 1. Ankara: Engin Yayıncılık.
  • Hughes, R. ve M. McCarthy (1998) “From sentence to discourse: Discourse grammar and English language teaching” TESOL Quarterly. Vol. 32, No.2, 257-263.
  • Hymes, D. (1971) “Competence and performance in linguistic theory1. R. Huxley ve E.
  • Ingram (haz.) Language Acquisition: Models and Methods. London: Academic Press. Kavas, Y. (2004) Türkçe Konuşmak İstiyorum: Yabancılar İçin İngilizce Açıklamalı
  • Türkçe Dersleri. İstanbul: Alfa Yayınları. Kocaman, A. (1988) “Modality in Turkish.” İçinde S. Koç (haz.) Studies on Turkish
  • Linguistics. Ankara: METU Yayınları, 463-469. Kocaman, A. ve N. Osam (2000) Uygulamalı Dilbilim – Yabancı Dil Öğretimi Terimleri
  • Sözlüğü. Ankara: Hitit Basım Yayın Ltd. Krashen, S.D. (1982) Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  • Lado, R. (1957) Linguistics Accross Cultures. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
  • Larsen-Freeman, D. (2001) “Teaching grammar.” İçinde M. Celce-Murcia (haz.) Teaching
  • English as a Second or Foreign Language. ABD: Heinle & Heinle. 249-251. Pinker, S. (1984) Language Learnability and Language Development. Cambridge, MA
  • Harvard University Press. Rutherford, W. E. (1977) Modern English. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  • Rutherford, W. E. (1987) Second Language Grammar: Learning and Teaching. London: Longman.
  • Sansa-Tura, S. (1986) “-DIr in modern Turkish.” İçinde A. Aksu-Koç ve E. Erguvanlı
  • Taylan (haz.) Proceedings of the Turkish Linguistics Conference. İstanbul: Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınları, 145-158
  • Scrivener, J. (1998) Learning Teaching. Heinemann.
  • Schmidt, R.W. (1990) “The role of consciousness in second language learning.” Applied Linguistics 11 (2 ), 17-46.
  • Segolowitz, N. ve E. Gatbanton (1994) Assesing the acquisition of second language fluency and determining input conditions for its promotion. Second Language
  • Research Forum, Montreal’de sunulan bildiri. Sharwood-Smith, M. (1986) “Comprehension versus acquisition: Two ways of processing input.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 15(2)
  • Sharwood-Smith, M. (1993) “Input enhancement in instructed SLA: Theoretical bases.”
  • Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 15(2), 165-179
  • Tomlin, R.S. ve V. Villa (1994) “Attention in cognitive science and language acquisition.”
  • Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 16 (2). Trask, R.L. (1993) A Dictionary of Grammatical Terms in Linguistics. New York: Routledge. van Lier, L. (2002) “The role of form in language learning.” İçinde M. Bax (haz.)
  • Reflections on Language and Language Learning: In Honour of Arthur van Essen. Philedelphia, PA, USA: John Benjamins. 253-267. Willis, J. ve D. Willis (haz.) (1997) Challenge and Change in Language Teaching. London: Heinemann.
  • Hughes, R. ve M. McCarthy 1998. From sentence to discourse: Discourse grammar and uarterly. Vol. 32, No.2, 257-263. English language teaching TESOLHymes, D.
  • Competence and performance in inguistic theory1. R. Huxley ve E. Ingram (haz.) Language Acquisition: Models and Methods. London: Academic Press. Kavas, Y. 2004. Türkçe Konuşmak İstiyorum: Yabancılar İçin İngilizce
  • Açıklamalı Türkçe Dersleri. İstanbul: Alfa Yayınları. Kocaman, A. 1988. Modality in Turkish. İçinde S. Koç (haz.) Studies on Turkish
  • Linguistics. Ankara: METU Yayınları. 463-469. Kocaman, A. ve N. Osam 2000. Uygulamalı Dilbilim – Yabancı Dil Öğretimi Terimleri
  • Sözlüğü. Ankara: Hitit Basım Yayın Ltd. Krashen, S.D. 1982. Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  • Lado, R. 1957. Linguistics Accross Cultures. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
  • Larsen-Freeman, D. 2001. Teaching grammar. İçinde M. Celce-Murcia (haz.) Teaching
  • English as a Second or Foreign Language. ABD: Heinle & Heinle. 249-251. Pinker, S. 1984. Language Learnability and Language Development. Cambridge, MA
  • Harvard University Press. Rutherford, W. E. 1977. Modern English. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  • Rutherford, W. E. 1987. Second Language Grammar: Learning and Teaching. London: Longman.
  • Sansa-Tura, S. 1986. -DIr in modern Turkish. İçinde A. Aksu-Koç ve E. Erguvanlı-Taylan
  • (haz.) Proceedings of the Turkish Linguistics Conference. İstanbul: Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınları, 145-158
  • Scrivener, J. 1998. Learning Teaching. Heinemann.
  • Schmidt, R.W. 1990. The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics 11 (2 ), 17-46.
  • Segolowitz, N. ve E. Gatbanton 1994. Assesing the acquisition of second language fluency and determining input conditions for its promotion. Second Language Research
  • Forum, Montreal’de sunulan bildiri. Sharwood-Smith, M. 1986. Comprehension versus acquisition: Two ways of processing input. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 15(2)
  • Sharwood-Smith, M. 1993. Input enhancement in instructed SLA: Theoretical bases.
  • Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 15(2), 165-179
  • Tomlin, R.S. ve V. Villa 1994. Attention in cognitive science and language acquisition.
  • Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 16 (2). Trask, R.L. 1993. A Dictionary of Grammatical Terms in Linguistics. New York: Routledge. van Lier, L. 2002. The role of form in language learning. İçinde M. Bax (haz.) Reflections on Language and Language Learning: In Honour of Arthur van Essen.
  • Philedelphia, PA, USA: John Benjamins. 253-267. Willis, J. ve D. Willis (haz.) 1997. Challenge and Change in Language Teaching. London: Heinemann.
There are 57 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Language Studies
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Ayşen Cem This is me

Publication Date June 1, 2005
Submission Date January 1, 2005
Published in Issue Year 2005

Cite

APA Cem, A. (2005). DİLBİLGİSİ ÖĞRETİMİNDE BİÇİM-ANLAMKULLANIM ÜÇLÜSÜ: DERS MALZEMESİ HAZIRLAMA VE UYGULAMA ÖNERİSİ. Dil Dergisi(128), 7-27. https://doi.org/10.1501/Dilder_0000000032