Utilising Environmental Social Governance Rating for Predicting Financial Risk: FTSE 100

Abstract

The focus of this research is on evaluating the ESG ratings of various FTSE 100 companies and their impact on financial risk. The study aims to analyze how ESG ratings affect the financial risk of FTSE 100 companies and to reveal the impact of profitability and liquidity on ESG ratings. Therefore, we examine the relationship between ESG ratings (Environmental, Social, and Governance) and financial risk for FTSE 100 companies. ESG factors are increasingly recognized as indicators of a company's ability to sustain itself and its financial performance. The utilization of ESG rating data offers several potential benefits, including providing investors and analysts with insights to evaluate companies' long-term sustainability and resilience. The study aims to reveal the connection between ESG ratings and financial risk, as well as investigate the influence of profitability and liquidity on ESG ratings. The research utilizes quantitative methodologies, including regression analysis and panel unit root tests, to analyze the data collected from FTSE 100 companies. The findings suggest a positive association between higher ESG ratings and better financial health, as well as a positive impact of profitability on ESG ratings. However, liquidity metrics do not significantly affect ESG ratings.

Keywords

• ESG Ratings
• Financial Risk
• Profitability
• Liquidity
• FTSE 100

Finansal Riski Öngörmede Çevresel, Sosyal ve Yönetişim Derecelendirmesinin Kullanımı: FTSE 100 Örneği

Abstract

Bu araştırmanın odak noktası, çeşitli FTSE 100 şirketlerinin ESG derecelendirmelerinin değerlendirilmesi ve finansal risk üzerindeki etkileridir. Çalışmanın amaçları, ESG derecelendirmelerinin FTSE 100 şirketlerinin finansal riskini nasıl etkilediğini analiz etmek ve kârlılık ve likiditenin ESG derecelendirmeleri üzerindeki etkisini ortaya koymaktır. Bu nedenle, FTSE 100 şirketleri özelinde (Çevresel, Sosyal ve Yönetişim) ESG derecelendirmeleri ile finansal risk arasındaki ilişki incelenmektedir. ESG faktörleri, bir şirketin sürdürülebilirliğini ve finansal performansını devam ettirme kapasitesinin göstergeleri olarak giderek daha fazla kabul görmektedir. ESG derecelendirme verilerinin kullanımı, yatırımcılara ve analistlere şirketlerin uzun vadeli sürdürülebilirlik ve dayanıklılıklarını değerlendirmede çeşitli faydalar sunmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, ESG derecelendirmeleri ile finansal risk arasındaki ilişkiyi ortaya koymak ve kârlılık ile likiditenin ESG derecelendirmeleri üzerindeki etkisini araştırmaktır. Araştırmada, FTSE 100 şirketlerinden elde edilen veriler, regresyon analizi ve panel birim kök testleri gibi nicel yöntemler kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular, yüksek ESG derecelendirmeleri ile daha iyi finansal sağlık arasında pozitif bir ilişki olduğunu ve kârlılığın ESG derecelendirmeleri üzerinde olumlu bir etkisi bulunduğunu göstermektedir. Ancak, likidite ölçütlerinin ESG derecelendirmeleri üzerinde anlamlı bir etkisi bulunmamıştır.

Keywords

• ESG Derecelendirmeleri
• Finansal Risk
• Kârlılık
• Likidite
• FTSE 100

References

1. Ahmad, N., Mobarek, A., & Roni, N. N. (2021). Revisiting the impact of ESG on financial performance of FTSE350 UK firms: Static and dynamic panel data analysis. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1900500. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1900500
2. Altman, E. I. (1968). Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. The journal of finance, 23(4), 589-609. https://doi.org/10.2307/2978933
3. Altman, E. I., Iwanicz-Drozdowska, M., Laitinen, E. K., & Suvas, A. (2014). Distressed firm and bankruptcy prediction in an international context: A review and empirical analysis of Altman's Z-score model. Available at SSRN 2536340. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2536340
4. Anjum, S. (2012). Business Bankruptcy Prediction Models: A Significant Study of the Altman’s Z-Score Model. Asian Journal of Management Research, 3(1), 212-219. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2128475
5. Atz, U., Van Holt, T., Liu, Z. Z., & Bruno, C. (2020). Do Corporate Sustainability and Sustainable Finance Generate Better Financial Performance? A Review and Metaanalysis. Mime. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3708495
6. Aybars, A., Ataunal, L., & Gurbuz, A. O. (2019). ESG and financial performance: impact of environmental, social, and governance issues on corporate performance. In Handbook of research on managerial thinking in global business economics (pp. 520-536). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-7180-3.ch029
7. Bag, D., & Mohanty, S. (2021). Impact of ESG Factors on Emerging Market Stock Returns. The Journal of Impact and ESG Investing, 2(2), 138-147. https://doi.org/10.3905/jesg.2021.1.029
8. Berg, F., Koelbel, J. F., and Rigobon, R. (2022). Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. Review of Finance, 26(6), 1315-1344. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfac033

