Öğretmen Adaylarının Motivasyonlarının Sosyal Girişimciliğe Etkisi: Nitel Çözümleme

Yıl 2019, , 499 - 514, 20.09.2019

Hale Erden

https://doi.org/10.22559/folklor.964

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı, öğretmen adaylarının olumlu ve olumsuz metafor kullanarak
motivasyonlarınının sosyal girişimciliğe etkisini belirlemektir. Bu araştırmada, yorumlayıcı
fenomenolojik metodoloji altında nitel araştırma paradigması kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın
katılımcıları Kuzey Kıbrıs’ta bulunan üniversitelerin eğitim fakültesi dördüncü sınıfında
öğrenim gören öğrencilerden belirlenen iki grup ile yapılmıştır. Gruplar, ilk veri katılımcıları
(Grup 1) ve sonraki veri katılımcıları (Grup 2) şeklinde adlandırılmışlardır. Grup 1’de 60
öğrenci ile odak grup görüşmeleri yapılmıştır. Grup 2'de ise 60 öğrenci ile derinlemesine
görüşmeler yapılmıştır. Çalışmaya katılan paydaşlardan, sosyal girişimciliği ve öğretmen
adaylarının motivasyonunu etkileyen olumlu ve olumsuz metaforları tanımlamaları ve
gerekçelerini tam cümle halinde yazılı olarak belirtmeleri istenmiştir. Veri toplama için
yorumlayıcı yaklaşım kullanılmış ve veriler içerik analizi yöntemi kullanılarak analiz
edilmiştir. Öğretmen adaylarının olumlu sosyal girişimcilik motivasyonlarını tanımlayan
metaforlar köpekbalığı, girişimci ruhu, sevgi ateşi ve becerikli olarak tanımlamıştır. Öğretmen
adaylarının olumsuz sosyal girişimcilik motivasyonlarını tanımlayan metaforlar ise, öğretmen
adaylarının motivasyonunu sıradan ve yoğun olarak tanımlamıştır. Araştırma sonucunda
öğretmen adaylarının motivasyonlarının sosyal girişimciliğe etkisine ilişkin model önerisi
yapılmıştır.  

Anahtar Kelimeler

motivasyon, sosyal girişimcilik, sosyal girişimcilik modeli, öğretmen adayları

Influence of Teacher Candidates’ Motivation on Social Entrepreneurship: A Qualitative Study

Öz

The aim of the current research is to determine the motivation of teacher candidates, through
positive and negative metaphors, which influences the social entrepreneurship. Qualitative
research paradigm under interpretive phenomenological methodology was used in the current
study. Participants of the study were two groups of students (the Group 1 as the-initial-data -
participants and the Group 2 as the-later-data-participants) from the fourth year of education
faculties of universities in North Cyprus. Focus group interviews were completed with 60
students in Group 1. In Group 2, in-dept interviewers were conducted with 60 students. The
key stakeholders in the study were asked to identify positive and negative metaphors affecting
teacher candidates’ motivation on social entrepreneurship and state their justification in full
sentences. An interpretive approach for data collection was used and data were analyzed using
the content analysis method. Metaphors defining the teacher candidates’ motivation on positive
social entrepreneurship were identified as shark, entrepreneurial spirit, fire of love and skilful.
Metaphors defining the teacher candidates’ motivation on negative metaphors were identified
as ordinary and intense. As a result of the research, a model on influencing the teacher
candidates’ motivation on social entrepreneurship was proposed. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

motivation, social entrepreneurship, social entrepreneurship model, teacher candidates, qualitative study

