Hybrid Warfare Studies and Russia’s Example in Crimea

Volume: 9 Number: 17 December 17, 2015
EN TR

Hybrid Warfare Studies and Russia’s Example in Crimea

Abstract

Although Hybrid Warfare is an old concept, theoretical studies in the western countries mainly began in the post-Col War era, focusing on asymmetrical threats against conventional superiority of western countries such as USA or Israel. September 11th attacks and 2006 Israel-Lebanon war played important roles for the evolution of hybrid warfare theories. However, there has not any consensus among scholars on a exact or unique definition of hybrid warfare. Hybrid warfare became one of the main security issues for the West and especially for NATO after the Russia-Ukraine crisis. Russian military strategies, called “hybrid warfare” by the western countries, resulted in the successful annexation of Crimea and, caused a serious security problem for the West resulting important structural and functional changes for the military system of NATO. Russian activities, which have been based on surprise, ambiguity and deniability, presented a unique example for hybrid warfare studies.

 

Keywords

References

  1. “A Secure Europe in a Better World. European Security Strategy”, Brussels, 12 December 2003.
  2. BERZINS Janis, Russian New Generation Warfare Is Not Hybrid Warfare, Ed. (in) Artis Pabriks and Andis Kudors, The War in Ukraine: Lessons for Europe, Konrad Adanauer Shiftung, The Centre For East European Policy Studies Uni- versity of Latvia Press, Riga, 2015.
  3. BLOMFİELD Adrian, “Russia ‘distributing passports in the Crimea’”, The Tele- graph, 17 August 2008.
  4. COALSON Robert, “Top Russian General Lays Bare Putin’s Plan for Ukraine”, Huffington Post, 09 February 2014, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert- coalson/valery-gerasimov-putin-ukraine_b_5748480.html
  5. “Die Russen nutzen alle Werkzeuge”, Die Zeit, 29 January 2015.
  6. GERASIMOV Valery, „New Challenges need to rethink the forms and methods of warfare“, http://www.vpk-news.ru/articles/14632.
  7. Grand Strategy: A View form Oregon, Hybrid Warfare, 7 October 2014 https:// geopolicraticus.wordpress.com/tag/georgii-isserson/
  8. GROBE Stefan, “Stoltenberg: NATO massively stepping up military presence in Europe”, EURONEWS, 25.03.2015, http://www.euronews.com/2015/03/25/ stoltenberg-nato-massively-stepping-up-military-presence-in-europe/

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Publication Date

December 17, 2015

Submission Date

December 17, 2015

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2015 Volume: 9 Number: 17

APA
Erol, M., & Oğuz, Ş. (2015). Hybrid Warfare Studies and Russia’s Example in Crimea. Gazi Akademik Bakış, 9(17), 261-277. https://doi.org/10.19060/gab.22813
AMA
1.Erol M, Oğuz Ş. Hybrid Warfare Studies and Russia’s Example in Crimea. Gazi Akademik Bakış. 2015;9(17):261-277. doi:10.19060/gab.22813
Chicago
Erol, Mehmet, and Şafak Oğuz. 2015. “Hybrid Warfare Studies and Russia’s Example in Crimea”. Gazi Akademik Bakış 9 (17): 261-77. https://doi.org/10.19060/gab.22813.
EndNote
Erol M, Oğuz Ş (December 1, 2015) Hybrid Warfare Studies and Russia’s Example in Crimea. Gazi Akademik Bakış 9 17 261–277.
IEEE
[1]M. Erol and Ş. Oğuz, “Hybrid Warfare Studies and Russia’s Example in Crimea”, Gazi Akademik Bakış, vol. 9, no. 17, pp. 261–277, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.19060/gab.22813.
ISNAD
Erol, Mehmet - Oğuz, Şafak. “Hybrid Warfare Studies and Russia’s Example in Crimea”. Gazi Akademik Bakış 9/17 (December 1, 2015): 261-277. https://doi.org/10.19060/gab.22813.
JAMA
1.Erol M, Oğuz Ş. Hybrid Warfare Studies and Russia’s Example in Crimea. Gazi Akademik Bakış. 2015;9:261–277.
MLA
Erol, Mehmet, and Şafak Oğuz. “Hybrid Warfare Studies and Russia’s Example in Crimea”. Gazi Akademik Bakış, vol. 9, no. 17, Dec. 2015, pp. 261-77, doi:10.19060/gab.22813.
Vancouver
1.Mehmet Erol, Şafak Oğuz. Hybrid Warfare Studies and Russia’s Example in Crimea. Gazi Akademik Bakış. 2015 Dec. 1;9(17):261-77. doi:10.19060/gab.22813

Cited By