9. Billio, M., Costola, M., Hristova, I., Latino, C., & Pelizzon, L. (2021). Inside the ESG ratings:(Dis) agreement and performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(5), 1426-1445. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2177
10. Bonacorsi, L., Cerasi, V., Galfrascoli, P., & Manera, M. (2024). ESG Factors and Firms' Credit Risk. Journal of Climate Finance, 6, 100032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclimf.2024.100032
11. Broadstock, D. C., Chan, K., Cheng, L. T., & Wang, X. (2021). The role of ESG performance during times of financial crisis: Evidence from COVID-19 in China. Finance research letters, 38, 101716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101716
12. Cao, Y., & Whyte, K. (2023). Corporate tax-shields and capital structure: leveling the playing field in debt vs equity finance. The European Journal of Finance, 29(15), 1716-1735. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2022.2158112
13. Care, R. (2023). Climate-related financial risks: exploring the known and charting the future. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 65, 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101385
14. Capelli, P., Ielasi, F., & Russo, A. (2021). Forecasting volatility by integrating financial risk with environmental, social, and governance risk. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(5), 1483-1495. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2180
15. Ceesay, N., Shubita, M., & Robertson, F. (2021). Sustainability reporting practices in ftse 100 companies. In The Sustainability Debate: Policies, Gender and the Media (pp. 77-100). Emerald Publishing Limited.
16. Cesarone, F., Martino, M. L., & Carleo, A. (2022). Does ESG impact really enhance portfolio profitability?. Sustainability, 14(4), 2050. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042050
17. Cerqueti, R., Ciciretti, R., Dalò, A., & Nicolosi, M. (2021). ESG investing: A chance to reduce systemic risk. Journal of Financial Stability, 54, 100887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2021.100887
18. Champagne, C., Coggins, F., & Sodjahin, A. (2022). Can extra-financial ratings serve as an indicator of ESG risk?. Global Finance Journal, 54, 100638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2021.100638
19. Chen, X., Yuan, C., & Chen, J. (2023). Study on the effect of ESG ratings of companies on financial restatement. Journal of Innovation and Development, 2(1), 77-81. https://doi.org/10.54097/jid.v2i1.5467
20. Chininga, E., Alhassan, A. L., & Zeka, B. (2023). ESG ratings and corporate financial performance in South Africa. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, (ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-03-2023-0072
21. D'Amato, V., D'Ecclesia, R., & Levantesi, S. (2023). Firms' profitability and ESG score: A machine learning approach. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry. https://doi.org/10.1002/asmb.2758
22. Demers, E., Hendrikse, J., Joos, P., & Lev, B. (2020). ESG didn’t immunize stocks against the COVID-19 market crash. Available at SSRN, 3675920.
23. Do, Y., & Kim, S. (2020). Do higher-rated or enhancing ESG of firms enhance their long–term sustainability? Evidence from market returns in Korea. Sustainability, 12(7), 2664. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072664
24. Dolinsek, T., & Kovac, T. (2024). Application of the Altman Model for the Prediction of Financial Distress in the Case of Slovenian Companies. Organizacija, 57(2), 115-126. https://doi.org/10.2478/orga-2024-0008
25. Dunn, J., Fitzgibbons, S., & Pomorski, L. (2018). Assessing risk through environmental, social and governance exposures. Journal of Investment Management, 16(1), 4-17. https://shorturl.at/ZhBOTESG Risk Ratings (2024). Sustainalytics.com. https://shorturl.at/goFMS
26. Engelhardt, N., Ekkenga, J., & Posch, P. (2021). ESG ratings and stock performance during the COVID-19 crisis. Sustainability, 13(13), 7133. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137133
27. Filbeck, A., Filbeck, G., & Zhao, X. (2019). Performance assessment of firms following sustainalytics ESG principles. The Journal of Investing, 28(2). https://joi.pm-research.com/content/28/2/7
28. Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge university press.
29. Fu, C., Yu, C., Guo, M., & Zhang, L. (2024). ESG rating and financial risk of mining industry companies. Resources Policy, 88, 104308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104308
30. Geczy, C. C., & Guerard Jr, J. B. (2021). ESG and expected returns on equities: The case of environmental ratings. Wharton Pension Research Council Working Paper, (2021-15). https://repository.upenn.edu/prc_papers/713
31. Giese, G., Lee, L. E., Melas, D., Nagy, Z., & Nishikawa, L. (2019). Foundations of ESG investing: How ESG affects equity valuation, risk, and performance. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 45(5), 69-83. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2019.45.5.069
