BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Büyük Veri Üzerine Eleştirel Sorular: Kültürel, Teknolojik ve Bilimsel Bir Olgu Hakkında Eleştirel Sorgulamalar

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 83, 199 - 215, 01.12.2015

Danah Boyd Kate Crawford Bilgesu Savcı

Öz

Büyük Veri çağı başlamıştır. Bilgisayar uzmanları, fizikçiler, ekonomistler, matematikçiler, siyaset bilimcileri, biyo-bilişimciler, sosyologlar ve diğer bilginler, yalnızca insanlar, şeyler ve bunların etkileşimleri tarafından ve haklarında üretilen devasa miktardaki bilgilere ulaşmak için çırpınıp durmaktadırlar. Çeşitli gruplar türeyimsel zincirleri, sosyal medya etkileşimlerini, sağlık kayıtlarını, telefon günlüklerini, devlet kayıtlarını ve insanların diğer tüm dijital izlerini incelemenin muhtemel faydaları ve getirileri hakkında tartışmalar yürütmektedirler. Böylece ortaya muazzam sorular çıkar: Büyük ölçekli araştırma verileri daha iyi araçlar, servisler ve kamu yararı oluşturmamıza yardımcı olacak mıdır, yoksa yeni bir gizlilik ihlali ve istilacı pazarlama dalgasının önünü mü açılacaktır? Veri analizi çevrimiçi toplulukları ve siyasal hareketleri anlamamıza yardım mı edecektir, yoksa protestocu izlerini takip etmek ve sesleri susturmak için mi kullanılacaktır? İnsan iletişimi ve kültürü üzerine çalışma disiplinlerimizi mi dönüştürecek, yoksa araştırma seçeneklerimizi daraltıp “araştırma” sözcüğünden ne anladığımızı mı değiştirecek? Bu açılardan, Büyük Veriyi sosyo-tekniksel bir olgu olarak ele aldığımızda, varsayım ve önyargıların eleştirel bir biçimde eklemlenmesinin gerekli olduğunu iddia etmekteyiz. Bu makalede ütopyacı ve distopyacı retoriği harekete geçirmekte olup, teknoloji, analiz ve mitoloji birlikteliğine dayanan kültürel, teknolojik ve bilimsel bir olgu olarak Büyük Veri etrafında toplanan konular hakkındaki görüşleri keskinleştirmek için altı farklı tartışma konusu öneriyoruz.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Büyük Veri mantıksal analiz sosyal medya iletişim çalışmaları sosyal ağ siteleri bilim felsefesi epistemoloji etik Twitter

