Psikolojide Tematik Analizin Kullanımı

Year 2019, Volume: 7 Issue: 2, 873 - 898, 30.04.2019

S. Nihat Şad Niyazi Özer Abdullah Atli

Abstract

Tematik analiz, sınırları çok iyi çizilmemiş olmasına ve az tanınmasına rağmen, psikoloji alanında yaygın olarak kullanılan nitel bir analiz yöntemidir. Bu makalede, tematikanaliz yönteminin nitel verilerin analizinde kullanışlı ve kuramsal açıdan esnek bir yaklaşım olduğu savunulmaktadır. Bu çalışmada öncelikle, tema veya örüntülerin arandığı diğer nitel analiz yöntemleri ve farklı epistemolojik ve ontolojik yaklaşımlar bağlamında tematik analizin ne olduğu ana hatlarıyla tanımlanmaktadır. Ardından, tematik analize ilk defa başlayacak ya da analizlerini daha planlı bir şekilde yapmak isteyen araştırmacılar için açık yönergeler sunulmuştur. Son olarak, tematik analizin dezavantajları ve avantajları özetlenmiştir. Sonuç bölümünde, tematik analizin psikoloji ve diğer disiplinlerde yürütülen nitel araştırmalarda kulllanılabilecek yararlı ve esnek bir teknik olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

Keywords

epistemoloji, esneklik, örüntüler, nitel psikoloji, tematik analiz

References

• Antaki, C., Billig, M., Edwards, D. and Potter, J. (2002). Discourse analysis means doing analysis: a critique of six analytic shortcomings. DAOL Discourse Analysis Online [electronic version], 1(1).
• Aronson, J. (1994). A pragmatic view of thematic analysis. Qualitative Report 2(1).
• Atkinson, J.M. and Heritage, J. (1984). Structures of social action: studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge University Press.
• Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research 1, 385-405.
• Bird, C.M. (2005). How I stopped dreading and learned to love transcription. Qualitative Inquiry 11, 226-48.
• Boyatzis, R.E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development. Sage.
• Braun, V. (2005a). In search of (better) female sexual pleasure: female genital ‘cosmetic’ surgery. Sexualities 8, 407-24.
• Braun, V. (2005b). Selling the perfect vulva. Manuscript under submission.
• Braun, V. and Kitzinger, C. (2001). The perfectible vagina: size matters. Culture Health & Sexuality, 3, 263-77.
• Braun, V. & Wilkinson, S. (2003). Liability or asset? Women talk about the vagina. Psychology of Women Section Review 5, 28-42.
• Braun, V., Gavey, N. & McPhillips, K. (2003). The ‘fair deal?’ Unpacking accounts of reciprocity in heterosex. Sexualities, 6, 237-61.
• Bryman, A. (1988). Quantity and quality in social research. Routledge.
• Bryman, A. (2001). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
• Burman, E. & Parker, I., editors, (1993). Discourse analytic research: repertoires and readings of texts in action. Routledge.
• Burr, V. (1995). An introduction to social constructionism. Routledge.
• Charmaz, K. (2002). Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis. In Gubrium, J.F. and Holstein J.A., (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: context and method. Sage, 675-94.
• Clarke, V. (2005). ‘We’re all very liberal in our views’: Students’ talk about lesbian and gay parenting. Lesbian and Gay Psychology Review, 6, 2-15.
• Clarke, V., & Kitzinger, C. (2004). Lesbian and gay parents on talk shows: resistance or collusion in heterosexism. Qualitative Research in Psychology 1, 195-217.
• Clarke, V., Burns, M., & Burgoyne, C. (2006). ‘Who would take whose name?’ An exploratory study of naming practices in same-sex relationships. Manuscript under submission.
• Dey, I. (1993). Qualitative data analysis: a userfriendly guide for social scientists. Routledge.
• Edwards, J.A. (1993). Principles and contrasting systems of discourse transcription. In Edwards, J.A. and Lampert, M.D., (Eds.), Talking data: transcription and coding in discourse research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 3-31.
• Edwards, J.A. and Lampert, M.D., editors, (1993). Talking data: transcription and coding in discourse research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Elliott, R., Fischer, C.T. and Rennie, D.L. (1999). Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 215-29.
• Ellis, S.J. and Kitzinger, C. (2002). Denying equality: an analysis of arguments against lowering the age of consent for sex between men. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 167-80.
• Ely, M., Vinz, R., Downing, M. & Anzul, M. (1997). On writing qualitative research: living by words. Routledge/Falmer.
• Fine, M. (2002). Disruptive voices: the possibilities for feminist research. University of Michigan Press.
• Foster, J.J. and Parker, I. (1995). Carrying out investigations in psychology: methods and statistics. BPS Books