The new leadership model of university management for innovation and entrepreneurship

Year 2014, , 73 - 90, 03.01.2015

Gamze Sart

https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2014.57.6

Abstract

Today‟s ever-changing educational environment has
created a need for new leadership styles that encourage positive change
and improvement. In Turkish universities, the most commonly used
leadership models are the classic and/or traditional ones, which lead to
stagnation in innovation and entrepreneurship. Only a limited number of
universities are actively engaged in innovative research activities and
achieve success in terms of entrepreneurship and cooperative work with
industry. A broad effort is needed to improve cooperation and encourage
leadership development

Keywords

New Leadership Model, University Management, Innovation, Entrepreneurship

References

• Bass, B. M. & Steidlmeier, P. (1999). Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behaviour. Leadership Quarterly, 10 (2), 181–217.
• Bolden, R. (2004). What is leadership? University of Exeter.
• Chapman, E. & Smith, JA. (2002). Interpretative phenomenological analysis and the new genetics. Journal of Health Psychology, 7, 125-130.
• Chemers, M. M. (1997). An integrative theory of leadership. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Chemers, M. M. (2000). Leadership research and theory: A functional integration. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4 (1), 27-43.
• Cross, S. E. (2012). A leadership model for the research university. 3rd International Conference on Leadership, Technology and Innovation Management. Atlanta, GA: Elsevier.
• Entrepreneur, n. (2014). Merriam-Webster dictionary. Retrieved May 31, 2014, from Merriam-Webster Dictionary: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/entrepreneur
• Gibb, A., Haskins, G., & Robertson, I. (2013). Leading the entrepreneurial university: Meeting the entrepreneurial development needs of higher education institutions. In Universities in Change (pp. 9-45). Springer New York.
• Givens, R. J. (2008). Transformational leadership: The impact on organizational and personal outcomes. Emerging Leadership Journeys, 1, 4-24.
• Grint, K. (2004). What is leadership? From hydra to hybrid [Working paper]. Saïd Business School and Templeton College, Oxford University.
• Hays, R. (2012). Leadership. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 345–347.
• Innovation, n. (2014). Merriam-Webster dictionary. Retrieved May 31, 2014, from Merriam-Webster Dictionary: from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/innovation
• Ives, A. (2011). Entrepreneurship education as a new model for leadership education. Journal of Leadership Studies, 5 (2), 85-88.
• Lans, T., Blok, V., & Wesselink, R. (2014). Learning apart and together: towards an integrated competence framework for sustainable entrepreneurship in higher education. Journal of Cleaner Production, 62, 37-47.
• Leadership, n. (2014, March). OED online. Retrieved May 29, 2014, from Oxford University Press: http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/106604?redirectedFrom=leadership&
• Lewis-Beck, M. S., Bryman, A. E. & Liao, T. F. F. (2003). The sage encyclopedia of social science research methods. Sage Publications.
• Michael, R. (2013). Women in leadership in higher education: Leadership styles and the (Doctoral dissertation, TREVECCA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY).
• Mills, G. E. (2007). Transformational leadership and employee retention: An exploratory investigation of the four characteristics. (Unpublished Degree of Doctor in Philosophy). Capella University, U.S.
• Nanjundeswaraswamy, T. S. & Swamy, D. R. (2014). Leadership styles. Advances In Management, 7 (2), 57-62.
• Ozturk, I. (2001). The role of education in economic development: A theoretical perspective. Journal of Rural Development and Administration, 33, 39-47.
• Pounder, J. S. (2001). “New leadership” and university organisational effectiveness: Exploring the relationship. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 22, 281 – 290.
• Quinlan, K. M. (2014). Leadership of teaching for student learning in higher education: what is needed?. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(1), 32-45.
• Scott, P. (2011). Leadership in universities. The International Journal of Leadership in Public Services, 7 (3), 229-234.
• Simsek, H. S. (2013). Transformational leadership in educational context: a fantasy of education scholars (Selected Keynotes). Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 51, 1-6.
• Smolenyak, M. & Majumdar, A. (1992). What is leadership? The Journal for Quality and Participation, 15 (4), 28.
• Stehman, S. V. (1997). Estimating standard errors of accuracy assessment statistics under cluster sampling. Remote Sensing of Environment, 60 (3), 258-269.
• Virkus, S. (2009). Leadership models/approaches. Retrieved from Leadership Models: http://www.tlu.ee/~sirvir/Leadership/Leadership percent200M Models/leadership_modelsapproaches.html
• Üniversite İnovasyon ve Girişimcilik Yönetimi Yeni Liderlik Modeli Atıf:
• Sart, G. (2014). The new leadership model of university management for innovation and entrepreneurship. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research. 57, 73-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2014.57.6