Could Five Factor Personality Inventory Be Used for The Purpose of Symptom Screening in a Non-Clinical Sample?: A Preliminary Study

Öz

This study investigated whether Five Factor Personality Inventory (5FKE) can be used for symptom screening purposes in a non-clinical sample. A total of 165 people 103 women (62.4%) and 62 men (37.6%) between the ages of 18-54 years participated in the study. The internal consistency for factors of 5FKE was found between 0.85 and 0.91, while for sub-scales of Symptom Checklist (SCL-90-R) it was between 0.69 and 0.91. Correlation coefficients between three sub-scales of SCL-90-R and the factors of 5FKE were as follows: Global Severity Index correlations with Openness to Experience was -0.17, with Conscientiousness 0.28, with Agreeableness -0.35, and with Emotional Instability it was 0.65; Positive Symptom Total correlations with Openness to Experience was -0.10, with Conscientiousness -0.20, with Agreeableness -0.23, and with Emotional Instability it was 0.57; Positive Symptom Distress Index correlations with Openness to Experience was -0.14, with Conscientiousness -0.28, with Agreeableness -0.33, and with Emotional Instability it was 0.51. Extraversion factor of 5FKE showed insignificant and weak correlations with all three sub-scales of SCL-90-R. Regression analysis calculated to infer total scores of three sub-scales of SCL-90-R showed that only the factor score of Emotional Instability inferred the total score of Global Symptom Index of SCL-90-R significantly. The results of this study gave clues that the 5FKE particularly “Emotional Instability” factor could be used for screening purposes in a non-clinical sample. However, the results also revealed that the issue should be investigated in more detail.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Personality; Signs and Symptoms; Affective Symptoms; Five Factor Personality Inventory; SCL-90-R

Klinik Olmayan Örneklemde Beş Faktör Kişilik Envanteri Belirti Tarama Amaçlı Kullanılabilir mi?: Ön Çalışma

Öz

Bu çalışmada, Beş Faktör Kişilik Envanteri’nin (5FKE) klinik olmayan örneklemde tarama amaçlı olarak kullanılıp kullanılamayacağı incelenmiştir. Çalışmaya 18-54 yaşları arasında 103 kadın (%62,4), 62 erkek (%37,6) olmak üzere toplam 165 kişi katılmıştır. Kullanılan ölçeklerin içtutarlılık katsayıları, 5FKE’nin faktörlerinin 0,85-0,94, Belirti Tarama Listesi’nin (SCL-90-R) alt ölçeklerinin ise 0,69-0,91 arasında gerçekleşmiştir. SCL- 90-R’nin üç genel alt boyutunun 5FKE’nin faktörleri ile Pearson korelasyon katsayıları ise şu şekildedir. Genel Belirti Düzeyi’nin Gelişime Açıklık ile -0,17, Öz-Denetim / Sorumluluk ile -0,28, Yumuşakbaşlılık / Geçimlilik ile -0,35 ve Duygusal Tutarsızlık ile 0,65 düzeyinde; Pozitif Belirti Toplamı’nın Gelişime Açıklık ile -0,10, Öz-Denetim / Sorumluluk ile -0,20, Yumuşakbaşlılık / Geçimlilik ile -0,23 ve Duygusal Tutarsızlık ile 0,57 düzeyinde; Pozitif Belirti Düzeyi’nin Gelişime Açıklık ile -0,14, Öz-Denetim / Sorumluluk ile -0,28, Yumuşakbaşlılık / Geçimlilik ile -0,33 ve Duygusal Tutarsızlık ile 0,51 düzeyinde korelasyon katsayıları gösterdiği belirlenmiştir. 5FKE’nin Dışadönüklük faktörü, hem Genel Belirti Düzeyi, hem Pozitif Belirti Toplamı hem de Pozitif Belirti Düzeyi ile istatistiksel düzeyde anlamsız ve düşük korelasyon göstermiştir. SCL-90-R’nin üç genel alt boyut toplam puanını yordamak için regresyon analizi yapılmış ve her üç alt boyut toplam puanını yordamada da sadece Duygusal Tutarsızlık faktör puanının istatistiksel düzeyde anlamlı olduğu görülmüştür. Bu çalışma klinik olmayan örneklemde 5FKE’nin özellikle de “Duygusal Tutarsızlık” faktörünün tarama amaçlı kullanılabileceğine ilişkin olarak ipucu sağlamıştır. Ancak konunun daha detaylı incelenmesinin gerekli olduğunu da göstermiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kişilik; Belirti ve Bulgular; Duygulanım Semptomlar; Beş Faktör Kişilik Envanteri; SCL-90-R