32. Gorzen-Mitka, I. (2023). ESG Risk Management: Some Observations from an Academic Perspective. Problems of Management in the 21st Century, 18(1), 4-6.
33. Gray, P., & Johnson, J. (2011). The relationship between asset growth and the cross-section of stock returns. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(3), 670-680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.06.005
34. Guan, L., Zhang, W. W., Ahmad, F., and Naqvi, B. (2021). The volatility of natural resource prices and its impact on the economic growth for natural resource-dependent economies: a comparison of oil and gold dependent economies. Resources Policy, 72, 102125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102125
35. Hubel, B., & Scholz, H. (2020). Integrating sustainability risks in asset management: the role of ESG exposures and ESG ratings. Journal of Asset Management, 21(1), 52-69. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41260-019-00139-z
36. Irawan, A., Prasetyo, A., & Irawan, D. (2021). Analysis of Financial Distress in Transportation Companies with the Altman Z-Score Approach. Review of Applied Accounting Research (RAAR), 1(2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.30595/RAAR
37. Keynes, J. M. (1937). The general theory of employment. The quarterly journal of economics, 51(2), 209-223. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882087
38. Kim, S., & Li, Z. (2021). Understanding the impact of ESG practices in corporate finance. Sustainability, 13(7), 3746. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073746
39. Kraussl, R., Oladiran, T., & Stefanova, D. (2024). A review on ESG investing: Investors’ expectations, beliefs and perceptions. Journal of Economic Surveys, 38(2), 476-502. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12599
40. Kumar, A. N. C., Smith, C., Badis, L., Wang, N., Ambrosy, P., & Tavares, R. (2016). ESG factors and risk-adjusted performance: a new quantitative model. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 6(4), 292-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2016.1234909
41. Latino, C., & Pelizzon, L. (2021). The power of ESG ratings on stock markets. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3801703 Landi, G., & Sciarelli, M. (2018). Towards a more ethical market: the impact of ESG rating on corporate financial performance. Social responsibility journal, 15(1), 11-27. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-11-2017-0254
42. Liu, J., Ge, Z., & Wang, Y. (2024). Role of environmental, social, and governance rating data in predicting financial risk and risk management. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(1), 260-273. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2567
43. Lo, K. Y., & Kwan, C. L. (2017). The effect of environmental, social, governance and sustainability initiatives on stock value–Examining market response to initiatives undertaken by listed companies. Corporate social responsibility and environmental management, 24(6), 606-619. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1431
44. Madhavan, A., Sobczyk, A., & Ang, A. (2021). Toward ESG alpha: Analyzing ESG exposures through a factor lens. Financial Analysts Journal, 77(1), 69-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/0015198X.2020.1816366
45. Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. The American economic review, 48(3), 261-297. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1809766
46. Owadally, I., Mwizere, J. R., Kalidas, N., Murugesu, K., & Kashif, M. (2021). Long-term sustainable investment for retirement. Sustainability, 13(9), 5000. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095000
47. Pathak, S. and Liang, Y. F. (2023). Australia’s Publicly Listed Manufacturing Companies-Analysing the connection between Return on Equity (ROE) and Altman Z-Scores. Archives of Business Research, 8(12), pp.110-117. https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.812.9542
48. Pedersen, L. H., Fitzgibbons, S., & Pomorski, L. (2021). Responsible investing: The ESG-efficient frontier. Journal of financial economics, 142(2), 572-597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.11.001
49. Peixoto, J. A., Machado, A. B., & Richter, M. F. (2022). ESG indicator metrics used by organisations to assess the degree of sustainability in companies. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science, 9(9), 589-600. https://dx.doi.org/10.22161/ijaers.99.64
50. Pellegrini, C.B., Caruso, R. and Mehmeti, N. (2019). The impact of ESG scores on cost of equity and firm’s profitability. New Challenges in Corporate Governance, Theory and Practice, 3, pp.38-40.
51. Penrose, E. T. (2009). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford university press.
