Examination of corporate culture dimensions in terms of sustainability success: a research in the context of BIS Sustaınabılıty 25 Index

Year 2025, Issue: 70, 37 - 46, 30.04.2025

Özlem Yaşar Uğurlu , Yasin Bayar , Perihan Ürper

https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.1526663

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the corporate culture characteristics of the companies in the BIST (Borsa Istanbul) Sustainability 25 Index, which are at a high level in terms of sustainability, in the context of sustainability. For this purpose, the annual and integrated reports of the companies included in the index for the year 2022 were analyzed and content analysis, one of the qualitative research methods, was used to achieve the main objective of the study. According to the results of the research, it has been determined that companies give due importance to the economic dimension of corporate culture dimensions that support sustainability, while the social dimension is given less importance than the economic and environmental dimensions. Similarly, it has been determined that companies give importance to quality management systems, environmentally friendly goals, talent attraction and retention, which are sub-dimensions of the economic dimension; green branding orientation, and concepts related to environmentally friendly and society in their mission statements are not sufficiently included.

Keywords

Sustainability , Corporate Culture , BIST

Sürdürülebilirlik başarısı açısından kurum kültürü boyutlarının incelenmesi: BİST Sürdürülebilirlik 25 Endeksi bağlamında bir araştırma

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı, BIST (Borsa İstanbul) Sürdürülebilirlik 25 Endeksinde bulunan, sürdürülebilirlik bakımından üst düzeyde yer alan firmaların kurum kültürü özelliklerini sürdürülebilirlik bağlamında incelemektir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda endekste yer alan firmaların 2022 yılına ait faaliyet ve entegre raporları incelenmiş, nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden içerik analizi yapılarak araştırmanın temel amacına ulaşılmaya çalışılmıştır. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre firmaların sürdürülebilirliği destekleyen kurum kültürü boyutlarından ekonomik boyuta gereken önemi verdikleri, sosyal boyuta ise ekonomik ve çevresel boyuta göre daha az önem verildiği tespit edilmiştir. Benzer şekilde firmaların ekonomik boyutun alt boyutları olan kalite yönetim sistemleri, çevre dostu hedefler, yetenek çekme ve elde tutma konularına önem verdikleri; yeşil markalaşma yönelimi, misyon ifadelerinde çevre dostu ve toplumla ilgili kavramlara yeterince yer vermedikleri tespit edilmiştir.

