Sağlık ve Spor Alanında Öğrenim Gören Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Ders Çalışma Becerilerinin Farklı Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi

İclal Şahin

TR EN

Sağlık ve Spor Alanında Öğrenim Gören Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Ders Çalışma Becerilerinin Farklı Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi

Abstract

Lise ve üniversite öğrencilerinin ders çalışma becerilerine yönelik yapılan çalışmalarda öğrencilerin ders çalışma becerilerinin istenen düzeyde olmadığı ve geliştirilmesi gerektiği ifade edilmektedir. Öğrencilerin geliştirmeleri beklenen ders çalışma becerilerinin motivasyon, zaman yönetimi ve sınavlara hazırlanma ve sınav kaygısı yönetimi gibi becerileri içermesi gerektiği bildirilmektedir. Bu kapsamda çalışmada Karadeniz Bölgesi’nde bulunan bir vakıf üniversitesinin Sağlık hizmetleri Meslek Yüksekokulunda (SHMYO), Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesinde (SBF) ve Spor Bilimleri Fakültesinde (SPR) öğrenim gören 3724 öğrenci ele alınmış, ölçeğe 434 öğrenci katılmıştır. Çalışmaya sağlık ve spor alanı öğrencilerinin dahil edilmesinin amacı bu alanda eğitim öğretim gören öğrencilerin müfredatlarında anatomi, fizyoloji gibi fen alanı derslerinden biyoloji kökenli derslerin olması, üniversite yerleştirme sonuçlarına bakıldığında da biyoloji sorularının cevaplanmasındaki ortalamanın düşük olması ve bu düşüklüğün üniversite tercih ve okula kayıt sonrası süreçte etkili olduğunun ön görülmesidir. Çalışmanın araştırma yaklaşımı nicel, araştırma deseni ise ilişkisel tarama şeklinde belirlenmiş olup, veri toplama aracı olarak demografik soruların ve ders çalışma becerileri ile ilgili soruların yer aldığı ölçek formu kullanılmıştır. Verilerin analizi SPSS 20 programı ile yapılmıştır. Çalışmada ölçeğe ait puanlar ile üniversiteye giriş puan türleri, üniversiteye giriş başarı dilimi, üniversite okunan program/ bölüm, son dönem AGNO ve devamsızlık süresi arasında anlamlı farklar bulunduğu tespit edilmiştir.

Keywords

Examining the Study Skills of University Students Studying in the Field of Health and Sports from the Perspective of Different Variables

Abstract

In this context, the study involved 3,724 students enrolled at a foundation university in the Black Sea Region, specifically in the Vocational School of Health Services, the Faculty of Health Sciences and the Faculty of Sport Sciences and 434 students participated in the scale. The reason for including students in the health and sports fields is that in the curriculum of students in these areas there are biology-based courses such as anatomy and physiology; moreover, when looking at university placement results, the average score for biology questions is low, and this low performance is anticipated to affect both the university choice and the post-enrollment process. The research approach of the study was quantitative, and the research design was relational screening. As a data collection tool, a questionnaire form was used, which included demographic questions and items related to study skills. The data were analyzed using SPSS 20. In the study, it was found that there were significant differences between the scores on the scale and the type of university entrance score, the success percentile in university entrance, the program/department attended at university, last semester’s GPA, and the duration of absenteeism.

