Kadına Yönelik Şiddet Tutumunun Çeşitli Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi: Bir Meta-Analiz Çalışması

Year 2025, Volume: 14 Issue: 3, 1139 - 1152, 25.09.2025

Esma Özmaya , Nermin Gürhan

https://doi.org/10.37989/gumussagbil.1608311

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, kadına yönelik şiddet tutumu üzerinde bazı değişkenlerin (cinsiyet, aile tipi, eğitim düzeyi vb.) etkilerini belirlemektir.
Konuyla ilgili YÖK Tez Merkezi, PubMed, EBSCOhost, Web of Science ve Google Akademik veri tabanları taranarak, dahil etme kriterlerine uygun toplam 30 çalışma meta-analize dahil edilmiştir. Analizlerde Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Ver. 2.2.064 (CMA) programı kullanılmıştır.
Analiz sonucunda, çalışmaya dahil edilen bireysel çalışmalarda yayın yanlılığı olmadığı bulunmuştur. Rastgele etkiler modeline göre yapılan analiz sonucunda, cinsiyetin kadına yönelik şiddet tutumu üzerindeki genel etkisinin (d= -1.26) yüksek düzeyde olduğu bulunmuştur. Aile tipi değişkeni için yapılan analizde çekirdek aile yapısına sahip bireylerin genel etki büyüklüklerinin ortalamalarının geniş ve parçalanmış aile yapısına sahip bireylerden daha yüksek olduğu bulunmuştur (d=47.301). Eğitim seviyesi değişkeni için yapılan analizde ilköğretim mezunu bireylerin genel etki büyüklüklerinin lise ve üzeri eğitim seviyesine sahip bireylerden daha yüksek olduğu bulunmuştur (d=56.935).
Analiz sonucunda cinsiyet, aile tipi ve eğitim seviyesinin kadına yönelik şiddet tutumu üzerinde etkili değişkenler olduğu görülmüştür.

Keywords

Kadına yönelik şiddet , cinsiyet , aile tipi , eğitim düzeyi , meta-analiz

An Investigation Of The Effect Of Various Variables On The Attitudes Towards Violence Against Women: A Meta-Analysis Study

Abstract

The main purpose of this study was to determine the effects of some variables (i.e. gender, family type, education level, etc.) on the attitude towards violence against women.
A total of 30 studies that were suitable for the inclusion criteria were included in the meta-analysis by scanning the databases of CHE Thesis Center, PubMed, EBSCOhost, Web of Science, and Google Scholar on the subject. The Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Ver. 2.2.064 (CMA) program was used in the analyses.
As a result of the analysis, it was found that there was no publication bias in the individual studies included in the study. As a result of the analysis made according to the random effects model, it was found that the general effect of gender on the attitude towards violence against women (d= -1.26) was at a high level. In the analysis made for the family type variable, it was found that the average general effect sizes of individuals with nuclear family structure were higher than those of extended and fragmented families (d=47.301). In the analyzes made for the education level variable, it was found that the general effect sizes of the individuals who had primary education level were higher than those who had high school and higher education level (d=56.935).
As a result of the analysis, it was seen that gender, family type and education level were effective variables on the attitude towards violence against women.

