STATIC AND DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF INTRA-INDUSTRY TRADE OF TURKEY’S CHEMICAL INDUSTRY: MEMBER AND CANDIDATE COUNTRIES OF EU, RUSSIAN FEDERATION, UKRAINE AND CHINA

Abstract

Intra-industry trade (IIT), a recently emerging concept in the foreign trade litareture, is defined as exchange of goods in forms of export and import within the same industry. Purpose of this study is to examine the intra-industry trade development of the Turkish chemical industry export/import activity with some forefront countries such as, Germany, Italy, Portugal, Sweden, Greece, Holland, Spain, France, Switzerland, Hungary, Belgium, England, Denmark, Poland, Czech Republic of European Union member countries and Bulgaria, Romania of EU candidate countries; Russian Federation, Ukraine and China. First, static analysis has been made, with data of chemical industry product category in accordance with 5 digit SITC Rev.3 for the period of 1990-2005. Then, dynamic analysis has been conducted to determine marginal intra industry trade using Brülhart’s A and B indexes

Keywords

• Intra-industry Trade
• Grubel-Lloyd Index
• Marginal Intra-Industry Trade

TÜRKİYE KİMYA SANAYİ ENDÜSTRİ İÇİ TİCARETİNİN STATİK VE DİNAMİK ANALİZİ: AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ ÜYE VE ADAY ÜLKELERİ, RUSYA FEDERASYONU, UKRAYNA VE ÇİN

Abstract

Dış ticaret literatüründe son yıllarda ortaya çıkan Endüstri İçi Ticaret (EİT) kavramı, aynı endüstriye ait malların iki yönlü değişimi olarak tanımlanabilir. Çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye’nin kimya sanayi ürünleri ithalat ve ihracatında öne çıkan ülkeler ile endüstri içi ticaretinin gelişimini incelemektir. Bu ülkeler Avrupa Birliği ülkelerinden Almanya, İtalya, Portekiz, İsveç, Yunanistan, Hollanda, İspanya, Fransa, Macaristan, Belçika, İngiltere, Danimarka, Polonya, Çek Cumhuriyeti ve AB’ye aday ülkelerden Bulgaristan, Romanya ile ayrıca Rusya Federasyonu, Ukrayna ve Çin’dir. İlk olarak, 1990–2005 dönemini kapsayan, SITC Rev.3’e göre 5 basamaklı kimya sanayi ürün grubuna ait verilerle, standart Grubel-Lloyd endeksi kullanılarak statik analiz yapılmıştır. Daha sonra Brülhart’ın marjinal endüstri-içi ticareti belirlemeye yönelik A ve B endeksleri kullanılarak da dinamik analize yer verilmiştir

Keywords

• Endüstri içi ticaret
• Grubel-Lloyd endeksi
• Marjinal endüstri içi ticaret

References

1. BALASSA, B. (1986): “The Determinants of Intra-Industry Specialization in
2. United States Trade”, Oxford Economic Papers, New Series, Vol.38, No.2, July: 23. BALASSA, B. ve BAUWENS, L. (1987): “Intra-Industry Specialisation in A Multi
3. Country and Multi-Industry Framework”, The Economic Journal, Vol.97, No.338, December: 923-39. BRÜLHART, M. (1994): Marginal Intra-Industry Trade: Measurement and Relevance for the Pattern of Industrial Adjustment, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, Vol.130: 600-13.
4. BRULHART, M. (2000: “Dynamics of Intraindustry Trade and Labor-Market
5. Adjustment”, Review of International Economics, 8 (3): 420-35. BRULHART, M. ve THORPE, M. (2000): “Intra-Industry Trade and Adjustment in Malaysia: Puzzling Evidence”, Applied Economic Letters 7, No.222: 233–47.
6. BRULHART, M. ve THORPE, M. (2001): “Export Growth of NAFTA Members,
7. Intra-Industry Trade and Adjustment”, Global Business and Economics Review, Vol.3, No.1: 94–110. ÇEPNİ, E. ve KÖSE, N. (2000): “Intra-Industry Trade Patterns of Turkey A Panel
8. Study”, METU International Conference on Economics IV, Ankara, September: 16. DIŞ TİCARET MÜSTEŞARLIĞI, Dış Ticaret İstatistikleri, http://www.dtm.org.tr (24.04.2005)

