Öğretmen Adaylarının Motivasyonlarının Sosyal Girişimciliğe Etkisi: Nitel Çözümleme

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı, öğretmen adaylarının olumlu ve olumsuz metafor kullanarak motivasyonlarınının sosyal girişimciliğe etkisini belirlemektir. Bu araştırmada, yorumlayıcı fenomenolojik metodoloji altında nitel araştırma paradigması kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın katılımcıları Kuzey Kıbrıs’ta bulunan üniversitelerin eğitim fakültesi dördüncü sınıfında öğrenim gören öğrencilerden belirlenen iki grup ile yapılmıştır. Gruplar, ilk veri katılımcıları (Grup 1) ve sonraki veri katılımcıları (Grup 2) şeklinde adlandırılmışlardır. Grup 1’de 60 öğrenci ile odak grup görüşmeleri yapılmıştır. Grup 2'de ise 60 öğrenci ile derinlemesine görüşmeler yapılmıştır. Çalışmaya katılan paydaşlardan, sosyal girişimciliği ve öğretmen adaylarının motivasyonunu etkileyen olumlu ve olumsuz metaforları tanımlamaları ve gerekçelerini tam cümle halinde yazılı olarak belirtmeleri istenmiştir. Veri toplama için yorumlayıcı yaklaşım kullanılmış ve veriler içerik analizi yöntemi kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Öğretmen adaylarının olumlu sosyal girişimcilik motivasyonlarını tanımlayan metaforlar köpekbalığı, girişimci ruhu, sevgi ateşi ve becerikli olarak tanımlamıştır. Öğretmen adaylarının olumsuz sosyal girişimcilik motivasyonlarını tanımlayan metaforlar ise, öğretmen adaylarının motivasyonunu sıradan ve yoğun olarak tanımlamıştır. Araştırma sonucunda öğretmen adaylarının motivasyonlarının sosyal girişimciliğe etkisine ilişkin model önerisi yapılmıştır.  

Anahtar Kelimeler

• motivasyon,sosyal girişimcilik,sosyal girişimcilik modeli,öğretmen adayları

Influence of Teacher Candidates’ Motivation on Social Entrepreneurship: A Qualitative Study

Öz

The aim of the current research is to determine the motivation of teacher candidates, through positive and negative metaphors, which influences the social entrepreneurship. Qualitative research paradigm under interpretive phenomenological methodology was used in the current study. Participants of the study were two groups of students (the Group 1 as the-initial-data - participants and the Group 2 as the-later-data-participants) from the fourth year of education faculties of universities in North Cyprus. Focus group interviews were completed with 60 students in Group 1. In Group 2, in-dept interviewers were conducted with 60 students. The key stakeholders in the study were asked to identify positive and negative metaphors affecting teacher candidates’ motivation on social entrepreneurship and state their justification in full sentences. An interpretive approach for data collection was used and data were analyzed using the content analysis method. Metaphors defining the teacher candidates’ motivation on positive social entrepreneurship were identified as shark, entrepreneurial spirit, fire of love and skilful. Metaphors defining the teacher candidates’ motivation on negative metaphors were identified as ordinary and intense. As a result of the research, a model on influencing the teacher candidates’ motivation on social entrepreneurship was proposed. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• motivation,social entrepreneurship,social entrepreneurship model,teacher candidates,qualitative study

Kaynakça

1. Armstrong, P. & Tomes, A. (2000). Entrepreneurship in science: Case studies from liquid crystal application. Prometheus: Critical Studies in Innovation, 18(2), 133-147. https://doi.org/10.1080/713692057
2. Beca, J. (2007). The need for improvement in innovativeness development and entrepreneurship training in high school and university science education. T-Space at the University of Toronto Libraries, University of Toronto Mississauga. Retrieved from https://www.j-humansciences.com/ojs/index.php/IJHS/article/view/3240
3. Bygrave, W.D. & Hofer, C.W. (1991). Theorising about entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 16(2), 13-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879201600203
4. Cal, A. & Tehmarn, A. (2016). Phenomenological epistemology approaches and implications for HRD research and practice. National Institute of Development Administration, Bangkok, Thailand. Retrieved from https://www.ufhrd.co.uk/wordpress/wpcontent/uploads/2016/10/paper_128.pdf
5. Clark, C.M. & Harrison, C. (2018). Entrepreneurship: An assimilated multi-perspective review. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship. Latest articles. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2018.1446665
6. Denzin, N.K. & Lincoln, Y. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Donckels, R. (1991). Education and entrepreneurship experiences from secondary and university education in Belgium. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 9(1), 35-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.1991.10600389
8. European Commission, (2012). Effects and impact of entrepreneurship programmes in higher education. Entrepreneurship Unit. Directorate-General for Enterprise and Industry B1049 Brussels, March 2012.