Keywords

References

Aktan, S. (2022). Yükseköğretimde Öz Düzenleyici Öğrenme Becerileri ve Modellerine İlişkin Bir Değerlendirme. Üniversite Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(3), 356-367. https://doi.org/10.32329/uad.1104442
Aljaffer, M. A., Almadan, A. H., AlDughaither, A. S., Basfar, A. A., AlGhadir, S. M., AlGhamdi, Y. A., AlHubaysh, B. N.,
AlMayouf, O. A., AlGhamdi, S. A., Ahmad, T., Abdulghani, H. M. (2024). The impact of study habits and personal factors on the academic achievement performances of medical students. BMC Medical Education, 24(1),10-11
Alci, B., Karataş, H., Balyer, A., (2015). An analysis of Undergraduates’ Study Skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 1355-1362.
Alva, C., & Manuel, L. (2017). Self-Esteem, Study Habits and Academic Performance among University Students. Journal of Educational Psychology-Propósitos Y Representaciones, 5(1),101-127.
Atılgan, M. (1998). Üniversite öğrencilerinin ders çalışma alışkanlıkları ile akademik başarılarının karşılaştırılması (Gaziantep Üniversitesi öğrencileri üzerine bir araştırma) Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Gaziantep Üniversitesi.
Bay, E., Tuğluk, M. N., & Gençdoğan, B. (2015). Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Ders Çalışma Becerilerinin İncelenmesi. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4(14), 94-105.
Çelik-Ercoşkun, N., & Gündoğdu, K. (2020). Matematik Öğretmen Adaylarının Öz Düzenleme ve Öz Yeterlik Algılarının İncelenmesi. Uluslararası Bilim ve Eğitim Dergisi, 3(2), 101-118. https://doi.org/10.47477/ubed.781499