Kaynakça

  • Acquisti, A. ve Gross, R. (2009). Predicting social security numbers from publicdata, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, sayı. 106, no. 27,ss. 10975–10980.
  • Anderson, C. (2008). The end of theory, will the data deluge makes the scientificmethod obsolete?, Edge, [Online] Erişim http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/anderson08/anderson08_ index.html (25 Temmuz 2011).
  • Anderson, M. (1988). The American Census: A Social History, Yale University Press,New Haven, CT.
  • Baca, G. (2004). Legends of Fordism: between myth, history, and foregone conclusions, Social Analysis, sayı. 48, no. 3, ss. 169–178.
  • Behar, R. ve Gordon, D. A. (Der.) (1996). Women Writing Culture, University of Califor- nia Press, Berkeley, CA.
  • Berry, D. (2011). The computational turn: thinking about the digital humanities, Cultu- re Machine, sayı. 12, [Online] Erişim: http://www.culturemachine.net/index.php/cm/article/ view/440/470 (11 Temmuz 2011).
  • Blass, T. (2004). The Man Who Shocked the World: The Life and Legacy of Stanley Milg- ram, Basic Books, New York.
  • Bollier, D. (2010). The promise and peril of big data, [Online] Erişim: http://www.as- peninstitute.org/sites/default/files/content/docs/pubs/The_Promise_and_Peril_of_Big_Data. pdf (11 Temmuz 2011).
  • Bowker, G. C. (2005). Memory Practices in the Sciences, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Boyd, D. ve Marwick, A. (2011). Social privacy in networked publics: teens’ attitudes,practices, and strategies, paper given at Oxford Internet Institute,[Online] Erişim: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1925128 (28 Eylül 2011).
  • Burkholder, L. (Der.) (1992). Philosophy and the Computer, Westview Press, Boulder, San Francisco ve Oxford.
  • Cain, M. ve Finch, J. (1981). Towards a rehabilitation of data, içinde P. Abrams, R. Deem, J. Finch ve P. Rock (Der.) Practice and Progress: British Sociology 1950 –1980, ss.105-119. George Allen and Unwin, London.
  • Clifford, J. ve Marcus, G. E. (Der.) (1986). Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
  • Conover, M. (2011). Jimmy Lin, Complexity and Social Networks Blog, [Online] Eri- şim: http://www.iq.harvard.edu/blog/netgov/2011/07/the_international_conference_o.html (9 Aralık 2011).
  • Crawford, K. (2009). Following you: disciplines of listening in social media’, Continu- um: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, sayı. 23, no. 4, ss. 532–533.
  • Derrida, J. (1996). Archive Fever: A Freudian Impression Çev. Eric Prenowitz, Univer- sity of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • Dourish, P. ve Bell, G. (2011). Divining a Digital Future: Mess and Mythology in Ubiqu- itous Computing, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Du Gay, P. ve Pryke, M. (2002). Cultural Economy: Cultural Analysis and Commercial Life, Sage, London.
  • Durkheim, E. (1895/1982). Rules of Sociological Method, The Free Press, New York,NY.
  • Ess, C. (2002). Ethical decision-making and Internet research: recommendations from the aoir ethics working committee, Association of Internet Researchers, [Online] Erişim: http:// aoir.org/reports/ethics.pdf (12 Eylül 2011).
  • Fischer, C. (1982). To Dwell Among Friends: Personal Networks in Town and City,University of Chicago, Chicago.
  • Forsythe, D. (2001). Studying Those Who Study Us: An Anthropologist in the World of Artificial Intelligence, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
  • Freeman, L. (2006). The Development of Social Network Analysis, Empirical Press,Vancouver.
  • Fry, J. P. ve Sibley, E. H. (1996). [1974] Evolution of database management systems, Computing Surveys, sayı. 8, no. 1.1, ss. 7 –42. yeniden basıldı: (1996) Great Papers in Com- puter Science, (Der.) L. Laplante, IEEE Press, New York.
  • Gitelman, L. (2011). Notes for the Upcoming Collection ‘Raw Data’ is an Oxymoron, [Online] Erişim: https://files.nyu.edu/lg91/public/ (23 Temmuz 2011).
  • Golder, S. (2010). Scaling social science with hadoop, Cloudera Blog, [Online] Erişim:http://www.cloudera.com/blog/2010/04/scaling-social-sciencewith-hadoop/(18 Ha- ziran 2011).
  • Golder, S. ve Macy, M.W. (2011). Diurnal and seasonal mood vary with work, sleep and Daylength across diverse cultures, Science, sayı. 333, no. 6051, ss. 1878–1881, [Online] Erişim: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/333/6051/1878.
  • Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties, American Journal of Sociology, sayı. 78, no. 6, ss. 1360–1380.
  • Harding, S. (2010). ‘Feminism, science and the anti-Enlightenment critiques’, içinde (Der.) A. Garry ve M. Pearsall, Women, Knowledge and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy, Unwin Hyman, Boston, MA, ss. 298–320.
  • Homans, G. C. (1974). Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Kranzberg, M. (1986).Technology and history: kranzberg’s laws, Technology and Cultu- re, sayı. 27, no. 3, ss. 544–560.
  • Latour, B. (2009). Tarde’s idea of quantification, içinde (Der.) M. Candea The Social after Gabriel Tarde:Debates and Assessments, ss. 145-162. Routledge, London. [Online] Avai- lable at: http://www.bruno-latour.fr/articles/article/116-TARDE-CANDEA.pdf (19 Haziran 2011).
