Journal of General Turkish History Research

General Turkish History, Pre-Islamic Turkish History, History of Central Asia, Turkish Savannah Culture, Turkish Society and Community, General Turkish History (Other)

Dr. Pınar YİĞİT TÜRKER It is not affiliated with an institution ORCID Profile

0000-0001-6515-6506

General Turkish History

Asst. Prof. Dr. Aslı ÇANDARLI ŞAHİN MUĞLA SITKI KOÇMAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ

General Turkish History, Turkish Cultural History

Assoc. Prof. Dr. Tülay YÜREKLİ ADNAN MENDERES ÜNİVERSİTESİ

History of Central Asia

Assoc. Prof. Dr. Oktay BERBER Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi, İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Fakültesi ORCID Profile

0000-0002-1609-3171

General Turkish History, Pre-Islamic Turkish History, History of Central Asia, Turkish Savannah Culture, Turkish Society and Community, Turkish Cultural History, Late Modern Russian History

Assoc. Prof. Dr. Özgür TÜRKER Süleyman Demirel University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Department of History, Isparta, Turkey ORCID Profile

0000-0002-4019-4976

History of Central Asia, Turkish Society and Community, Late Modern Military History

Assoc. Prof. Dr. Selim Serkan ÜKTEN AKSARAY ÜNİVERSİTESİ

General Turkish History

Assoc. Prof. Dr. Tuba TOMBULOĞLU Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Department of History, Ankara, Turkey ORCID Profile

0000-0001-8061-4480

Pre-Islamic Turkish History, History of Central Asia, Turkish Savannah Culture, Turkish Society and Community, Turkish Cultural History

Aim & Scope

General Turkish History Research Journal (GTTAD) aims to produce and present scientific researches on Turkish history and culture.

The Journal of General Turkish History Research is an International Peer-reviewed journal on the research of the history of Turks and the studies of the researchers who devoted their life to researching Turkish history.

With the accumulation of thousands of years of Turkish history; It aims to contribute to the publication of academic studies in the field of history and culture in Russia, Eastern Europe, Idil-Ural and Siberia, Caucasus, Iran and Turkistan.

The Turkish Journal of General Turkish History Studies deals with issues such as political history of the Turks, state traditions, social life, military and economic activities, religious beliefs, culture and mythologies, etc.

Writing Rules

Text

1. In orthographic rules, the latest edition of Turkish Language Association’s Orthography Manual must be taken as a basis.

2. The article must be written with “Microsoft Word” programme, 10-font size and single line spacing.

3. The font must be “Times New Roman”

4. There must be 0, 8 cm space for indents.

5. The author’s name and surname must be written under the title after 12pt space with 10 font size and centre aligned. Title, address and e-mail information must be written at the bottom of the page with (*) mark and with 8 font size.

6. In articles and translations, there must be a summary which is independent from the article, between 200-300 words. At least 4, at most 8 keywords must be written under the summary after 1 line space.

7. Major headings must be written with uppercase letters, subheadings must be written with lower case letters except the first letter and must be in bold typeface.

8. The original titles of the translated articles must be reported to the institution.

_{Rules for Publishing Translative Works and Book Analyses
1-}_{The rules accredited by Journal of General Turkish History Research must be applied in translation and book analyses.
2-In translated articles, translator must obtain permissive documents from the author(s) of the aforementioned article or the original publishing journal.
3-All copyright fees are on translator.
4-It is obligatory to upload a copy showing the original article source of the article translated with the translated article itself to Dergipark system. Without these documents, the article will be returned without any process started.
5-For translated articles, the source of translation must be declared in footnotes.
6-On the condition that, in translated articles, the abstract part is present in the original article, translator must use it for the abstract of the translated article. Elsewise, due to the necessitated nature of adding an abstract part in Dergipark system, translator may add a few sentences for abstract part.
7-The book analyses must not be a summarisation process of a certain book, but a critical evaluation of it. The analysis must focus on the crucial points and discuss them critically.}

References

1. References less than 5 lines must be written in italic typeface. Statements that must be emphasized must also be written in italic typeface.

2. When the reference exceed 5 lines, they must be written in inverted comas, 1cm further in from the indentation and the left side.

Footnotes

Footnotes must be written with 8 font size, single line space and with the same font.

Sources in the footnotes (books, thesis, encyclopaedia or journal names) must be written in italic typeface and authors name, surname, name of the source, number of the volume (if there is), publishing house, place of publication, and date and page numbers must be written in order.