Çepni, S. (2014). Araştırma ve Proje Çalışmalarına Giriş. Bursa: Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi.
Derhem, T. A., & Bumin, G. (2022). Üniversite öğrencilerinin çalışma alışkanlıklarının uyku kalitesi, stres ve yorgunluk ile ilişkisi. Ergoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, 10(2), 37-44.
Dilekli, Y., Orakçı, Ş., & Ayçiçek, B. (2023). Öğretmen adaylarının öz yeterlik algıları ve öz düzenleyici Öğrenme Becerileri Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi . TEBD, 21(3), 1360-1383. https://doi.org/10.37217/tebd.1313393
Durukan, Ü., Batman, D., & Yiğit, N. (2015). Öğretmen adaylarının ders çalışma alışkanlıkları. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(1), 63-81.
Erdamar, G. (2010). Öğretmen adaylarının ders çalışma stratejilerini etkileyen bazı değişkenler. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi , 38(38), 82-93.
Fraenkel, J., Wallen, N., & Hyun, H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Fraenkel,, J., & Wallen, N. (2008). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: Mcgraw-Hill International Edition.
Gömleksiz, M. N., & Demiralp, D. (2012). Öğretmen Adaylarının Öz-Düzenleyici Öğrenme Becerilerine İlişkin Görüşleri. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(3), 777-795.
Güdek, B., & Aydın, Ş. (2022). Müzik Öğretmeni Adaylarının Öz-Düzenleyici Öğrenme Becerilerinin İncelenmesi. Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 132, 44-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.29228/ASOS.63670
Güngör-Seyhan, H. (2020). Lise Öğrencilerinin Kimya Dersine Yönelik Motivasyon, Tutum ve Öz Yeterlik Seviyeleri ile Öz Düzenleyici Öğrenme Stratejilerinin Bazı Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi: Sivas İli Örneği. Eğitim Blim ve Araştırma Dergisi, 1(1), 33-56.
İşcan, S. (2008). Pamukkale Üniversitesi öğrencilerinin zaman yönetimi becerilerinin akademik başarıları üzerindeki etkisi (Yüksek lisans tezi). Pamukkale: Pamukkale Üniversitesi.
Jafari, H., Aghaei, A., & Khatony, A. (2019). Relationship between study habits and academic achievement in students of medical sciences in Kermanshah-Iran. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 10, 637-643.
Karaoğlu, B., & Pepe, O. (2020). Beden Eğitimi Öğretmen Adaylarının Akademik Öz Düzenleme Becerilerinin Bazı Değişkenlere Göre İncelenmesi. Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 14(2); 214-224.
Karasar, N. (2023). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi: kavramlar, ilkeler, teknikler. Ankara: Nobel Yayınları.
Khan, M. J., & Rasheed, S. (2019). Moderating Role of Learning Strategies Between Meta-Cognitive Awareness and Study Habits Among University Students. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research, 34(1), 215-231.
Magulod, G. C. (2019). Learning styles, study habits and academic performance of Filipino university students in applied science courses: Implications for instruction. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(2), 184-198.
Meşeci, B., & Karamustafaoğlu, S. (2023). Kamu Personeli Seçme Sınavına Hazırlanan Öğretmen Adaylarının Ders çalışma Becerilerinin Belirlenmesi. Uluslararası Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Araştırma Dergisi, 10(94), 858-869. http://dx.doi.org/10.26450/jshsr.3600
Metin, M. (2015). Kuramdan Uygulamaya Eğitimde Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Olpak, Y. Z., & Korucu, A. T. (2014). Öğrencilerin Ders Çalışma Yaklaşımlarının Farklı Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(1), 333-347.
Öğrenci Seçme ve Yerleştirme Merkezi. (2022, 15 Ağustos). YKS Yerleştirme Sonuçlarına İlişkin Sayısal Bilgiler. https://www.osym.gov.tr/TR,23912/2022-yks-yerlestirme-sonuclari-aciklandi-15082022.html
Öğrenci Seçme ve Yerleştirme Merkezi. (2023, 19 Ağustos). 2023-YKS Yerleştirme Sonuçlarına İlişkin Sayısal Bilgiler. https://www.osym.gov.tr/TR,25736/2023-yks-yerlestirme-sonuclarina-iliskin-sayisal-bilgiler.html
Öğrenci Seçme ve Yerleştirme Merkezi. (2024, 13 Ağustos). 2024-YKS Yerleştirme Sonuçlarına İlişkin Sayısal Bilgiler. https://www.osym.gov.tr/TR,29511/2024-yks-yerlestirme-sonuclarina-iliskin-sayisal-bilgiler.html
Özay-Köse, E., Gül, Ş., & Erkol, M. (2018). Biyoloji Öğretmen Adaylarının Ders Çalışma Becerilerinin İncelenmesi, Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, UBEK-2018, 24-40
Öztürk-Can, H. , Kaya, B., & Akyürek, A. (2024). Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Zaman Yönetimi Davranışları ve Ders Çalışma Yaklaşımlarını Etkileyen Faktörlerin İncelenmesi. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 11(1), 108-11.
Patidar, J. (2019). Evaluation of Study Skills in Nursing Students. International Journal of Nursing Education, 11(3), 27-31. 10.5958/0974-9357.2019.00058.8
Saracaloğlu, S. A., Aldan-Karademir, Ç., Dursun, F., Altın, M., & Üstündağ, N. (2017). Sınıf Öğretmeni Adaylarının Öz-Düzenleyici Öğrenme Becerilerinin, Akademik Öz-Yeterlik, Akademik Kontrol Odağı Ve Akademik Başarıları İle İlişkisi. International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 12(33), 379-402. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.12705
Silverrajoo, P., & Hassan, A. (2018). Relationship between Study Habits and Academic Achievement among Health Science Students. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(7), 763–780.
TDK. (2024). httpps://sozluk.gov.tr.
Temelli , A., & Kurt, M. (2010). Eğitim fakültesi ve fen fakültesi biyoloji öğrencilerinin ders çalışma alışkanlıklarının farklı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim, 3(2), 27-36.
Topkaya, N., Yaka, B., & Öğretmen, T. (2011). Öğrenme ve ders çalışma yaklaşımları envanteri’nin uyarlanması ve ilgili yapılarla ilişkisinin incelenmesi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 36(159), 192-204.
Turan, S., & Demirel, Ö. (2010). Öz-Düzenleyici Öğrenme Becerilerinin Akademik Başarı İle İlişkisi: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Örneği. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 38, 279-291.
Tus, J., Rayo, F., Lubo, R., & Cruz, M. A. (2020). The Leaners' Study Habits and its relation on Their Academic Performance. International Journal of All Research Writings, 2(6), 1-19.
Tuygar, Ş. F. (2014). Sağlık hizmetleri meslek yüksekokulu öğrencilerinin ders çalışma becerilerinin incelenmesi. Balikesir University The Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 17(31), 69-94.
Tümkaya, S., & Bal, L. (2006). Çukurova Üniversitesi Öğrencilerinin Ders Çalışma Alışkanlıklarının Bazı Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 15(2), 313-326.
Yeniyol, A., Taşdönderen, B., & Sağlık, S. (2023). Lise Öğrencilerinin Mobil Odaklanma Sayaçlarının Ders Çalışma Alışkanlıklarına ve LGS Puanlarına Etkisinin İncelenmesi. Milli Eğitim, 52(237), 489-514. 10.37669/milliegitim.11381828
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64-70. 10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