9. European Commission, (June, 2013). Entrepreneurship education: A guide for educators. Entrepreneurship and Social Economy Unit. European Union, 2013, Bruxelles.
10. Farny, S., Frederiksen, S.H., Hannibal, M. & Jones, S. (2016). A Culture of entrepreneurship education. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development: An International Journal, 28(7-8), 514-535. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2016.1221228
11. Hannula, H., Ruskovaara, E., Seikkula-Leino, J. & Tiikkala, A. (2012). Evaluating Finnish teacher educators as entrepreneurship educators, 8th International Conference on Evaluation for Practice, Improvement by Evaluation, A Conference for Experts of Education, Human Services and Policy 18– 20 June 2012, University of Tampere, Pori, Finland.
12. Hays, B.A. & Sidlow, F. (2010). Student interest in studying and engaging in public relations entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 23(1), 709-718. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2010.10593511
13. Hyrsky, K. (1999). Entrepreneurial metaphors and concepts: An exploratory study. International Small Business Journal, 18(1), 13-34. Retrieved from isb.sagepub.com
14. Johannisson, B. (1991). University training for entrepreneurship: Swedish approaches. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 3(1), 67-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985629100000005
15. Janssen, F. & Bacq, S. (2010). Cultural and outcomes-related issues in implementing an interdisciplinary cross-campus entrepreneurship education program. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 23(1), 733-746. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2010.10593513
16. Johannisson, B. (2016). Limits to and prospects of entrepreneurship education in the academic context. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development: An International Journal, 28(5-6), 403-423. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2016.1177982
17. Johansen, V. & Schanke, T. (2013). Entrepreneurship education in secondary education and training. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 57(4), 357-368. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2012.656280
18. Kautonen, T., Gelderen, M.V., & Tornikoski, E.T. (2013). Prediction entrepreneurial behaviour: A test of the theory of planned behaviour. Applied Economics, 45(6), 697- 707. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2011.610750
19. Krueger, N.F. & Carsrud, A.L. (1993). Entrepreneurial intentions: Applying the theory of planned behaviour. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development: An International Journal, 5(4), 315-330. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985629300000020
20. Kružić, D. & Pavić, I. (2010). Students’ entrepreneurial characteristics: Empirical evidence from Croatia. The Business Review, Cambridge, 14(2), 216-221.
21. Komulainen, K., Korhonen, M. & Raty, H. (2009). Risk-taking abilities for everyone? Finnish entrepreneurship education and the enterprising selves imagined by pupils. Gender and Education, 21(6), 631-649. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250802680032
22. Korhonen, M., Komulainen, K. & Raty, H. (2012). ‘Not everyone is cut out to be the entrepreneur type’; How Finnish school teachers construct the meaning of entrepreneurship education and the related abilities of the pupils. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 56(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2011.567393
23. Korsgaard, S., Ferguson, R. & Gaddefors, J. (2015). The best of both worlds: How rural entrepreneurs use placial embeddedness and strategic networks to create opportunities. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development: An International Journal, 27(9-10), 574- 598. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2015.1085100
24. Kyrö, P. (2015). The conceptual contribution of education to research on entrepreneurship education. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development: An International Journal, 27(9-10), 599-618. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2015.1085726
25. Lamine, W., Jack, S., Fayolle, A. & Chabaud, D. (2015). One step beyond? Towards a process view of social networks in entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development: An International Journal, 27(7-8), 413-429. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2015.1070535
26. Lefebvre, V., Lefebvre, M.R. & Simon, E. (2015). Formal entrepreneurial networks as communities of practice: A longitudinal case study. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development: An International Journal, 27(7-8), 500-525. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2015.1070539
27. Lindh, I. & S. Thorgren . (2016). Entrepreneurship education: The role of local business. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 28(5–6), 313–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2015.1134678
28. McClelland, D.C. (1961). The achieving society. Princeton, New Jersey: Van Nostrand. Retrieved from https://www.questia.com/library/1438901/the-achieving-society
29. Pittaway, L.A., Gazzard, J., Shore, A. & Williamson, T. (2015). Student clubs: Experiences in entrepreneurial learning. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development: An International Journal, 27(3-4), 127-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2015.1014865
30. Pittaway, L. & Thorpe, R. (2012). A framework for entrepreneurial learning: A tribute to Jason Cope. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development. An International Journal. Special Issues on Entrepreneurship Education and Context and Government Policies to Support Entrepreneurship, 24(9-10), 837-859. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2012.694268
31. Rasmussen, E., Mosey, S. & Wright, M. (2015). The transformation of network ties to develop entrepreneurial competencies for university spin-offs. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development: An International Journal. One Step Beyond? Towards a Process View of Social Networks in Entrepreneurship, 27(7-8), 430-457. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2015.1070536
32. Ray, D., M. (1993). Understanding the entrepreneur: Entrepreneurial attributes, experience and skils. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development: An International Journal, 5(4), 345-358. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985629300000022
33. Sirelkhatim, F., Gangi, Y. & Nisar, T. (2015). Entrepreneurship education: A systematic literature review of curricula contents and teaching methods. Cogent Business and Management, 2(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2015.1052034
34. Shinnar, R., Pruett, M. & Toney, B. (2009). Entrepreneurship education: Attitudes across campus. Journal of Education for Business, 84(3), 151-159. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.84.3.151-159
35. Somby, H.M. & Johansen, V. (2017). Entrepreneurship education: motivation and effort for pupils with special needs in Norwegian compulsory school. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 32(2), 238-251, https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2016.1223398
36. Srivastva, S. & Barrett, F.J.(1998). The transforming nature of metaphors in group development: A study in group theory. Human Relations, 41, 31-64. Retrieved from https://calhoun.nps.edu/bitstream/handle/10945/55665/Barrett_Transforming_1988.pdf? sequence=1
37. Stuetzer, M., Audretsch, D.B., Obschonka, M., Gosling, S.D., Rentfrow, P.J. & Potter, J. (2018). Entrepreneurship culture, knowledge spillovers and the growth of regions. Regional Studies: Innovation and Geographical Spillovers, 52(5), 608-618. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1294251
38. Walter, S.G. & Dohse, D.(2012). Why mode and regional context matter for entrepreneurship education. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development. Special Issue on: Entrepreneurship Education and Context and Government Policies to Support Entrepreneurship, 24(9-10), 807-835. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2012.721009