Keywords

Sürdürülebilirlik , Kurum Kültürü , BIST

References

• Abbas, J. (2020). Impact of total quality management on corporate sustainability through the mediating effect of knowledge management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 244, 118806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118806
• Afjal, M., Kathiravan, C., Dana, L. P. ve Nagarajan, C. D. (2023). The dynamic impact of financial technology and energy consumption on environmental sustainability. Sustainability, 15(12), 9327. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129327
• Aggarwal, P., ve Agarwala, T. (2023). Relationship of green human resource management with environmental performance: mediating effect of green organizational culture. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 30(7), 2351-2376. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-08-2021-0474
• Agyeman, J. (2014). Environmental justice and sustainability. In Handbook of sustainable development (pp. 188-205). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782544708.00022
• Akkaya, M. A. (2023). Sürdürülebilirlik Kütüphane Yakınsamasına Bilgi Üzerinden Farklı Bir Bakış: Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Hedefleri (SKH) ve Kütüphaneler. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 14(1), 113-141. https://doi.org/10.54558/jiss.1223912
• Alateeg, S., ve Alhammadi, A. (2024). The Impact of Organizational Culture on Organizational Innovation with mediation role of Strategic Leadership in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Statistics Applications & Probability, 13(2), 843-858. http://dx.doi.org/10.18576/jsap/130220
• Alhabeeb, M. J. (2007). Consumers’ Cues For Product Quality: An Applıcatıon of The Sıgnalıng Theory. Allied Academies International Conference, Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Studies, 12(1), 1-6.
• Alraja, M. N., Imran, R., Khashab, B. M., ve Shah, M. (2022). Technological innovation, sustainable green practices and SMEs sustainable performance in times of crisis (COVID-19 pandemic). Information Systems Frontiers, 24(4), 1081-1105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10250-z
• Armindo, J., Fonseca, A., Abreu, I. ve Toldy, T. (2018). Perceived importance of sustainability dimensions in the Portuguese metal industry. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology. 26. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2018.1508524.
• Arslan, Z., ve Albayrak, R. S. (2019). Sürdürülebilirlik Raporlarının Kurumsal Marka Bakış Açısı ile Analizi: Arçelik Örneği. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 21(2), 467-492. http://dx.doi.org/10.16953/deusosbil.421050
• Asha, A. A., Dulal, M. ve Habib, A. (2023). The influence of sustainable supply chain management, technology orientation, and organizational culture on the delivery product quality-customer satisfaction nexus. Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain, 7, 100107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clscn.2023.100107
• Assoratgoon, W. ve Kantabutra, S. (2023). Toward a sustainability organizational culture model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 400, 136666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136666
• Aydınlıoğlu, Ö., ve Susur, M. (2021). Sürdürülebilirlik ve Kurumsal Reklam İlişkisi Bağlamında Göstergebilimsel Bir Analiz. Selçuk İletişim, 14(4), 1727-1763. https://doi.org/10.18094/josc.936904
• Azmat, F., Lim, W. M., Moyeen, A., Voola, R. ve Gupta, G. (2023). Convergence of business, innovation, and sustainability at the tipping point of the sustainable development goals. Journal of Business Research, 167, 114170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114170
• Bektaş, O. ve Yücel, E. (2022). Entegre Raporlamada Sosyal Sürdürülebilirlik: Türkiye’de Yayınlanan Entegre Raporların İçerik Analizi. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, (96), 59-84. https://doi.org/10.25095/mufad.1177991
• Beyazyol, E., ve Ataman, B. (2023). Sürdürülebilirlik Raporlaması Ve Bıst Sürdürülebilirlik Endeksine Tabi Şirketlerde Bir Araştırma. Öneri Dergisi, 18(59), 110-145. https://doi.org/10.14783/maruoneri.1170235
• Borsa İstanbul (2024, Şubat). Erişim adresi: https://borsaistanbul.com/tr/endeks-detay/521/bist-surdurulebilirlik-25
• Bumin, M., ve Ertuğrul, A. (2024). Bıst Sürdürülebilirlik Endeksindeki Şirketlerin Sürdürülebilirlik Notları İle Finansal Performansları Arasındaki İlişkinin Analizi. PressAcademia Procedia, 18(1), 57-62. http://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2023.1851
• Burak, M. F. ve Deniz, R. B. (2021). Kurum Kültürü, Sürdürülebilir Rekabet Avantajı, Çevresel Belirsizlik ve Kurumsal Performans İlişkisi: Türk İhracatçı Firmaları. International Journal of Arts And Social Studies, 4(6), 49-83. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/asstudies/issue/63596/962422
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak Kılıç, E., Akgün, Ö E., Karadeniz, Ş. ve Demirel, F. (2018). Eğitimde bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri, Pegem Akademi, 25. Baskı.