Specialist Studies in Education (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

İclal Şahin ^*
0000-0002-5340-1081
Türkiye

Publication Date

June 30, 2026

Submission Date

November 24, 2025

Acceptance Date

March 10, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Number: 1

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA36CH97CY

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Şahin, İ. (2026). Sağlık ve Spor Alanında Öğrenim Gören Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Ders Çalışma Becerilerinin Farklı Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi. Giresun Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1. https://izlik.org/JA36CH97CY

AMA

1.Şahin İ. Sağlık ve Spor Alanında Öğrenim Gören Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Ders Çalışma Becerilerinin Farklı Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi. GUEFD. 2026;(1). https://izlik.org/JA36CH97CY

Chicago

Şahin, İclal. 2026. “Sağlık Ve Spor Alanında Öğrenim Gören Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Ders Çalışma Becerilerinin Farklı Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi”. Giresun Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, no. 1. https://izlik.org/JA36CH97CY.

EndNote

Şahin İ (June 1, 2026) Sağlık ve Spor Alanında Öğrenim Gören Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Ders Çalışma Becerilerinin Farklı Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi. Giresun Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 1

IEEE

[1]İ. Şahin, “Sağlık ve Spor Alanında Öğrenim Gören Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Ders Çalışma Becerilerinin Farklı Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi”, GUEFD, no. 1, June 2026, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA36CH97CY

ISNAD

Şahin, İclal. “Sağlık Ve Spor Alanında Öğrenim Gören Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Ders Çalışma Becerilerinin Farklı Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi”. Giresun Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 1 (June 1, 2026). https://izlik.org/JA36CH97CY.

JAMA

1.Şahin İ. Sağlık ve Spor Alanında Öğrenim Gören Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Ders Çalışma Becerilerinin Farklı Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi. GUEFD. 2026. Available at https://izlik.org/JA36CH97CY.

MLA

Şahin, İclal. “Sağlık Ve Spor Alanında Öğrenim Gören Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Ders Çalışma Becerilerinin Farklı Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi”. Giresun Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, no. 1, June 2026, https://izlik.org/JA36CH97CY.

Vancouver

1.İclal Şahin. Sağlık ve Spor Alanında Öğrenim Gören Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Ders Çalışma Becerilerinin Farklı Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi. GUEFD [Internet]. 2026 Jun. 1;(1). Available from: https://izlik.org/JA36CH97CY

Giresun University Journal of Faculty of Education is an international peer-reviewed journal and was established to reveal "studies in the field of education". In this regard, it is aimed to contribute to the solution of educational problems through qualified scientific studies.
In this context, the aims of Giresun University Journal of Faculty of Education are;
• To publish research on issues of national and international importance in the field of education,
• To publish high quality articles of national and international importance in terms of research design and/or findings,
• Establishing a communication network between national and international researchers,
• To provide a platform for scientific studies in the fields of education, training and learning to reach large audiences.