52. Purwanti, D. & Syarif, A.D. (2022). Analysis of the Effect Liquidity, Leverage, Profitability and Sales Growth on Financial Distress (Altman Z-Score) (Empirical Study of Retail Sub–Sector Companies Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) 2015-2019. Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Studies, 5(03), 721-729. https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v5-i3-23
53. Rompotis, G. G. (2022). The ESG ETFs in the UK. Journal of Asset Management, 23(2), 114-129. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41260-021-00251-z
54. Sandberg, J. (2018). Toward a theory of sustainable finance. Designing a sustainable financial system: Development goals and socio-ecological responsibility, 329-346. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66387-6_12
55. Shakil, M.H. (2021). Environmental, social and governance performance and financial risk: Moderating role of ESG controversies and board gender diversity. Resources Policy, 72, p.102144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102144
56. Singh, K. and Pillai, D. (2022). Corporate governance in small and medium enterprises: a review. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 22(1), pp.23-41. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-10-2020-0470
57. Singhania, M. and Saini, N. (2023). Institutional framework of ESG disclosures: comparative analysis of developed and developing countries. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 13(1), pp.516-559. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.1964810
58. Suganda, T.R. and Kim, J. (2023). An empirical study on the relationship between corporate social responsibility and default risk: Evidence in Korea. Sustainability, 15(4), p.3644. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043644
59. Suciu, M. C., Noja, G. G., & Cristea, M. (2020). Diversity, social inclusion and human capital development as fundamentals of financial performance and risk mitigation. Amfiteatru Economic, 22(55), 742-757. https://doi.org/10.24818/EA/2020/55/742
60. Tarigan, J., Susanto, A.R.S., Hatane, S.E., Jie, F. and Foedjiawati, F. (2021). Corporate social responsibility, job pursuit intention, quality of work life and employee performance: case study from Indonesia controversial industry. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 13(2), pp.141-158. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-09-2019-0189
61. Tickner, J., Geiser, K. and Baima, S. (2021). Transitioning the chemical industry: the case for addressing the climate, toxics, and plastics crises. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 63(6), pp.4-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2021.1979857
62. Trainor, W. J., & Shelley, G. L. (2022). Dynamic Z-score Asset Allocation to Size, Value, and Industry Return Shocks. Business and Economic Research, 12(4), 211-223.
63. Wang, J., Wang, S., Dong, M., & Wang, H. (2024). ESG rating disagreement and stock returns: Evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 91, 103043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.103043
64. Willey, T., Edwards, S. and Bhagwat, Y. (2023). An Investigation of the Altman Z-Score Measure and Return on Equity (ROE) of Firms in the Airline Industry. Archives of Business Research, 11(12), pp.96-102. https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.1112.16059
65. Vivel-Bua, M., Lado-Sestayo, R., Martínez-Salgueiro, A., & Diaz-Ballesteros, M. (2023). Environmental, social, and governance perfomance and default risk in the eurozone. Review of Managerial Science, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00702-4
66. Yuan, X., Li, Z., Xu, J. and Shang, L. (2022). ESG disclosure and corporate financial irregularities–Evidence from Chinese listed firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 332, p.129992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129992
67. Zaman, R., Jain, T., Samara, G. and Jamali, D. (2022). Corporate governance meets corporate social responsibility: Mapping the interface. Business & Society, 61(3), pp.690-752. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650320973415
68. Zhanbayev, R.A., Irfan, M., Shutaleva, A.V., Maksimov, D.G., Abdykadyrkyzy, R. and Filiz, S. (2023). Demoethical model of sustainable development of society: A roadmap towards digital transformation. Sustainability, 15(16), p.12478. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612478
69. Zhao, C., Guo, Y., Yuan, J., Wu, M., Li, D., Zhou, Y., & Kang, J. (2018). ESG and corporate financial performance: Empirical evidence from China’s listed power generation companies. Sustainability, 10(8), 2607. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082607
70. Zhou, G., Liu, L., & Luo, S. (2022). Sustainable development, ESG performance and company market value: Mediating effect of financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(7), 3371-3387. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3089