Analysis of Mixed Methods Graduate Thesis Studies in Special Education Programs in Turkey

Murat Doğan; Seçil Çelik; Gözde Tomris

Analysis of Mixed Methods Graduate Thesis Studies in Special Education Programs in Turkey

Abstract

This research aims to analyze mixed methods graduate thesis studies completed between 2010 and 2020 in special education programs in Turkey. The literature scan has yielded 26 studies. A qualitative research method, analytical research design has been employed in this study. Research data has been obtained from documents – namely the graduate thesis studies – and analyzed through content analysis carried out following fundamental stages of mixed methods research as proposed in the literature. These stages served as themes in this study: 'Determining the research aim and research questions', 'Selecting a mixed methods research design', 'Explaining the rationale for the mixed methods approach', 'Sampling', 'Collecting the data', 'Analysing the data', 'Integrating, interpreting and reporting the data', 'Researcher competencies and roles' and 'Ethics'. The limitations observed in the methodology and reporting of the thesis studies have suggested that the quality standards of mixed methods research are not reflected on the studies. These limitations include confusion in terminology, lack of explanation as to why the method and the design have been employed, restricted validity and reliability, and lack of integration through blending quantitative and qualitative data. In summary, despite the increase in the number of mixed methods research studies in special education has contributed to the field, it is still debatable whether the philosophical perspective behind the method and its strong suits can be reflected on the studies.

Keywords

References

*Graduate thesis studies analyzed within this study. Amerikan Psikoloji Dernegi (American Psychological Association) (APA) (2015). APA Publication manual yayım kılavuzu (6. Basımın Turkcesi). Kaktus Yayınları.
Anguera, M. T., Camerino, O., Castañer, M., Sánchez-Algarra, P., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2017). The specificity of observational studies in physical activity and sports sciences: Moving forward in mixed methods research and proposals for achieving quantitative and qualitative symmetry. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(2196), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02196
*Anıl, A. (2019). İsverenlerin engellilere yonelik tutumları ile engelli calısanların calısma alanına yonelik goruslerinin incelenmesi [Examining attitudes of employers towars the disabled and opinions of employees toward theiır working area] (Tez No. 542424) [Yuksek Lisans Tezi, Necmettin Erbakan Universitesi]. Yuksekogretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
Askun, V., & Cizel, R. (2020). Twenty years of research on mixed methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Studies, 1, 28-43. https://doi.org/10.14689/jomes.2020.1.2
Baim-Lance, A., Onwuegbuzie, A., & Wisdom, J. (2020). Project management principles for optimizing publication productivity of mixed methods studies. The Qualitative Report, 25(3), 646-661. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4149
Balci, A. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde arastırma yontem teknik ve ilkeler (10. bs.). Pegem Akademi.
Baloglu, B. (2009). Sosyal bilimlerde arastırma yontemleri (4. bs.). Der Yayınları.
*Bayrakli, H. (2016). Okul oncesinde kaynastırma konulu Anne Egitim Programının cıktılarının anne ve ogretmen goruslerine gore degerlendirilmesi: Bir karma yontem arastırması [Evaluating outcomes of a mother training program about inclusion in early childhood according to mothers’ and teachers’views: A mixed method study]. (Tez No. 432660) (Doktora Tezi, Ankara Universitesi). Yuksekogretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi.