  • Lazer, D., Pentland, A., Adamic, L., Aral, S., Baraba´si, A., Brewer, D., Christakis, N., Contractor, N., Fowler, J., Gutmann, M., Jebara, T., King, G., Macy, M.,Roy, D. ve Van Alstyne, M. (2009). Computational social science, Science, sayı.323, no. 5915, ss. 721–723.
  • Leinweber, D. (2007). Stupid data miner tricks: overfitting the S&P 500, The Journal of Investing, sayı. 16, no. 1, ss. 15–22.
  • Lessig, L. (1999). Code: and Other Laws of Cyberspace, Basic Books, New York, NY.
  • Lewis, K., Kaufman, J., Gonzalez, M., Wimmer, A. ve Christakis, N. (2008). Tastes, ties, and time: a new social network dataset using Facebook.com, Social Networks, sayı. 30, no. 4, ss. 330–342.
  • Lotan, G., Graeff, E., Ananny, M., Gaffney, D., Pearce, I. ve boyd, D. (2011). The revo- lutions were tweeted: information flows during the 2011 Tunisian and Egyptian revolutions, International Journal of Communications, sayı. 5, ss. 1375–1405, [Online] Erişim: http:// ijoc.org/ojs/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1246.
  • Manovich, L. (2011). Trending: the promises and the challenges of big social data, İçinde (Der.) M.K. Gold, Debates in the Digital Humanities, The University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN, [Online] Erişim: http://www.manovich.net/DOCS/Manovich_trending_ paper.pdf (15 Temmuz 2011).
  • McCloskey, D. N. (Der.) (1985). From methodology to rhetoric, The Rhetoric of Econo- mics, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, ss. 20–35.
  • Meeder, B., Tam, J., Gage Kelley, P. ve Faith Cranor, L. (2010). RT @IWantPrivacy: wi- despread violation of privacy settings in the Twitter social network, paper presented at Web 2.0 Security and Privacy, W2SP 2011, Oakland, CA.
  • Meiss, M. R., Menczer, F. ve Vespignani, A. (2008). Structural analysis of behavioral networks from the Internet, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, sayı. 41, no. 22, ss. 220–224.
  • Moretti, F. (2007). Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for a Literary History, Verso, London.
  • Onnela, J. P., Sarama¨ki, J., Hyvo¨nen, J., Szabo´, G., Lazer, D., Kaski, K., Kerte´sz, J. ve Baraba´si, A. L. (2007). Structure and tie strengths in mobile communication networks, Proceedings from the National Academy of Sciences, sayı. 104, no. 18, ss. 7332–7336.
  • Pariser, E. (2011). The Filter Bubble: What the Internet is Hiding from You, Penguin Press, New York.
  • Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. (1940). On social structure, The Journal of the Royal Anthropo- logical Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, sayı. 70, no. 1, ss. 1–12.
  • Reverby, S. M. (2009). Examining Tuskegee: The Infamous Syphilis Study and Its Legacy, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC.
  • Savage, M. ve Burrows, R. (2007). The coming crisis of empirical sociology, Sociology,sayı. 41, no. 5, ss. 885–899.
  • Schrag, Z. M. (2010). Ethical Imperialism: Institutional Review Boards and the Social Sciences, 1965 –2009, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
  • Shamma, D. A., Kennedy, L., veChurchill, E. F. (2010). Tweetgeist: Can the Twitter Ti- meline Reveal the Structure of Broadcast Events?. Paper presented at the Computer-Suppor- ted Cooperative Work-2010, Association for Computing Machinery, February 6 –10, Savan- nah, Georgia USA. Erişim: http://research.yahoo.com/pub/3041.
  • Suchman, L. (2011). Consuming anthropology, içinde (Der.) A. Barry ve G. Born In- terdisciplinarity: Reconfigurations of the Social and Natural Sciences, eds, Routledge, London,[Online] Erişim: http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fass/doc_library/sociology/Suchman_con- suming_anthroploogy.pdf.
  • Troshynski, E., Lee, C. ve Dourish, P. (2008). Accountabilities of presence: reframing lo- cation-based systems, Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, Nisan 5–10, Florence, Italy.
  • Twitter (2011). One hundred million voices, Twitter Blog, [Online] Erişim:http://blog. Twitter.com/2011/09/one-hundred-million-voices.html (12 Eylül 2011).
  • Veinot, T. (2007). The eyes of the power company: workplace information practices of a vault inspector, The Library Quarterly, sayı. 77, no. 2, ss. 157–180.
  • Wang, X. (2011). Twitter posts show workers worldwide are stressed out on the job’, Bloomberg Businessweek, [Online] Erişim: http://www.businessweek.com/news/2011-09- 29/Twitter-posts-show-workers-worldwide-arestressed-out-on-the-job.html (12 Mart 2012).
  • Wu, S., Hofman, J. M., Mason, W. A. ve Watts, D. J. (2011). Who says what to whom on Twitter’, Proceedings of the International World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2011), Mart 28-Nisan 1, Hyderabad, India, ss. 705 –714.
  • Zimmer, M. (2008). More on the “Anonymity” of the Facebook dataset – it’s Harvard Col- lege, MichaelZimmer.org Blog, [Online] Erişim: http://www.michaelzimmer.org/2008/01/03/ more-on-the-anonymity-of-the-facebook-dataset-its-harvard-college/ (20 Haziran 2011).
  • Anahtar sözcükler: Büyük Veri; mantıksal analiz; sosyal medya; iletişim çalışmaları; sosyal ağ siteleri; bilim felsefesi; epistemoloji; etik; Twitter