• Cameron, K. S., Freeman, S. J. ve Mishra, A. K. (1993). Downsizing And Redesigning Organizations. Organizational Change and Redesign, 19-63. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.4.1.10
• Campbell, B., Khachatryan, H., Behe, B., Dennis, J., ve Hall, C. (2015). Consumer perceptions of eco-friendly and sustainable terms. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 44(1), 21-34. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1068280500004603
• Cheng, S., Hua, X. ve Wang, Q. (2023). Corporate Culture and Firm Resilience In China: Evidence From the Sino-US Trade War. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 79, 102039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2023.102039
• Cherian, J., Gaikar, V., Paul, R., ve Pech, R. (2021). Corporate culture and its impact on employees’ attitude, performance, productivity, and behavior: An investigative analysis from selected organizations of the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010045
• Chiarabilli, A., Galvani, S., ve Pagano, A. (2022). Innovation Units as Organisational Resources in the Transition Towards Sustainability: A Case Study in the Oil & Gas Sector. Available at SSRN 3983092. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3983092
• Dyck, B., Walker, K. ve Caza, A. (2019). Antecedents of Sustainable Organizing: A Look At The Relationship Between Organizational Culture and The Triple Bottom Line. Journal Of Cleaner Production, 231, 1235-1247.231, 1235-1247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.287
• Edmans, A. (2011). Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity prices. Journal of Financial economics, 101(3), 621-640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.03.021
• Erkmen T. ve Bozkurt S. (2011). Örgüt Kültürü ve Örgütsel Bağlılık İlişkisinin İncelenmesine Yönelik Bir Araştırma. Marmara Üniversitesi İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, XXXI (II), 197-228. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/muiibd/issue/498/4453
• Eş, A., ve Kamacı, T. B. (2020). Bankaların Sürdürülebilirlik Performanslarının Edas ve Aras Yöntemleriyle Değerlendirilmesi. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 20(4), 807-831. https://doi.org/10.11616/basbed.v20i58861.809533
• Evans, S., Vladimirova, D., Holgado, M., Van Fossen, K., Yang, M., Silva, E. A., ve Barlow, C. Y. (2017). Business model innovation for sustainability: Towards a unified perspective for creation of sustainable business models. Business strategy and the environment, 26(5), 597-608. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1939
• Fiordelisi, F., ve Ricci, O. (2014). Corporate Culture and CEO Turnover. Journal of Corporate Finance, 28, 66-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.11.009
• Fok, L., Morgan, Y. C., Zee, S., ve Mock, V. E. (2023). The impact of organizational culture and total quality management on the relationship between green practices and sustainability performance. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 40(6), 1564-1586. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-12-2021-0450
• Galpin, T., Whitttington, J. L. ve Bell, G. (2015). Is your sustainability strategy sustainable? Creating a culture of sustainability. Corporate Governance, 15(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/CG-01-2013-0004
• Gedik, Y. (2020). Sosyal, Ekonomik ve Çevresel Boyutlarla Sürdürülebilirlik ve Sürdürülebilir Kalkinma. Uluslararası Ekonomi Siyaset İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(3), 196-215. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ijephss/issue/54205/722850
• Giacobbo, S. (2022). Sustainable Hrm: Organizational Practices To Attract Employees In The War For Talent. Master's Thesis. University Of Padua.
• Giannetti, B. F., Scarpelin, J., Di Agustini, C. A., Paranhos, M. A., Lozano, P. A., Agostinho, F., ve Almeida, C. M. (2022). Perceived Value Versus Real Value: Why Can İnvestors in Sustainable Companies Fail in Their Mission? Cleaner Production Letters, 3, 100020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clpl.2022.100020
• Gorton, G. B. ve Zentefis, A. K. (2020). Corporate culture as a theory of the firm (No. w27353). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecca.12537
• Gorton, G. B., Grennan, J. ve Zentefis, A. K. (2022). Corporate Culture. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 14, 535-561. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-financial-092321-124541
• Graham, J. R., Grennan, J., Harvey, C. R. ve Rajgopal, S. (2022). Corporate Culture: Evidence From the Field. Journal of Financial Economics, 146(2), 552-593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2022.07.008
• Guiso, L., Sapienza, P. ve Zingales, L. (2015). The Value of Corporate Culture. Journal of Financial Economics, 117(1), 60-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.05.010
• Gutterman, A. S. (2020). Sustainability and Corporate Governance: A Guide To Law And Practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003055440