*Bilgic, E. (2018). Kaynastırma uygulamalarındaki ogretimsel uyarlamalar egitiminin sınıf ogretmenlerinin ogretimsel uyarlamaların onemine iliskin goruslerine etkisi [The effects of training about instructional adaptations of importance for inclusive educaiıon on primary school teachers' opinions]. (Tez No. 527289) [Doktora Tezi, Anadolu Universitesi] Yuksekogretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
Bowen, G. (2017). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In W. Damon & R. Lerner (Series Eds.) & R. M. Lerner (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol 1: Theoretical models of human development (pp. 793-828.) (6th ed.). Wiley.
Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97-113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058877
*Bural, B. (2020). Zihin engelli ogrencilerle calısan ogretmenlerin ogretim yontem ve teknikleri ile ilgili yeterlik duzeylerinin gelistirilmesinde uygulanan egitim programının etkililigi [The effectiveness of educatİon programme adapted for improving the competency levels of teachers who work wİth students with intellectual disabilities in terms of teaching methods and techniques]. (Tez No. 616657) [Doktora Tezi, Necmettin Erbakan Universitesi]. Yuksekogretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
*Cankuvvet, N. (2015). Cocugu koklear implant adayı ebeveynlerin gereksinimlerine dayalı bilgilendirme programı gelistirilmesi [Development of an informatıon program based on the needs of parents with cochlear implant candidate to child] (Tez No. 385585) [Doktora Tezi, Anadolu Universitesi]. Yuksekogretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
Collins, K. M., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Sutton, I. L. (2006). A model incorporating the rationale and purpose for conducting mixed methods research in special education and beyond. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 4(1), 67-100. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242218134
Corr, C., Snodgrass, M. R., Greene, J. C., Meadan, H., & Santos, R. M. (2019). Mixed methods in early childhood special education research: Purposes, challenges, and guidance. Journal of Early Intervention, 42(1), 20-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815119873096
Corrigan, J. A., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2020). Toward a meta-framework for conducting mixed methods representation analyses to optimize meta-inferences. The Qualitative Report, 25(3), 785-812. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2020.3579
Creswell, J. W., Shope, R., Plano Clark, V. L., & Green, D. O. (2006). How interpretive qualitative research extends mixed methods research. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 1-11. https://www.lcwu.edu.pk/ocd/cfiles/Gender%20&%20Development%20Studies/GDS-502/Thevalidityissueinmixedresearch.pdf#page=8
Cresswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson Publishing.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano-Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Zhang, W. (2009). The application of mixed methods designs to trauma research. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 22(6), 612-621. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.20479
*Celik, S. (2019). Okuloncesi ogretmenlerine yonelik olarak gelistirilen yuz yuze ve web tabanlı dogal ogretim ogretmen egitimi programı (ODOP)'nın etkiliginin incelenmesi [Evaluating the effectiveness of teacher training program based face to face and web based naturalistic teaching (TPNT) developed for preschool teachers] (Tez Numarası: 544399) [Yuksek lisans tezi, Anadolu Universitesi]. Yuksekogretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
*Deniz, S. (2019). Ozel ogrenme guclugune sahip ogrencilerle calısan ogretmenler icin gelistirilen ogretmen yeterlikleri egitim programının etkililigi [Effectiveness of the teacher qualifications educaiıon program developed for teachers working with students with special learning deficiency] (Tez No. 543749) [Doktora Tezi, Necmettin Erbakan Universitesi]. Yuksekogretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
Doyle, L., Brady, A. M., & Byrne, G. (2009). An overview of mixed methods research. Journal of Research in Nursing, 14(2), 175-185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987108093962
Dures, E., Rumsey, N., Morris, M., & Gleeson, K. (2011). Mixed methods in health
psychology: Theoretical and practical considerations of the third paradigm. Journal
of Health Psychology, 16, 332-341. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105310377537
*Eker, A. (2020). Ozel yetenekli ogrencilerin ogretmenlerinin mesleki yeterliklerini artırmaya yonelik gelistirilen ogretmen egitimi programının etkililigi [The effectiveness of training programme for gifted and talented students’ elemantary teachers in order to enhance their competencies](Tez No. 616539) [Doktora Tezi, Necmettin Erbakan Universitesi]. Yuksekogretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
*Erkaya, A. (2018). Okul oncesi ve ilkokul donemindeki isitme kayıplı cocukların ev ve okul dısı ortamlardaki iletisim sorunlarının incelenmesi [An examination of communication problems of pre-school and elementary school aged children wıith hearing loss in environments other than home and school] (Tez No. 523708) [Yuksek Lisans Tezi, Anadolu Universitesi]. Yuksekogretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
Firat, M., Kabakcı Yurdakul, I., & Ersoy, A. (2014). Bir egitim teknolojisi arastırmasına dayalı olarak karma yontem arastırması deneyimi. Egitimde Nitel Arastırmalar Dergisi - Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 2(1), 65-86. https://doi.org/10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.2s3m
Foss, C., & Ellefsen, B. (2002). The value of combining qualitative and quantitative approaches in nursing research by means of method triangulation. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 40(2), 242-248. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02366.x
Glesne, C. (2011). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (4th ed.). Pearson Education.
Greene, J. C. (2006). Toward a methodology of mixed methods social inquiry. Research in
The Schools, 13(1), 93-98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689807309969
Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(8), 255- 274. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737011003255
Gunbayi, İ. (2020). Knowledge-constitutive interests and social paradigms in guiding mixed methods research (MMR). Journal of Mixed Methods Studies, 1, 44-56. https://doi.org/10.14689/jomes.2020.1.3
Gorard, S., & Taylor, C. (2004). Combining methods in educational and social research. McGraw-Hill Education.
Heward, W.L. (2009) Exceptional Children. An Introduction to Special Education. Pearson Education.
*Icyuz, B. S. (2019). Otizm spektrum bozuklugu olan cocukların sosyal becerilerinin gelisiminde yaratıcı drama yonteminin etkililiginin incelenmesi [Investigating the effectiveness of creative drama method in the development of social skills of children with ASD](Tez No. 551296) [Yuksek Lisans Tezi, Necmettin Erbakan Universitesi]. Yuksekogretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
*Icyuz, R. (2016). İsitme kayıplı cocugu kaynastırmaya devam eden ebeveynlerin sorunlarının ve gereksinimlerinin belirlenmesi [Problems and needs of the parents of children with hearing loss attending inclusive education] (Tez No. 432660) [Yuksek Lisans Tezi, Anadolu Universitesi]. Yuksekogretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2010). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (7th ed.). Sage Publication.
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research
paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014
Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed-methods research. Journal of Mixed-methods Research, 1(2), 112-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224
*Kahveci, G. (2015). Birlestirilmis davranıssal konsultasyon programının gormeyen otizmli cocugun uygun olmayan davranıslarına ve iletisim/sosyal becerilerine etkisi [The effect of conjoint behavioral consultation program on problem behavior and communication/social skills wıth a blind and autistic child] (Tez No. 397457) [Doktora Tezi, Gazi Universitesi]. Yuksekogretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
*Karaca, M. A. (2018). Kaynastırma egitimi programının ogretmenlerin kaynastırma uygulamalarındaki mesleki yeterliliklerine etkisi [The effect of integration training program on the professional competencies of teachers about integration interventions] (Tez No. 509031) [Yuksek Lisans Tezi, Necmettin Erbakan Universitesi]. Yuksekogretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
*Karahan, S. (2019). Okul oncesindeki ozel gereksinimli cocukların sosyal becerilerine iliskin anne, baba ve ogretmen gorusleri: Karma yontem calısması [Mother, father and teachers’ views on social skills of pre-school children with special needs: A mixed method study] (Tez No. 593767) [Yuksek Lisans Tezi, Hasan Kalyoncu Universitesi]. Yuksekogretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi’nden edinilmistir.
*Karaslan, O. (2010). Etkilesime dayalı erken egitim programının (edep) gelisimsel yetersizlige sahip cocuklar ve anneler uzerindeki etkililigi [The effectiveness of responsive teaching early intervention program on children with developmental disabilities and their mothers] (Tez No. 265733) [Yuksek Lisans Tezi, Anadolu Universitesi]. Yuksekogretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
*Kaya, D. (2011). Yetiskin zihin engelli bireylerin sosyal becerilerinin gelisiminde yaratıcı drama yonteminin etkililiginin incelenmesi [The analysis of the efficiency of creative drama method on the development of social skills of adults wıth mental disabilities](Tez No. 278833) [Yuksek Lisans Tezi, Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Universitesi]. Yuksekogretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
*Kilic, M. (2020). İsitme kayıplı cocukların dil gelisimlerinin desteklenmesine yonelik aile gereksinimlerinin belirlenmesi [Determination of family needs for supporting the language development of children with hearing loss] (Tez No. 623792) [Yuksek Lisans Tezi, Anadolu Universitesi]. Yuksekogretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
Klingner, J. K., & Boardman, A. G. (2011). Addressing the “research gap” in special education through mixed methods. Learning Disability Quarterly, 34(3), 208-218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948711417559
Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2009). A typology of mixed methods research designs. Qual Quant, 43, 265-275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-007-9105-3
Li, S., Marquart, J. M., & Zercher, C. (2000). Conceptual issues and analytic strategies in mixed-method studies of preschool inclusion. Journal of Early Intervention, 23(2), 116-132. https://doi.org/10.1177/105381510002300206
*Melekoglu, M. (2017). Erken cocuklukta okul caplı olumlu davranıs destegi modelinin etkililigi [The effectiveness of school-wide positive behavior support model in early childhood] (Tez No. 463439) [Doktora Tezi, Anadolu Universitesi]. Yuksekogretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
Morgan, D. L. (2014). Pragmatism as a paradigm for social research. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(8), 1045-1053. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800413513733
Neel, R.G. (1981). Sosyal davranısta arastırma yontemleri [Research methods in social behavior.]. (Trans. Ayse Can Baysal). Fatih Yayınevi Matbaası.
Neupane, N. (2019). Paradigm shift in research: Emergence of mixed methods research design. Journal of NELTA Gandaki (JoNG), I, 74-86. https://doi.org/10.3126/jong.v1i0.24462
Newman, I., Ridenour, C. S., Newman, C., & DeMarco, G. M. P. (2003). A typology of research purposes and its relationship to mixed methods. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 167-188). Sage Publications Ltd.
O’Rleary, Z. (2004). The essential guide to doing research. Sage Publications Ltd.
Odom, S. L., Brantlinger, E., Gersten, R., Horner, R. H., Thompson, B., & Harris, K. R. (2005). Research in special education: Scientific methods and evidence-based practices. Exceptional children, 71(2), 137-148. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100201
Onwuegbuzie, A. J. & Poth, C. (2016). Editors’ afterword: Toward evidence-based guidelines for reviewing mixed methods research manuscripts submitted to journals. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 15(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406916628986