The Giresun University Journal of Faculty of Education welcomes studies encompassing theoretical, experimental, meta-analysis, and review articles pertaining to education. Studies conducted within the realm of education are published in the Giresun University Journal of Faculty of Education in either Turkish or English. The target audience of the journal encompasses researchers, teachers, teacher candidates, informaticians, students, as well as individuals and organizations producing products and services for the education sector, who are actively engaged in fields such as Mathematics and Science Education, Turkish and Social Sciences Education, Psychological Counseling and Guidance Education, Elementary Education, Computer and Instructional Technologies, Foreign language Education, and Fine Arts Education under the umbrella of education scientists. The Giresun University Journal of Faculty of Education operates as an open-access and double-blind peer-reviewed journal. Submitted articles undergo evaluation by at least two referees to assess their alignment with the journal's purpose, focus, and scope. Based on the evaluation results provided by referees and the section editor, the articles are either rejected or accepted for publication. Should at least two referees and section editor express positive feedback, authors are instructed to incorporate necessary revisions in accordance with the received feedbacks. Upon completion of required revisions by the authors, articles are re-evaluated to ensure compliance with writing rules before being communicated with the authors for publication in their final form.

The submissions to Giresun University Journal of Faculty of Education must adhere to the following conditions listed below. Works that do not meet these conditions will be returned to the authors.

Submitted works must not have been previously published or submitted for evaluation to another journal.
Works submitted to the journal must be in Microsoft Word format.
For works submitted in Turkish to the journal, an Extended English Abstract is required.
***Authors should submit the English extended abstracts of Turkish works below the reference heading as shown in the sample template. Proofreading of the English version is the responsibility of the author. Articles with insufficient language proficiency will not be published until language validity is ensured.
Submitted articles are subject to a maximum character limit of 12,000 characters.
An plagiarism report must be uploaded along with the candidate article. The similarity rate, excluding references, should be below 20%. No other filters should be applied in the report. Articles with high similarity rates will be returned to the author after editor review.
The submitted works must comply with the following writing rules.

You may find writing template here

General Page Layout
The page structure should be "vertical", on A4 (210 × 297 mm) standard white paper, with margins set at "1 cm top, 2 cm bottom, 1.5 cm right and left". The text alignment should be set to "justified", and the text font should be "Georgia".

Abstract
The abstract of the article should be written using the "Georgia" font, 9-point size, single line spacing, and with 0 space before and 6 nk space after the paragraph. The abstract should be between 150 and 200 words. The abstract should clearly state the purpose of the article, the method used, the main findings obtained, conclusions, and recommendations. A minimum of 3 and a maximum of 5 keywords should be provided in the abstract. Keywords should be listed from general to specific.

Main Text of the Article
The paragraphs in the main text of the article should be indented by 1.00 cm, with 0 space before and 3 nk space after the paragraph, and 1.15 line spacing. The text font should be "Georgia" with a size of 11 points. Paragraphs should be justified. The main text of the article should provide a concise expression of the relevant study/research and may consist of numbered subsections as needed. For example; Introduction, Method, Results, Discussion, Conclusion, and Recommendations. In writing the article, a narrative and structure should be followed that allows the reader to understand and evaluate every stage of the study. The author's expression in the text should be as simple and understandable as possible. Unnecessary repetitions and unsupported statements should be avoided; statements containing judgments or certainties must be based on data or references. Attention should be paid to academic writing principles in all subsections of the article. The data obtained within the scope of the research should be reflected cohesively.

Writing Principles
Articles to be submitted to the Giresun University Faculty of Education Journal should be prepared in accordance with APA 7.

References
A new page should be started for references, and they should be written in accordance with APA 7 writing style. An example of reference citation is provided below.

Examples of Reference Citations

Journal article with Doi Number
Grady, J. S., Her, M., Moreno, G., Perez, C., & Yelinek, J. (2019). Emotions in storybooks: A comparison of storybooks that represent ethnic and racial groups in the United States. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 8(3), 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000185

Journal article without Doi Number
Asar, R., & Çelikten, Y. (2016). Shadowing a woman administrator: A Turkish case. Universal Journal of Management, 4(11), 607-614.