• Günel, T. (2017). Kurumsal kuram perspektifinden kurumsal sürdürülebilirlik: İşletmelerin kurumsal sürdürülebilirlik raporlamaları üzerine bir uygulama (Yüksek Lisans tezi, Başkent Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü). Erişim adresi: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/155303072.pdf
• Heybet, K. ve Duran, C. (2023). Sürdürülebilirlik Sinyali Olarak Faaliyet ve Sürdürülebilirlik Raporlarının İncelenmesi: BIST Sürdürülebilirlik Endeksinde Bir Araştırma. JOEEP: Journal of Emerging Economies and Policy, 8(1), 23-38. Erişim adresi: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/2869326
• Hitka, M., Vetráková, M., Balážová, Ž. ve Danihelová, Z. (2015). Corporate culture as a tool for competitiveness improvement. Procedia Economics and Finance, 34, 27-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01597-X
• Islam, M.S., Tseng, M. ve Karia, N. (2019). Assessment Of Corporate Culture In Sustainability Performance Using A Hierarchical Framework And Interdependence Relations. Journal of Cleaner Production. 217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.259.
• Jarnagin, C., ve Slocum, J. (2007). Creating Corporate Cultures Through Mythopoetic Leadership. SMU Cox School Of Business Research Paper Series, (07-004). https://ssrn.com/abstract=1004565
• Jiang, F., Kim, K. A., Ma, Y., Nofsinger, J. R., ve Shi, B. (2019). Corporate culture and investment–cash flow sensitivity. Journal of Business Ethics, 154, 425-439 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3444-3
• Johansson, L., Jonasson, I. ve Reim, W. (2023). Sustainable expansion: Capabilities for “New food source”-Companies. Future Foods, 8, 100259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fufo.2023.100259
• Kang, S. ve Hur, W. M. (2012). Investigating the antecedents of green brand equity: a sustainable development perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 19(5), 306-316. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.281
• Katsikeas, C. S., Leonidou, C. N. ve Zeriti, A. (2016). Eco-friendly product development strategy: antecedents, outcomes, and contingent effects. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44, 660-684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0470-5
• Kişi, N. (2024). Sağlık Sektöründe Çalışan Adanmışlığı: Küresel Şirketlerin Sürdürülebilirlik Raporlarına Dayalı Bir Analiz. Uluslararası Ekonomi ve Yenilik Dergisi, 10(1), 81-110. https://doi.org/10.20979/ueyd.1400901
• Kinnunen, J., Saunila, M., Ukko, J. ve Rantanen, H. (2022). Strategic sustainability in the construction industry: Impacts on sustainability performance and brand. Journal of Cleaner Production, 368, 133063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133063
• Kopnina, H. (2017). Sustainability: new strategic thinking for business. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 19, 27-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-015-9723-1
• Korga, S. ve Aslanoğlu, S. (2024). Sürdürülebilirlik Raporlamasında Sürdürülebilirlik Göstergelerinin Önem Düzeylerinin Belirlenmesi. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, (102), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.25095/mufad.1425008
• Kucharska, W. ve Kowalczyk, R. (2019). How to achieve sustainability?—Employee's point of view on company's culture and CSR practice. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(2), 453-467. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1696
• Kurniawan, , Maulana, A. ve Iskandar, Y. (2023). The effect of technology adaptation and government financial support on sustainable performance of MSMEs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cogent Business & Management, 10(1), 2177400. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2177400
• Lazaroiu, G., Ionescu, L., Andronie, M., ve Dijmărescu, I. (2020). Sustainability management and performance in the urban corporate economy: a systematic literature review. Sustainability, 12(18), 7705. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187705
• Leite, A. C. D. C. F., Pinto, P. D. J. F., ve Nunes, J. D. S. (2018). Sustainability and ethics as attraction factor and talent retaining, the case of the companies in Brazil. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 12(1-2), 28-43. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISD.2018.089270
• Li, K., Liu, X., Mai, F. ve Zhang, T. (2021). The role of corporate culture in bad times: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 56(7), 2545-2583. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109021000326
• Linnenluecke, M. K., ve Griffiths, A. (2010). Corporate sustainability and organizational culture. Journal of World Business, 45(4), 357-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2009.08.006
• Magbool, M. A. H. B., Amran, A., Nejati, M., ve Jayaraman, K. (2016). Corporate sustainable business practices and talent attraction. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 7(4), 539-559. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-06-2015-0042
• Marlapa, E., Yuliantini, T., Junaedi, J., Kusuma, M., Shahnia, C. ve Endri, E. (2024). Determinants of sustainable performance: The mediating role of organizational culture. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 12(2), 1031-1040. http://dx.doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2023.12.005