Examples

- Bahaeddin Ögel, İslamiyetten Önce Türk Kültür Tarihi, Türk Tarih Kurumu, Ankara 1984, s.88.

Article or encyclopaedia item names in the footnotes must be written in quotation marks and regular typeface, periodical publications and encyclopaedia names in italic typeface.

For article or encyclopaedia item names in the footnotes, the authors name, surname, title of the article, periodical publication’s number or volume number, place of publication and date and page numbers must be written.

Examples

- W. Eberhard, “Orta Asya’da At Cinsleri ve Beygir Yetiştirme Hakkında Malumat”, Ülkü, 16/92, Ankara 1940, s.162.
- Ömer Faruk Akün, “Mehmed Fuad Köprülü” İslam Ansiklopedisi, C 28, İstanbul 2013, s. 473.

Scientific report names in the footnotes must be written in quotation marks and regular typeface and the name of the scientific event must be written in italic typeface. The author’s name, surname, reports title, the name of the event (assembly/symposium etc.), the place where it was held and the date, editor’s name, number of the volume, publishing house, publishing place, and date and page numbers will be written in order.

Example

-C.V.Uygur, “Dul (Tul) Kelimesine Dair”, XI. Milli Türkoloji Kongresi Bildirileri, C. I, İstanbul 2015, s.187-200.

For sources which has more than two authors, first two authors names must be written, and for the others “vd.” contraction must be used. But in the bibliography all authors must be written.

Example

- Ayşe Onat, Sema Orsoy, Konuralp Ercilasun, Han Hanedanlığı Tarihi, Ankara 2004, s.89.

For translated works, the author’s name and surname, name of the work, translators name and surname, number of the volume, publishing house, publishing place, date and page numbers must be written in order.

Example:

- Wilhelm Radloff, Türklerin Kökleri, çev. A.Ekinci-Y.Ünlü, C. III, Ankara 1999, s.122.

- L. N. Gumilev, Hunlar, çev. Ahsen Batur, Selenge, İstanbul 2003, s.140

For edited works, name and surname of the editor, name of the work, volume number, publishing house, place of publishing, date and page numbers must be written in order. For works which have an author and an editor, authors name and surname, name of the work, editors name and surname, volume number, publishing house, place of publishing, date and page numbers must be written.

Örnekler:

- Mehmet Emin Efendi, İstanbul’dan Orta Asya’ya Seyahat, Haz. R.Akdemir, Ankara 1986, s.124.
- İbn Fadlan, İbn Fadlan Seyahatnamesinden Seçmeler, Haz. Ramazan Şeşen, Bedir Yayınevi İstanbul 1975, s.77.

For sources which were acquired through the internet, the name of the source must be in quotation marks and author’s name and surname, name of the source, web page’s address, access date, and hour must be written in order.

Example

- Yasin Yusupcan, “Türk Kültürünün Çin Kültürü Üzerindeki Etkileri”, http://www.turkishstudies.net/sayilar/sayi16/yusupcanyasin1367.pdf 20.10.2018 sa.2351-2370.

For repeated references, the author’s name and surname, page numbers and age., agm., agy., according to the source type must be written.

Statements belonging to the person who editor, translator or compiler must be written as a footnote by using the haz., drl., and cev. Contractions.

Additional documents and Albums

All materials like pictures, figures and documents must be numbered and their explanations must be written below them in italic typeface and 10 font size.

References

References must be written at the end of the work. References can be grouped under names like feature of the work, archive resources, books, articles, thesis, encyclopaedia items, etc.

In this part first the surname, then the name of the author must take place. Other information about the work must be lined up according to the rules given in the “Footnotes” section.

References must be sorted according to the alphabetical order of the surnames.

In the references, only the works that are used or cited must be written.

Book, thesis, and journal names must be italic typeface, article or encyclopaedia names must be in regular typeface and quotation marks.

Examples

- Ögel, B. (1955). “Uygur Devleti’nin Teşekkülü ve Yükseliş Devri,” Belleten, XIX/75, s. 331-376.
- Ahmetbeyoğlu, Ali, Avrupa Hun İmparatorluğu, Yeditepe Ankara 2001.
- Caferoğlu, Ahmet, “Türk Onomastiğinde At Kültü”, Türkiyat Mecmuası, C. 10, İstanbul 1953

Pages of the articles and encyclopaedia items in the publications which they are published must also be written.