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 83, 199 - 215, 01.12.2015

Danah Boyd Kate Crawford Bilgesu Savcı

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Acquisti, A. ve Gross, R. (2009). Predicting social security numbers from publicdata, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, sayı. 106, no. 27,ss. 10975–10980.
  • Anderson, C. (2008). The end of theory, will the data deluge makes the scientificmethod obsolete?, Edge, [Online] Erişim http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/anderson08/anderson08_ index.html (25 Temmuz 2011).
  • Anderson, M. (1988). The American Census: A Social History, Yale University Press,New Haven, CT.
  • Baca, G. (2004). Legends of Fordism: between myth, history, and foregone conclusions, Social Analysis, sayı. 48, no. 3, ss. 169–178.
  • Behar, R. ve Gordon, D. A. (Der.) (1996). Women Writing Culture, University of Califor- nia Press, Berkeley, CA.
  • Berry, D. (2011). The computational turn: thinking about the digital humanities, Cultu- re Machine, sayı. 12, [Online] Erişim: http://www.culturemachine.net/index.php/cm/article/ view/440/470 (11 Temmuz 2011).
  • Blass, T. (2004). The Man Who Shocked the World: The Life and Legacy of Stanley Milg- ram, Basic Books, New York.
  • Bollier, D. (2010). The promise and peril of big data, [Online] Erişim: http://www.as- peninstitute.org/sites/default/files/content/docs/pubs/The_Promise_and_Peril_of_Big_Data. pdf (11 Temmuz 2011).
  • Bowker, G. C. (2005). Memory Practices in the Sciences, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Boyd, D. ve Marwick, A. (2011). Social privacy in networked publics: teens’ attitudes,practices, and strategies, paper given at Oxford Internet Institute,[Online] Erişim: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1925128 (28 Eylül 2011).
  • Burkholder, L. (Der.) (1992). Philosophy and the Computer, Westview Press, Boulder, San Francisco ve Oxford.
  • Cain, M. ve Finch, J. (1981). Towards a rehabilitation of data, içinde P. Abrams, R. Deem, J. Finch ve P. Rock (Der.) Practice and Progress: British Sociology 1950 –1980, ss.105-119. George Allen and Unwin, London.
  • Clifford, J. ve Marcus, G. E. (Der.) (1986). Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
  • Conover, M. (2011). Jimmy Lin, Complexity and Social Networks Blog, [Online] Eri- şim: http://www.iq.harvard.edu/blog/netgov/2011/07/the_international_conference_o.html (9 Aralık 2011).
  • Crawford, K. (2009). Following you: disciplines of listening in social media’, Continu- um: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, sayı. 23, no. 4, ss. 532–533.
  • Derrida, J. (1996). Archive Fever: A Freudian Impression Çev. Eric Prenowitz, Univer- sity of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • Dourish, P. ve Bell, G. (2011). Divining a Digital Future: Mess and Mythology in Ubiqu- itous Computing, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Du Gay, P. ve Pryke, M. (2002). Cultural Economy: Cultural Analysis and Commercial Life, Sage, London.
  • Durkheim, E. (1895/1982). Rules of Sociological Method, The Free Press, New York,NY.
  • Ess, C. (2002). Ethical decision-making and Internet research: recommendations from the aoir ethics working committee, Association of Internet Researchers, [Online] Erişim: http:// aoir.org/reports/ethics.pdf (12 Eylül 2011).
  • Fischer, C. (1982). To Dwell Among Friends: Personal Networks in Town and City,University of Chicago, Chicago.
  • Forsythe, D. (2001). Studying Those Who Study Us: An Anthropologist in the World of Artificial Intelligence, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