9. DOĞANER GÖNEL, F. (2001a): “How Important is Intra-Industry Trade
10. Between Turkey and Its Trading Partners? A Comparison Between the European Union and Central Asia Turkic Republics” Russian anad East European Finance and Trade, Vol.37, No:4 : 61-76. DOĞANER GÖNEL, F. (2001b): “Tekstil Sektöründe Endüstri-içi Ticaret”, Dış
11. Ticaret Dergisi, Vol.21: 15-31. DPT (2001), 8. Beş yıllık Kalkınma Planı, Kimya Sanayi Özel İhtisas Komisyonu
12. Raporu, DPT 2564-ÖİK 580, Ankara, www.ekutup.dpt.gov/imalatsa/kimya /öik580.pdf (13.03.2005)
13. ERK, N. ve TEKGÜL, Y. (2001): “Ekonomik Entegrasyon ve Endüstri-içi Ticaret:
14. Türkiye-AB Ülkeleri Arasındaki Endüstri-içi Ticaretin Ölçülmesi ve Ticaret Tipinin Belirlenmesi”, METU International Conference on Economics V, Ankara, September : 10-13. ERLAT, G. ve ERLAT, H. (2003): “Measuring Intra-Industry and Marginal Intra
15. Industry Trade: The Case for Turkey”, Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, vol.39, no.6, November-December: 5-38. EUROPEAN CHEMİCAL INDUSTRY COUNCİL (2004), “Horizon 2015:
16. Perspectives for The European Chemical Industry”, March, www.cefic.org/files/ Publications/ Scenarios2.pdf (12.05.2006)
17. FLAM, H. ve HELPMAN, E. (1987): “Vertical Product Differentiation and North
18. South Trade”, The American Economic Review, Vol.77, No.5 December: 810- GREENAWAY, D. ve MİLNER, C. (1983): “On the Measurement of Intra
19. Industry Trade”, The Economic Journal, 93 December, 900-8. GREENAWAY, D., HINE R., MILNER C. (1995): “Vertical and Horizontal Intra
20. Industry Trade: A Cross Industry Analysis for the United Kingdom” The Economic Journal, Vol.105, no.433, November: 1505-18, http:/www.jstor.org (May 13, 2005).
21. GRUBEL, H. G. (1967): “Intra-Industry Specialization and the Pattern of Trade”,
22. The Canadian Journal of Economics and No.3pp. August: 374-88, http://www.jstor.org, May 12,2005.
23. Political Science, Vol.33, GRUBEL, H.G. ve LLOYD, P.J. (1975): Intra-Industry Trade: The Theory and Measurement of International Trade in Differentiated Products, London: Macmillan Pres.
24. Hazine Müsteşarlığı İstatistikleri, http://www.hazine.gov.tr (15.05.2006)
25. HELPMAN, E. (1999): “The Trade Structure of Foreing Trade”, The Journal of
26. Economic Perspectives, Vol. 13, No.2, Spring: 121-44. JANDA, K. ve MÜNİCH D. (2004): “The Intra-Industry Trade of the Czech
27. Republic in the Economic Transition”,Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Vol.40, No.2, March-April: 27-50. KRUGMAN, P. R. (1981): “Intraindustry Specialization and the Gains from
28. Trade”, The Journal of Political Economy, Vol.89, No.5 October: 959-73. MARTİN, C. ve BLANES, J. V. (1999): “The Nature and Causes of Intra-Industry
29. Trade: Back to the Comparative Advantage Explanation? The Case of Spain” European Economy Group Working Paper, no.1/1999, http://www.ucm.es/info/econeuro (14.04.2006)
30. MURSHED, M. S. (2001): “Petterns of East Asian Trade and Intra-Industry
31. Trade in Manufactures”, Journal of the Asaia Pasific Economy, 6(1): 99-123. RIVERA-BATIZ, L. A. ve OLIVA, M. A. (2003): International Trade: Theory,
32. Strategies, and Evidence, Oxford University Press. TAEGI, K. ve OH K. (2001): “Country Size, Income Level and Intra-industry
33. Trade”, Applied Economics, 33: 401-6. TÜBİTAK (2003): “Vizyon 2023 Teknoloji Öngörü Projesi, Kimya Paneli
34. Raporu”, Temmuz, Ankara, http://vizyon2023.tubitak.gov.tr/teknolojiongorusu/paneller/kimya/raporlar/son/ki mya_son_sunum.pdf (21.05.2006)
35. TÜRKİYE İSTATİSTİK KURUMU (TÜİK) İstatistikleri, http://www.tuik.gov.tr (06.06.2006)
36. TÜSİAD-Sabancı Üniversitesi Rekabet Forumu, Türkiye Küresel Rekabet Raporu 2006, Ekim 2006.
37. WORLD CHEMICAL OUTLOOK, http://pubs.acs.org/cen/coverstory/83/8302wcoeurope.html (01/06/2006)