Keywords

violence against women , gender , family type , education level , meta-analyses

References

• . UN (1993). Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women, https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/documents/atrocity-crimes/Doc.21_declaration%20elimination%20vaw.pdf,.(Access date:20.11.2021).
• 2. WHO (2018). Violence Against Women Prevalence Estimates, 2018, https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240022256, (Access date:24.11.2021).
• 3. Gürhan, N. (2016). Violence and Types of Violence, Mental Health and Psychiatric Nursing (Ed: Nermin Gürhan), Ankara Nobel Medical Publishing House, 737-790.
• 4. El-Serag, R. and Thurston, R.C. (2020). Matters of the Heart and Mind: Interpersonal Violence and Cardiovascular Disease in Women. J Am Heart Assoc, 9(4):e015479. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.015479
• 5. Demir, S. and Oskay, ÜY. (2015). The effect of domestic violence on reproductive health. Düzce University Journal of Health Sciences Institute. 5(1):35-8.
• 6. Cumming, G. (2012). Understanding the new statistics (effect sizes, confidence, intervals and metaanalysis). New York: Routledge.
• 7. Dinçer, S. (2014). Applied meta-analysis in educational sciences. Ankara: Pegem Academy.
• 8. Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P. & Stewart, LA. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic reviews, 4, 1, 1.
• 9. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools For Use in IBI Systematic Reviews. http://joannabriggs.org/research/critical-appraisal-tools.html(25.11.2021).
• 10. Ried, K. (2006). Interpreting and understanding metaanalysis graphs. Australian Family Physician, 35(8), 635-638. PMID: 16894442.
• 11. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for The Behavioral Sciences. 2. Baskı. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, 19-27.
• 12. Bakioğlu, A. and Özcan, Ş. (2016). Meta-Analysis. Ankara: Nobel Akademik, 160-212.
• 13. Flood, M. and Pease, B. (2009). Factors influencing attitudes to violence against women. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, 10(2),125–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838009334131
• 14. Gencer, M.Z., Ağırman, E., & Arıca, S. (2019). Frequency of violence against women and women's perception of violence in Istanbul province. Ahi Evran Med J, 3(1):18-25.
• 15. Dikmen, H.A., Marakoğlu K. (2019). An examination of nursing students' attitudes toward gender roles and violence against women. General Medicine Journal; 29(2):73-79.
• 16. FRA (2014). European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, Violence against women https://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra_uploads/fra-2014-vaw-survey-main-results-apr14_en.pdf (Access date:29.11.2021)
• 17. HÜ (2014). “Summary Report on Domestic Violence Against Women in Turkey,” Hacettepe University, http://www.hips.hacettepe.edu.tr/TKAA2014_Ozet_Rapor.pdf ,.
• 18. Taher, Z.O. (2020). Nursing Students' Emotional Self-Efficacy and Their Attitudes Towards Violence Against Women and Their Professional Roles in Violence, Ondokuz Mayis University Graduate School of Nursing, Master's Thesis.
• 19. Power, N. (2010). One-Dimensional Woman. 1st Edition, Istanbul, Habitus Publications, 28-33.
• 20. Belek, E.U. (2015). Social Gender Perceptions of Women from Different Social Categories, Hacettepe University Institute of Social Sciences, Ankara, Doctoral Thesis; 132.
• 21. Demirbilek, S. (2007). Sociological Analysis of Gender Discrimination, Financial Policy & Economic Commentary, Volume: 44 Issue: 511.
• 22. Başkaya, Z. and Ünal A. (2017). Temporal Change in Marriage and Divorce Rates in Turkey at the Provincial Level (2001-2015), International Journal of Social Research, 10(53). https://doi.org/10.17719/jisr.20175334124.
• 23. Özden, S. and Gölbaşı, Z. (2018). Determining Health Workers' Attitudes Towards Gender Roles, KOU Health Sciences Journal Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 95-100. https://doi.org/10.30934/kusbed.420223
• 24. Yıldız, T.S. (2019). Examination of Violence Against Women in Terms of Different Variables, Iğdır University Institute of Social Sciences Department of Philosophy and Religious Sciences Religious Psychology Master's Thesis.
• 25. Erenoğlu, R. ve Can, R. (2020). Nursing Students' Attitudes Towards Violence Against Women and Their Professional Role in Violence and Influencing Factors. Van Journal of Health Sciences; 13(2):31-41.
• 26. Babahanoğlu, R., Kesen, N.F., and Daşbaş, S. (2018). Education, Poverty, and Violence Against Women, Health and Society Year: 28, Issue: 1 January-April 2018.
• 27. Demirel, M.Y. (2019). Economic Violence Against Women: The Case of Izmir Province, Master's Thesis, Sakarya University Institute of Social Sciences.
• 28. Kalanlar, B. (2012). “Dimensions of Violence Against Women in Slum Areas,” Proceedings of the International Symposium on Violence Against Women and Children, Dolunay Şenol et al. (eds.), Ankara, Neyir Printing.
• 29. Genç, Y., Altıparmak, İ.B., and Ustabaşı Gündüz, D. (2019). Men's Assessment of Violence Against Women: The Case of Sakarya. Afyon Kocatepe University Journal of Social Sciences, 21(2), 391-408.
• 30. Bowlus, A.J. & Seitz, S. (2006). Domestic violence, employment, and divorce. International Economic Review, 47 (4), 1113–1149. 10.1111/j.1468-2354.2006.00408.x
• 31. Najafova, L. (2020). Systematic Review of Studies on Domestic Violence Against Women in Turkey, Istanbul University Institute of Social Sciences Department of Public Law Master's Thesis.
• 32. Fageeh, W.M. (2014). Factors associated with domestic violence: A cross-sectional study among women in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, BMJ, 4 ( 2 ), e004242. 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004242.
• 33. Paul, S. (2016). Women's labor force participation and domestic violence: Evidence from India. South Asian Journal of Development, 11 (2), 224-250. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973174116649148.