• Menegaki, A. (2022). A Note on Contemplating Sustainable Functions in New Economics: What Have We Learned so Far About Sustainability? Available at SSRN 4304385. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4304385
• Mishra, D. M. K. (2023). The emerging role of corporate governance on environmental sustainability. Available at SSRN 4656662. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4656662
• Missimer, M. ve Mesquita, P. L. (2022). Social sustainability in business organizations: A research agenda. Sustainability, 14(5), 2608. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052608
• Monteiro, B., Santos, V., Reis, I., Sampaio, M. C., Sousa, B., Martinho, F., ... ve Au-Yong-Oliveira, M. (2020). Employer branding applied to SMEs: A pioneering model proposal for attracting and retaining talent. Information, 11(12), 574. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11120574
• Mucan, B., Kayabaşı, A., ve Madran, C. (2016). Yöneticilerde sürdürülebilirlik algısı ve firma uygulamalarına yönelik değerlendirme. Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 12(2), 57-72. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/528736
• Nguyen, M. H., Phan, A. C., ve Matsui, Y. (2018). Contribution of quality management practices to sustainability performance of Vietnamese firms. Sustainability, 10(2), 375. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020375
• Nuryanto, U. W., Quraysin, I. ve Pratiwi, I. (2024). Harmonizing Eco-Control and Eco-Friendly Technologies with Green Investment: Pioneering Business Innovation for Corporate Sustainability in the Indonesian Context. Environmental Challenges, 100952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2024.100952
• Oncer, A. Z. (2019). Örgütlerde yeşil insan kaynakları yönetimi uygulamaları: Teorik bir inceleme. İş ve İnsan Dergisi, 6(2), 199-208. https://doi.org/10.18394/iid.552555
• Onocak, D., Demir, M. ve Köse, Ö. (2023). Bist’te İşlem Gören Sigorta Şirketlerinin Sürdürülebilirlik Raporlarının İçerik Analizi ile Değerlendirilmesi. Dicle Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (32), 368-394. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/diclesosbed/issue/76043/1199623
• Piila, N., Sarja, M., Onkila, T. ve Mäkelä, M. (2022). Organisational drivers and challenges in circular economy implementation: An issue life cycle approach. Organization & Environment, 35(4), 523-550. https://doi.org/10.1177/10860266221099658
• Pisar, P. (2020). Controlling, communication and corporate culture–the opportunities for Smes. Economics & Sociology, 13(3), 113-132. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2020/13-3/8
• Poyser, A. ve Daugaard, D. (2023). Indigenous sustainable finance as a research field: A systematic literature review on indigenising ESG, sustainability and indigenous community practices. Accounting & Finance, 63(1), 47-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.13062
• Rass, L., Treur, J., Kucharska, W. ve Wiewiora, A. (2023). Adaptive dynamical systems modelling of transformational organizational change with focus on organizational culture and organizational learning. Cognitive Systems Research, 79, 85-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2023.01.004
• Rasul, T. (2018). Relationship marketing’s importance in modern corporate culture. The Journal of developing areas, 52(1), 261-268. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26417006
• Raut, R. D., Mangla, S. K., Narwane, V. S., Gardas, B. B., Priyadarshinee, P., ve Narkhede, B. E. (2019). Linking big data analytics and operational sustainability practices for sustainable business management. Journal of cleaner production, 224, 10-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.181
• Razak, S. E. A., Mustapha, M., Shah, S. M., ve Kasim, N. A. A. (2024). Sustainability risk management: Are Malaysian companies ready?. Heliyon, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24681
• Sarbat, I. ve Ozmehmet Tasan, S. (2020). A structural framework for sustainable processes in ergonomics. Ergonomics, 63(3), 346-366. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2019.1641614
• Sarıyıldız, E. ve Altunay, M. A. (2023). Kamu Üniversitelerinde Kurum Kültürü-İç Kontrol İlişkisi: Bir Kamu Üniversitesinin Yöneticileri Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Uluslararası İşletme, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Perspektifleri Dergisi, 7(1), 79-113. http://dx.doi.org/10.29228/ijbemp.69564
• Selvakumar, P. P. (2020). Investigation of Corporate Social Responsibility in Multi-National Companies to Promote Environmental Sustainability. OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development, 13(05), 11-20. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4193258
• Shafique, I., Ahmad, B., ve Kalyar, M. N. (2020). How ethical leadership influences creativity and organizational innovation: Examining the underlying mechanisms. European Journal of Innovation Management, 23(1), 114-133 https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-12-2018-0269