  • Freeman, L. (2006). The Development of Social Network Analysis, Empirical Press,Vancouver.
  • Fry, J. P. ve Sibley, E. H. (1996). [1974] Evolution of database management systems, Computing Surveys, sayı. 8, no. 1.1, ss. 7 –42. yeniden basıldı: (1996) Great Papers in Com- puter Science, (Der.) L. Laplante, IEEE Press, New York.
  • Gitelman, L. (2011). Notes for the Upcoming Collection ‘Raw Data’ is an Oxymoron, [Online] Erişim: https://files.nyu.edu/lg91/public/ (23 Temmuz 2011).
  • Golder, S. (2010). Scaling social science with hadoop, Cloudera Blog, [Online] Erişim:http://www.cloudera.com/blog/2010/04/scaling-social-sciencewith-hadoop/(18 Ha- ziran 2011).
  • Golder, S. ve Macy, M.W. (2011). Diurnal and seasonal mood vary with work, sleep and Daylength across diverse cultures, Science, sayı. 333, no. 6051, ss. 1878–1881, [Online] Erişim: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/333/6051/1878.
  • Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties, American Journal of Sociology, sayı. 78, no. 6, ss. 1360–1380.
  • Harding, S. (2010). ‘Feminism, science and the anti-Enlightenment critiques’, içinde (Der.) A. Garry ve M. Pearsall, Women, Knowledge and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy, Unwin Hyman, Boston, MA, ss. 298–320.
  • Homans, G. C. (1974). Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Kranzberg, M. (1986).Technology and history: kranzberg’s laws, Technology and Cultu- re, sayı. 27, no. 3, ss. 544–560.
  • Latour, B. (2009). Tarde’s idea of quantification, içinde (Der.) M. Candea The Social after Gabriel Tarde:Debates and Assessments, ss. 145-162. Routledge, London. [Online] Avai- lable at: http://www.bruno-latour.fr/articles/article/116-TARDE-CANDEA.pdf (19 Haziran 2011).
  • Lazer, D., Pentland, A., Adamic, L., Aral, S., Baraba´si, A., Brewer, D., Christakis, N., Contractor, N., Fowler, J., Gutmann, M., Jebara, T., King, G., Macy, M.,Roy, D. ve Van Alstyne, M. (2009). Computational social science, Science, sayı.323, no. 5915, ss. 721–723.
  • Leinweber, D. (2007). Stupid data miner tricks: overfitting the S&P 500, The Journal of Investing, sayı. 16, no. 1, ss. 15–22.
  • Lessig, L. (1999). Code: and Other Laws of Cyberspace, Basic Books, New York, NY.
  • Lewis, K., Kaufman, J., Gonzalez, M., Wimmer, A. ve Christakis, N. (2008). Tastes, ties, and time: a new social network dataset using Facebook.com, Social Networks, sayı. 30, no. 4, ss. 330–342.
  • Lotan, G., Graeff, E., Ananny, M., Gaffney, D., Pearce, I. ve boyd, D. (2011). The revo- lutions were tweeted: information flows during the 2011 Tunisian and Egyptian revolutions, International Journal of Communications, sayı. 5, ss. 1375–1405, [Online] Erişim: http:// ijoc.org/ojs/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1246.
  • Manovich, L. (2011). Trending: the promises and the challenges of big social data, İçinde (Der.) M.K. Gold, Debates in the Digital Humanities, The University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN, [Online] Erişim: http://www.manovich.net/DOCS/Manovich_trending_ paper.pdf (15 Temmuz 2011).
  • McCloskey, D. N. (Der.) (1985). From methodology to rhetoric, The Rhetoric of Econo- mics, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, ss. 20–35.
  • Meeder, B., Tam, J., Gage Kelley, P. ve Faith Cranor, L. (2010). RT @IWantPrivacy: wi- despread violation of privacy settings in the Twitter social network, paper presented at Web 2.0 Security and Privacy, W2SP 2011, Oakland, CA.