Popular Magazine Article
Özbaşaran-Dede, N. (2008, November). Global climate warriors: Earthworms. Science and Technology, 492, 11-13.

Single-authored book
Balcı, A. (2005). Annotated glossary of educational management terms. Single Tree.

Multi-authored book
Başaran, İ. E., & Çınkır, Ş. (2011). Turkish education system and school management. Ekinoks Publishing House.

Edited book
Kesharwani, P. (Ed.). (2020). Nanotechnology based approaches for tuberculosis treatment. Academic Press.

Chapter in an edited book
Dönmez, B. (2013). Motivation. In S. Özdemir (Ed.), Theory and practice in educational management (pp. 185-229). Pegem Academy.

Unpublished Master's Thesis
Teyfur, M. (2011). Perceptions of primary school administrators' management styles and evaluation of school administrators' management skills by parents [Unpublished master's thesis]. Atatürk University.

Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation
Zorlu, K. (2009). Problems encountered by businesses in the democratic management process and an application [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Kırıkkale University.

Encyclopedia or Dictionary
Sadie, S. (Ed.). (1980). The new Grove dictionary of music and musicians (6th ed., Vols. 1-20). MacMillan.

Newspaper
Hitts, P. J. (February 16, 1999). In forecasting their emotions, most people flunk out. New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com

Conference Paper
Karadağ, E., & Öney, A. (2006, September). Examination of the effect of school administrators' stress levels on teachers' stress levels. Paper presented at the 14th National Psychology Congress. Hacettepe University Department of Psychology, Ankara.

Detailed information on the reference list can be found at the following links:
• https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/journal-file/27710
• https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/index.html

Publication Ethics
In order to ensure impartiality and ethics in the articles published in the Giresun University Journal of Faculty of Education (GUEFD), the Editorial Board has developed certain ethical policies. These policies cover authors, reviewers, editors, and processes related to the study. The ethical duties and responsibilities outlined in GUEFD are prepared taking into account the publication policies of journals scanned in national and international fields, as well as guidelines and policies published as open access by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

Authors' Ethical Responsibilities
Authors submitting to GUJFE are expected to adhere to the following ethical responsibilities:
• Authors are required to obtain "Ethical Committee Approval" for experimental studies.
• Authors are expected to ensure that their submitted works are original and up-to-date.
• Authors must cite and/or quote all works they have benefited from completely and accurately.
• Individuals who do not contribute to the content of the work should not be listed as authors. (If any) situations and relationships that may constitute a conflict of interest should be disclosed.
• Authors may be requested to provide raw data related to their articles within the framework of the evaluation process. Authors must provide the requested data and information to the publication and/or scientific committee.
• Authors have an obligation to inform the journal editor or publisher and collaborate with the editor in correcting or withdrawing their work in the event of noticing any error or mistake in their published or under-review work.
• Authors cannot submit their works to more than one journal at the same time.
• A work previously published in another journal cannot be submitted to GUEFD.
• A work that has been submitted to another journal and has not yet been evaluated cannot be submitted to GUJFE.
• Changes such as adding or removing authors, changing the order of authors, cannot be requested for a work for which the evaluation process has started.

For all accepted articles, the "Giresun University Journal of Faculty of Education License Copyright Usage Permission Form" must be filled out and signed by the corresponding author.

The authors reserve the right to copyright and transfer all full publication rights to the journal without restriction.