• Simão, L., ve Lisboa, A. (2017). Green marketing and green brand–The Toyota Case. Procedia manufacturing, 12, 183-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.08.023
• Siva, V., Gremyr, I., Bergquist, B., Garvare, R., Zobel, T., ve Isaksson, R. (2016). The support of Quality Management to sustainable development: A literature review. Journal of cleaner production, 138, 148-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.020
• Soubbotina, T. P. 2004. Beyond economic growth an introduction to sustainable development, 2nd edition, USA: World Bank.
• Sohns, T. M., Aysolmaz, B., Figge, L., ve Joshi, A. (2023). Green business process management for business sustainability: A case study of manufacturing small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) from Germany. Journal of cleaner production, 401, 136667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136667
• Şahin A. (2010). Örgüt Kültürü-Yönetim İlişkisi ve Yönetsel Etkinlik. Maliye Dergisi Sayı 159, Temmuz- Aralık, 21-35. https://acikerisim.selcuk.edu.tr/items/3c1dc9b2-039e-4d70-94c9-652ca428bdaf
• Tang, G., Chen, Y., Jiang, Y., Paillé, P. ve Jia, J. (2018). Green human resource management practices: scale development and validity. Asia pacific journal of human resources, 56(1), 31-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12147
• Tjahjadi, B., Soewarno, N., Hariyati, H., Nafidah, L. N., Kustiningsih, N. ve Nadyaningrum, V. (2020). The role of green innovation between green market orientation and business performance: Its implication for open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(4), 173. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040173
• Tourish, D. ve Pinnington, A. (2002). Transformational leadership, corporate cultism and the spirituality paradigm: An unholy trinity in the workplace?. Human relations, 55(2), 147-172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726702055002181
• Tura, N., Keränen, J. ve Patala, S. (2019). The darker side of sustainability: Tensions from sustainable business practices in business networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 77, 221-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.09.002
• Tüyen, Z. (2020). İşletmelerde Sürdürülebilirlik Kavramı ve Sürdürülebilirliği Etkileyen Etmenler. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19(37), 91-117. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/iticusbe/issue/54570/743704
• Uçar, O. K. ve Özdemir, O. (2022). Üniversitelerde sürdürülebilirlik faaliyetleri ve raporlama örnekleri. Ida Academia Muhasebe ve Maliye Dergisi, 5(1), 13-30. https://doi.org/10.52059/idaacmmd.1029118
• Ültay, E., Akyurt, H. ve Ültay, N. (2021). Sosyal Bilimlerde Betimsel İçerik Analizi. IBAD Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (10), 188-201. https://doi.org/10.21733/ibad.871703
• Ünüvar, S., Vural, Z. B. A. ve Değirmen, G. C. (2024). Kurumsal Sürdürülebilirlikte Kurum Kültürünün Önemi: Eğitim Sektörüne Yönelik Nitel Bir Araştırma. Etkileşim, (13), 86-108. https://doi.org/10.32739/etkilesim.2024.7.13.242
• Vale, J., Miranda, R., Azevedo, G. ve Tavares, M. C. (2022). The impact of sustainable intellectual capital on sustainable performance: A case study. Sustainability, 14(8), 4382. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084382
• Wang, M., Chan, R. Y., Hwang, K. S. ve Lim, M. K. (2024). The influence of learning orientation on corporate sustainability: serial mediation of supply chain practices. European Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2024.01.007
• Wyrwicka, M. K. ve Chuda, A. (2019). The diagnosis of organizational culture as a change's factor in the context application of design thinking. LogForum, 15(2), 279-290. http://doi.org/10.17270/J.LOG.2019.319
• Yao, C. L. ve Wang, L. Y. (2024). Corporate sustainable development performance through top management team's transactive memory system and organizational resilience: A moderated mediation analysis. Heliyon, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24674
• Yeniçeri, T. ve Böcek, A. (2022). Sürdürülebilir Perakendecilik: Bist Sürdürülebilirlik Endeksinde Yer Alan Perakendeci Şirketler Üzerine İçerik Analizi. Kafkas Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(26), 682-709. https://doi.org/10.36543/kauiibfd.2022.029
• Yıldız, S. (2022). Sürdürülebilirlik Performansının Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemleri ile Ölçümü (Master's thesis, Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat Üniversitesi, Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü). https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12868/1514
• Yozgat, U. ve Karataş, N. (2011). Going green of mission and vision statements: ethical, social, and environmental concerns across organizations. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24, 1359-1366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.09.110
• Zaman, R. (2024). When corporate culture matters: The case of stakeholder violations. The British Accounting Review, 56(1), 101188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2023.101188