Examples

- Bakır, Abdulhalik, “Ortaçağ İslam Dünyasında Maden ve Maden Sanayi”, Belleten, 61/232, Ankara: 1997, 519-595.
- Ömer Faruk Akün, “Mehmed Fuad Köprülü” İslam Ansiklopedisi, C 28, İstanbul 2013, s. 471-486.

Ethical Principles and Publication Policy

Publication Ethics & Malpractice

The ethics statement of the GTTAD is based on the Code of Conduct guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), available at www.publicationethics.org

this journal follows the COPE Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors and the Code of Conduct for Journal Publishers.

Duties of Editors

Fair play and editorial independence

Editors evaluate submitted manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit (importance, originality, study’s validity, clarity) and its relevance to the journal’s scope, without regard to the authors’ race, gender, sexual orientation, ethnic origin, citizenship, religious belief, political philosophy or institutional affiliation. Decisions to edit and publish are not determined by the policies of governments or any other agencies outside of the journal itself. The Editor-in-Chief has full authority over the entire editorial content of the journal and the timing of publication of that content.

Confidentiality

Editors and editorial staff will not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Editors and editorial board members will not use unpublished information disclosed in a submitted manuscript for their own research purposes without the authors’ explicit written consent. Privileged information or ideas obtained by editors as a result of handling the manuscript will be kept confidential and not used for their personal advantage. Editors will recuse themselves from considering manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships/connections with any of the authors, companies or institutions connected to the papers; instead, they will ask another member of the editorial board to handle the manuscript.

Publication decisions

The editors ensure that all submitted manuscripts being considered for publication undergo peer-review by at least two reviewers who are expert in the field. The Editor-in-Chief is responsible for deciding which of the manuscripts submitted to the journal will be published, based on the validation of the work in question, its importance to researchers and readers, the reviewers’ comments, and such legal requirements as are currently in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The Editor-in-Chief may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Involvement and cooperation in investigations

Editors (in conjunction with the publisher and/or society) will take responsive measures when ethical concerns are raised with regard to a submitted manuscript or published paper. Every reported act of unethical publishing behaviour will be looked into, even if it is discovered years after publication. Editors follow the COPE Flowcharts when dealing with cases of suspected misconduct. If, on investigation, the ethical concern is well-founded, a correction, retraction, expression of concern or other note as may be relevant, will be published in the journal.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to editorial decisions

Peer review assists editors in making editorial decisions and, through editorial communications with authors, may assist authors in improving their manuscripts. Peer review is an essential component of formal scholarly communication and lies at the heart of scientific endeavour.

Promptness

Any invited referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should immediately notify the editors and decline the invitation to review so that alternative reviewers can be contacted.

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review are confidential documents and must be treated as such; they must not be shown to or discussed with others except if authorized by the Editor-in-Chief (who would only do so under exceptional and specific circumstances). This applies also to invited reviewers who decline the review invitation.

Standards of objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively and observations formulated clearly with supporting arguments so that authors can use them for improving the manuscript. Personal criticism of the authors is inappropriate.

Acknowledgement of sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that is an observation, derivation or argument that has been reported in previous publications should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also notify the editors of any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other manuscript (published or unpublished) of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Any invited referee who has conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies or institutions connected to the manuscript and the work described therein should immediately notify the editors to declare their conflicts of interest and decline the invitation to review so that alternative reviewers can be contacted.

Unpublished material disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer’s own research without the express written consent of the authors. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for the reviewer’s personal advantage. This applies also to invited reviewers who decline the review invitation.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards

Authors of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed and the results, followed by an objective discussion of the significance of the work. The manuscript should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Review articles should be accurate, objective and comprehensive, while editorial 'opinion' or perspective pieces should be clearly identified as such. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

Data access and retention

Authors may be asked to provide the raw data of their study together with the manuscript for editorial review and should be prepared to make the data publicly available if practicable. In any event, authors should ensure accessibility of such data to other competent professionals for at least 10 years after publication (preferably via an institutional or subject-based data repository or other data centre), provided that the confidentiality of the participants can be protected and legal rights concerning proprietary data do not preclude their release.

Originality and plagiarism

Authors should ensure that they have written and submit only entirely original works, and if they have used the work and/or words of others, that this has been appropriately cited. Publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the work reported in the manuscript should also be cited. Plagiarism takes many forms, from "passing off" another's paper as the author's own, to copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of another's paper (without attribution), to claiming results from research conducted by others. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Multiple, duplicate, redundant or concurrent submission/publication

Papers describing essentially the same research should not be published in more than one journal or primary publication. Hence, authors should not submit for consideration a manuscript that has already been published in another journal. Submission of a manuscript concurrently to more than one journal is unethical publishing behaviour and unacceptable.

