Our Article Review Process:

1) In the first stage, every article submitted to our journal undergoes a preliminary review by the editor, and a subject matter expert is assigned to the article as a field editor. Articles that do not pass the preliminary review are returned to the authors.

2) In the second stage, articles approved by the subject matter editor are checked for compliance with writing rules and journal policies. A communication chain is established between the authors and the editorial team, and articles that receive approval proceed to the next stage. Articles that do not comply with writing rules and journal policies are returned.

3) In the third stage, each article is evaluated by at least two doctoral-level reviewers relevant to the subject matter. If there is a tie between one acceptance and one rejection, a third reviewer's opinion is requested. All processes are conducted on a double-blind basis. The files and reviewer reports of articles requiring corrections are sent to the authors, and the process continues until the reviewers give their approval or rejection. If the reviewer reports are deemed insufficient, the editorial team may request additional reports or assign additional reviewers to the article.

4) In the fourth stage, articles that successfully complete the peer review stage are reviewed for language and spelling by a language editor.

5) In the fifth stage, articles approved by the language editor are sent for final proofreading by a different field editor. If the article is free of language and spelling errors, it is placed in the publication queue and sent to the editorial office for typesetting.