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Collins, K. M. T. (2017). The role of sampling in mixed methods-research enhancing inference quality. Kolner Zeitschrift fur Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 69(2), 133-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-017-0455-0
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2004). Post hoc power: A concept whose time has come. Understanding Statistics, 3(4), 201-230. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328031us0304_1
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2007). A call for qualitative power analyses. Quality and Quantity, 41, 105-121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-005-1098-1
*Ozdemir, E. (2016). Kaynastırma uygulamalarına devam eden isitme kayıplı ogrencilerin sosyal uyumlarının incelenmesi [Investigating the social adaptation of students with hearing loss in inclusive education] (Tez No. 438263) (Yuksek Lisans Tezi). Yuksekogretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
Punch, K. F. (2009). Introduction to research methods in education. Sage Publications Ltd.
*Sani-Bozkurt, S. (2016). Otizm spektrum bozuklugu olan cocuklara sosyal beceri ogretiminde teknoloji destekli etkilesimli ortam tasarımı ve etkililigi [Design and effectiveness of technology enhanced interactive media in teaching social skılls for children with autism spectrum disorder](Tez No. 432444) [Doktora Tezi, Anadolu Universitesi]. Yuksekogretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
Schneider, B., & McDonald, S. K. (2007). Scale-up in education: Issues in practice (Vol. 2). Rowman and Littlefield.
*Sahin, C. H. (2019). Otizm spektrum bozuklugu olan cocuga sahip anne-babalara ev ici guvenlik becerilerinin ogretimi: Karma arastırma [Training on home safety skills for parents of children with autism spectrum disorder: a mixed method research ](Tez No. 570280) [Doktora Tezi, Anadolu Universitesi]. Yuksekogretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
Salehi, K., & Golafshani, N. (2010). Commentary: Using mixed methods in research studies: An opportunity with its challenges. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 4(3), 186-191. https://doi.org/10.5172/mra.2010.4.3.186
San, E. (2020). Turkiye'de egitim alanında yayınlanan karma yonteme dayalı makalelerin incelenmesi [Based mixed methods study of the article published in the field of education in Turkey] (Tez Numarası: 624474) [Yuksek lisans tezi, Maltepe Universitesi]. Yuksekogretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddle, C. (2003). The past and future of mixed method research: From data triangulation to mixed model designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddle (Eds.),
Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 671-701). Sage Publications Ltd.
T.C. Resmi Gazete, 9 Mart 2019, sayı: 30709. https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2019/03/20190309.htm
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioral science. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 3-50). Sage Publications Ltd.
Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 77-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/2345678906292430
*Tomris, G. (2019). Down sendromlu cocugu olan ebeveynlere yonelik gelistirilen dogal ogretime dayalı erken mudahale (DODEM) programının ebeveyn ve cocukları uzerindeki etkililigi [The effectiveness of an early intervention program based on naturalistic teaching for parents of children wıth down syndrome on parents and their children](Tez No. 542844) [Doktora tezi, Anadolu Universitesi]. Yuksekogretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
*Toper-Korkmaz, O. (2015). Eve dayalı olarak gerceklestirilen etkilesim temelli erken cocuklukta mudahale programının (ETECOM) otizm spektrum bozuklugu tanılı cocuklar ve anneleri uzerindeki etkililigi [Effectiveness of home-based responsive teaching (RT) early intervention program on children with autism spectrum disorder and their mothers](Tez No. 385584) [Doktora tezi, Anadolu Universitesi]. Yuksekogretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
Trainor, A. A. (2011). Commentary: Using mixed methods to transform special education research. Learning Disability Quarterly, 34(3), 219-221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948711417560
*Tunali, C. (2018). Ozel yetenekli ogrencilerin sayı duyusu duzeylerinin belirlenmesi [The determination of gifted students' level of number sense] (Tez No. 512940) [Yuksek lisans tezi, Dokuz Eylul Universitesi]. Yuksekogretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
Turkish Higher Education Institution (2020). Ozel Egitim Ogretmenligi Programı Bulunan Tum Universiteler [All Universities with Special Education Teaching Programs]. https://yokatlas.yok.gov.tr/lisans-bolum.php?b=20903
Vaughn, S., Klingner, J., & Hughes, M. (2000). Sustainability of research-based practices. Exceptional Children, 66(2), 163-171. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290006600202
Wachsmann, M. S., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Hoisington, S., Gonzales, V., Wilcox, R., Valle, R., & Aleisa, M. (2019). Collaboration patterns as a function of research experience among mixed researchers: A mixed methods bibliometric study. The Qualitative Report, 24(12), 2954-2979. https://doi.org/10.5296/jei.v3i1.10699
Yardley, L., & Bishop, F. L. (2015). Using mixed methods in health research: Benefits and challenges. British Journal of Health Psychology, 20(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12126
Yildirim, A., & Simsek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel arastırma yontemleri [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences] (9. bs.). Seckin Yayıncılık.
*Yildirim-Hacıibrahimoglu, B. (2013). Ozel gereksinimli ogrencilerin ilkogretime geciste yasadıkları gucluklerin belirlenmesi [Determination the difficulties of the students with special needs by teachers as transition to elementary school] (Tez No. 449827) [Doktora tezi, Ankara Universitesi]. Yuksekogretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
*Yilmaz, B. (2014). Okul oncesi kaynastırma sınıflarının kalitesinin degerlendirilmesi [Evaluating preschool inclusive classrooms’ quality in Turkey] (Tez No. 397446) [Yuksek lisans, Gazi Universitesi]. Yuksekogretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Murat Doğan ^* This is me
Türkiye