Kaynakça

1. Aydemir, Ö., - Köroglu, E. , Psikiyatride Kullanılan Klinik Ölçekler, Hekim- ler Yayın Birliği, Ankara, 2000, s. 33-40.
2. Buss, A. H., - Finn, S. E., “Classification of personality traits”, Journal of personality and social psychology, 52(2), 1987, s. 432-444.
3. Carson, RC., “Personality”, Annual review of psychology, 40(1), 1989, s. 227-248.
4. Chaplin, W. F., John, O.P., - Goldberg, L. R., “Conceptions of states and tra- its: dimentional attributes ideals as prototypes” Journal of personality and social psychology, 54(4), 1988, s. 541-557.
5. Claridge, G., - Davis, C.,”What’s the use of neuroticism?” Personality And Individual Differences, 31(3), 2001, s. 383-400.
6. Costa, P. T., - McCrae, R. R., “Domains and facets: Hierachical personality assessment using the revised NEO personality inventory”, Journal Of Persona- lity Assessment, 64(1), 1995, s. 21-50.
7. Costa, P. T., - McCrae, R. R., “From catalog to classification: Murray’s nee- ds and five-factor model”, Journal of personality and social psychology, 55(2), 1988, s. 258-265.
8. Costa, P. T., - McCrae, R. R., “Neuroticism, somatic complaints, and disease: Is the bark worse than the bite”, Journal Of Personality, 55(2), 1987, s. 299-316.