  • Meiss, M. R., Menczer, F. ve Vespignani, A. (2008). Structural analysis of behavioral networks from the Internet, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, sayı. 41, no. 22, ss. 220–224.
  • Moretti, F. (2007). Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for a Literary History, Verso, London.
  • Onnela, J. P., Sarama¨ki, J., Hyvo¨nen, J., Szabo´, G., Lazer, D., Kaski, K., Kerte´sz, J. ve Baraba´si, A. L. (2007). Structure and tie strengths in mobile communication networks, Proceedings from the National Academy of Sciences, sayı. 104, no. 18, ss. 7332–7336.
  • Pariser, E. (2011). The Filter Bubble: What the Internet is Hiding from You, Penguin Press, New York.
  • Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. (1940). On social structure, The Journal of the Royal Anthropo- logical Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, sayı. 70, no. 1, ss. 1–12.
  • Reverby, S. M. (2009). Examining Tuskegee: The Infamous Syphilis Study and Its Legacy, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC.
  • Savage, M. ve Burrows, R. (2007). The coming crisis of empirical sociology, Sociology,sayı. 41, no. 5, ss. 885–899.
  • Schrag, Z. M. (2010). Ethical Imperialism: Institutional Review Boards and the Social Sciences, 1965 –2009, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
  • Shamma, D. A., Kennedy, L., veChurchill, E. F. (2010). Tweetgeist: Can the Twitter Ti- meline Reveal the Structure of Broadcast Events?. Paper presented at the Computer-Suppor- ted Cooperative Work-2010, Association for Computing Machinery, February 6 –10, Savan- nah, Georgia USA. Erişim: http://research.yahoo.com/pub/3041.
  • Suchman, L. (2011). Consuming anthropology, içinde (Der.) A. Barry ve G. Born In- terdisciplinarity: Reconfigurations of the Social and Natural Sciences, eds, Routledge, London,[Online] Erişim: http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fass/doc_library/sociology/Suchman_con- suming_anthroploogy.pdf.
  • Troshynski, E., Lee, C. ve Dourish, P. (2008). Accountabilities of presence: reframing lo- cation-based systems, Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, Nisan 5–10, Florence, Italy.
  • Twitter (2011). One hundred million voices, Twitter Blog, [Online] Erişim:http://blog. Twitter.com/2011/09/one-hundred-million-voices.html (12 Eylül 2011).
  • Veinot, T. (2007). The eyes of the power company: workplace information practices of a vault inspector, The Library Quarterly, sayı. 77, no. 2, ss. 157–180.
  • Wang, X. (2011). Twitter posts show workers worldwide are stressed out on the job’, Bloomberg Businessweek, [Online] Erişim: http://www.businessweek.com/news/2011-09- 29/Twitter-posts-show-workers-worldwide-arestressed-out-on-the-job.html (12 Mart 2012).
  • Wu, S., Hofman, J. M., Mason, W. A. ve Watts, D. J. (2011). Who says what to whom on Twitter’, Proceedings of the International World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2011), Mart 28-Nisan 1, Hyderabad, India, ss. 705 –714.
  • Zimmer, M. (2008). More on the “Anonymity” of the Facebook dataset – it’s Harvard Col- lege, MichaelZimmer.org Blog, [Online] Erişim: http://www.michaelzimmer.org/2008/01/03/ more-on-the-anonymity-of-the-facebook-dataset-its-harvard-college/ (20 Haziran 2011).
  • Anahtar sözcükler: Büyük Veri; mantıksal analiz; sosyal medya; iletişim çalışmaları; sosyal ağ siteleri; bilim felsefesi; epistemoloji; etik; Twitter
Toplam 57 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Diğer ID JA68KS96YG
Bölüm Derleme Makaleleri -Compilation Articles
Yazarlar