The publication of some kinds of articles (such as clinical guidelines, translations) in more than one journal is sometimes justifiable, provided that certain conditions are met. The authors and editors of the journals concerned must agree to the secondary publication, which must reflect the same data and interpretation of the primary document. The primary reference must be cited in the secondary publication.

Authorship of the manuscript

Only persons who meet these authorship criteria should be listed as authors in the manuscript as they must be able to take public responsibility for the content: (i) made significant contributions to the conception, design, execution, data acquisition, or analysis/interpretation of the study; and (ii) drafted the manuscript or revised it critically for important intellectual content; and (iii) have seen and approved the final version of the paper and agreed to its submission for publication. All persons who made substantial contributions to the work reported in the manuscript (such as technical help, writing and editing assistance, general support) but who do not meet the criteria for authorship must not be listed as an author, but should be acknowledged in the "Acknowledgements" section after their written permission to be named as been obtained. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate coauthors (according to the above definition) and no inappropriate coauthors are included in the author list and verify that all coauthors have seen and approved the final version of the manuscript and agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Authors should—at the earliest stage possible (generally by submitting a disclosure form at the time of submission and including a statement in the manuscript)—disclose any conflicts of interest that might be construed to influence the results or their interpretation in the manuscript. Examples of potential conflicts of interest that should be disclosed include financial ones such as honoraria, educational grants or other funding, participation in speakers’ bureaus, membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest, and paid expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements, as well as non-financial ones such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs in the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. All sources of financial support for the work should be disclosed (including the grant number or other reference number if any).

Acknowledgement of sources

Authors should ensure that they have properly acknowledged the work of others, and should also cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. Information obtained privately (from conversation, correspondence or discussion with third parties) must not be used or reported without explicit, written permission from the source. Authors should not use information obtained in the course of providing confidential services, such as refereeing manuscripts or grant applications, unless they have obtained the explicit written permission of the author(s) of the work involved in these services.

Hazards and human or animal subjects

If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the authors must clearly identify these in the manuscript. If the work involves the use of animals or human participants, the authors should ensure that all procedures were performed in compliance with relevant laws and institutional guidelines and that the appropriate institutional committee(s) has approved them; the manuscript should contain a statement to this effect. Authors should also include a statement in the manuscript that informed consent was obtained for experimentation with human participants. The privacy rights of human participants must always be observed.

Peer review

Authors are obliged to participate in the peer review process and cooperate fully by responding promptly to editors’ requests for raw data, clarifications, and proof of ethics approval, patient consents and copyright permissions. In the case of a first decision of "revisions necessary", authors should respond to the reviewers’ comments systematically, point by point, and in a timely manner, revising and re-submitting their manuscript to the journal by the deadline given.

Fundamental errors in published works

When authors discover significant errors or inaccuracies in their own published work, it is their obligation to promptly notify the journal’s editors or publisher and cooperate with them to either correct the paper in the form of an erratum or to retract the paper. If the editors or publisher learns from a third party that a published work contains a significant error or inaccuracy, then it is the authors’ obligation to promptly correct or retract the paper or provide evidence to the journal editors of the correctness of the paper.

Price Policy

For the articles published in the Journal of General Turkish History Research, no fee is paid to the author and no fee is charged from the author. The journal does not charge any fee for article submission, editorial processes or publication. Articles are freely available digitally.

Download Cover Image

Issue Files

Archive

Genel Türk Tarihi Araştırmaları Dergisi (GTTAD) yazarların yayın haklarını korumak amacıyla aşağıdaki lisansı tercih etmektedir:

Bu eser Creative Commons Alıntı-GayriTicari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.

Volume: 5 Issue: 10, 7/20/23

Articles

Page : 423-432

Page : 433-452

Page : 453-464

Page : 465-474

Page : 475-492

Page : 493-508

Page : 509-522

Page : 523-536

Page : 537-546

Page : 547-560

Page : 561-614

Page : 615-630

Page : 631-648

Page : 649-666

Page : 667-674

Page : 675-692

Page : 693-718

Page : 719-740

Page : 741-758

Page : 759-774

Page : 775-788

Page : 789-806

Page : 807-818

Page : 819-828

Page : 829-852

Translation Article

Page : 853-866

Page : 867-882

Book Review

Page : 883-886

Page : 887-890

Issue Editorial Board

Aim & Scope

Writing Rules

Ethical Principles and Publication Policy

Price Policy