9. Costa, P. T., - McCrae, R. R., “Personality in adulthood: A six-year longitu- dinal study of self-reports and spouse ratings on the NEO personality inventory”, Journal of personality and social psychology, 54(5), 1988, s. 853-863.
10. Costa, P. T., - McCrae, R. R., “Primary traits of eysenck’s P-E-N system: Three and five factor solutions”, Journal of personality and social psychology, 69(2), 1995, s. 308-317.
11. Dağ, İ., “Belirti Tarama Listesi (SCL-90-R)’nin üniversite öğrencileri için güvenirliği ve geçerliği”, Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 2(1), 1991, s. 5-12.
12. DeNeve, K. M., - Cooper, H. ,“The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being”, Psychological Bulletin, 124 (2), 1998, s. 197-229.
13. Derogatis, L. R.,”SCL-90-R administration, scoring and procedures manu- al-II”, Clinical Psychometric Research, Towson, MD, 1983, s. 1-61.
14. Derogatis, L. R., Lipman, R. S., Rickels, K., Uhlenhuth, E. H., - Covi, L. The Hopkins symptom check-list (HSCL): A self-report symptom inventory. Behavi- oral science, 19(1), 1974, s. 1-15.
15. Digman, J. M.,”Personality Structure: Emergence of the five factor model”, Annual review of psychology, 41(1), 1990, s. 417-440.
16. Digman, J. M., - Inouye, J.,”Further specification of the five robust factors of personality”, Journal of personality and social psychology, 50(1), 1986, s. 116- 123.
17. Friedman, H. S., - Schustack, M. W., Personality: Classic theories and mo- dern research (5th Ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson: Allyn & Bacon, 2012, s. 1-22.
18. Goldberg, L. R.,”An alternative “Description of personality”: The big-five factor structure”, Journal of personality and social psychology, 59(6), 1990, s. 1216-1229.
19. Goldberg, L. R., “The development of markers for the big-five factor structu- re”, Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 1992, s. 26-42.
20. Goldberg, L. R., “The structure of phenotypic personality traits”, American psychologist, 48(1), 1993, s. 26-34.
21. Goldberg, L. R., - Saucier, G.,”So what do you propose we use instead? A reply to block”, Psychological Bulletin, 117(2), 1995, s. 221-225.
22. Hills, P., - Argyle, M.,”Emotional stability as a major dimension of happi- ness”, Personality And Individual Differences, 31(8), 2001, s. 1357-1364.
23. Hogan, R. T.,”A socioanalytic theory of personality” In M. M. Page (Ed.), 1982 Nebraska symposium on motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1983, s. 55-89.
24. Johnson, J. A., - Ostendorf, F.,”Clarification of the five-factor model with the abridged big-five dimensional circumplex”, Journal of personality and social psychology, 65(3), 1993, s. 563-576.
25. MacDonald, K., “Evolution, the five-factor model and levels of personality”, Journal Of Personality, 63(3), 1995, s. 525-567.
26. McCrae, R. R.,”Creativity, divergent thinking and openness to experience”, Journal of personality and social psychology, 52(6), 1987, s. 1258-1265.
27. McCrae, R. R.,”Moderated analyses of longitudional personality stability”, Journal of personality and social psychology, 65(3), 1993, s. 577-585.
28. McCrae, R. R., - Costa, P. T.,”Personality trait structure as a human univer- sal”, American psychologist, 52(5), 1997, s. 509-516.
29. McCrae, R. R., - Costa, P. T., “Recalled parent-child relationship and adult personality”, Journal Of Personality, 56(2), 1988, s. 417-434.
30. McCrae, R. R., - Costa, P. T.,”Reinterpreting the myers-briggs type indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model”, Journal Of Personality, 57(1), 1989, s. 17-40.
31. McCrae, R. R., - Costa, P. T.,”Rotation to maksimize the construct validity of factors in NEO personality inventory”, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24(1), 1989, s. 107-124.
32. McCrae, R. R., - Costa, P. T.,”The NEO personality inventory: Using the five factor model in counseling”, Journal Of Counseling and Development, 69(4), 1991, s. 367-372.
33. McCrae, R. R., - Costa, P. T.,”The structure of interpersonal traits: Wigginn’s circumplex and the five factor model”, Journal of personality and social psycho- logy, 56(4), 1989, s. 586-595.
34. McCrae, R. R., - Costa, P. T.,”Updating norman’s “adequate taxonomy”: In- telligence and personality dimensions in natural language and in questionnaires”, Journal of personality and social psychology, 49(3), 1985, s. 710-721.
35. McCrae, R. R., - Costa, P. T.,”Validation of the five-factor model of persona- lity across instruments and observers”, Journal of personality and social psycho- logy, 52(1), 1987, s. 81-90.
36. McCrae, R. R., - John, O. P.,”An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications”, Journal Of Personality, 60(2), 1992, s. 175-215.
37. McFatter, R. M.,”Interactions in predicting mood from extraversion and neuroticism”, Journal of personality and social psychology, 66(3), 1994, s. 570- 578.
38. Murberg, T. A., - Bru, E.,”The role of neuroticism and perceived school-re- lated stress in somatic symptoms among students in norwegian junior high scho- ols”, Journal of Adolescence, 30(2), 2007, s. 203-212.
39. Öner, N., Türkiye’de Kullanılan Psikolojik Testlerden Örnekler: Bir Başvu- ru Kaynağı. (Genişletilmiş 2. Baskı). Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınevi, İstanbul, 2008, s. 748-751.
40. Peabody, D, - Goldberg, L. R., “Some determinants of factor structures from personalty-trait descriptors”, Journal of personality and social psychology, 57(3), 1989, s. 552-567.
41. Pervin, L. A., “Personality- current controversies, issues and directions”, An- nual review of psychology, 36(1), 1985, s. 83-114.
42. Pervin, L. A., - Cervone, D., Personality: theory and research (11th edition). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, 2010, s. 1-31.
43. Saucier, G. Hampson, S. E., - Goldberg, L. R., “Cross-language studies of lexical personality factors”, In SE Hampson (Ed.), Advances in personality psy- chology, Volume 1. Hove, England: Psychology Press, 2000, s. 1-36.
44. Somer, O., Korkmaz, M., - Tatar, A., “Beş Faktör Kişilik Envanteri’nin Ge- liştirilmesi I: Ölçek ve Alt Ölçeklerin Oluşturulması”, Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 17(49), 2002, s. 21-33.
45. Somer, O., Korkmaz, M., - Tatar, A., Kuramdan Uygulamaya Beş Faktör Ki- şilik Modeli Ve Beş Faktör Kişilik Envanteri (5FKE). Ege Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi, Yayın No: 128, İzmir, 2004, s. 45-66.
46. Steinberg, M., Barry, D. T. Sholomskas, D., - Hall, P. , “SCL-90 symptom patterns: Indicators of dissociative disorders”, Bulletin of The Menninger Clinic, 69(3), 2005, s. 237-249.
47. Whittington, J. E., - Huppert, F. A., “Neuroticism, psychiatric symptoms and life events”, Personality And Individual Differences, 24(1), 1998, s. 97-107.
48. Wiggins, J. S., “A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonel domain”, Journal of personality and social psychology, 37(3), 1979, s. 395-412.
49. York, K. L., - John, O. P.,”The four faces of eve: A typological analysis of women’s personality at midlife”, Journal of personality and social psychology, 63(3), 1992, s. 494-508.