Kaynakça

• Armstrong, P. & Tomes, A. (2000). Entrepreneurship in science: Case studies from liquid crystal application. Prometheus: Critical Studies in Innovation, 18(2), 133-147. https://doi.org/10.1080/713692057
• Beca, J. (2007). The need for improvement in innovativeness development and entrepreneurship training in high school and university science education. T-Space at the University of Toronto Libraries, University of Toronto Mississauga. Retrieved from https://www.j-humansciences.com/ojs/index.php/IJHS/article/view/3240
• Bygrave, W.D. & Hofer, C.W. (1991). Theorising about entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 16(2), 13-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879201600203
• Cal, A. & Tehmarn, A. (2016). Phenomenological epistemology approaches and implications for HRD research and practice. National Institute of Development Administration, Bangkok, Thailand. Retrieved from https://www.ufhrd.co.uk/wordpress/wpcontent/uploads/2016/10/paper_128.pdf
• Clark, C.M. & Harrison, C. (2018). Entrepreneurship: An assimilated multi-perspective review. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship. Latest articles. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2018.1446665
• Denzin, N.K. & Lincoln, Y. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Donckels, R. (1991). Education and entrepreneurship experiences from secondary and university education in Belgium. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 9(1), 35-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.1991.10600389
• European Commission, (2012). Effects and impact of entrepreneurship programmes in higher education. Entrepreneurship Unit. Directorate-General for Enterprise and Industry B1049 Brussels, March 2012.
• European Commission, (June, 2013). Entrepreneurship education: A guide for educators. Entrepreneurship and Social Economy Unit. European Union, 2013, Bruxelles.
• Farny, S., Frederiksen, S.H., Hannibal, M. & Jones, S. (2016). A Culture of entrepreneurship education. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development: An International Journal, 28(7-8), 514-535. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2016.1221228
• Hannula, H., Ruskovaara, E., Seikkula-Leino, J. & Tiikkala, A. (2012). Evaluating Finnish teacher educators as entrepreneurship educators, 8th International Conference on Evaluation for Practice, Improvement by Evaluation, A Conference for Experts of Education, Human Services and Policy 18– 20 June 2012, University of Tampere, Pori, Finland.
• Hays, B.A. & Sidlow, F. (2010). Student interest in studying and engaging in public relations entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 23(1), 709-718. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2010.10593511
• Hyrsky, K. (1999). Entrepreneurial metaphors and concepts: An exploratory study. International Small Business Journal, 18(1), 13-34. Retrieved from isb.sagepub.com
• Johannisson, B. (1991). University training for entrepreneurship: Swedish approaches. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 3(1), 67-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985629100000005
• Janssen, F. & Bacq, S. (2010). Cultural and outcomes-related issues in implementing an interdisciplinary cross-campus entrepreneurship education program. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 23(1), 733-746. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2010.10593513
• Johannisson, B. (2016). Limits to and prospects of entrepreneurship education in the academic context. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development: An International Journal, 28(5-6), 403-423. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2016.1177982
• Johansen, V. & Schanke, T. (2013). Entrepreneurship education in secondary education and training. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 57(4), 357-368. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2012.656280
• Kautonen, T., Gelderen, M.V., & Tornikoski, E.T. (2013). Prediction entrepreneurial behaviour: A test of the theory of planned behaviour. Applied Economics, 45(6), 697- 707. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2011.610750
• Krueger, N.F. & Carsrud, A.L. (1993). Entrepreneurial intentions: Applying the theory of planned behaviour. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development: An International Journal, 5(4), 315-330. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985629300000020
• Kružić, D. & Pavić, I. (2010). Students’ entrepreneurial characteristics: Empirical evidence from Croatia. The Business Review, Cambridge, 14(2), 216-221.
• Komulainen, K., Korhonen, M. & Raty, H. (2009). Risk-taking abilities for everyone? Finnish entrepreneurship education and the enterprising selves imagined by pupils. Gender and Education, 21(6), 631-649. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250802680032
• Korhonen, M., Komulainen, K. & Raty, H. (2012). ‘Not everyone is cut out to be the entrepreneur type’; How Finnish school teachers construct the meaning of entrepreneurship education and the related abilities of the pupils. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 56(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2011.567393
• Korsgaard, S., Ferguson, R. & Gaddefors, J. (2015). The best of both worlds: How rural entrepreneurs use placial embeddedness and strategic networks to create opportunities. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development: An International Journal, 27(9-10), 574- 598. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2015.1085100
• Kyrö, P. (2015). The conceptual contribution of education to research on entrepreneurship education. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development: An International Journal, 27(9-10), 599-618. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2015.1085726
• Lamine, W., Jack, S., Fayolle, A. & Chabaud, D. (2015). One step beyond? Towards a process view of social networks in entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development: An International Journal, 27(7-8), 413-429. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2015.1070535
• Lefebvre, V., Lefebvre, M.R. & Simon, E. (2015). Formal entrepreneurial networks as communities of practice: A longitudinal case study. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development: An International Journal, 27(7-8), 500-525. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2015.1070539
• Lindh, I. & S. Thorgren . (2016). Entrepreneurship education: The role of local business. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 28(5–6), 313–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2015.1134678
• McClelland, D.C. (1961). The achieving society. Princeton, New Jersey: Van Nostrand. Retrieved from https://www.questia.com/library/1438901/the-achieving-society
• Pittaway, L.A., Gazzard, J., Shore, A. & Williamson, T. (2015). Student clubs: Experiences in entrepreneurial learning. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development: An International Journal, 27(3-4), 127-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2015.1014865
• Pittaway, L. & Thorpe, R. (2012). A framework for entrepreneurial learning: A tribute to Jason Cope. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development. An International Journal. Special Issues on Entrepreneurship Education and Context and Government Policies to Support Entrepreneurship, 24(9-10), 837-859. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2012.694268
• Rasmussen, E., Mosey, S. & Wright, M. (2015). The transformation of network ties to develop entrepreneurial competencies for university spin-offs. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development: An International Journal. One Step Beyond? Towards a Process View of Social Networks in Entrepreneurship, 27(7-8), 430-457. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2015.1070536
• Ray, D., M. (1993). Understanding the entrepreneur: Entrepreneurial attributes, experience and skils. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development: An International Journal, 5(4), 345-358. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985629300000022
• Sirelkhatim, F., Gangi, Y. & Nisar, T. (2015). Entrepreneurship education: A systematic literature review of curricula contents and teaching methods. Cogent Business and Management, 2(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2015.1052034
• Shinnar, R., Pruett, M. & Toney, B. (2009). Entrepreneurship education: Attitudes across campus. Journal of Education for Business, 84(3), 151-159. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.84.3.151-159
• Somby, H.M. & Johansen, V. (2017). Entrepreneurship education: motivation and effort for pupils with special needs in Norwegian compulsory school. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 32(2), 238-251, https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2016.1223398
• Srivastva, S. & Barrett, F.J.(1998). The transforming nature of metaphors in group development: A study in group theory. Human Relations, 41, 31-64. Retrieved from https://calhoun.nps.edu/bitstream/handle/10945/55665/Barrett_Transforming_1988.pdf? sequence=1
• Stuetzer, M., Audretsch, D.B., Obschonka, M., Gosling, S.D., Rentfrow, P.J. & Potter, J. (2018). Entrepreneurship culture, knowledge spillovers and the growth of regions. Regional Studies: Innovation and Geographical Spillovers, 52(5), 608-618. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1294251
• Walter, S.G. & Dohse, D.(2012). Why mode and regional context matter for entrepreneurship education. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development. Special Issue on: Entrepreneurship Education and Context and Government Policies to Support Entrepreneurship, 24(9-10), 807-835. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2012.721009