Editor, Assistant Editor, and Section Editors' Responsibilities
Editors;
• Strive to meet the information needs of reviewers, authors, researchers, practitioners, and readers, provide feedback when necessary, and act according to the principles of transparency in correction and explanation during the publication process.
• Take care to ensure that the decision to publish articles contributes to the originality of the articles, the scientific literature, and benefits readers, researchers, and practitioners.
• Implement blind peer-review and evaluation process policies among the publication policies of the journal, keep the identities of reviewers confidential, and ensure that each article is evaluated objectively and within the specified timeframe.
• Send articles to section editors and reviewers considering their areas of expertise, and support impartial and independent evaluations.
• Editors consider the conflict of interest or alignment of interests between editors, reviewers, and authors to ensure unbiased evaluation of the article.
• Prevent non-academic and unscientific evaluations that do not comply with academic etiquette.
• Ensure the protection of personal data in evaluated articles; protect the individual data of authors, reviewers, and readers.
• Take care of the protection of human and animal rights in articles, value the documented explicit consent of participants, and reject articles when there is no ethical committee approval for participants in experimental research.
• Ensure the correction of errors, inconsistencies, or misguidance in the evaluated articles.
 The editorial board takes responsibility for the evaluation of the article, the decision-making process of the editorial board policies, and the publication decisions for publications written on legal restrictions such as plagiarism, insult, and copyright infringement.
 Ensure fair evaluation of all articles based on the intellectual content of the writing, regardless of factors such as gender, race, ethnicity, religion, citizenship, political affiliation, and values or authors' paradigm orientations.

Reviewers' Ethical Responsibilities
• Works submitted to GUJFE are sent to at least two anonymous reviewers in the relevant field for evaluation. In cases where the opinions about the article are equally positive and negative, the opinion of the editor or a third reviewer is sought.
• GUJFE adopts a double-blind peer-review process, where the identities of authors and reviewers are kept confidential. In this context, reviewers evaluating articles in GUEFD are expected to have the following ethical responsibilities:
 Read the publication policies of GUEFD,
 Only agree to evaluate works related to their field of expertise. They should not accept evaluation if they do not have expertise in the field, just to be able to have an opinion on the subject of the article.
 Complete the evaluation process within a specified time frame,
 Make evaluations within the framework of impartiality and confidentiality,
 Refuse to evaluate if they encounter a situation such as a conflict of interest and inform the editor about this situation,
 Inform the editor if they detect that the evaluated article has been submitted to another journal simultaneously,
 Pay attention to the evaluation process not being influenced by factors such as belief, sect, race, gender, or political thought. They should act sensitively to ensure that these factors do not affect the evaluation process.

Author Rights
Authors have the following rights:

They can identify the referees they do not want their work to be sent to due to conflicts of interest and/or ethical reasons.
They can withdraw their unpublished works during the evaluation process.
They have the right to appeal against referee reports and editor decisions.
They may request corrections (erratum) for problematic areas in their first published work or information errors caused by them due to material errors arising during the printing process.
Reporting Unethical Situations to the Editor
In the Journal of Turkish Academic Publications, if an unethical behavior related to editors, referees, authors, or an unethical situation concerning a manuscript in the early or published stages of the evaluation process is encountered, it should be reported to guefd@giresun.edu.tr via email.

Publication Policy
Giresun University Journal of Faculty of Education(GÜEFD):

It is an online peer-reviewed academic journal in the field of educational sciences.
It publishes articles in Turkish and English twice a year.
The evaluation process is conducted through double-blind peer review. According to this principle, the identities of both authors and referees are kept anonymous.
Only one academic work of an author may be included in each issue.
It is a non-profit academic journal.
Open Access Policy
Giresun University Journal of Faculty of Education (GÜEFD) is an open-access journal and provides direct open access to its published content. The journal aims to support, develop, and disseminate science with its open-access policy.

Plagiarism Policy
Giresun University Journal Faculty of Education (GÜEFD) subjects every completed work in the peer-review process to plagiarism detection to maintain its integrity. Plagiarism check is conducted through software such as Turnitin and iThenticate. Following the plagiarism check, the editorial board may request the responsible author to correct errors or decide not to publish the work based on the report.

Publication Fee
GÜEFD does not request any fees from authors during the submission, evaluation, or publication stages for any reason.