Danah Boyd Bu kişi benim

Kate Crawford Bu kişi benim

Bilgesu Savcı Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Aralık 2015
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2015 Cilt: 21 Sayı: 83

Kaynak Göster

APA Boyd, D., Crawford, K., & Savcı, B. (2015). Büyük Veri Üzerine Eleştirel Sorular: Kültürel, Teknolojik ve Bilimsel Bir Olgu Hakkında Eleştirel Sorgulamalar. Folklor/Edebiyat, 21(83), 199-215.

Derginin yayım dili Türkçe ve İngilizce’dir, ayrıca Türkçe de olsa tüm basılan makalelerin başlık, öz ve anahtar sözcükleri İngilizce olarak da makalede bulunur. Hakemlerden onay almış Türkçe makaleler için 750-1000 sözcükten oluşan genişletilmiş özet (extended summary) gereklidir. Elektronik çeviriler kabul edilmez.
Dergi TR-Dizin, Web of Science (ESCI), DOAJ ile diğer pek çok dizin tarafından taranmaktadır. Scimagoe quartile değeri: Q2 'dir:

TR DIZIN 2020 Etik Kriterleri kapsamında, dergimize 2020 yılından itibaren etik kurul izni gerektiren çalışmalar için makalenin yöntem bölümünde ilgili Etik Kurul Onayı ile ilgili bilgilere (kurul-tarih-sayı) yer verilmesi gerekecektir. Bu nedenle dergimize makale gönderecek olan yazarlarımızın ilgili kriteri göz önünde bulundurarak makalelerini düzenlemeleri önemle rica olunur.

Alan Editörleri/ Field Editörs

Halkbilimi/Folklore
Prof.Dr. Hande Birkalan-Gedik (JohannWolfgang-Goethe İniversitet-birkalan-gedik@m.uni-frankfurt.de)
Prof.Dr. Ali Yakıcı (Gazi Üniversitesi-yakici@gazi.edu.tr)
Prof.Dr. Aynur Koçak (Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi-nurkocak@yildiz.edu.tr)
Prof.Dr. Işıl Altun ( (Regensburg Üniversitesi/Kocaeli Üniversitesi-İsil.Altun@zsk.uni-regensburg.de)
Edebiyat/Literature
Prof.Dr. Abdullah Uçman (Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi -emekli-29 MayısÜniversitesi-abdullahucman@29mayis.edu.tr
Prof. Dr. Ramazan Korkmaz (Ardahan Üniversitesi-emekli-Kafkasya Üniversiteler Birliği -KÜNİB-r_korkmaz@hotmail.com)
Prof.Dr. Emel Kefeli (Marmara Üniversitesi-emekli-İstanbul 29 Mayıs Üniversitesi-ayseemelkefeli @gmail.com)
Antropoloji/Anthropology
Prof.Dr. Hanife Aliefendioğlu (Doğu Akdeniz Üniversitesi-hanife.aliefendioglu@emu.edu.tr)
Prof. Dr. Şebnem Pala Güzel (Başkent Üniversitesi-sebnempa@baskent.edu.tr)
Prof.Dr. Derya Atamtürk Duyar (İstanbul Üniversitesi-datamturk@istanbul.edu.tr)
Prof.Dr. Meryem Bulut (Ankara Üniversitesi-meryem.bulut@gmail.com)
Dil-Dilbilim/Language-Linguistics
Prof.Dr. Nurettin Demir (Hacettepe Üniversitesi-demir@hacettepe.edu.tr)
Prof. Dr. Aysu Erden (Maltepe Üniversitesi-aysuerden777@gmail.com)
Prof.Dr. Sema Aslan Demir (Hacettepe Üniversitesi-semaaslan@hacettepe.edu.tr)