Seçil Çelik This is me
Türkiye

Gözde Tomris This is me
Türkiye

Publication Date

January 31, 2022

Submission Date

January 31, 2022

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Number: 29

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA43YB32WX

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Doğan, M., Çelik, S., & Tomris, G. (2022). Analysis of Mixed Methods Graduate Thesis Studies in Special Education Programs in Turkey. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 29, 1-32. https://izlik.org/JA43YB32WX

AMA

1.Doğan M, Çelik S, Tomris G. Analysis of Mixed Methods Graduate Thesis Studies in Special Education Programs in Turkey. Derginin Amacı ve Kapsamı. 2022;(29):1-32. https://izlik.org/JA43YB32WX

Chicago

Doğan, Murat, Seçil Çelik, and Gözde Tomris. 2022. “Analysis of Mixed Methods Graduate Thesis Studies in Special Education Programs in Turkey”. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, nos. 29: 1-32. https://izlik.org/JA43YB32WX.

EndNote

Doğan M, Çelik S, Tomris G (January 1, 2022) Analysis of Mixed Methods Graduate Thesis Studies in Special Education Programs in Turkey. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi 29 1–32.

IEEE

[1]M. Doğan, S. Çelik, and G. Tomris, “Analysis of Mixed Methods Graduate Thesis Studies in Special Education Programs in Turkey”, Derginin Amacı ve Kapsamı, no. 29, pp. 1–32, Jan. 2022, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA43YB32WX

ISNAD

Doğan, Murat - Çelik, Seçil - Tomris, Gözde. “Analysis of Mixed Methods Graduate Thesis Studies in Special Education Programs in Turkey”. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi. 29 (January 1, 2022): 1-32. https://izlik.org/JA43YB32WX.

JAMA

1.Doğan M, Çelik S, Tomris G. Analysis of Mixed Methods Graduate Thesis Studies in Special Education Programs in Turkey. Derginin Amacı ve Kapsamı. 2022;:1–32.

MLA

Doğan, Murat, et al. “Analysis of Mixed Methods Graduate Thesis Studies in Special Education Programs in Turkey”. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, no. 29, Jan. 2022, pp. 1-32, https://izlik.org/JA43YB32WX.

Vancouver

1.Murat Doğan, Seçil Çelik, Gözde Tomris. Analysis of Mixed Methods Graduate Thesis Studies in Special Education Programs in Turkey. Derginin Amacı ve Kapsamı [Internet]. 2022 Jan. 1;(29):1-32. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA43YB32WX